論文使用權限 Thesis access permission:自定論文開放時間 user define
開放時間 Available:
校內 Campus:開放下載的時間 available 2027-08-01
校外 Off-campus:開放下載的時間 available 2027-08-01
論文名稱 Title |
外送平台訂閱制對消費者選擇及平台利潤的影響 The impact of delivery platform subscription system on consumer choice and platform profits |
||
系所名稱 Department |
|||
畢業學年期 Year, semester |
語文別 Language |
||
學位類別 Degree |
頁數 Number of pages |
59 |
|
研究生 Author |
|||
指導教授 Advisor |
|||
召集委員 Convenor |
|||
口試委員 Advisory Committee |
|||
口試日期 Date of Exam |
2024-06-24 |
繳交日期 Date of Submission |
2024-08-01 |
關鍵字 Keywords |
訂閱制、沉默成本、第三需求理論、心理帳戶、賽局理論 Subscribe, Sunk Cost, Alchian–Allen theorem, Mental Accounts, Game Theory |
||
統計 Statistics |
本論文已被瀏覽 91 次,被下載 0 次 The thesis/dissertation has been browsed 91 times, has been downloaded 0 times. |
中文摘要 |
隨著數位經濟的迅速發展,訂閱制逐漸成為各大外送、購物和影音服務等平台的重要營運模式。本研究旨在探討在一個獨佔市場中,僅有高價和低價兩家廠商時,消費者訂閱行為對平台利潤的影響。 考慮消費者將運費及產品費用視為同一心理帳戶,並將其區分為經濟人(理性消費者)和自然人(非理性消費者),根據第三需求理論和沉默成本,分析訂閱前後的購買行為變化。我們認為訂閱前,多數使用者會認為運費較高傾向選擇高價產品,但使用者通常會購買運費較低的低價產品。訂閱後,自然人的消費頻率增加,特別是在無低消門檻的情況下,更傾向選擇低價產品,相反,在有低消門檻的情況下,會傾向選擇過低消門檻的高價產品,因此平台總利潤得以提高。 為了驗證我們的猜想,實際對10位訂閱者進行訪談,並建立數學模型。研究結果顯示,訂閱制能夠有效提高平台的利潤,為平台業者制定策略提供參考。 |
Abstract |
With the rapid development of the digital economy, subscription models have increasingly become a crucial business strategy for major platforms, including delivery, shopping, and streaming services. This study aims to analyze how consumer subscription behavior affects platform profits in a monopolistic market with only two vendors: a high-priced vendor and a low-priced vendor. Based on the third laws of demand, considered consumers' perception of shipping fees and product costs within the same mental account. We categorize consumers into rational and irrational types. According to the third demand theory, irrational consumers alter their purchasing decisions. Analyzing changes in purchasing behavior before and after subscription, we hypothesize that before subscribing, most users tend to opt for higher-priced products due to the perceived higher shipping costs, while they typically purchase lower-priced products with lower shipping fees. After subscribing, the sunk cost of the membership fee will increase purchase frequency but lead consumers to choose lower-priced products. Without a minimum spending threshold, consumers will select very low-priced products. In contrast, with a minimum threshold, consumers will pick higher-priced products that meet the threshold, resulting in higher platform profits. To validate our hypothesis, we conducted interviews with 10 subscribers and established a mathematical model. The research findings indicate that subscription models can effectively enhance platform profitability, providing valuable insights for platform operators in formulating strategies. |
目次 Table of Contents |
論文審定書 ……………………………………………………………… i 致謝 ……………………………………………………………………… ii 中文摘要 …………………………………………………………………iii 英文摘要 …………………………………………………………………iv 目錄 ……………………………………………………………………… v 圖目錄 .…………………………………………………………………. vii 表目錄 …………………………………………………………………. viii 第壹章 緒論 ………………………………………………… 1 第一節 研究背景 ………………………………………………… 1 第二節 研究動機 ………………………………………………… 2 第一節 研究目的 ………………………………………………… 2 第四節 研究設計與流程 ………………………………………… 3 第貳章 文獻回顧 ……………………………………………… 5 第一節 第三需求理論 …………………………………………… 5 第二節 沉默成本 ………………………………………………… 6 第三節 心理帳戶 ………………………………………………… 7 第四節 賽局理論 ………………………………………………… 9 第五節 理性vs.不理性的消費者 ………………………………. 10 第六節 外送平台 ……………………………………………….. 12 第七節 訂閱制 ………………………………………………….. 13 第參章 研究方法 ……………………………………………… 15 第一節 訪談大綱 ………………………………………….…… 15 第二節 賽局模型 ………………………………………….…… 16 第三節 賽局設定 ………………………………………….…… 17 第肆章 研究結果 ………………………………………………. 21 第一節 訪談分析 ………………………………………….…… 21 第二節 訪談結果 ………………………………………………. 22 第三節 模型討論 ………………………………………………. 23 第四節 策略討論 ………………………………………………. 32 第伍章 討論與建議 …………………………………………… 33 第一節 研究結論 ………………………………………………. 33 第二節 研究限制與未來建議 …………………………………. 34 參考文獻………………………………………………………… 36 附錄……………………………………………………………… 41 |
參考文獻 References |
1. Alchian, Armen. A. and Allen, William. R. (1964) University Economics, Belmont, Calif.: Wadsworth Publishing Co. 2. Alchian, A. A., & Allen, W. R. (1972). University economics: Elements of inquiry. 3. Arkes, H. R., & Blumer, C. (1985). The psychology of sunk cost. Organizational behavior and human decision processes, 35(1), 124-140. 4. Ariely, D., & Jones, S. (2008). Predictably irrational (p. 20). New York: HarperCollins. 5. Axelrod, J., & Reisine, T. D. (1984). Stress hormones: their interaction and regulation. Science, 224(4648), 452-459. 6. Brown, M. T., Rascher, D. A., McEvoy, C. D., & Nagel, M. (2006). Treatment of travel expenses by golf course patrons: Sunk or bundled costs and the first and third laws of demand. Available at SSRN 1690896. 7. Binmore, K. G. (2007). Playing for real: a text on game theory. Oxford university press. 8. Chen, H. S., Liang, C. H., Liao, S. Y., & Kuo, H. Y. (2020). Consumer attitudes and purchase intentions toward food delivery platform services. Sustainability, 12(23), 10177. 9. Cunha, Jr, M., & Caldieraro, F. (2009). Sunk‐cost effects on purely behavioral investments. Cognitive science, 33(1), 105-113. 10. Dodds, W. B., Monroe, K. B., & Grewal, D. (1991). Effects of price, brand, and store information on buyers’ product evaluations. Journal of marketing research, 28(3), 307-319. 11. Erat, S., & Bhaskaran, S. R. (2012). Consumer mental accounts and implications to selling base products and add-ons. Marketing Science, 31(5), 801-818. 12. Fudenberg, D., & Tirole, J. (1991). Game theory. MIT press. 13. Guo, F., & Liu, Y. (2023). The effectiveness of membership-based free shipping: An empirical investigation of consumers’ purchase behaviors and revenue contribution. Journal of Marketing, 87(6), 869-888. 14. Iyengar, R., Park, Y. H., & Yu, Q. (2022). The impact of subscription programs on customer purchases. Journal of Marketing Research, 59(6), 1101-1119. 15. Jun, K., Yoon, B., Lee, S., & Lee, D. S. (2021). Factors influencing customer decisions to use online food delivery service during the COVID-19 pandemic. Foods, 11(1), 64. 16. Johnson, M. D., Herrmann, A., & Bauer, H. H. (1999). The effects of price bundling on consumer evaluations of product offerings. International Journal of research in marketing, 16(2), 129-142. 17. Kahneman, D., & Tversky, A. (1979). Prospect Theory: An Analysis of Decision under Risk. Econometrica, 47(2), 263-292. 18. Kahneman, D. (2003). Maps of bounded rationality: Psychology for behavioral economics. American economic review, 93(5), 1449-1475. 19. Kim, Y. J., & Kim, B. Y. (2020). The purchase motivations and continuous use intention of online subscription services. International Journal of Management, 11(11). 20. Kreps, D. M. (1990). Corporate culture and economic theory. Perspectives on positive political economy, 90(109-110), 8. 21. Li, Z., Zhao, X., & Ou, G. (2023). Understanding customer satisfaction in curated subscription services: Moderating roles of subscription time and information disclosure. Information & Management, 60(6), 103834. 22. Li, S., Luo, Q., Qiu, L., & Bandyopadhyay, S. (2020). Optimal pricing model of digital music: subscription, ownership or mixed?. Production and Operations Management, 29(3), 688-704. 23. Li, X., Balasubramanian, H., Chen, Y., & Pang, C. (2024). Managing conflicting revenue streams from advertisers and subscribers for online platforms. European Journal of Operational Research, 314(1), 241-254. 24. Magalhães, P., & White, K. G. (2014). The effect of a prior investment on choice: the sunk cost effect. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Learning and Cognition, 40(1), 22. 25. Nasır, S. (2017). Customer retention strategies and customer loyalty. In Advertising and branding: concepts, methodologies, tools, and applications (pp. 1178-1201). IGI Global. 26. Nash Jr, J. F. (1950). Equilibrium points in n-person games. Proceedings of the national academy of sciences, 36(1), 48-49. 27. Niu, B., Li, Q., Mu, Z., Chen, L., & Ji, P. (2021). Platform logistics or self-logistics? Restaurants’ cooperation with online food-delivery platform considering profitability and sustainability. International Journal of Production Economics, 234, 108064 28. Phau, I., & Meng Poon, S. (2000). Factors influencing the types of products and services purchased over the Internet. Internet Research, 10(2), 102-113. 29. Rojas, C., & Shi, T. (2011). Tax incidence when quality matters: Evidence from the beer market. Journal of Agricultural & Food Industrial Organization, 9(1). 30. Ratchford, B. T. (1987). New Insights about the FCB grid. Journal of advertising research. 31. Rochet, J. C., & Tirole, J. (2006). Two‐sided markets: a progress report. The RAND journal of economics, 37(3), 645-667. 32. Schröder, P. J., & Sørensen, A. (2009). Tariff Cuts versus Real Trade Cost Reductions when Firms are Heterogeneous. 33. Spulber, D. F. (2019). The economics of markets and platforms. Journal of Economics & Management Strategy, 28(1), 159-172. 34. Simonson, I., & Tversky, A. (1992). Choice in context: Tradeoff contrast and extremeness aversion. Journal of marketing research, 29(3), 281-295. 35. Shefrin, H. M., & Thaler, R. H. (1988). The behavioral life‐cycle hypothesis. Economic inquiry, 26(4), 609-643. 36. Swink, M., Hu, K., & Zhao, X. (2022). Analytics applications, limitations, and opportunities in restaurant supply chains. Production and Operations Management, 31(10), 3710-3726. 37. Thaler, R. H. (1999). Mental accounting matters. Journal of Behavioral decision making, 12(3), 183-206. 38. Thaler, R. (1980). Toward a positive theory of consumer choice. Journal of economic behavior & organization, 1(1), 39-60. 39. Thaler, R. (1985). Mental accounting and consumer choice. Marketing science, 4(3), 199-214. 40. Umbeck, John (1980) “Shipping the Good Apples Out: Some Ambiguities in the Interpretation of ‘Fixed Charge’,” Journal of Political Economy, 88(1), 199-208. 41. Wu, J., Zhao, H., & Chen, H. (2021). Coupons or free shipping? Effects of price promotion strategies on online review ratings. Information Systems Research, 32(2), 633-652. 42. Zhang, X., Iyer, G., Xu, X., & Chong, J. K. (2023). Sunk Cost Effect, Self-control, and Contract Design. Journal of Marketing Research, 00222437231196824. 二、網路資源 1. MIC資策會產業情報研究所(2024).【外送大調查】外送市場邁向M型化71%網友使用、訂閱成長5% 兩大龍頭差距擴大16% 市場經營策略出現定位區隔 2. MIC資策會產業情報研究所(2022).【外送大調查】72%消費者使用過外送服務 18~35歲最愛用31%已訂閱 50%會員平均每次消費300元以上 3. MIC資策會產業情報研究所(2020). 11%臺灣網友疫情期間首度使用美食外送服務 |
電子全文 Fulltext |
本電子全文僅授權使用者為學術研究之目的,進行個人非營利性質之檢索、閱讀、列印。請遵守中華民國著作權法之相關規定,切勿任意重製、散佈、改作、轉貼、播送,以免觸法。 論文使用權限 Thesis access permission:自定論文開放時間 user define 開放時間 Available: 校內 Campus:開放下載的時間 available 2027-08-01 校外 Off-campus:開放下載的時間 available 2027-08-01 您的 IP(校外) 位址是 3.15.239.0 現在時間是 2024-11-21 論文校外開放下載的時間是 2027-08-01 Your IP address is 3.15.239.0 The current date is 2024-11-21 This thesis will be available to you on 2027-08-01. |
紙本論文 Printed copies |
紙本論文的公開資訊在102學年度以後相對較為完整。如果需要查詢101學年度以前的紙本論文公開資訊,請聯繫圖資處紙本論文服務櫃台。如有不便之處敬請見諒。 開放時間 available 2027-08-01 |
QR Code |