本研究建立一個小型開放經濟體的內生成長模型，分析國內外汙染減量技術、金融摩擦與環境政策對經濟成長與環境品質的長期影響。結果顯示，在單一技術下，國際利率上升或貸款成數下降會抑制研發與技術成長，使環境品質惡化；提高貸款成數、定額稅或環境稅則能增加補貼與技術累積，促進環境改善。然而，市場競爭激烈時，補貼提升難以彌補利潤損失，技術成長與環境品質仍易受影響。技術共存下，國外技術可穩定彌補國內技術不足，有助於維持環境品質。環境稅提升能有效減少污染排放並推動技術進步，但定額稅僅能擴大補貼，無法直接抑制排放。綜合而言，結合環境政策與研發補貼，並促進技術多元化，有助於實現技術創新、經濟成長與環境永續發展的政策目標。

This thesis constructs a small open economy endogenous growth model.
The model analyzes the long-term effects of domestic and foreign pollution abatement technologies, financial frictions and environmental policies on economic growth and environmental quality.The results are as follows. Under a single technology, an increase in international interest rates or a decrease in the loan-to-value ratio would inhibit R\&D and technology growth. This effect worsens the quality of the environment. An increase in the loan-to-value ratio and an increase in tax revenues can increase subsidies and technology accumulation. This effect promotes environmental improvement. However, when market competition increases, the increase in subsidies will not compensate for the loss of profits. Technology growth and environmental quality are still affected. With the co-existence of technologies, foreign technologies can make up for the shortcomings of domestic technologies and help maintain the quality of the environment. Environmental taxes can reduce emissions and promote technological progress. However, a lump-sum tax cannot directly curb emissions. In summary, a combination of environmental policy and R\&D subsidies can realize the policy objectives of technological innovation, economic growth and environmental sustainability.

論文審定書. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . i
誌謝. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ii
摘要. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . iii
Abstract . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . iv
目錄. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . v
圖次. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . vii
表次. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .viii
第一章緒論. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .1
1.1 研究背景與動機. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1
1.2 文獻回顧. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .2
1.3 本文架構. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4
第二章基本模型. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5
2.1 家計單位. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5
2.2 最終財廠商. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9
2.3 中間財廠商. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 11
2.4 汙染減量技術R&D 廠商. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 15
2.5 政府部門. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .18
2.6 生態環境系統. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 18
2.7 競爭均衡. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .19
第三章長期均衡. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 22
3.1 均衡成長路徑. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 22
3.2 靜止均衡. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 26
3.2.1 單一技術. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .26
3.2.2 技術共存. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .27
第四章主要結果. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 29
4.1 參數設定與數值結果. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 29
4.2 比較靜態分析. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 31
4.2.1 單一技術. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 31
4.2.2 技術共存. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .34
第五章結論. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .37
參考文獻. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .50
附錄. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 54

Acemoglu, D., Aghion, P., Bursztyn, L. and Hemous, D. (2012). The environment and directed technical change. American Economic Review, 102(1):131–66.
Aghion, P. and Howitt, p. (1992). A model of growth through creative destruction. Econometrica,60(2):323–351.
Beladi, H.,Chen, P-H.,Chu, H.,Hu, M-Y and Lai, C-C. (2021). Environmental taxes and economic growth with multiple growth engines. The B.E. Journal of Macroeconomics, 21(2):629–658.
Bovenberg, A. L. and de Mooji, R. A. (1997). Environmental tax reform and endogenous growth. Journal of Public Economics, 63:207–237.
Bovenberg, A. L. and Smulders, S. (1995). Environmental quality and pollution-augmenting technical change in a two-sector endogenous growth model. Journal of Public Economics, 57:369–391.
Chu, H. and Lai, C-C. (2014). Abatement R&D, market imperfections, and environmental policy in an endogenous growth model.Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, 41:20–37.
Dixit, A. K. and Stiglitz, J. E. (1977). Monopolistic competition and optimum product diversity. American Economic Review, 67:297–308.
Fullerton, D., and Kim, S. R. (2008). Environmental investment and policy with distortionary taxes, and endogenous growth. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 56:141–154.
Itaya, J. (2008). Can environmental taxation stimulate growth? The role of indeterminacy in endogenous models with environmental externalities. Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, 32:1156–1180.
Jones, C. I. (1995). R&D-based models of economic growth. Journal of Political Economy, 103, 759–784.
Kiyotaki, N. and Moore, J. (1997). Credit cycles. Journal of Political Economy, 105(2):211–248.
Lai, C-C.,Chin, C-T. and Chen, K-J. (2017). Oil dependence, international borrowings, and economic instability in a small open economy. Macroeconomic Dynamics, 21(4):889–917.
Männasoo, K.,Meriküll, J. (2020).Credit constraints and R&D over the boom and bust: Firm-level evidence from Central and Eastern Europe. Economic Systems, 44(2):100747.
Nakada, M. (2004). Does environmental policy necessarily discourage growth? Journal of Economics, 81(3):249–275.
Peia, O., and Romelli, D. (2022). Did financial frictions stifle R&D investment in Europe during the great recession? Journal of International Money and Finance, 120:102263.
Romer, P. M. (1990). Endogenous technological change. Journal of Political Economy, 98:S71–S102.
Tahvonen, O. and Kuuluvainen, J. (1991). Optimal growth with renewable resources and pollution. European Economic Review, 35:650–661.
van Ewijk, C. and van Wijnbergen, S. (1995). Can abatement overcome the conflicts between the environment and economic growth? De Economist, 143:197–216.
van Zon, A. and Yetkiner, I. H. (2003). An endogenous growth model with embodied energy-saving technical change. Resource and Energy Economics, 25:81–103.