Responsive image
博碩士論文 etd-0718122-035102 詳細資訊
Title page for etd-0718122-035102
論文名稱
Title
探討企業社會責任與公司治理對股票報酬之影響: 以台灣電子業為例
Exploring the Impact of Corporate Social Responsibility and Corporate Governance on Stock Returns: Evidence of Taiwan’s Electronics Industry
系所名稱
Department
畢業學年期
Year, semester
語文別
Language
學位類別
Degree
頁數
Number of pages
59
研究生
Author
指導教授
Advisor
召集委員
Convenor
口試委員
Advisory Committee
口試日期
Date of Exam
2022-07-14
繳交日期
Date of Submission
2022-08-18
關鍵字
Keywords
企業社會責任、公司治理、獨立董監事、股票報酬、電子產業
corporate social responsibility, corporate governance, independent corporate directors and supervisors, stock returns, electronics industry
統計
Statistics
本論文已被瀏覽 271 次,被下載 252
The thesis/dissertation has been browsed 271 times, has been downloaded 252 times.
中文摘要
本研究目的在探討台灣電子產業在資本市場中,受到企業社會責任與公司治理影響,其與股票報酬之關係。我們以電子菁英30指數成分股來驗證企業社會責任與公司治理對其長短期股票報酬之影響。本論文研究發現,企業規模與企業社會責任呈現高度正相關性;在公司治理方面,獨立董監事比率對短期股票報酬有顯著正相關影響結果;在董事長是否兼任或專任總經理方面,該因素對在長期股票報酬有顯著負相關影響結果。另外在產業影響部分,半導體產業對長期股票報酬有顯著正相關的影響。
Abstract
The purpose of this study is to examine whether the Taiwan electronics industry is affected by corporate social responsibility (CSR) and corporate governance in the capital market. We use the constituent stocks of the Electronics Elite 30 Index to verify the impact of CSR and corporate governance on their short- and long-term stock returns. In this paper, we found that corporate size and CSR have a high positive correlation; In terms of corporate governance, the ratio of independent directors and supervisors has a significant positive effect on short-term stock returns; In terms of whether the chairman is also the general manager, this factor has a significant negative effect on long-term stock returns. In addition, the semiconductor industry has a significant positive impact on long-term stock returns.
目次 Table of Contents
目錄
論文審定書i
誌 謝ii
摘 要iii
Abstractiv
圖次vii
表次viii
第一章 緒論1
第一節 概論企業社會責任1
第二節 研究動機4
第三節 研究目的4
第四節 研究架構與流程5
第二章 文獻回顧6
第一節 企業社會責任6
第二節 公司治理9
第三節 社會責任、公司治理與股票報酬11
第三章 研究方法13
第一節 變數之解釋13
第二節 定義方法14
第三節 樣本選取16
第四章 實證分析20
第一節 企業社會責任與股票報酬敘述性統計20
第二節 公司治理部分與股票報酬26
第三節 企業社會責任、公司治理與股票報酬與股票報酬26
第四節 公司治理部分與股票報酬27
第五章 結論與建議31
第一節 研究結論31
第二節 建議31
參考文獻33
附錄37
附錄表1 企業社會責任SIZE企業規模37
附錄表2 企業社會責任MG產業屬別(以次產業區分)39
附錄表3 公司治理結構董事長兼任總經理MS42
附錄表4 公司治理部分前十大股東持股BSH44
附錄表5 公司治理結構獨立董事比例MS47
附錄表6 指數成分股之次產業名稱及其權值比重50


參考文獻 References
1. 池祥麟、林怡君 (2007),「企業社會績效與企業財務績效關聯性之分析—以道瓊 STOXX 永續性指數為例」《企業倫理和公司治理國際研討會》,台灣台北。
2. 池祥麟、陳庭萱 (2007),「盈餘操縱、盈餘資訊內涵與企業社會責任—銀行業全球實證研究」,《證券市場發展季刊》,第19 卷第1 期,91-132。
3. 邱其彬、李秀華 (2014) ,海峽兩岸體育研究學報第8卷第1期2014年期3月Vol8 No1 Mar 2014。
4. 邱慈觀、黃啟瑞 (2019),「治理結構對企業社會責任的影響」《中山管理評論第二十七卷第三期p.511-550 2019年九月號》DOI:10.6160/SYSMR.201909_27(3).0002,ISSN 1023-2842。
5. 亞洲貨幣雜誌(2020),「2020亞洲銀行業女力調查報告」(2020, 十月份亞洲貨幣雜誌網站) 。
6. 沈中華、張元 (2008),「企業社會責任的行為可以改善財務績效嗎?以英國FTSE 社會責任指數為例」,《經濟論文》,第36 卷第3 期,339-385。
7. 教育部全球資訊網站(2021) 。
8. 董志明、許淑燕、黃戊田 (2015) ,SPA經營管理關鍵成功因素之研究,美容科技學刊第十二卷第二期12-2-04,V12-2-04 Dec 2015。
9. 彭劍鋒、朱寧寧 (2011),「HSBC 匯豐—環球金融與地方智慧」,上奇資訊。
10. 高惠松、鄭品卉 (2012),「集團企業特性、公司治理與社會責任績效」,中華管理評論國際學報,第15 卷第3 期,1-34。
11. 遠見雜誌 (2007),「歷年CSR 調查分析,企業社會責任漸成獲利指標」,第251期。
12. 黃瓊瑤、王癸元、張鳳真 (2013),「企業社會責任事件宣告與股價異常報酬之研究」,《當代會計》,第14 卷第2 期,175-204。
13. 劉美纓、丁碧慧、朱奐聿 (2014),「企業社會責任與公司治理、公司績效之關聯性研究」,《第17 屆科際整合管理研討會》,17-30。
14. 葛俊佑 (2015) ,企業社會責任表現變動與股價報酬關聯之實證研究,國立台灣大學管理學院會計研究所博士論文。
15. 葉馨蓮 (2017) ,月營收資訊內涵、投資人情緒與股價報酬之探討,國立中山大學財務管理學系碩士論文。
16. 蘇寄萍 (2003) ,桃園區農業改良研究彙報(52),2003,出版日期2003/03,53-67。
17. 顏暄祐 (2019) ,網路口碑對消費性企業績效之影響:大數據之應用,國立中山大學經濟研究所碩士在職專班碩士論文。
18. Adams, C. A., W. Y. Hill, and C. B. Roberts (1998), “Corporate Social ReportingPractices in Western Europe: Legitimating Corporate Behavior?,” British Accounting Review, Vol.30, No.1, 1-21.
19. Allen, F., Bernardo, A., and Welch, I., 2000, “A Theory of Dividends Based on Tax Clientele,” Journal of Finance, Vol. 55, No. 6, 2499-2536.
20. Anderson, J. C. and A. W. Frankle (1989), “Voluntary Social Reporting: An Iso-beta Portfolio Analysis,” Accounting Review, Vol. 55, pp.467-479.
21. Barnea, A. and Rubin, A., 2010, “Corporate Social Responsibility as a Conflict between Shareholders,” Journal of Business Ethics, Vol. 97, No. 1, 71-86.
22. Bowen, H. R. (1953), “Social Responsibility of the Businessman,” New York:Harper and Row.
23. Brammer, S., and A. Millington (2008), “Does It Pay to be Different? An Analysis of the Relationship between Corporate Social and Financial Performance,” Strategic Management Journal, Vol.29, No.12, 1325-1343.
24. Carroll A. B, (1979), “A Three-Dimensional Conceptual Model of Corporate Social Performance,” Academy of Management Review, Vol.4, No.4, 497-506.
25. Cardebat, J. M., and N. Sirven (2010), “What Corporate Social Responsibility Reporting Adds to Financial Return?,” Journal of Economics and International Finance, Vol.2, No.2, 20-27.
26. Chen, C. Y. Roger, Tang, H. W., and Hung, S. W., 2013, “Corporate Social Responsibility and Firm Performance,” Journal of American Business Review, Cambridge, Vol. 2, No. 1, 181-188.
27. Cheung, Y. L., K. Jiang, B. S. C. Mak, and W. Tan (2013), “Corporate SocialPerformance, Firm Valuation, and Industrial Difference: Evidence from Hong Kong,” Journal of business ethics, Vol.114, No.4, 625-631.
28. Consolandi, C., A. Jaiswal-Dale, E. Poggiani, and A. Vercelli (2008), “Global Standards and Ethical Stock Indexes: The Case of the Dow Jones Sustainability Stoxx Index,” Journal of Business Ethics, Vol.87, No.1,185-197.
29. Davis, K. (1973), “The Case For and Against Business Assumption of Social Responsibility,” Academy of Management Journal, Vol. 16, pp.312-322.
30. Demsetz, H. and Lehn, K., 1985, “The Structure of Corporate Ownership: Causes and Consequences,” Journal of Political Economy, Vol. 93, No. 6, 1155-1177.
31. Elyasiani, E. and Jia, J., 2010, “Distribution of Institutional Ownership and Corporate Firm Performance,” Journal of Banking and Finance, Vol. 34, No. 3, 606-620.
32. Fama, E. and Jensen, M., 1983, “Agency Problems and Residual Claims,” Journal of Law and Economics, Vol. 26, No. 2, 327-349.
33. Fauzi, H., Mahoney, L., and Rahman, A. A., 2007, “Institutional Ownership and Corporate Social Performance: Empirical Evidence from Indonesian Companies,” Social and Environmental Accounting, Vol. 1, No. 2, 334-347.
34. Flammer, C. (2013), “Corporate Social Responsibility and Shareholder Reaction:the Environmental Awareness of Investors,” Academy of Management Journal, Vol.56, No.3, 758-781.
35. Frooman, J. (1997), “Socially Irresponsible and Illegal Behavior and Shareholder Wealth,” Business and Society, Vol. 36, pp.221-249.
36. Godfrey, P. C., C. B. Merrill, and J. M. Hansen (2009), “The Relationship between Corporate Social Responsibility and Shareholder Value: An Empirical Test of the Risk Management Hypothesis,” Strategic Management Journal, Vol.30, No. 4, 425-445.
37. Goel, A. and Thakor, A., 2008, “Overconfidence, CEO Selection, and Corporate Governance,” Journal of Finance, Vol. 63, No. 6, 2737-2784.
38. Glaser, M. and Müller, S., 2010, “Is the Diversification Discount Caused by the Book Value Bias of Debt?” Journal of Banking and Finance, Vol. 34, No. 10, 2307-2317.
39. Kim, Y., H. Li, and S. Li (2014), “Corporate Social Responsibility and Stock Price Crash Risk,” Journal of Banking and Finance, Vol.43, 1-13.
40. Malmendier, U. and Tate, G., 2005, “CEO Overconfidence and Corporate Investment,” Journal of Finance, Vol. 60, No. 6, 2661-2700.
41. McWilliams, A. and D. Siegel, (2000), “Corporate Social Responsibility and Financial Performance: Correlation or Misspecification?,” Strategic Management Journal, Vol.21, No.5, 603-609.
42. Nelling, E., and E. Webb (2009), “Corporate Social Responsibility and Financial Performance: the “Virtuous Circle” Revisited,” Review of Quantitative Finance and Accounting, Vol.32, No.2, 197-209.
43. Nuryaman, (2013), “The Effect Corporate Social Responsibility Activities on Profitability and Stock Price,” Journal of Global Management, Vol.6, No. 1,113-123.
44. Porter, M. E., and M. R. Kramer (2002), “The Competitive Advantage of Corporate Philanthropy,” Harvard business review, Vol.80, No.12, 56-68.
45. Preston, L. E. and O'Bannon, D. P., 1997, “The Corporate Social-Financial Performance Relationship: A Typology and Analysis,” Business and Society, Vol. 36, No. 1, 419- 429.
46. Scholtens, B. (2009), “Corporate Social Responsibility in the International Banking Industry,” Journal of Business Ethics, Vol.86, No.2, 159-175.
47. Schuler, D. A. and Cording, M., 2006, “A Corporate Social Performance-Corporate Financial Performance Behavioral Model for Consumers,” Academy of Management Review, Vol. 31, No. 3, 540-558
48. Shank, T., D. Manullang, and R. Hill (2005), “Doing Well while Doing Good” Revisited: A Study of Socially Responsible Firms' Short-term versus Long-term Performance,” Managerial Finance, Vol.31, No.8, 33-46.
49. Shen, C. H., and H. L. Chih (2005), “Investor Protection, Prospect Theory, and Earnings Management: An International Comparison of the Banking Industry,” Journal of Banking and Finance, Vol.29, No.10, 2675-2697.
50. Statman, M, (2000), “Socially Responsible Mutual Funds,” Financial Analysts Journal, Vol.56, No.3, 30-39.
51. Tsoutsoura, M. (2004), “Corporate Social Responsibility and Financial Performance,” Center for Responsible Business.
52. Wu, M. W., and C. H. Shen (2013), “Corporate Social Responsibility in the Banking Industry: Motives and Financial Performance,” Journal of Bankingand Finance, Vol.37, No.9, 3529-3547.
53. Yan, X. S., and Z. Zhang (2009), “Institutional Investors and Equity Returns: Are Short-term Institutions Better Informed?” Review of financial Studies,Vol.22, No.2, 893-924.
電子全文 Fulltext
本電子全文僅授權使用者為學術研究之目的,進行個人非營利性質之檢索、閱讀、列印。請遵守中華民國著作權法之相關規定,切勿任意重製、散佈、改作、轉貼、播送,以免觸法。
論文使用權限 Thesis access permission:校內校外完全公開 unrestricted
開放時間 Available:
校內 Campus: 已公開 available
校外 Off-campus: 已公開 available


紙本論文 Printed copies
紙本論文的公開資訊在102學年度以後相對較為完整。如果需要查詢101學年度以前的紙本論文公開資訊,請聯繫圖資處紙本論文服務櫃台。如有不便之處敬請見諒。
開放時間 available 已公開 available

QR Code