Responsive image
博碩士論文 etd-0701122-223351 詳細資訊
Title page for etd-0701122-223351
論文名稱
Title
跨領域教學下教師對教具之購買行為影響因素研究
Research on The Influencing Factors of Teachers' Purchase Behavior of Teaching Aids under Cross-Disciplinary Teaching
系所名稱
Department
畢業學年期
Year, semester
語文別
Language
學位類別
Degree
頁數
Number of pages
87
研究生
Author
指導教授
Advisor
召集委員
Convenor
口試委員
Advisory Committee
口試日期
Date of Exam
2022-06-08
繳交日期
Date of Submission
2022-08-01
關鍵字
Keywords
跨領域教學、EKB模式、消費者行為、需求動機、需求認知
cross-domain teaching, EKB model, consumer behavior, demand motivation, demand cognition
統計
Statistics
本論文已被瀏覽 354 次,被下載 89
The thesis/dissertation has been browsed 354 times, has been downloaded 89 times.
中文摘要
近年來因應全球化知識經濟及社會變遷對未來人才培育的需求,歐美國家開始推行結合科學(S)、科技(T)、工程(E)、藝術(A)與數學(M)的跨領域教學政策,即STEAM教育,而我國教育部於民國108年開始推行融入STEAM教育策略的新課綱,進而衍生出教師不知如何選擇相關科技教具來應用教學的困境。本研究透過訪談資料蒐集,從傳統教學法與跨領域教學的差異,到教具市場供應生態的前後落差,以EKB模式為架構來討論在跨領域教學下,教師對教具之購買行為影響因素,研究目的包括:
1.因108課綱導入STEAM教育,使教師的教學方法從原來的傳統教法轉變為跨領域教學法,探討其與教師選購教具時的供應管道之關聯性。
2.探討教師因課綱改變而改變其購買教具的管道時,在不同的教具供應管道所評估購買教具之因素有哪些。

研究結果發現,在跨領域教學下,教師對教具的購買因素排序為需求、預算、功能品質、售後服務及口碑,品牌及本土製造對購買行為沒有一定的影響。

Abstract
In recent years, there have been increasing social pressures for a global increase in demand for skilled financial and scientific professionals. European and American countries have thus begun to prioritize interdisciplinary education using the STEAM model: (S)science, (T)technology,(E)engineering,(A)art, and (M)mathematics. Taiwan’s Ministry of Education, in year 108, began to also implement a new STEAM curriculum. However, the teachers had difficulty with the selection of relevant teaching aids that would be effective for STEAM. This study collects interview data examining the differences between traditional teaching methods and previous STEAM methods, as well as differences in the choice selection differences for available teaching aids, and uses the EKB model as the framework to discuss the factors that affect teachers' purchase behavior of teaching aids under cross-disciplinary teaching.
The objectives include:
1. Due to the STEAM education, teaching method has changed from the traditional to a cross-disciplinary teaching method, explore the correlation between different teaching methods and teaching aid supply channels;.
2. When the teachers change their purchasing channels for teaching aids due to changes in the syllabus, explore the selection methodology that teachers use to evaluate teaching aids in different teaching aid supply channels.
The results of the study found that with STEAM education in Taiwan, compelling purchasing factors in decreasing order for teaching aids were demand, budget, functional quality, after-sales service and word of mouth. Brands and local manufacturing had no influence on purchasing behavior.

目次 Table of Contents
論文審定書i
誌謝ii
摘要iii
Abstractiv
目錄vi
圖次viii
表次ix
第一章 緒論1
第一節、研究背景1
第二節、研究動機與目的3
第三節、研究流程4
第二章 文獻探討6
第一節、傳統教學法與跨領域教學法6
第二節、消費者行為理論與模式16
第三節、消費者購買決策模式22
第四節、品牌及品牌形象24
第三章 研究方法與設計34
第一節、研究方法34
第二節、研究假說與問題36
第三節、深度訪談法37
第四節、建議方案39
第四章 實證分析41
第一節、訪談問題與重點整理41
第二節、分析探討47
第五章 結論與建議50
第一節、研究結論50
第二節、建議51
參考文獻53
附錄61
參考文獻 References
中國教育報. (2020). 疫情加速日本教育信息化. 取自http://www.jyb.cn/rmtzgjyb/202009/t20200918_359610.html
文崇一, & 楊國樞. (2000). 訪問調查法, 社會及行為科學研究法 (下冊). 台北市: 東華.
王文科, & 王智弘. (2010). 質的研究的信度和效度. 彰化師大教育學報, (17), 29-50.
王為國. (2021). STEAM 教育之教師專業問題與因應建議. 臺灣教育評論月刊, 115.
王駿良. (1999). 高齡者對福利產品購買決策型態之研究-以高雄市為例. 國立成功大學企業管理研究所碩士論文.
石元伍, & 朱寓卿. (2020). 基於遊戲化思維下STEAM教育產品設計研究.
朱珮禎, & 曾淑惠. (2018). 創客(Maker) 教育實踐於十二年國教課程之評析. 臺灣教育評論月刊, 7(3), 160-163.
行政院國家資通安全會報. 資通安全網路月報(2020). 取自https://nicst.ey.gov.tw/Page/8770AD7511CB8DC9/bcf867e8-5774-4675-8849-4d3001eae9d4
呂秀蓮(2016). 臺灣國民教育三波課程改革與課綱的關係. 選才電子報. 取自https://www.ceec.edu.tw/xcepaper/cont?xsmsid=0J066588036013658199&sid=0J184537832726476606
林生傳. (2003). 教育研究法: 全方位的統計與分析. 台北市: 心理, 154-156.
林佳慧. (2002). 教師必備的行頭-教具設計與應用. 幼教資訊, 121, 24-27.
林坤誼. (2018). STEM 教育在台灣推行的現況與省思. Journal of Youth Studies, 21(1), 41.
林金定, 嚴嘉楓, & 陳美花. (2005). 質性研究方法: 訪談模式與實施步驟分析. 身心障礙研究季刊, 3(2), 122-136.
林南宏, 王文正, 邱聖媛, & 鍾怡君. (2007). 產品知識及品牌形象對購買意願的影響-產品類別的干擾效果. 行銷評論, 4(4), 481-504.
林靈宏, & 張魁峰. (2006). 消費者行為學. 台北市: 五南.

國家教育研究院電子報(2019a). 各國推動STEM教育的新動態. 取自https://epaper.naer.edu.tw/edm.php?grp_no=3&edm_no=180&content_no=3176
國家教育研究院電子報(2019b). 歐美國家數位教學的發展與挑戰. 取自https://epaper.naer.edu.tw/edm.php?eg_name=%E5%9C%8B%E9%9A%9B%E6%95%99%E8%82%B2%E8%A8%8A%E6%81%AF%E5%88%86%E6%9E%90&edm_no=186&content_no=3288
張玉山. (2017). STEAM Maker 創客/自造教育的課程思維. 中等教育, 68(2), 8-11. doi:10.6249/SE.2017.68.2.01
張添洲. (2000). 教材教法-發展與革新. 台北市: 五南.
教育部, (2002). 創造力教育白皮書. 台北市: 教育部.
教育部, (2003). 科學教育白皮書. 台北市: 教育部.
教育部國民及學前教育署 12年國教/課程綱要 (2014). 取自https://12basic.edu.tw/12about-3.php
郭生玉. (1980). 教師期望與教師行為及學生學習行為關係之分析. 教育心理學報, (13), 133-152. doi:10.6251/BEP.19800601.10
郭春在, & 卓素慧. (2008). 從認知發展觀點探討幼兒教具設計原則之研究. 應用藝術與設計學報.
曾倫崇, 粘孝堉, 徐憲宏, & 何嘉惠. (2004). 消費者行為學派的另一扇窗-網路消費行為理論. 遠東學報, 21(4), 657-678.
游恒山(譯). (2008). 消費者行為心理學. (原作者: Brian Mullen, Craig Johnson). 台北市: 五南.
黃光玉, 劉念夏, & 陳清文. (2004). 媒介與傳播研究方法: 質化與量化研究途徑. 台北: 風雲論壇.
楊國樞, 文崇一, 吳聰賢, & 李亦園. (1989). 社會及行為科學研究法, 台北市: 東華.
經濟部工業局108年度專案計畫(2019). 智慧學習產業產值調查報告. 取自https://www.epark.org.tw/download/108%E5%B9%B4%E5%BA%A6%E6%99%BA%E6%85%A7%E5%AD%B8%E7%BF%92%E7%94%A2%E5%80%BC%E8%AA%BF%E6%9F%A5%E5%A0%B1%E5%91%8A.pdf
萬文隆. (2004). 深度訪談在質性研究中的應用. 生活科技教育月刊, 37(4), 17-23.
葉乃靜. (2012). 質性研究. 國家教育研究院. 雙語詞彙、學術名詞暨辭書資訊網. 取自https://terms.naer.edu.tw/detail/1678706/
臺灣PISA國家研究中心. 歷屆學生表現. 取自https://pisa.irels.ntnu.edu.tw/performed.html
劉姵君. (2019).美國、歐盟、英國STEM教育策略對我國之啟發. 人力規劃及發展研究報告第20輯. 台北市: 中華民國國家發展委員會.
潘淑滿. (2003). 質性研究: 理論與應用. 台北市: 心理.
蕭瑞麟. (2020). 不用數字的研究: 質性研究的思辯脈絡. 台北市: 五南.
賴光真. (2013). 教科書審查範圍與程序的改革精進. 臺灣教育評論月刊, 2(11), 75-77.
簡紅珠(2000). 講述教學法. 國家教育研究院. 雙語詞彙、學術名詞暨辭書資訊網. 取自https://terms.naer.edu.tw/detail/1315014/
譚凱銘. (2015). 教科書供應下的新壟斷現象. 臺灣教育評論月刊, 4(8), 31-32.
關輝, & 董大海. (2007). 品牌形象對消費者行為傾向影響的實證研究. 中國流通經濟, 21(7), 42-45.
騰訊網. 2022年中國青少年STEAM教育研究報告. 取自https://new.qq.com/omn/20220214/20220214A08KTM00.html
Aaker, D. A. (1996). Building Strong Brands, 1st, New York: The Free Press.
Aaker, D. A., & Keller, K. L. (1990). Consumer evaluations of brand extensions. Journal of marketing, 54(1), 27-41.
American Marketing Association. (1960). Marketing definitions: A glossary of marketing terms. Chicago: American Marketing Association.
Anger, C., Plünnecke, A., & Schüler, R. M. (2018). INSM-Bildungsmonitor 2018. Teilhabe, Wohlstand und Digitalisierung. Studie im Auftrag der Initiative Neue Soziale Marktwirtschaft (INSM), Köln: Institut der deutschen Wirtschaft Köln.
Bauer, Raymond A. (1960), Consumer Behavior as Risk Taking, in Dynamic Marketing for a Changing World, Robert S. Hancock, ed. Chicago: American Marketing Association, 389-398.
Belk, R. W., Bahn, K. D., & Mayer, R. N. (1982). Developmental recognition of consumption symbolism. Journal of consumer research, 9(1), 4-17.
Bennett,P.D. (1988). Dictionary of Marketing Terms, The American Marketing Association , Chicago,IL,p.18.
Biel, A. L. (1992). How brand image drives brand equity. Journal of advertising research, 32(6), RC6-RC12.
Bitner, M. J. (1990). Evaluating service encounters: The effects of physical surroundings and employee responses. Journal of Marketing, Vol.54, pp.69-82.
Corbin, J., &Strauss, A. (1990). Grounded theory research: Procedures, canons, and evaluative criteria. Qualitative Sociology, 13(1).
De Chernatony, L. & McDonald, M. (1992). Creating powerful brands. Oxford, Butterworth-Heinemann.
Demby, D. (1974), Psychographics and from where it comes, In W. D. Wells (Ed.), Life style and psychographics, 71-96, Chicago: American Marketing Association.
Dibb, S. (1997). How marketing planning builds internal networks. Long Range Planning, 30(1), 53-63.
Dobni, D., & Zinkhan, G. M. (1990). In search of brand image: A foundation analysis. ACR North American Advances.
Engel, J. F., Blackwell, R. D., & Miniard, P. W. (1995). Consumer behavior. Fort Worth: Dryden Press.
Engel, J. F., Kollat, D. T., & Blackwell, R. D. (1968). Consumer Behavior Holt. New York: Rinehart and Winston Marketing Series.
Engel, J. F., Kollat, D. T., & Blackwell, R. D. (1973). Consumer behavior 2nd edition.
Engel, J. F., Kollat, D. T., & Blackwell, R. D. (1982). Consumer Behavior, 4th ed. New York: Rinehart and Winston.
Friedmann, R. (1987). Psychological meaning of products and product positioning. Journal of Product Innovation Management.1
Hawkins, D. I., Best, R. J., & Coney, K. A. (2001). Consumer behavior: Building marketing strategy. Boston: Irwin/McGraw Hill.
Hoover, K. H., & Hollingsworth, P. M. (1982). A handbook for elementary school teachers. Allyn & Bacon.
Howard, J. A. (1989). Customer Behavior in Marketing Strategy. Prentice-Hall Inc.
Howard, J.A. and Sheth, J.N. (1969). The Theory of Buyer Behavior. John Wiley, New York, 12-15.
Kamins, M. A., &Marks, L. J. (2017). The Perception of Kosher as a Third Party Certification Claim in Advertising for Familiar and Unfamiliar Brands: Http://Dx.Doi.Org/10.1177/009207039101900303, 19(3), 177–185. https://doi.org/10.1177/009207039101900303
Kapferer, J.-N. (2004). The new strategic brand management : creating and sustaining brand equity long term. 497.
Keller, K. L. (2018). Conceptualizing, Measuring, and Managing Customer-Based Brand Equity: Https://Doi.Org/10.1177/002224299305700101, 57(1), 1–22. https://doi.org/10.1177/002224299305700101
Keller, K. (2001). Building customer-based brand equity : a blueprint for creating strong brands. Marketing Science Institute.
Kotler, P. (1997). Marketing management : analysis, planning, implementation, and control, 9th ed. Prentice Hall International.
Kotler, P. (2012). Marketing management Philip Kotler, Kevin Lane Keller. (14th ed., Global ed., Vol. 1, Issue October 2014). Pearson.
Kotler, P., Bowen, J.T. &Makens, J. C. (1999). Marketing for hospitality and tourism (2. ed.). Prentice Hall.
Kotler, P., Pfoertsch, W., &Michi, I. (2006). B2B brand management. B2B Brand Management, 1–357. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-44729-0
Kretlow, A. G., Wood, C. L., &Cooke, N. L. (2011). Using in-service and coaching to increase kindergarten teachers’ accurate delivery of group instructional units. Journal of Special Education, 44(4), 234–246. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022466909341333
Lavidge, R. J., &Steiner, G. A. (2018). A Model for Predictive Measurements of Advertising Effectiveness: Https://Doi.Org/10.1177/002224296102500611, 25(6), 59–62. https://doi.org/10.1177/002224296102500611
Maeda, J. (2013). STEM + Art = STEAM. STEAM, 1(1), 1–3. https://doi.org/10.5642/STEAM.201301.34
Martineau, P. (1958) The personality of the retail store, Harvard Business Review, 36 (1), 47-55
Maurya, U. K., & Mishra, P. (2012). What is a brand? A Perspective on Brand Meaning. European Journal of Business and Management, 4(3), 122-133.
McGuire, W. J. (1969). The Nature of Attitudes and Attitude Change. In G. Lindzey & E. Aronson (Eds.), The Handbook of Social Psychology (2nd Ed., Vol. 3, pp. 136-314). Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley
Moriarty, S., & Franzen, G. (2008). The science and art of branding. ME Sharpe Incorporated.
National Education Policy 2020. (NEP2020), Ministry of Human Resource. Development .Government of India. Retrieved from https://www.education.gov.in/sites/upload_files/mhrd/files/NEP_Final_English_0.pdf
National Science Board. (1986). Undergraduate Science,Mathematics and Engineering Education. Retrieved from https://www.nsf.gov/nsb/publications/1986/nsb0386.pdf

National Science Foundation. (1996). Strategies for revitalizing undergraduate education. Retrieved from https://www.nsf.gov/publications/pub_summ.jsp?ods_key=nsf9873
Nicosia, F. (1966). Consumer decision processes : marketing and advertising implications. Prentice-Hall.
Park, C. S., &Srinivasan, V. (1994). A Survey-Based Method for Measuring and Understanding Brand Equity and Its Extendibility. Journal of Marketing Research, 31(2), 271–288. https://doi.org/10.1177/002224379403100210
Park, C. W., Jaworski, B. J., &MacInnis, D. J. (1986). Strategic Brand Concept-Image Management. Journal of Marketing, 50(4), 135–145. https://doi.org/10.1177/002224298605000401
Perignat, E., &Jen Katz-Buonincontro. (2019). STEAM in practice and research: An integrative literature review. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 31. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2018.10.002
Pettis, C. (1997). Challenge: Try branding unix. Marketing Computers, 17(4), 68-70.
Pitcher, A. E. (1985). The role of branding in international advertising. International Journal of Advertising, 4(3), 241-246. https://doi.org/10.1080/02650487.1985.11105067
Richardson, P. S., Dick, A. S., & Jain, A. K. (1994). Extrinsic and intrinsic cue effects on perceptions of store brand quality. Journal of marketing, 58(4), 28-36. https://doi.org/10.1177/002224299405800403
Runyon D W., K. E. and S. (1987). Consumer behavior and the practice of marketing. Merrill Pub. Co.
Sanders, M. (2008). STEM, STEM Education, STEMmania. Technology Teacher.
Schiffman, L. G., & Kanuk, L. L. (2000). Consumer behavior, 7th. NY: Prentice Hall, 15-36.
Schiffman, L. G., & Kanuk, L. L. (1991). Communication and consumer behavior. Consumer Behavior, 2, 268-306.
Sheth, J. N., Newman, B. I., & Gross, B. L. (1991). Why we buy what we buy: A theory of consumption values. Journal of business research, 22(2), 159-170.
Sowell, E. J. (1989). Effects of Manipulative Materials in Mathematics Instruction. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 20(5), 498-505. https://doi.org/10.2307/749423
Tanenbaum, C., Gray, T., Lee, K., Williams, M., & Upton, R. (2016). STEM 2026: A vision for innovation in STEM education. US Department of Education, Washington, DC.
Tu, Y.-T., Wang, C.-M., &Chang, H.-C. (2012). Corporate Brand Image and Customer Satisfaction on Loyalty: An Empirical Study of Starbucks Coffee in Taiwan. Journal of Social and Development Sciences, 3(1), 24–32. https://doi.org/10.22610/JSDS.V3I1.682
Williams, T. G. (1982). Consumer behavior : fundamentals & strategies. West Publishing Company.
Yakman, G. (2010). What is the point of STE@ M?–A Brief Overview. Steam: A Framework for Teaching Across the Disciplines. STEAM Education, 7.
電子全文 Fulltext
本電子全文僅授權使用者為學術研究之目的,進行個人非營利性質之檢索、閱讀、列印。請遵守中華民國著作權法之相關規定,切勿任意重製、散佈、改作、轉貼、播送,以免觸法。
論文使用權限 Thesis access permission:校內校外完全公開 unrestricted
開放時間 Available:
校內 Campus: 已公開 available
校外 Off-campus: 已公開 available


紙本論文 Printed copies
紙本論文的公開資訊在102學年度以後相對較為完整。如果需要查詢101學年度以前的紙本論文公開資訊,請聯繫圖資處紙本論文服務櫃台。如有不便之處敬請見諒。
開放時間 available 已公開 available

QR Code