論文使用權限 Thesis access permission:自定論文開放時間 user define
開放時間 Available:
校內 Campus:開放下載的時間 available 2031-07-06
校外 Off-campus:開放下載的時間 available 2031-07-06
論文名稱 Title |
臺灣盤中零股交易制度對投資人下單積極度之影響: 以臺灣上市公司為例 The Impact of Intraday Odd-Lot Trading on Investor Order Aggressiveness: Evidence from Taiwan Listed Company |
||
系所名稱 Department |
|||
畢業學年期 Year, semester |
語文別 Language |
||
學位類別 Degree |
頁數 Number of pages |
51 |
|
研究生 Author |
|||
指導教授 Advisor |
|||
召集委員 Convenor |
|||
口試委員 Advisory Committee |
|||
口試日期 Date of Exam |
2026-07-06 |
繳交日期 Date of Submission |
2026-07-06 |
關鍵字 Keywords |
微結構、委託積極度、委託規模、散戶投資人、盤中零股交易、樂透大獎 microstructure, order aggressiveness, order size, retail investors, intraday odd-lot trading, jackpot |
||
統計 Statistics |
本論文已被瀏覽 84 次,被下載 0 次 The thesis/dissertation has been browsed 84 times, has been downloaded 0 times. |
中文摘要 |
本文以樂透大獎日作為可重複之自然實驗,檢驗盤中零股交易制度實施前後,整張市場投資人委託決策之變化,並探討其背後原因。實證結果顯示,盤中零股制度實施後,整張市場中散戶投資人面對樂透大獎日時,委託積極度與委託規模的變化幅度皆顯著減少,顯示樂透與股票之間的替代效果減弱。進一步觀察零股市場後發現,零股市場中的散戶投資人面對樂透大獎日時委託規模的變化,呈現出與制度實施前整張市場相似的結果。綜合以上發現,本文認為原先在整張市場中具有賭博情緒的投資人,於盤中零股交易制度實施後,可能轉移至零股市場進行交易,以滿足其投機性需求。 |
Abstract |
This study uses lottery jackpot day as a repeated natural experiment to examine changes in the order-submission behavior of round-lot market investors before and after the implementation of the intraday odd-lot trading policy, and to explore the underlying mechanisms. Empirical results indicate that following the policy implementation, the magnitude of changes in both order aggressiveness and order size among retail investors in the round-lot market on jackpot days diminished significantly, suggesting a notable weakening of the substitution effect between lotteries and stocks. Further analysis of the odd-lot market reveals that the change in order size among retail investors on jackpot days closely resembles the pattern previously observed in the round-lot market prior to the policy implementation. Taken together, these findings suggest that gambling-driven investors, who previously traded in the round-lot market, may have shifted their trading activity to the odd-lot market following the introduction of intraday odd-lot trading, in order to satisfy their speculative trading demand. |
目次 Table of Contents |
論文審定書...........................................................i 摘要................................................................ii Abstract............................................................iii 目錄................................................................iv 表次.................................................................v 第一章、前言.........................................................1 第二章、文獻回顧與假說...............................................3 2.1 零股交易之相關文獻...........................................3 2.2 投資人賭博行為相關文獻.......................................3 2.3 投資人下單積極度之相關文獻...................................4 2.4 研究假說.....................................................6 第三章、研究資料與方法...............................................8 3.1 資料來源.....................................................8 3.2 被解釋變數...................................................8 3.3 解釋變數....................................................10 3.4 迴歸模型....................................................10 第四章、實證結果與分析..............................................13 4.1 敘述統計....................................................13 4.2 實證結果....................................................13 4.3 穩健性分析..................................................14 第五章、結論........................................................16 參考文獻............................................................18 附錄................................................................44 |
參考文獻 References |
Bae, K.-H., Jang, H., & Park, K. S. (2003). Traders' choice between limit and market orders: Evidence from NYSE stocks. Journal of Financial Markets, 6(4), 517-538. Bali, T. G., Cakici, N., & Whitelaw, R. F. (2011). Maxing out: Stocks as lotteries and the cross-section of expected returns. Journal of Financial Economics, 99(2), 427-446. Barber, B. M., Lee, Y.-T., Liu, Y.-J., & Odean, T. (2009). Just how much do individual investors lose by trading? Review of Financial Studies, 22(2), 609-632. Bartlett, R. P., McCrary, J., & O'Hara, M. (2024). Tiny trades, big questions: Fractional shares. Journal of Financial Economics, 157, Article 103836. Biais, B., Hillion, P., & Spatt, C. (1995). An empirical analysis of the limit order book and the order flow in the Paris Bourse. Journal of Finance, 50(5), 1655-1689. Dorn, A. J., Dorn, D., & Sengmueller, P. (2015). Trading as gambling. Management Science, 61(10), 2376-2393. Duong, H. N., Kalev, P. S., & Krishnamurti, C. (2009). Order aggressiveness of institutional and individual investors. Pacific-Basin Finance Journal, 17(5), 533-546. Ellul, A., Holden, C. W., Jain, P., & Jennings, R. (2007). Order dynamics: Recent evidence from the NYSE. Journal of Empirical Finance, 14(5), 636-661. Gao, X., & Lin, T. C. (2015). Do individual investors treat trading as a fun and exciting gambling activity? Evidence from repeated natural experiments. The Review of Financial Studies, 28(7), 2128-2166. Green, T. C., & Hwang, B. H. (2012). Initial public offerings as lotteries: Skewness preference and first-day returns. Management Science, 58(2), 432-444. Griffiths, M. D., Smith, B. F., Turnbull, D. A. S., & White, R. W. (2000). The costs and determinants of order aggressiveness. Journal of Financial Economics, 56(1), 65-88. Grinblatt, M., & Keloharju, M. (2009). Sensation seeking, overconfidence, and trading activity. Journal of Finance, 64(2), 549-578. Hung, P.-H. (2016). Investor sentiment, order submission, and investment performance on the Taiwan Stock Exchange. Pacific-Basin Finance Journal, 39, 124-140. Johnson, H. (2014). Odd lot trades: The behavior, characteristics, and information content, over time. Financial Review, 49(4), 669-684. Johnson, H., & Roseman, B. (2017). Odd lot order aggressiveness and stealth trading. Journal of Financial Research, 40(2), 249-281. Kaniel, R., Saar, G., & Titman, S. (2008). Individual investor trading and stock returns. Journal of Finance, 63(1), 273-310. Kumar, A. (2009). Who gambles in the stock market? Journal of Finance, 64(4), 1889-1933. Kupfer, A., & Schmidt, M. G. (2021). In search of retail investors: The effect of retail investor attention on odd lot trades. Journal of Empirical Finance, 62, 141-158. Lien, D., Hung, P. H., Zhu, J. D., & Chen, Y. H. (2019). Price limit changes and market quality in the Taiwan Stock Exchange. Pacific-Basin Finance Journal, 55, 239-258. Liu, B., Wang, H., Yu, J., & Zhao, S. (2020). Time-varying demand for lottery: Speculation ahead of earnings announcements. Journal of Financial Economics, 138(3), 789-817. O'Hara, M., Yao, C., & Ye, M. (2014). What's not there: Odd lots and market data. Journal of Finance, 69(5), 2199-2236. Pascual, R., & Veredas, D. (2009). What pieces of limit order book information matter in explaining order choice by patient and impatient traders? Quantitative Finance, 9(5), 527-545. Ranaldo, A. (2004). Order aggressiveness in limit order book markets. Journal of Financial Markets, 7(1), 53-74. 謝俊欽(2020). 盤中零股交易制度概述. 證券服務,(78):6–10. |
電子全文 Fulltext |
本電子全文僅授權使用者為學術研究之目的,進行個人非營利性質之檢索、閱讀、列印。請遵守中華民國著作權法之相關規定,切勿任意重製、散佈、改作、轉貼、播送,以免觸法。 論文使用權限 Thesis access permission:自定論文開放時間 user define 開放時間 Available: 校內 Campus:開放下載的時間 available 2031-07-06 校外 Off-campus:開放下載的時間 available 2031-07-06 您的 IP(校外) 位址是 18.97.9.170 現在時間是 2026-10-06 論文校外開放下載的時間是 2031-07-06 Your IP address is 18.97.9.170 The current date is 2026-10-06 This thesis will be available to you on 2031-07-06. |
紙本論文 Printed copies |
紙本論文的公開資訊在102學年度以後相對較為完整。如果需要查詢101學年度以前的紙本論文公開資訊,請聯繫圖資處紙本論文服務櫃台。如有不便之處敬請見諒。 開放時間 available 2031-07-06 |
QR Code |