論文使用權限 Thesis access permission:校內校外完全公開 unrestricted
開放時間 Available:
校內 Campus: 已公開 available
校外 Off-campus: 已公開 available
論文名稱 Title |
不規則也有規則?探討產品排列視覺模式對於態度和點擊意圖之影響:以圖像背景和文案類型作為干擾變數 The Rule for Irregularity? Exploring the Effects of Product Arrangement on Attitude and Click Intention: The Moderating Effect of Imagery Background and Copy Style |
||
系所名稱 Department |
|||
畢業學年期 Year, semester |
語文別 Language |
||
學位類別 Degree |
頁數 Number of pages |
159 |
|
研究生 Author |
|||
指導教授 Advisor |
|||
召集委員 Convenor |
|||
口試委員 Advisory Committee |
|||
口試日期 Date of Exam |
2024-05-29 |
繳交日期 Date of Submission |
2024-07-29 |
關鍵字 Keywords |
產品排列視覺模式、雙元訊息處理模型、視覺複雜度、處理流暢性、推敲、圖像背景、文案類型 product arrangement, Heuristic-Systematic Model, visual complexity, processing fluency, elaboration, imagery background, copy style |
||
統計 Statistics |
本論文已被瀏覽 106 次,被下載 13 次 The thesis/dissertation has been browsed 106 times, has been downloaded 13 times. |
中文摘要 |
近年來數位廣告市場持續成長下,於線上進行廣告投放成為重要行銷策略之一。廣告視覺化呈現方式相當多元,其中,產品如何在廣告中進行排列亦是排版上常見的構圖情境之一。然而,在學術上卻鮮少進行研究與討論。本研究將以雙元訊息處理模型作為理論觀點,探討複雜程度差異的產品排列視覺模式是否會因處理流暢性與推敲而影響態度和點擊意圖,並加入實務設計上常運用的圖像背景與文案類型作為干擾以釐清廣告所帶來的個別效果,以提供更多實務建議。 本研究採用實驗法進行三個實驗。實驗一採2(產品排列視覺模式:規則vs. 不規則)x 2(圖像背景:簡單vs. 複雜)二因子組間設計;實驗二與實驗三採2(產品排列視覺模式:規則vs. 不規則)x 2(圖像背景:簡單vs. 複雜)x 2(文案類型:明示vs. 暗示)之三因子組間設計,以線上廣告作為情境,透過圖片操弄方式產生分別4種、8種不同廣告以了解消費者在產品排列視覺模式、圖像背景與文案類型之間的適配性組合如何透過處理流暢性與推敲進而影響廣告態度、品牌態度和點擊意圖。研究結果發現,產品排列視覺模式須在與圖像背景、文案類型之二階與三階適配性下才會產生處理流暢性和推敲,並分別採用捷思式與系統式訊息處理途徑,且在較為複雜的情境下,會因過於複雜而使消費者不進行推敲。此外,本研究亦證實暗示文案作為主要推敲來源所帶來的適配效果。 |
Abstract |
In recent years, with the continuous growth of the digital advertising market, online advertising has become a crucial marketing strategy. There is a wide variety of visual presentation tips for advertisements, which the product arrangement in ads is a common design. However, previous studies have rarely focused on this topic. Based on Heuristic-Systematic Model, this study aims to examine whether the complexity of product arrangement in online advertisements would affect attitude and click intention by processing fluency and elaboration, and the moderating effects by imagery background and copy style to provide several practical suggestions. This research conducted three studies through experimental method. Study 1 is a 2 (product arrangement: regular vs. irregular) x 2 (imagery background: simple vs. complex) two-factor between-subjects design. Study 2 and 3 are 2 (product arrangement: regular vs. irregular) x 2 (imagery background: simple vs. complex) x 2 (copy style: explicit vs. implicit) three-factor between-subjects design. This research aims to understand how product arrangement fit between imagery background and copy style, affect attitude and click intentions through processing fluency and elaboration. The results show that product arrangement needs to fit with imagery background and copy style to induce processing fluency and elaboration. Consumer tends to use heuristic and systematic process, respectively. Moreover, in more complex scenarios, consumer may refrain from elaboration due to excessive complexity. Additionally, the results also show that the matching effects which implicit copy as the primary source of elaboration. |
目次 Table of Contents |
論文審定書 i 誌謝 ii 摘要 iii Abstract iv 圖目錄 vii 表目錄 ix 第壹章 緒論 1 第一節 研究背景 1 第二節 研究動機 2 第三節 研究目的 5 第貳章 文獻回顧 6 第一節 數位廣告市場現況 6 第二節 雙元訊息處理模型 11 第三節 視覺複雜度 12 第四節 產品排列視覺模式 16 第五節 處理流暢性 19 第六節 推敲 21 第七節 圖像背景 23 第八節 文案類型 26 第九節 態度 28 第十節 點擊意圖 29 第參章 研究架構與研究假說 31 第一節 研究架構 31 第二節 假說推論 31 第肆章 實驗一 40 第一節 研究方法 40 第二節 分析結果 45 第伍章 實驗二 59 第一節 研究方法 59 第二節 分析結果 65 第陸章 實驗三 83 第一節 研究方法 83 第二節 分析結果 86 第柒章 結論與建議 104 第一節 研究發現與討論 104 第二節 理論貢獻 111 第三節 實務貢獻 113 第四節 研究限制與未來研究方向 114 參考文獻 116 附錄 130 |
參考文獻 References |
動腦雜誌(2023)。從心動到行動!掌握四大關鍵打造吸睛廣告素材。https://www.brain.com.tw/news/articlecontent?ID=51532#84tb2gTE 數位時代(2024)。RMN是什麼?momo、全家都在做!「零售媒體聯播網」能拯救低毛利困境嗎?。 https://www.bnext.com.tw/article/78347/retail-media-cookie 劉宜芬(2012)。廣告對產品線外溢效果之影響:廣告策略,品牌聯想與屬性呈現之角色。管理學報,29 (6),539-557。 Alter, A. L. (2013). The benefits of cognitive disfluency. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 22(6), 437-442. Alter, A. L., & Oppenheimer, D. M. (2009). Uniting the tribes of fluency to form a metacognitive nation. Personality and social psychology review, 13(3), 219-235. Alter, A. L., Oppenheimer, D. M., Epley, N., & Eyre, R. N. (2007). Overcoming intuition: metacognitive difficulty activates analytic reasoning. Journal of experimental psychology: General, 136(4), 569. Arnheim, R. (1969). Visual Thinking Berkeley: Univ. In: Calif. Press. Arnold, J. E., & Tanenhaus, M. K. (2011). Disfluency effects in comprehension: How new information can become accessible. The processing and acquisition of reference, 197-217. Attneave, F. (1954). Some informational aspects of visual perception. Psychological review, 61(3), 183. Avnet, T., & Higgins, E. T. (2006). How regulatory fit affects value in consumer choices and opinions. Journal of marketing research, 43(1), 1-10. Babatunde, S. O., Odejide, O. A., Edunjobi, T. E., & Ogundipe, D. O. (2024). The role of AI in marketing personalization: A theoretical exploration of consumer engagement strategies. International Journal of Management & Entrepreneurship Research, 6(3), 936-949. Baek, E., Huang, Z., & Lee, S. S. (2023). Visual complexity= hedonic? Effects of visually complex packages on consumer perceptions and evaluations of products. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 74, 103435. Bagchi, R., & Cheema, A. (2013). The effect of red background color on willingness-to-pay: the moderating role of selling mechanism. Journal of Consumer Research, 39(5), 947-960. Baker, W. E., & Lutz, R. J. (2000). An empirical test of an updated relevance-accessibility model of advertising effectiveness. Journal of Advertising, 29(1), 1-14. Berlyne, D. E. (1958). The influence of complexity and novelty in visual figures on orienting responses. Journal of experimental psychology, 55(3), 289. Berlyne, D. E. (1960). Conflict, arousal, and curiosity. Berlyne, D. E. (1966). Curiosity and Exploration: Animals spend much of their time seeking stimuli whose significance raises problems for psychology. Science, 153(3731), 25-33. Berlyne, D. E. (1973). Aesthetics and psychobiology. Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism, 31(4). Bettman, J. R. (1979). Memory factors in consumer choice: A review. Journal of Marketing, 43(2), 37-53. Bleier, A., & Eisenbeiss, M. (2015). The importance of trust for personalized online advertising. Journal of Retailing, 91(3), 390-409. Bohner, G., Moskowitz, G. B., & Chaiken, S. (1995). The interplay of heuristic and systematic processing of social information. European review of social psychology, 6(1), 33-68. Bornstein, R. F., & D'agostino, P. R. (1992). Stimulus recognition and the mere exposure effect. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 63(4), 545. Breuer, R., & Brettel, M. (2012). Short-and long-term effects of online advertising: Differences between new and existing customers. Journal of Interactive Marketing, 26(3), 155-166. Chae, B., & Hoegg, J. (2013). The future looks “right”: Effects of the horizontal location of advertising images on product attitude. Journal of Consumer Research, 40(2), 223-238. Chaiken, S. (1980). Heuristic versus systematic information processing and the use of source versus message cues in persuasion. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 39(5). Chaiken, S., Liberman, A., & Eagly, A. H. (1989). Heuristic and Systematic Information Processing within and beyond the Persuasion Context. In Unintended Thought (pp. 212-252). Guilford. Chaiken, S., & Stangor, C. (1987). Attitudes and attitude change. Annual review of psychology, 38(1), 575-630. Chaiken, S., & Trope, Y. (1999). Dual-process theories in social psychology. Guilford Press. Chang, C.-T., Wu, Y.-C., Lee, Y.-K., & Chu, X.-Y. (2018). Right metaphor, right place: choosing a visual metaphor based on product type and consumer differences. International Journal of Advertising, 37(2), 309-336. Chapelle, O., Manavoglu, E., & Rosales, R. (2014). Simple and scalable response prediction for display advertising. ACM Transactions on Intelligent Systems and Technology (TIST), 5(4), 1-34. Chen, C., Zhang, D., Zhang, F., & Zhang, F. (2023). The interaction effect of online composite reviews and time pressure on information persuasiveness: A heuristic-systematic perspective. Electronic Commerce Research and Applications, 59, 101269. Cheung, M. F., & To, W.-M. (2017). The influence of the propensity to trust on mobile users' attitudes toward in-app advertisements: An extension of the theory of planned behavior. Computers in Human Behavior, 76, 102-111. Chi, C.-F., & Dewi, R. S. (2014). Matching performance of vehicle icons in graphical and textual formats. Applied ergonomics, 45(4), 904-916. Chin, C.-Y., Lu, H.-P., & Wu, C.-M. (2015). Facebook users' motivation for clicking the “like” button. Social Behavior and Personality: an international journal, 43(4), 579-592. Cho, C.-H. (1999). How advertising works on the WWW: Modified elaboration likelihood model. Journal of current issues & research in advertising, 21(1), 34-50. Choi, J., Li, Y. J., Rangan, P., Yin, B., & Singh, S. N. (2020). Opposites attract: Impact of background color on effectiveness of emotional charity appeals. International Journal of Research in Marketing, 37(3), 644-660. Corbett, E. P., & Connors Robert, J. (1999). ClassicalRhetoricforthe Modern Student. In: Oxford UniversityPress, New York. Corley, M., MacGregor, L. J., & Donaldson, D. I. (2007). It’s the way that you, er, say it: Hesitations in speech affect language comprehension. Cognition, 105(3), 658-668. Cortese, M. J., Khanna, M. M., & Hacker, S. (2010). Recognition memory for 2,578 monosyllabic words. Memory, 18(6), 595-609. Dass, M., Kohli, C., Kumar, P., & Thomas, S. (2014). A study of the antecedents of slogan liking. Journal of Business Research, 67(12), 2504-2511. De Keyzer, F., Dens, N., & De Pelsmacker, P. (2022). How and when personalized advertising leads to brand attitude, click, and WOM intention. Journal of Advertising, 51(1), 39-56. Deng, L., & Poole, M. S. (2010). Affect in web interfaces: A study of the impacts of web page visual complexity and order. MIS quarterly, 711-730. Deng, X., & Kahn, B. E. (2009). Is your product on the right side? The “location effect” on perceived product heaviness and package evaluation. Journal of marketing research, 46(6), 725-738. Deng, X., Kahn, B. E., Unnava, H. R., & Lee, H. (2016). A “wide” variety: Effects of horizontal versus vertical display on assortment processing, perceived variety, and choice. Journal of marketing research, 53(5), 682-698. Desimone, R., & Duncan, J. (1995). Neural mechanisms of selective visual attention. Annual review of neuroscience, 18(1), 193-222. Diemand-Yauman, C., Oppenheimer, D. M., & Vaughan, E. B. (2011). Fortune favors the (): Effects of disfluency on educational outcomes. Cognition, 118(1), 111-115. Djamasbi, S., Fruhling, A., & Loiacono, E. (2009). The influence of affect, attitude and usefulness in the acceptance of telemedicine systems. Journal of Information Technology Theory and Application (JITTA), 10(1), 4. Djamasbi, S., Siegel, M., & Tullis, T. (2011). Visual hierarchy and viewing behavior: An eye tracking study. Human-Computer Interaction. Design and Development Approaches: 14th International Conference, HCI International 2011, Orlando, FL, USA, July 9-14, 2011, Proceedings, Part I 14, Donato, C., & Adıgüzel, F. (2022). Visual complexity of eco-labels and product evaluations in online setting: Is simple always better? Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 67, 102961. Donderi, D. C. (2006). Visual complexity: a review. Psychological Bulletin, 132(1), 73. Doucé, L., & Adams, C. (2020). Sensory overload in a shopping environment: Not every sensory modality leads to too much stimulation. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 57, 102154. Ducoffe, R. H. (1995). How consumers assess the value of advertising. Journal of current issues & research in advertising, 17(1), 1-18. Egner, T. (2007). Congruency sequence effects and cognitive control. Cognitive, Affective, & Behavioral Neuroscience, 7(4), 380-390. Elder, R. S., & Krishna, A. (2012). The “visual depiction effect” in advertising: Facilitating embodied mental simulation through product orientation. Journal of Consumer Research, 38(6), 988-1003. Farace, S., Roggeveen, A., Villarroel Ordenes, F., De Ruyter, K., Wetzels, M., & Grewal, D. (2020). Patterns in motion: How visual patterns in ads affect product evaluations. Journal of Advertising, 49(1), 3-17. Forsythe, A., Mulhern, G., & Sawey, M. (2008). Confounds in pictorial sets: The role of complexity and familiarity in basic-level picture processing. Behavior research methods, 40(1), 116-129. Gao, L., Waechter, K. A., & Bai, X. (2015). Understanding consumers’ continuance intention towards mobile purchase: A theoretical framework and empirical study–A case of China. Computers in Human Behavior, 53, 249-262. Geissler, G. L., Zinkhan, G. M., & Watson, R. T. (2006). The influence of home page complexity on consumer attention, attitudes, and purchase intent. Journal of Advertising, 35(2), 69-80. Germelmann, C. C., Herrmann, J.-L., Kacha, M., & Darke, P. R. (2020). Congruence and incongruence in thematic advertisement–medium combinations: Role of awareness, fluency, and persuasion knowledge. Journal of Advertising, 49(2), 141-164. Geuens, M., De Pelsmacker, P., & Faseur, T. (2011). Emotional advertising: Revisiting the role of product category. Journal of Business Research, 64(4), 418-426. Gonzalez, L. M. (2005). The impact of ad background color on brand personality and brand preferences. Electronic version). Retrieved December, 13, 2007. Graham, K. W., & Wilder, K. M. (2020). Consumer-brand identity and online advertising message elaboration: effect on attitudes, purchase intent and willingness to share. Journal of Research in Interactive Marketing, 14(1), 111-132. Greenwald, A. G., & Leavitt, C. (1984). Audience involvement in advertising: Four levels. Journal of Consumer Research, 11(1), 581-592. Guo, X., Qian, Y., Li, L., & Asano, A. (2018). Assessment model for perceived visual complexity of painting images. Knowledge-Based Systems, 159, 110-119. Hall, R. H., & Hanna, P. (2004). The impact of web page text-background colour combinations on readability, retention, aesthetics and behavioural intention. Behaviour & information technology, 23(3), 183-195. Hansen, S. F., Michelson, E. S., Kamper, A., Borling, P., Stuer-Lauridsen, F., & Baun, A. (2008). Categorization framework to aid exposure assessment of nanomaterials in consumer products. Ecotoxicology, 17, 438-447. Harper, S., Michailidou, E., & Stevens, R. (2009). Toward a definition of visual complexity as an implicit measure of cognitive load. ACM Transactions on Applied Perception (TAP), 6(2), 1-18. Hastie, R. (1984). Causes and effects of causal attribution. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 46(1), 44. Hastie, R., & Kumar, P. A. (1979). Person memory: Personality traits as organizing principles in memory for behaviors. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 37(1), 25. Hatzithomas, L., Manolopoulou, A., Margariti, K., Boutsouki, C., & Koumpis, D. (2021). Metaphors and body copy in online advertising effectiveness. Journal of Promotion Management, 27(5), 642-672. Heaps, C., & Handel, S. (1999). Similarity and features of natural textures. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 25(2), 299. Heckler, S. E., & Childers, T. L. (1992). The role of expectancy and relevancy in memory for verbal and visual information: what is incongruency? Journal of Consumer Research, 18(4), 475-492. Hekkert, P. (2006). Design aesthetics: principles of pleasure in design. Psychology science, 48(2), 157. Hekkert, P., & Leder, H. (2008). Product aesthetics. Product experience, 259-285. Herrmann, A., Zidansek, M., Sprott, D. E., & Spangenberg, E. R. (2013). The power of simplicity: Processing fluency and the effects of olfactory cues on retail sales. Journal of Retailing, 89(1), 30-43. Houston, M. J., Childers, T. L., & Heckler, S. E. (1987). Picture-word consistency and the elaborative processing of advertisements. Journal of marketing research, 24(4), 359-369. Huang, J., Wang, Z., Liu, H., & Yu, L. (2020). Similar or contrastive? Impact of product–background color combination on consumers' product evaluations. Psychology & Marketing, 37(7), 961-979. Huang, Y., Li, C., Wu, J., & Lin, Z. (2018). Online customer reviews and consumer evaluation: The role of review font. Information & Management, 55(4), 430-440. Hubbard, T. L. (1995). Environmental invariants in the representation of motion: Implied dynamics and representational momentum, gravity, friction, and centripetal force. Psychonomic bulletin & review, 2, 322-338. Huhmann, B. A., & Albinsson, P. A. (2012). Does rhetoric impact advertising effectiveness with liking controlled? European Journal of Marketing, 46(11/12), 1476-1500. Huhmann, B. A., & Mott‐Stenerson, B. (2008). Controversial advertisement executions and involvement on elaborative processing and comprehension. Journal of Marketing Communications, 14(4), 293-313. Im, H., Ju, H. W., & Johnson, K. K. (2021). Beyond visual clutter: the interplay among products, advertisements, and the overall webpage. Journal of Research in Interactive Marketing, 15(4), 804-821. Isen, A. M. (2003). Positive affect as a source of human strength. Isen, A. M., & Shalker, T. E. (1982). The effect of feeling state on evaluation of positive, neutral, and negative stimuli: When you" accentuate the positive," do you" eliminate the negative"? Social psychology quarterly, 58-63. Jacoby, L. L., & Dallas, M. (1981). On the relationship between autobiographical memory and perceptual learning. Journal of experimental psychology: General, 110(3), 306. Jeong, S. W., Fiore, A. M., Niehm, L. S., & Lorenz, F. O. (2009). The role of experiential value in online shopping: The impacts of product presentation on consumer responses towards an apparel web site. Internet Research, 19(1), 105-124. Joachims, T., Granka, L., Pan, B., Hembrooke, H., Radlinski, F., & Gay, G. (2007). Evaluating the accuracy of implicit feedback from clicks and query reformulations in web search. ACM Transactions on Information Systems (TOIS), 25(2), 7-es. Johar, J. S., & Sirgy, M. J. (1991). Value-expressive versus utilitarian advertising appeals: When and why to use which appeal. Journal of Advertising, 20(3), 23-33. Kahn, B. E., & Wansink, B. (2004). The influence of assortment structure on perceived variety and consumption quantities. Journal of Consumer Research, 30(4), 519-533. Kang, J. A., Hong, S., & Hubbard, G. T. (2020). The role of storytelling in advertising: Consumer emotion, narrative engagement level, and word‐of‐mouth intention. Journal of Consumer Behaviour, 19(1), 47-56. Kardes, F. R. (1988). Spontaneous inference processes in advertising: The effects of conclusion omission and involvement on persuasion. Journal of Consumer Research, 15(2), 225-233. Kareklas, I., Muehling, D. D., & King, S. (2019). The effect of color and self-view priming in persuasive communications. Journal of Business Research, 98, 33-49. Karp, E. M., & Karp, H. (1988). Color associations of male and female fourth-grade school children. The Journal of Psychology, 122(4), 383-388. Kelley, C. M., & Lindsay, D. S. (1993). Remembering mistaken for knowing: Ease of retrieval as a basis for confidence in answers to general knowledge questions. Journal of memory and language, 32(1), 1-24. King, D., & Janiszewski, C. (2011). The sources and consequences of the fluent processing of numbers. Journal of marketing research, 48(2), 327-341. Knauff, M., & Johnson-Laird, P. N. (2002). Visual imagery can impede reasoning. Memory & Cognition, 30, 363-371. Kotler, P., & Armstrong, G. M. (2010). Principles of marketing. Pearson Education India. Kress, G., & Van Leeuwen, T. (2020). Reading images: The grammar of visual design. Routledge. Kupor, D., & Tormala, Z. (2018). When moderation fosters persuasion: The persuasive power of deviatory reviews. Journal of Consumer Research, 45(3), 490-510. Kusumasondjaja, S., & Tjiptono, F. (2019). Endorsement and visual complexity in food advertising on Instagram. Internet Research, 29(4), 659-687. Labroo, A. A., Dhar, R., & Schwarz, N. (2008). Of frog wines and frowning watches: Semantic priming, perceptual fluency, and brand evaluation. Journal of Consumer Research, 34(6), 819-831. Labroo, A. A., & Lee, A. Y. (2006). Between two brands: A goal fluency account of brand evaluation. Journal of marketing research, 43(3), 374-385. Labroo, A. A., & Pocheptsova, A. (2016). Metacognition and consumer judgment: Fluency is pleasant but disfluency ignites interest. Current Opinion in Psychology, 10, 154-159. Lagerwerf, L. (2002). Deliberate ambiguity in slogans: recognition and appreciation. Document design, 3(3), 244-260. Landwehr, J. R., McGill, A. L., & Herrmann, A. (2011). It's got the look: The effect of friendly and aggressive “facial” expressions on product liking and sales. Journal of Marketing, 75(3), 132-146. Lee, A. Y., & Aaker, J. L. (2004). Bringing the frame into focus: the influence of regulatory fit on processing fluency and persuasion. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 86(2), 205. Lee, A. Y., Keller, P. A., & Sternthal, B. (2010). Value from regulatory construal fit: The persuasive impact of fit between consumer goals and message concreteness. Journal of Consumer Research, 36(5), 735-747. Lee, K., Choi, J., Marakas, G. M., & Singh, S. N. (2019). Two distinct routes for inducing emotions in HCI design. International journal of human-computer studies, 124, 67-80. Lee, K., & Shavitt, S. (2009). Can McDonald's food ever be considered healthful? Metacognitive experiences affect the perceived understanding of a brand. Journal of marketing research, 46(2), 222-233. Leigh, J. H. (1994). The use of figures of speech in print ad headlines. Journal of Advertising, 23(2), 17-33. Lewenstein, M., & Nowak, A. (1989). Recognition with self-control in neural networks. Physical Review A, 40(8), 4652. Liu, S. Q., & Mattila, A. S. (2017). Airbnb: Online targeted advertising, sense of power, and consumer decisions. International Journal of Hospitality Management, 60, 33-41. Locher, P., & Nodine, C. (1989). The perceptual value of symmetry. In Symmetry 2 (pp. 475-484). Elsevier. Luffarelli, J., Stamatogiannakis, A., & Yang, H. (2019). The visual asymmetry effect: An interplay of logo design and brand personality on brand equity. Journal of marketing research, 56(1), 89-103. Lutz, R. J. (1985). Affective and cognitive antecedents of attitude toward the ad: A conceptual framework. Psychological processes and advertising effects, 45-64. Mac Cormac, E. R. (1990). A cognitive theory of metaphor. MacKenzie, S. B., Lutz, R. J., & Belch, G. E. (1986). The role of attitude toward the ad as a mediator of advertising effectiveness: A test of competing explanations. Journal of marketing research, 23(2), 130-143. Maheswaran, D., & Chaiken, S. (1991). Promoting systematic processing in low-motivation settings: Effect of incongruent information on processing and judgment. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 61(1), 13. Malaviya, P., Kisielius, J., & Sternthal, B. (1996). The effect of type of elaboration on advertisement processing and judgment. Journal of marketing research, 33(4), 410-421. Malodia, S., Singh, P., Goyal, V., & Sengupta, A. (2017). Measuring the impact of brand-celebrity personality congruence on purchase intention. Journal of Marketing Communications, 23(5), 493-512. Mazzoni, G., & Nelson, T. O. (2014). Metacognition and cognitive neuropsychology: Monitoring and control processes. Psychology Press. McDougall, S., & Isherwood, S. (2009). What’s in a name? The role of graphics, functions, and their interrelationships in icon identification. Behavior research methods, 41(2), 325-336. McQuarrie, E. F., & Mick, D. G. (1992). On resonance: A critical pluralistic inquiry into advertising rhetoric. Journal of Consumer Research, 19(2), 180-197. McQuarrie, E. F., & Mick, D. G. (1996). Figures of rhetoric in advertising language. Journal of Consumer Research, 22(4), 424-438. McQuarrie, E. F., & Mick, D. G. (1999). Visual rhetoric in advertising: Text-interpretive, experimental, and reader-response analyses. Journal of Consumer Research, 26(1), 37-54. Mehta, R., Zhu, R., & Cheema, A. (2012). Is noise always bad? Exploring the effects of ambient noise on creative cognition. Journal of Consumer Research, 39(4), 784-799. Meyers-Levy, J., & Peracchio, L. A. (1992). Getting an angle in advertising: The effect of camera angle on product evaluations. Journal of marketing research, 29(4), 454-461. Meyers-Levy, J., & Peracchio, L. A. (1995). Understanding the effects of color: How the correspondence between available and required resources affects attitudes. Journal of Consumer Research, 22(2), 121-138. Miceli, G. N., Scopelliti, I., Raimondo, M. A., & Donato, C. (2014). Breaking through complexity: Visual and conceptual dimensions in logo evaluation across exposures. Psychology & Marketing, 31(10), 886-899. Mitchell, A. A., & Olson, J. C. (1981). Are product attribute beliefs the only mediator of advertising effects on brand attitude? Journal of marketing research, 18(3), 318-332. Molian, D. (1993). 'I am a doughnut': Lessons for the sloganeer. European Business Journal, 5(2), 40. Moore, R. S., Stammerjohan, C. A., & Coulter, R. A. (2005). Banner advertiser-web site context congruity and color effects on attention and attitudes. Journal of Advertising, 34(2), 71-84. Moorman, M., Neijens, P. C., & Smit, E. G. (2002). The effects of magazine-induced psychological responses and thematic congruence on memory and attitude toward the ad in a real-life setting. Journal of Advertising, 31(4), 27-40. Mosteller, J., Donthu, N., & Eroglu, S. (2014). The fluent online shopping experience. Journal of Business Research, 67(11), 2486-2493. Nadkarni, S., & Gupta, R. (2007). A task-based model of perceived website complexity. MIS quarterly, 501-524. Nielsen, J. H., & Escalas, J. E. (2010). Easier is not always better: The moderating role of processing type on preference fluency. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 20(3), 295-305. Novemsky, N., Dhar, R., Schwarz, N., & Simonson, I. (2007). Preference fluency in choice. Journal of marketing research, 44(3), 347-356. Ogbanufe, O., & Kim, D. J. (2018). “Just how risky is it anyway?” The role of risk perception and trust on click-through intention. Information Systems Management, 35(3), 182-200. Orth, U. R., & Wirtz, J. (2014). Consumer processing of interior service environments: The interplay among visual complexity, processing fluency, and attractiveness. Journal of Service Research, 17(3), 296-309. Palmer, S. E. (1999). Vision science: Photons to phenomenology. MIT press. Peracchio, L. A., & Meyers-Levy, J. (2005). Using stylistic properties of ad pictures to communicate with consumers. Journal of Consumer Research, 32(1), 29-40. Petty, R. E., & Cacioppo, J. T. (1986). The elaboration likelihood model of persuasion. Springer. Petty, R. E., Cacioppo, J. T., & Schumann, D. (1983). Central and peripheral routes to advertising effectiveness: The moderating role of involvement. Journal of Consumer Research, 10(2), 135-146. Petty, R. E., Schumann, D. W., Richman, S. A., & Strathman, A. J. (1993). Positive mood and persuasion: Different roles for affect under high-and low-elaboration conditions. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 64(1), 5. Phillips, B. J., & McQuarrie, E. F. (2002). The development, change, and transformation of rhetorical style in magazine advertisements 1954–1999. Journal of Advertising, 31(4), 1-13. Pick, D. F., Sweeney, J., & Clay, J. A. (1991). Creative advertising and the von Restorff effect. Psychological Reports, 69(3), 923-926. Pieters, R., Wedel, M., & Batra, R. (2010). The stopping power of advertising: Measures and effects of visual complexity. Journal of Marketing, 74(5), 48-60. Priester, J. R., Godek, J., Nayakankuppum, D., & Park, K. (2004). Brand congruity and comparative advertising: When and why comparative advertisements lead to greater elaboration. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 14(1-2), 115-123. Reber, R., & Schwarz, N. (2006). Perceptual fluency, preference, and evolution. Polish Psychological Bulletin, 37(1), 16. Reber, R., Schwarz, N., & Winkielman, P. (2004a). Processing fluency and aesthetic pleasure: Is beauty in the perceiver's processing experience? Personality and social psychology review, 8(4), 364-382. Reber, R., Winkielman, P., & Schwarz, N. (1998). Effects of perceptual fluency on affective judgments. Psychological science, 9(1), 45-48. Reber, R., Wurtz, P., & Zimmermann, T. D. (2004b). Exploring “fringe” consciousness: The subjective experience of perceptual fluency and its objective bases. Consciousness and cognition, 13(1), 47-60. Robinson, H., Wysocka, A., & Hand, C. (2007). Internet advertising effectiveness: the effect of design on click-through rates for banner ads. International Journal of Advertising, 26(4), 527-541. Ryu, S., & Ryu, S. (2021). Feeling excited and fluent: how consumers respond to the visual appeals of products in an online shopping environment. Behaviour & information technology, 40(11), 1219-1233. Şahin, A., Turhan, G., & Zehir, C. (2013). Building behavioral intentions in automotive industry: Brand experience, satisfaction, trust, direct mail communication and attitudes toward advertising. Business Management Dynamics, 3(4), 45-61. Sardar, S., Tata, S. V., & Sarkar, S. (2024). Examining the influence of source factors and content characteristics of influencers' post on consumer engagement and purchase intention: A moderated analysis. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 79, 103888. Sawyer, A. G., & Howard, D. J. (1991). Effects of omitting conclusions in advertisements to involved and uninvolved audiences. Journal of marketing research, 28(4), 467-474. Schlosser, A. E., Rikhi, R. R., & Dagogo-Jack, S. W. (2016). The ups and downs of visual orientation: The effects of diagonal orientation on product judgment. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 26(4), 496-509. Schwarz, N. (2004). Metacognitive experiences in consumer judgment and decision making. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 14(4), 332-348. Schwarz, N. (2018). Of fluency, beauty, and truth: Inferences from metacognitive experiences. Metacognitive diversity: An interdisciplinary approach, 25-46. Segev, S., Wang, W., & Fernandes, J. (2014). The effects of ad–context congruency on responses to advertising in blogs: Exploring the role of issue involvement. International Journal of Advertising, 33(1), 17-36. Shapiro, S. (1999). When an ad's influence is beyond our conscious control: Perceptual and conceptual fluency effects caused by incidental ad exposure. Journal of Consumer Research, 26(1), 16-36. Shapiro, S. A., & Nielsen, J. H. (2013). What the blind eye sees: Incidental change detection as a source of perceptual fluency. Journal of Consumer Research, 39(6), 1202-1218. Sharma, A., Dwivedi, Y. K., Arya, V., & Siddiqui, M. Q. (2021). Does SMS advertising still have relevance to increase consumer purchase intention? A hybrid PLS-SEM-neural network modelling approach. Computers in Human Behavior, 124, 106919. Sharma, R. W. (2015). Communicating across age-groups: variance in consumer attitudes from tweenagers to adults. Young Consumers, 16(3), 348-362. Shen, H., Jiang, Y., & Adaval, R. (2010). Contrast and assimilation effects of processing fluency. Journal of Consumer Research, 36(5), 876-889. Sirgy, M. J., Johar, J. S., Samli, A. C., & Claiborne, C. B. (1991). Self-congruity versus functional congruity: Predictors of consumer behavior. Journal of the academy of marketing science, 19, 363-375. Sohn, S. (2017). Consumer processing of mobile online stores: Sources and effects of processing fluency. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 36, 137-147. Sonderegger, A., & Sauer, J. (2010). The influence of design aesthetics in usability testing: Effects on user performance and perceived usability. Applied ergonomics, 41(3), 403-410. Song, H., & Schwarz, N. (2008). If it's hard to read, it's hard to do: Processing fluency affects effort prediction and motivation. Psychological science, 19(10), 986-988. Song, H., & Schwarz, N. (2009). If it's difficult to pronounce, it must be risky: Fluency, familiarity, and risk perception. Psychological science, 20(2), 135-138. Spears, N., & Singh, S. N. (2004). Measuring attitude toward the brand and purchase intentions. Journal of current issues & research in advertising, 26(2), 53-66. Srull, T. K., Lichtenstein, M., & Rothbart, M. (1985). Associative storage and retrieval processes in person memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 11(2), 316. Stathakopoulos, V., Theodorakis, I. G., & Mastoridou, E. (2008). Visual and verbal rhetoric in advertising: the case of ‘resonance’. International Journal of Advertising, 27(4), 629-658. Storme, M., Myszkowski, N., Davila, A., & Bournois, F. (2015). How subjective processing fluency predicts attitudes toward visual advertisements and purchase intention. Journal of Consumer Marketing, 32(6), 432-440. Teeny, J. D., Siev, J. J., Briñol, P., & Petty, R. E. (2021). A review and conceptual framework for understanding personalized matching effects in persuasion. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 31(2), 382-414. Teng, S., Khong, K. W., & Goh, W. W. (2015). Persuasive communication: A study of major attitude-behavior theories in a social media context. Journal of Internet Commerce, 14(1), 42-64. Thompson, D. V., & Ince, E. C. (2013). When disfluency signals competence: The effect of processing difficulty on perceptions of service agents. Journal of marketing research, 50(2), 228-240. Tom, G., & Eves, A. (1999). The use of rhetorical devices in advertising. Journal of advertising research, 39, 39-44. Toncar, M., & Munch, J. (2001). Consumer responses to tropes in print advertising. Journal of Advertising, 30(1), 55-65. Tong, X., Chen, Y., Zhou, S., & Yang, S. (2022). How background visual complexity influences purchase intention in live streaming: The mediating role of emotion and the moderating role of gender. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 67, 103031. Tsai, C. I., & McGill, A. L. (2011). No pain, no gain? How fluency and construal level affect consumer confidence. Journal of Consumer Research, 37(5), 807-821. Tuch, A. N., Bargas-Avila, J. A., Opwis, K., & Wilhelm, F. H. (2009). Visual complexity of websites: Effects on users’ experience, physiology, performance, and memory. International journal of human-computer studies, 67(9), 703-715. Valenzuela, A., & Raghubir, P. (2010). Are consumers aware of top-bottom but not of left-right inferences? implications for shelf space positions Van der Helm, P. A. (2000). Simplicity versus likelihood in visual perception: From surprisals to precisals. Psychological Bulletin, 126(5), 770. Venkatraman, V., Dimoka, A., Pavlou, P. A., Vo, K., Hampton, W., Bollinger, B., Hershfield, H. E., Ishihara, M., & Winer, R. S. (2015). Predicting advertising success beyond traditional measures: New insights from neurophysiological methods and market response modeling. Journal of marketing research, 52(4), 436-452. Verhagen, T., Feldberg, F., van den Hooff, B., Meents, S., & Merikivi, J. (2012). Understanding users’ motivations to engage in virtual worlds: A multipurpose model and empirical testing. Computers in Human Behavior, 28(2), 484-495. Walters, G., Sparks, B., & Herington, C. (2007). The effectiveness of print advertising stimuli in evoking elaborate consumption visions for potential travelers. Journal of Travel Research, 46(1), 24-34. Wang, B., Liu, S. Q., Kandampully, J., & Bujisic, M. (2020). How color affects the effectiveness of taste-versus health-focused restaurant advertising messages. Journal of Advertising, 49(5), 557-574. Wang, Q., Ma, D., Chen, H., Ye, X., & Xu, Q. (2020). Effects of background complexity on consumer visual processing: An eye-tracking study. Journal of Business Research, 111, 270-280. Wheeler, S. C., Petty, R. E., & Bizer, G. Y. (2005). Self-schema matching and attitude change: Situational and dispositional determinants of message elaboration. Journal of Consumer Research, 31(4), 787-797. White, K., & Willness, C. (2009). Consumer reactions to the decreased usage message: The role of elaborative processing. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 19(1), 73-87. Winkielman, P., Schwarz, N., Fazendeiro, T., & Reber, R. (2003a). The hedonic marking of processing fluency: Implications for evaluative judgment. The psychology of evaluation: Affective processes in cognition and emotion, 189, 217. Winkielman, P., Schwarz, N., Reber, R., & Fazendeiro, T. A. (2003b). Cognitive and affective consequences of visual fluency: When seeing is easy on the mind. In Persuasive imagery (pp. 75-89). Routledge. Wood, L. (2000). Brands and brand equity: definition and management. Management decision, 38(9), 662-669. Wu, C., Sundiman, D., Kao, S.-C., & Chen, C.-H. (2018). Emotion induction in click intention of picture advertisement: a field examination. Journal of Internet Commerce, 17(4), 356-382. Yoo, C. Y., Kim, K., & Stout, P. A. (2004). Assessing the effects of animation in online banner advertising: Hierarchy of effects model. Journal of interactive advertising, 4(2), 49-60. Yoo, J., & Kim, M. (2014). The effects of online product presentation on consumer responses: A mental imagery perspective. Journal of Business Research, 67(11), 2464-2472. Yoon, S. H., Lim, J. H., & Ji, Y. G. (2015). Perceived visual complexity and visual search performance of automotive instrument cluster: A quantitative measurement study. International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction, 31(12), 890-900. Yu, C., Zhang, Z., Lin, C., & Wu, Y. J. (2020). Can data-driven precision marketing promote user AD clicks? Evidence from advertising in WeChat moments. Industrial Marketing Management, 90, 481-492. Zanjani, S. H., Diamond, W. D., & Chan, K. (2011). Does ad-context congruity help surfers and information seekers remember ads in cluttered e-magazines? Journal of Advertising, 40(4), 67-84. Zhang, K. Z., Zhao, S. J., Cheung, C. M., & Lee, M. K. (2014). Examining the influence of online reviews on consumers' decision-making: A heuristic–systematic model. Decision Support Systems, 67, 78-89. |
電子全文 Fulltext |
本電子全文僅授權使用者為學術研究之目的,進行個人非營利性質之檢索、閱讀、列印。請遵守中華民國著作權法之相關規定,切勿任意重製、散佈、改作、轉貼、播送,以免觸法。 論文使用權限 Thesis access permission:校內校外完全公開 unrestricted 開放時間 Available: 校內 Campus: 已公開 available 校外 Off-campus: 已公開 available |
紙本論文 Printed copies |
紙本論文的公開資訊在102學年度以後相對較為完整。如果需要查詢101學年度以前的紙本論文公開資訊,請聯繫圖資處紙本論文服務櫃台。如有不便之處敬請見諒。 開放時間 available 已公開 available |
QR Code |