本研究透過文獻分析整理了臺灣學者在TSSCI、非(T)SSCI、SSCI期刊及國科會計畫中有關STE(A)M教育的相關論文。旨在通過初步分析研究目的、對象和工具，深入了解臺灣STEM與STEAM教育研究的現況。並進一步探討期刊論文和國科會計畫的研究差異與整合趨勢，以提供對臺灣STEAM課程、教學及相關研究的全面視角。研究結果可供政府、學校、教師及STEAM計畫擬定者參考，促進STEAM教育在課程發展及人才培育上的進一步發展，也為未來相關研究提供指引。研究顯示，TSSCI（19篇）、SSCI（99篇）、非(T)SSCI（132篇）和國科會計畫（457份）中的STEAM研究逐年增加，從2006年至2023年，顯示出該領域的持續關注。初期TSSCI論文多聚焦於STEM，後來STEAM與STEM的研究逐漸持平。SSCI期刊仍以STEM研究為主。非(T)SSCI論文中，STEAM研究自2020年起顯著增加。國科會計畫中，STEAM計畫自2017年起超過STEM。研究多集中於科學與科技領域，而STEAM研究則包含科技、藝術、創造力等多元主題，跨學科性常被提及。研究對象主要集中於國小高年級至大學生，目的多元，涵蓋學生學習、教師教學、內容分析等。實驗研究法廣泛應用，使用可量化工具，提升了研究的可信度和比較性。

This study offers a thorough analysis of Taiwanese scholars' contributions to STEM and STEAM education research. By examining papers published in TSSCI, non-(T)SSCI, SSCI journals, and reports from NSC projects, the research highlights the evolving landscape of STEM and STEAM education in Taiwan from 2006 to 2023.
Key Findings:
1. Increasing Trend in STEAM Studies: There has been a steady rise in research output, with a total of 19 papers in TSSCI, 99 in SSCI, 132 in non-(T)SSCI journals, and 457 reports from NSC projects.
2. Shift in Research Focus:
TSSCI Journals: Initially focused more on STEM but have become more balanced between STEM and STEAM.
SSCI Journals: Predominantly STEM-oriented.
Non-TSSCI Journals: Significant increase in STEAM research since 2020.
NSC Projects: Notable shift towards STEAM since 2017, surpassing STEM initiatives.
3. Interdisciplinary Nature: The research encompasses a broad range of themes, including technology, arts, creativity, and interdisciplinarity, reflecting the comprehensive nature of STEAM.
4. Research Subjects and Methods: The studies typically focus on upper elementary to college students, covering various objectives such as student learning, teacher teaching, and content analysis. Experimental research methods, often using quantifiable tools, are commonly employed to ensure the reliability and comparability of the findings.
Implications:
The results offer valuable insights for policymakers, educators, and curriculum developers. They underline the importance of integrating arts into traditional STEM education, thereby promoting a more holistic and interdisciplinary approach. The findings can guide future curriculum development, teacher training, and policy-making to better support the evolving needs of STEAM education in Taiwan.
Conclusion:
This comprehensive literature analysis provides a detailed overview of the current state and trends in STEM and STEAM education research in Taiwan. It emphasizes the increasing attention to STEAM, particularly its integration into broader educational practices, and serves as a crucial reference for further academic and practical advancements in the field.

論文審定書i
中文摘要ii
英文摘要iii
目次iv
圖目錄vi
表目錄vii
第一章 緒論1
第一節 研究背景與動機1
第二節 研究目的8
第三節 名詞釋義8
第四節 研究範圍與限制11
第二章 文獻探討12
第一節 STEAM教育之緣起、演變與挑戰12
第二節 各國STEAM教育發展18
第三節 STEAM相關文獻分析研究25
第三章 研究方法28
第一節 研究方法28
第二節 研究架構29
第三節 研究對象與取樣29
第四節 研究信實度32
第四章 研究結果與討論35
第一節 臺灣 STE(A)M 教育期刊論文與國科會計畫發展回顧分析35
第二節 臺灣學者刊登(T)SSCI期刊論文回顧分析78
第五章 結論與建議87
第一節 研究結論87
第二節 研究建議90
參考文獻92

Aik, L. T., & Wee, T. T. (2022). Status and trends of STEM Education in Singapore. Status and trends of STEM education in highly competitive countries: Country reports and international comparison (pp. 259-304). Taipei: Technological and Vocational Education Research Center, National Taiwan Normal University and K-12 Education Administration, Ministry of Education.
Ali, M. (2021). State of STEM education in Hong Kong: A policy review. Academia Letters, Article 3680. https://doi.org/10.20935/AL3680.
Baba, H., & Loh, W. L. (2022). A study of STEAM Education and related learning environments in elementary schools: A case study of elementary schools of Fukuoka City. With design: Reinventing design modes. Proceedings of the 9th Congress of the International Association of Societies of Design Research (IASDR 2021) (pp. 1397–1419). Springer Nature. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-19-4472-7_91
Bybee, R. W. (2010). Advancing STEM education: A 2020 vision. Technology and Engineering Teacher, 70(1), 30-35.
Bybee, R. W. (2013). The case for STEM education: Challenges and opportunities. NSTA Press.
Chen, Y., Luo, T., & So, W. W. M. (2022). STEM education policies in Hong Kong. In Y. Chen, T. Luo, & W. W. M. So (Eds.), STEM education from Asia: Trends and perspectives (pp. 12-32). Abingdon, Oxon: Routledge.
Christenson, J. (2011). Ramaley coined STEM term now used nationwide. Winona Daily News. Retrieved from http://www.winonadailynews.com/news/local/article_457afe3e-0db3-11e1-abe0-001cc4c03286.html
Chung, C. C., Cartwright, C., & Cole, M. (2014). Assessing the impact of an autonomous robotics competition for STEM education. Journal of STEM Education: Innovations and Research, 15(2), 24-34.
Education Bureau. (2016). Report on promotion of STEM education: Unleashing potential in innovation. Retrieved from www.edb.gov.hk/attachment/en/curriculumdevelopment/renewal/STEM%20Edu
Gonzalez, H. B., & Kuenzi, J. J. (2012). Science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM)education: A Primer. CRS Report No. R42530. Washington DC: Library of Congress Congressional Research Service.
Gül, K.S., & Taşar, M.F. (2020). A review of researches on STEM in preservice teacher education. Elementary Education Online, 19(2), 515-539.
Günbatar, S. A., & Tabar, V. (2019). Türkiye’de gerçekleştirilen STEM araştırmalarının içerik analizi. Van Yüzüncü Yıl Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 16(1), 1054-1083.
Hamad, S., Tairab, H., Wardat, Y., Rabbani, L., AlArabi, K., Yousif, M., Abu-Al-Aish, A., & Stoica, G. (2022). Understanding science teachers’ implementations of integrated STEM: Teacher perceptions and practice. Sustainability, 14(6), 3594. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14063594
Herro, D., & Quigley, C. (2017). Exploring teachers’ perceptions of STEAM teaching through professional development: Implications for teacher educators. Professional Development in Education, 43(3), 416-438. https://doi.org/10.1080/19415257.2016.1205507
Hom, E. J. (2014). What is STEM education? Live Science: Tech. https://www.livescience.com/43296- what-is-stem-education.htmlHunter
Hong O. (2017). STEAM education in Korea: Current policies and future directions. Science and Technology Trends Policy Trajectories and Initiatives in STEM Education, 8(2), 92–102.
Hong, O. (2022). STEM/STEAM education research in South Korea. In T. W. Teo, A.-L. Tan, & P. Teng (Eds.), STEM education from Asia trends and perspectives (pp. 211-227). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003099888-11
Indriyanti, N. Y., Kartika, E. F. R., & Susanti, E. (2021). Pre-service teachers’ perception in integrating STEAM in chemistry learning. In AIP Conference Proceeding (Vol. 2331, No. 1). AIP Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0041842
John M. (2013)."STEM + Art = STEAM," The STEAM Journal: Vol. 1: Iss. 1,34. DOI: 10.5642/steam.201301.34
Kaleci, D., & Korkmaz, Ö. (2018). STEM Education Research: Content Analysis. Universal Journal of Educational Research, 6(11), 2404-2412.
Karpudewan, M., Krishnan, P., Ali, M. N., & Yoon Fah, L. (2022). Designing instrument to measure STEM teaching practices of Malaysian teachers. PloS one, 17(5), e0268509. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0268509
Kim, S., & Lee, Y. (2018). An investigation of teachers’ perception on STEAM education teachers’ training program according to school level. Indian Journal of Public Health Research and Development, 9(9), 256-264.
Kim, S., & Lee, Y. (2022). Developing students’ attitudes toward convergence and creative problem solving through multidisciplinary education in Korea. Sustainability, 14, 9929. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14169929
Koh, D., & Tan, A. L. (2021). Singaporean pre-service teachers’ perceptions of STEM epistemic practices and education. Journal of STEM Teacher Education, 56(2), 1-30.DOI: https://doi.org/10.30707/JSTE56.2.1649165366.257139
Lee M. H., Chai C. S., & Hong H. Y. (2019b). STEM education in Asia Pacific: Challenges and development. The Asia-Pacific Education Researcher, 28(1), 1–4. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40299-018-0424-z
Li Y., Wang K., Xiao Y., Froyd J. E. (2020). Research and trends in STEM education: A systematic review of journal publications. International journal of STEM education, 7, 1-16.
Lin, K. Y., Hsiao, H. S., Chang, Y. S., Chien, Y. H., & Wu, Y. T. (2018). The effectiveness of using 3D printing technology in STEM project-based learning activities. EURASIA Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 14(12), em1633.
Margot, K.C., & Kettler, T. (2019). Teachers’ perception of STEM integration and education: A systematic literature review. International Journal of STEM Education, 6, 2. doi:10.1186/s40594-018-0151-2
Mariano, K. W., & Chiappe, A. (2021). 21st-century skills and their relationship to STEAM learning environments: a review.
METI (2019). Retrieved from https://www.meti.go.jp/english/
MEXT (2018). Retrieved from https://www.mext.go.jp/en/
MOE (2022). Retrieved from https://www.moe.gov.sg/
Moore, T. J., Stohlmann, M. S., Wang, H. H., Tank, K. M., Glancy, A. W., & Roehrig, G. H. (2014). Implementation and integration of engineering in K-12 STEM education. In Engineering in Pre-College Settings: Synthesizing Research, Policy, and Practices (pp. 35-60). Purdue University Press.
NSF (1996). Retrieved from https://www.nsf.gov/
Paik S.-H. Kim, S.-W., Lee, Y. (2018). A study on teachers practices of STEAM education in Korea. International Journal of Pure and Applied Mathematics, 118(19B), 2339-2365.
Park, H.J., Byun, S.Y., Sim, J., Han, H., & Baek, Y. S. (2016). Teachers’ perceptions and practices of STEAM education in South Korea. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 12(7), 1739-1753. https://doi.org/10.12973/eurasia.2016.1531a
Razi, A., & Zhou, G. (2022). STEM, iSTEM, and STEAM: What is next? International Journal of Technology in Education, 5(1), 1.
Rifandi, R., Rahmi, Y. L., Widya, W., & Indrawati, E. S. (2020). Pre-service teachers’ perception on science, technology, engineering, and mathematics(stem)education. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1554(1). https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1554/1/012062
Sahin, A., Ayar, M.C., & Adiguzel, T. (2014). STEM related after-school program activities and associated outcomes on student learning. Educational Sciences: Theory& Practice, 14(1),13-26.
Scientix (2019) .Retrieved from https://www.scientix.eu/observatory
STEM 2026：A Vision for Innovation in STEM Education (2016) .Retrieved from https://oese.ed.gov/files/2016/09/AIR-STEM2026_Report_2016.pdf
Sujarwanto, E., Madlazim, & Ibrahim, M. (2019). Attitude, knowledge, and application of STEM owned by science teachers. Journal of Physics: Conference Series. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1417/1/012096
Summary of the 2018 White House State-Federal STEM Education Summit (2018) .Retrieved from https://trumpwhitehouse.archives.gov/wp-content/uploads/2018/12/Summary-of-2018-STEM-Ed-Stategic-Plan-Release-Event.pdf
Sutaphan, S., & Yuenyong, C. (2021). Examine pre-service science teachers’ existing ideas about STEM education in school setting. In Journal of Physics: Conference Series (Vol. 1835, No. 1, p. 012002). IOP Publishing.
Teo, T. W., & Choy, B. H. (2021). STEM education in Singapore. In O. S. Tan, E. L. Low, E. G. Tay, & Y. K. Yan (Eds.), Empowering teaching and learning through policies and practice: Singapore and international perspectives (Vol. 1, pp. 43-59) Singapore Math and Science Education Innovation: beyond PISA, Springer Nature Singapore https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-16-1357-9_3
Topalska, R. (2021). STEAM education in the view of the Bulgarian teacher. TEM Journal, 10(4), 1822-1827.
Wahono, B., & Chang, C.-Y.(2019a). Assessing teacher’s attitude, knowledge, and application (AKA)on STEM: An effort to foster the sustainable development of STEM education. Sustainability, 11(4), 950. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11040950.
Wahono, B., & Chang, C.-Y.(2019b). Development and validation of a survey instrument (AKA)towards attitude, knowledge and application of STEM. Journal of Baltic Science Education, 18(1), 63–76. https://doi.org/10.33225/jbse/19.18.63.
Wahono, B., Lin, P. L., & Chang, C. Y. (2020). Evidence of STEM enactment effectiveness in Asian students’ learning outcomes. International Journal of STEM Education, 7, 36. doi:10.1186/s40594-020-00236-1
White, D., & Delaney, S. (2021). Full STEAM Ahead, but Who Has the Map for Integration? A PRISMA Systematic Review on the Incorporation of Interdisciplinary Learning into Schools. LUMAT: International Journal on Math, Science and Technology Education, 9(2), 9-32.
Worsham, E. K., Clevenger, A., & Whealan-George, K. A. (2016). STEM education discrepancy in the United States and Singapore. Beyond, 1, 20-26.
Yakman, G. (2008). STEAM education: An overview of creating a model of integrative education. Pupils attitude towards technology 2008 annual proceeding. Retrieved from https://www.iteea.org/File.aspx?id=86752&v=75ab076a
Yilmaz, A., Gülgün, C., Çetinkaya, M., & Doganay, K. (2018). Initiatives and New Trends towards STEM Education in Turkey. Journal of Education and Training Studies, 6, 1-10.
2025年最重要的工作技能是什麼？（2020）。取自https://www.cw.com.tw/article/5102958
21世紀必備「5C」能力！科技時代孩子的成功關鍵（2019）。取自https://medium.com/%E6%81%86%E7%B4%A0%E9%A4%8A-%E5%A4%A7%E7%A2%A9%E6%95%99%E8%82%B2/21%E4%B8%96%E7%B4%80%E5%BF%85%E5%82%99-5c-%E8%83%BD%E5%8A%9B-%E7%A7%91%E6%8A%80%E6%99%82%E4%BB%A3%E5%AD%A9%E5%AD%90%E7%9A%84%E6%88%90%E5%8A%9F%E9%97%9C%E9%8D%B5-264e0c749173
二十一世紀公民關鍵5C能力-你準備好了嗎？（2018）。取自https://blog.fliprobot.com/are-you-ready-for-the-5c-ability/
十二年國民基本教育課程綱要總綱（2014）。取自https://www.naer.edu.tw/upload/1/16/doc/288/%E5%8D%81%E4%BA%8C%E5%B9%B4%E5%9C%8B%E6%95%99%E8%AA%B2%E7%A8%8B%E7%B6%B1%E8%A6%81%E7%B8%BD%E7%B6%B1.pdf
王文科（1999）。教育研究法。五南。
中央社訊息服務（2021）。實踐跨領域學習 興國高中進行「糖文化」實地踏查。取自https://www.cna.com.tw/postwrite/chi/293373
王石番（1989）。傳播內容分析法：理論與實證。幼獅。
王科、李業平、肖煜（2019）。STEM 教育研究發展的現狀和趨勢:解讀美國 STEM 教育研究項目。數學教育學報，3，53-61。
世界經濟論壇《2020年未來工作趨勢報告》（2020）。取自https://www.cw.com.tw/article/5102958
李揚津、陳文豪、陳偉康、霍年亨、郭炳偉、李凱雯、吳永水、曾耀輝、楊志豪（2017）。STEM教育：從理論到實踐。香港教育大學。
社會科學引文索引（2013）。取自https://web.archive.org/web/20130504094724/http://thomsonreuters.com/products_services/science/science_products/a-z/social_sciences_citation_index/
香港教育局（2016）。取自https://www.edb.gov.hk/tc/
高寶玉、賴明珠（2020）。序言，輯於高寶玉等主編《香港STEM教育：理論與課堂實踐》。3-4。香港，香港教育大學卓越教學發展中心。
國家科學及技術委員會（2023）。取自https://www.nstc.gov.tw/folksonomy/list/f6d5c23c-b3ce-438e-911b-12a705dbac5a?l=ch
教育部（2014）。取自https://www.edu.tw/Default.aspx
陳彥綸（2022）。取自https://ceag.tyc.edu.tw/ceag/acts_show.php?id=63fb98e96ba47&subject_id=31&page=1
曾鈺成、馮可強、戴希立、馮智政（2017）。推動STEM+ 教育－STEM教育的在地化與頂層設計
楊孝濚（2006）。內容分析。楊國樞、吳聰賢、文崇一、李亦園（主編），社會及行為科學研究法（下冊），903-927。東華。
葉重新（2017）。教育研究法。心理。
臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫（2013）。取自https://tci.ncl.edu.tw/cgi-bin/gs32/gsweb.cgi/ccd=mGzQ11/aboutdb
蔡進雄（2019）。各國推動STEM教育的新動態。國家教育研究院電子報，180。https://epaper.naer.edu.tw/edm.php?grp_no=3&edm_no=180&content_no=3176
鄭秉漢、蔡仁哲、陳仕燁、張俊彥（2020）。從桌上行為流向生活習慣:水資源議題桌遊之設計與成效。環境教育研究，16（1），1-36。
薛昱翔（2023）。臺灣STEAM教育領域相關學位論文之發展回顧與評析〔未出版之碩士論文〕。國立中山大學教育研究所。
魏美梅、陳瑞貞、袁小敏、張靜雲、何新滿、羅睿瑩（2018）。改善中學STEM教育的資源運用。香港青年協會。