這篇論文探討了社會資本下的政府信任與社會運動參與關係。研究採用實驗法，通過操縱政府信任程度來觀察其對社會運動參與意願的影響，希望可以補充台灣社會資本與社會運動參與研究的文獻缺口。研究發現，單純的情境操縱對社會運動參與的影響有限，而社會資本，尤其是工會和休閒活動參與，對社會運動參與有顯著正面影響。政治興趣也對社會運動參與表現出正面影響。研究還發現不同政黨支持者的社會運動參與傾向存在差異。然而，人口統計變數和兩岸關係態度對社會運動參與的影響不顯著。這些結果強調了影響社會運動參與的因素的多元性和複雜性，不僅包括社會資本和政治態度，還涉及個人的價值觀和經歷。

This paper examines the relationship between government trust and participation in social movements within the context of social capital. The study employs an experimental method, manipulating levels of government trust to observe its effect on willingness to participate in social movements. It aims to address a gap in the literature on social capital and social movement participation in Taiwan. The research finds that situational manipulation alone has limited impact on participation in social movements. However, social capital, particularly involvement in unions and leisure activities, shows a significant positive influence on social movement participation. Political interest also demonstrates a positive effect on engagement in social movements. The study further reveals differences in social movement participation tendencies among supporters of different political parties. However, demographic variables and attitudes towards cross-strait relations do not significantly affect social movement participation. These results emphasize the diversity and complexity of factors influencing participation in social movements, encompassing not only social capital and political attitudes but also individual values and experiences.

目錄
摘要 ii
Abstract iii
目錄 iv
第一章、緒論 1
第一節、研究動機與目的 1
第二節、研究問題 2
第二章、文獻回顧與研究假設 3
第一節、社會運動定義及社會運動參與要素 3
第二節、社會資本與信任 8
第三節、社會資本與社會運動 15
第三章、研究方法 18
第一節、研究架構 18
第二節、資料收集 20
第三節、變數及問卷說明 22
第四章、實證分析 28
第一節、情境組與對照組T檢定結果 28
第二節、降低政府信任對於受測者的影響（Model 1） 29
第三節、社會活動參與以及社會運動參與關係（Model 2） 29
第四節、納入政治因素（Model 3） 30
第五節、納入人口變數及兩岸關係（Model 4） 31
第五章、結果與討論 34
第一節、政府信任對社會運動參與的影響 34
第二節、其餘社會資本對社會運動參與的影響 35
第三節、政治效能感對社會運動參與的影響 35
第四節、不同社會階層與政治參與 36
第五節、未來研究與研究限制 36
參考文獻 38
附錄 43

表 一、人口學變數描述統計 21
表 二、主要分析變數描述統計 24
表 三、問卷對照表 25
表 四、T檢定對照表 29

中文文獻:
林南（2007）。社會資本理論與研究簡介。社會科學論叢，1(1)，1-32。https://doi.org/10.30401/RSS.200704_1(1).0001
吳乃德（2002）。認同衝突和政治信任：現階段台灣族群政治的核心難題。台灣社會學，(4)，75-118。https://doi.org/10.6676/TS.2002.4.75
吳重禮、湯京平、黃紀（1999）。我國「政治功效意識」測量之初探。選舉研究，6(2)，23-44。https://doi.org/10.6612/tjes.1999.06.02.23-44
陳婉琪、張恒豪、黃樹仁（2016）。網絡社會運動時代的來臨？太陽花運動參與者的人際連帶與社群媒體因素初探。人文及社會科學集刊，28(4)，467-501。
陳陸輝（2002）。政治信任感與台灣地區選民投票行為。選舉研究，9(2)，65-84。https://doi.org/10.6612/tjes.2002.09.02.65-84
陳陸輝（2006）。政治信任的政治後果―以2004年立法委員選舉為例。臺灣民主季刊，3(2)，39-61。https://doi.org/10.6448/TDQ.200606.0039
陳陸輝、陳映男（2012）。寧信地方，不信中央：政治信任的類型及其政治後果。社會科學論叢，6(1)，15-57。https://doi.org/10.30401/RSS.201204_6(1).0002
黃紀（2024）。因果推論在政治學中之發展與應用：以調查實驗為例。中國統計學報，Forthcoming.
熊瑞梅（2020）。社會資本與信任：東亞社會資本調查的反思。臺灣社會學刊，54，1-30。https://dx.doi.org/10.6786/TJS.201406_(54).0001
鄭夙芬、陳陸輝、劉嘉薇（2008）。選舉事件與政治信任：以2004年總統選舉為例。問題與研究，47(3)，29-50。https://doi.org/10.30390/ISC.200809_47(3).0002
英文文獻:
Brehm, J., & Rahn, W. (1997). Individual-Level Evidence for the Causes and Consequences of Social Capital. American Journal of Political Science, 41(3), 999–1023. https://doi.org/10.2307/2111684
Christopher J. Paul, Erika S. Weinthal, Marc F. Bellemare, Marc A. Jeuland. (2016). Social capital, trust, and adaptation to climate change: Evidence from rural Ethiopia. Global Environmental Change, 36, 124-138. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2015.12.003
de Zúñiga, H. G. (2012). Social media use for news and individuals' social capital, civic engagement, and political participation. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 17(3), 319–336. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1083-6101.2012.01574.x
Della Porta, D. (2000). Social Capital, Beliefs in Government, and Political Corruption. In S. J. Pharr, & R. D. Putnam (Eds.), Disaffected Democracies: What's Troubling the Trilateral Countries? (pp. 202-27). Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Diani, M. (1992). The Concept of Social Movement. The Sociological Review, 40(1), 1-25. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-954X.1992.tb02943.x
Diani, M. (1997). Social Movements and Social Capital: A Network Perspective on Movement Outcomes.
Escobar, A. (1992). Imagining a Post-Development Era? Critical Thought, Development and Social Movements. Social Text, (31/32), 20. https://doi.org/10.2307/466217
Evans, P. (1996). Government action, social capital and development: Reviewing the evidence on synergy. World Development, 24(6), 1119-1132. https://doi.org/10.1016/0305-750X(96)00021-6
Fennema, M., & Tillie, J. (1999). Political participation and political trust in Amsterdam: Civic communities and ethnic networks. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, 25(4), 703–726. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369183X.1999.9976711
Fukuyama, F. (2000). Social Capital and Civil Society. IMF Working Paper, WP/00/74.
Fukuyama, F. (2001). Social capital, civil society and development. Third World Quarterly, 22(1), 7–20. https://doi.org/10.1080/713701144
Hooghe, M., & Marien, S. (2012). A comparative analysis of the relation between political trust and forms of political participation in Europe. European Societies, 15(1), 131–152. https://doi.org/10.1080/14616696.2012.692807
Hwang, H. and Kim, K.-O. (2015). Social media as a tool for social movements: the effect of social media use and social capital on intention to participate in social movements. International Journal of Consumer Studies, 39, 478-488. https://doi.org/10.1111/ijcs.12221
Jenkins, J. C., & Perrow, C. (1977). Insurgency of the Powerless: Farm Worker Movements (1946-1972). American Sociological Review, 42(2), 249. https://doi.org/10.2307/2094604
Kaase, M. (1999). Interpersonal trust, political trust and non‐institutionalised political participation in Western Europe. West European Politics, 22(3), 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1080/01402389908425313
Keele, L. (2007). Social Capital and the Dynamics of Trust in Government. American Journal of Political Science, 51(2), 241–254. http://www.jstor.org/stable/4620063
Klandermans, B. (1984). Mobilization and participation: Social-psychological expansions of resource mobilization theory. American Sociological Review, 49(5), 583–600. https://doi.org/10.2307/2095417
Klandermans, B., & Oegema, D. (1987). Potentials, networks, motivations, and barriers: Steps towards participation in social movements. American Sociological Review, 52(4), 519–531. https://doi.org/10.2307/2095297
Lake, R. L. D., & Huckfeldt, R. (1998). Social capital, social networks, and political participation. Political Psychology, 19(3), 567–584. https://doi.org/10.1111/0162-895X.00118
Levi, M. and Stoker, L. (2000). Political Trust and Trustworthiness. Annual Review of Political Science, 3, 475-507. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.polisci.3.1.475
Li, Y., Pickles, A., & Savage, M. (2005). Social Capital and Social Trust in Britain. European Sociological Review, 21(2), 109–123. https://doi.org/10.1093/esr/jci007
Lin, N. (2005). A Network Theory of Social Capital. In D. Castiglione, J. van Deth, & G. Wolleb (Eds.), Handbook on Social Capital. Oxford University Press.
Newton, K. (2001). Trust, Social Capital, Civil Society, and Democracy. International Political Science Review, 22(2), 201–214. http://www.jstor.org/stable/1601186
Opp, K. (1988). Grievances and Participation in Social Movements. American Sociological Review, 53(6), 853. https://doi.org/10.2307/2095895
Paldam, M. (2000). Social Capital: One or Many? Definition and Measurement. Journal of Economic Surveys, 14, 629-653. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-6419.00127
Paul, C. J., Weinthal, E. S., Bellemare, M. F., & Jeuland, M. A. (2016). Social capital, trust, and adaptation to climate change: Evidence from rural Ethiopia. Global Environmental Change, 36, 124-138. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2015.12.003
Putnam, R.D. (1993). What makes democracy work?. National Civic Review, 82, 101-107. https://doi.org/10.1002/ncr.4100820204
Putnam, R.D. (1995). Bowling Alone: America's Declining Social Capital. Journal of Democracy, 6(1), 65-78. https://doi.org/10.1353/jod.1995.0002
Putnam, R. D. (2001). Social Capital: Measurement and Consequences. Isuma: Canadian Journal of Policy Research, 2, 41-51.
Rahn, W. M., & Transue, J. E. (1998). Social trust and value change: The decline of social capital in American youth, 1976–1995. Political Psychology, 19(3), 545–565. https://doi.org/10.1111/0162-895X.00117
Rothstein, B., & Stolle, D. (2008). The State and Social Capital: An Institutional Theory of Generalized Trust. Comparative Politics, 40, 441-459. https://doi.org/10.5129/001041508X12911362383354
Seligson, M. A. (1980). Trust, Efficacy and Modes of Political Participation: A Study of Costa Rican Peasants. British Journal of Political Science, 10(1), 75–98. http://www.jstor.org/stable/193449
Snow, D. A., Rochford, E. B., Worden, S. K., & Benford, R. D. (1986). Frame Alignment Processes, Micromobilization, and Movement Participation. American Sociological Review, 51(4), 464–481. https://doi.org/10.2307/2095581
Stern, P. C., Dietz, T., Abel, T. D., Guagnano, G., & Kalof, L. (1999). A Value-Belief-Norm Theory of Support for Social Movements: The Case of Environmentalism. College of the Environment on the Peninsulas Publications, 1. https://cedar.wwu.edu/hcop_facpubs/1
Taylor, V.A. (1989). Social Movement Continuity: The Women's Movement in Abeyance. American Sociological Review, 54, 761.