Responsive image
博碩士論文 etd-0628122-144713 詳細資訊
Title page for etd-0628122-144713
論文名稱
Title
論民營廠商在混和寡占市場之勾結可持續性
The collusion sustainability of private enterprises in a mixed oligopoly market
系所名稱
Department
畢業學年期
Year, semester
語文別
Language
學位類別
Degree
頁數
Number of pages
34
研究生
Author
指導教授
Advisor
召集委員
Convenor
口試委員
Advisory Committee
口試日期
Date of Exam
2022-07-15
繳交日期
Date of Submission
2022-07-28
關鍵字
Keywords
混和寡占市場、勾結、數量競爭、價格競爭、競爭模式選擇
mixed oligopoly market, collusion, quantity competition, price competition, endogenous choice of competition mode
統計
Statistics
本論文已被瀏覽 246 次,被下載 89
The thesis/dissertation has been browsed 246 times, has been downloaded 89 times.
中文摘要
本文與相關文獻作為對照,旨在探討混和寡占市場下民營企業進行勾結的誘因,並分析廠商在數量競爭以及價格競爭下卡特爾集團的穩定性。我們透過剖析不同競爭模式下產量、價格、廠商利潤、消費者剩餘及社會福利等變量的變動情形,得到在混和寡占市場下廠商進行價格競爭相較於數量競爭更有利於民營企業之間的勾結。若與傳統的純粹寡占模型進行比較,本論文的研究成果也顯示,當寡占市場進行數量競爭時,公營事業的存在會讓民營企業之間的勾結行為不容易成功。
Abstract
This paper compares relevant papers from these years. We use the public sector in a pure oligopoly market to figure out the incentives for private enterprises to choose to collude in a mixed oligopoly market and analyze the changes in the Cartel group’s stability between many variables such as total production, price, profit, consumer surplus, and social welfare under two models of quantity competition and price competition at the same time. In the end, the result proves among manufacturers in a mixed-oligopoly market under price competition are more conducive to collusion among private enterprises than quantity competition. If we compared the result with the traditional pure oligopoly model, our research result also shows that when the oligopoly market conducts a quantitative competition, the existence of public enterprises will make the collusion of private enterprises difficult.
目次 Table of Contents
論文審定書 i
摘要 ii
Abstract iii
目錄 iv
表次 v
第一章 前言 1
第二章 模型設定 5
第三章 Cournot 競爭 8
第一節 沒有卡特爾組織下的市場均衡 8
第二節 成立卡特爾組織下的市場均衡 9
第三節 勾結的穩定性 11
第四章 Bertrand 競爭 14
第一節 沒有卡特爾組織下的市場均衡 14
第二節 成立卡特爾組織下的市場均衡 15
第三節 勾結的穩定性 17
第五章 模型比較 20
第六章 結論 22
參考文獻 23
附錄 26
參考文獻 References
Albæk, S., & Lambertini, L. (1998). Collusion in differentiated duopolies revisited. Economics Letters 59, 305-308.
Albæk, S., & Lambertini, L. (2004). Price vs quantity in duopoly supergames with close substitutes. Journal of Regional Science 38, 567-577.
Chang, M.-H. (1991). The effects of product differentiation on collusive pricing. International Journal of Industrial Organization 9, 453-469.
Chang, M.-H. (1992). Intertemporal Product Choice and Its Effects on Collusive Firm Behavior. International Economic Review 4, 773-793.
Colombo, S. (2013). Product differentiation and collusion sustainability when collusion is costly. Marketing Science 32, 669-674.
Colombo, S. (2016) Mixed oligopolies and collusion. Journal of Economics 2, 167-184.
Cato, S., & Matsumura, T. (2012). Long-Run Effects of Foreign Penetration on Privatization Policies. Journal of Institutional and Theoretical Economics 168, 444-454.
Deneckere, R. (1983). Duopoly supergames with product differentiation. Economics Letters 11, 37-42.
Escrihuela-Villar, M. (2008). Partial coordination and mergers among quantity-setting firms. International Journal of Industrial Organization 26, 803-810.
Friedman, J.W. (1971). A noncooperative equilibrium for supergames. Review of Economic Studies 38, 1-12.
Fujiwara, K. (2007). Partial Privatization in a Differentiated Mixed Oligopoly. Journal of Economics 1, 51-65.
Häckner, J. (1995). Endogenous product design in an infinitely repeated game. International Journal of Industrial Organization 13, 277-299.
Haraguchi, J., & Matsumura, T. (2018). Government-leading welfare-improving collusion. International Review of Economics and Finance 56, 363-370.
Ishibashi, I., & Shimizu, D. (2010) Collusive behavior under a leniency program. Journal of Economics 2, 169-183.
Lambertini, L., & Schultz, C. (2003). Price or quantity in tacit collusion? Economics Letters 78, 131-137.
Motta, M., & Polo, M. (2003). Leniency programs and cartel prosecution. International Journal of Industrial Organization 21, 347-379.
Matsumura, T., & Kanda, O. (2005). Mixed Oligopoly at Free Entry Markets. Journal of Economics 1, 27-48.
Merrill, W.C., & Schneider, N. (1966). Government Firms in Oligopoly Industries: A Short-Run Analysis. Quarterly Journal of Economics 3, 400-412.
Rothschild, R. (1992). On the sustainability of collusion in differentiated duopolies. Economics Letters 40, 33-37.
Sertel, M.R., & Istanbul, Turkey. (1988). Regulation by Participation. Journal of Economic 2, 111-134.
Singh, N., & Vives, X. (1984). Price and quantity competition in a differentiated duopoly. RAND Journal of Economics 15, 546-554.
Shy, O. (1996). Industrial Organization: Theory and Applications. The MIT Press.
Thomadsen, R., & Rhee, K.E. (2007). Costly collusion in differentiated industries. Marketing Science 26, 660-665.
電子全文 Fulltext
本電子全文僅授權使用者為學術研究之目的,進行個人非營利性質之檢索、閱讀、列印。請遵守中華民國著作權法之相關規定,切勿任意重製、散佈、改作、轉貼、播送,以免觸法。
論文使用權限 Thesis access permission:校內校外完全公開 unrestricted
開放時間 Available:
校內 Campus: 已公開 available
校外 Off-campus: 已公開 available


紙本論文 Printed copies
紙本論文的公開資訊在102學年度以後相對較為完整。如果需要查詢101學年度以前的紙本論文公開資訊,請聯繫圖資處紙本論文服務櫃台。如有不便之處敬請見諒。
開放時間 available 已公開 available

QR Code