博碩士論文 etd-0721105-233622 詳細資訊


[回到前頁查詢結果 | 重新搜尋]

姓名 高義智(Yi-Chih Kao) 電子郵件信箱 p1688@mail2000.com.tw
畢業系所 資訊管理學系研究所(Information Management)
畢業學位 碩士(Master) 畢業時期 93學年第2學期
論文名稱(中) 成功與失敗e化專案之因素探討 - 以某非營利教育訓練單位為例
論文名稱(英) Factors of Successful and Unsuccessful e-Projects
-A Case Study of a Non-Profit Education and Training Institute
檔案
  • etd-0721105-233622.pdf
  • 本電子全文僅授權使用者為學術研究之目的,進行個人非營利性質之檢索、閱讀、列印。
    請遵守中華民國著作權法之相關規定,切勿任意重製、散佈、改作、轉貼、播送,以免觸法。
    論文使用權限

    電子論文:校內校外均不公開

    論文語文/頁數 中文/110
    統計 本論文已被瀏覽 5636 次,被下載 0 次
    摘要(中) 本研究之目的希望能從一個非營利的教育訓練組織資訊系統導入個案中,發現其成功的主要關鍵因素。該個案在全省共有五個教育訓練中心,招收資訊技術相關之在職進修及長期養成班學員。該個案單位有鑒於持續成長及競爭之壓力,自數年前即積極推動企業e化專案。但經數年的系統開發與導入後,一項滿意度問卷調查發現個案之使用者僅對部份e化系統持接受的態度。
      本研究以科技接受模式 (TAM) 為主要研究架構,並參考其他學者的系統導入成功模式,例如: 在研究架構中加入了Pitt (1995)等學者的理論,將資訊人員的服務品質等與認知有用性、認知易用性、系統品質、資訊品質等五個構面列為資訊系統導入成功之因素。並將使用者滿意度列為本研究架構之依變項。
      本研究將選擇課程管理系統及知識管理系統作為資訊系統導入成功與失敗之代表。研究方法除了採用個案描述法外,也使用問卷調查法。本研究將兩個資訊系統導入之背景、過程及結果均深入調查分析。利用調查法瞭解使用者對兩個系統比較時,對前述之五個構面是否有明顯的差異。
      問卷調查所得之統計資料,明顯區分並驗證兩個個案研究之發現。本研究希望能為個案未來系統開發時,建立新的標準作業模式,提升內部使用者滿意度及提升資訊系統導入成功之機率。
    摘要(英) The study aims to find key factors of information system success in a non-profit education and training institute. The institute under study has five centers providing on-job training and long-term cultivation in the area of information technology. Facing the pressure of continuing growth and increasing competition, the institute has begun the e-projects since many years ago. After several years of system development and implementation, a survey of users’ satisfaction showed that only part of the systems was acceptable.  
      This study adopts the Technology Acceptance Model (TAM) as the primary research framework along with the service quality model and comes up with five success factors including perceived usefulness, perceived ease-of-use, system quality, information quality and service quality. Moreover, user satisfaction is taken as dependent variable of the framework.
      In order to differentiate the successful system from the unsuccessful system, a curriculum management system and a knowledge management system was selected to represent the successful and unsuccessful systems respectively. The case study method and questionnaire survey wre both used as research method. In the case study, the development and implementation background, process and results were investigated. The survey method was used to verify the differences between the two systems using the five factors mentioned previously.
      The results of questionnaire survey and statistical test clearly distinguish the two systems and support case study findings. The results of this study can serve as guideline to improve the users’ satisfaction as well as to improve the information system success.
    關鍵字(中)
  • 非營利組織
  • 資訊系統成功模式
  • 科技接受模式
  • 關鍵字(英)
  • Technology Acceptance Model
  • Non-Profit Organization
  • Information System Successful Model
  • 論文目次 目錄
    摘要................................................................................................................................v
    第一章 緒論…...........................................................................................1
    第一節 研究背景.............................................................................................1
    第二節 研究動機.............................................................................................3
    第三節 研究目的.............................................................................................7
    第四節 研究步驟與流程.................................................................................8
    第五節 論文結構.............................................................................................9
            
    第二章 文獻探討........................................................................................................10
    第一節  非營利組織之經營特質.....................................................................10
    第二節  資訊系統導入相關研究.....................................................................11
    第三節  知識管理.............................................................................................23
    第四節  專案管理.............................................................................................31
    第五節  個案研究法及調查法理論.................................................................32
    第三章 研究設計........................................................................................................36
    第一節  研究方法.............................................................................................36
    第二節  研究架構.............................................................................................37
    第三節  問卷設計.............................................................................................40
    第四章 個案描述........................................................................................................42
    第一節  個案背景資料及問題.........................................................................42
    1. 研究個案的組織與分工...........................................................42
    2. 研究個案之營運壓力...............................................................43
    3. 研究個案目前系統上之問題...................................................44
    第二節  個案分析….........................................................................................44
    1. 個案一: 知識管理系統…..........................................................45
           2. 個案二: 課程管理系統…..........................................................58
    第三節  資料分析與理論之比對….................................................................70
    第四節  未來改善之建議……………….……………………………………71
    第五章 資料分析與研究結果....................................................................................72
    第六章 結論與建議....................................................................................................75
    第一節  結論….................................................................................…………75
    第二節  研究限制與範圍….............................................................................79
    第三節  研究之貢獻.........................................................................................79
    第四節  未來研究方向.....................................................................................80
    參考文獻......................................................................................................................82
    中文參考文獻......................................................................................................82
    英文參考文獻......................................................................................................85
    附錄..............................................................................................................................91
    問卷1: 知識管理系統使用者滿意度簡易問卷調查........................................91
    問卷2: 課程管理系統使用者滿意度簡易問卷調查........................................92
    問卷3: 知識管理系統使用者滿意度問卷調查................................................93
    問卷4: 課程管理系統使用者滿意度問卷調查................................................96
    科技接受模式 (TAM) 原始問卷.....................................................................100
    參考文獻 中文參考文獻
    1.行政院主計處網站,http://www.dgbas.gov.tw/ct.asp?xItem=5596&ctNode=3233。
    2.行政院經濟建設委員會網站,http://210.69.188.228/upload/OVERALL/NatPlan_Long/new2_d2@41808.99661067583@.pdf。
    3.朱慧德 (2005),政府委外專案管理的策略性思維與品質管理架構,微軟資訊學園
    4.李振昌(1999)譯,J. P. Papows(1998)著,16定位:Lotus總裁眼中網路時代的企業策略,台北:大塊文化。
    5.李祐榮(2001),知識管理系統接受度影響因素之研究,國立中山大學資訊管理研究所碩士論文。
    6.李燕強(2002),發展中船公司建造規範知識管理系統之行動研究,國立中山大學企業管理學系碩士論文。
    7.吳思華(2000),知識型企業經營管理,http://www.cme.org.tw/know/。
    8.余佩珊(1994)譯,非營利機構的經營之道,台北:遠流出版社。
    9.余佩珊(2004)譯,彼得•杜拉克:使命與領導,台北:遠流出版社
    10.吳宜澄、盧姵綺(2003),論文寫作格式手冊,桂冠圖書。
    11.林東清(2002),資訊管理-e化企業的核心競爭能力,智勝文化。
    12.林東清、孫培真、徐景智(2000),影響資訊系統使用者抗拒行為之原因:以計劃行為理論為基礎之整合研究,資訊管理研究第二卷第二期。
    13.林佩璇(1999),學校本位課程發展的個案研究:台北縣鄉土教學活動的課程發展,國立台灣師範大學教育研究所博士論文。
    14.林信惠、黃明祥、王文良(2002),軟體專案管理,智勝文化。
    15.郭生玉(1986),心理與教育研究方法(第五版),台中:精華書局。
    16.陳仲儼(2003),專案管理與CMMI中執行力、執行度、和軟體品質的探討,中央警察大學『資訊、科技與社會』學報第三卷第二期。
    17.陳姿伶 (2005),個案研究法(Case Study),中興大學農業推廣教育研究所
    18.許光華、何文榮(1998),專案管理理論與實務,華泰書局。
    19.梁定澎(2002), 電子商務理論與實務第二版,台北: 華泰文化事業公司。
    20.葉重新(2001),教育研究法,台北市:心理出版社。
    21.劉京偉(2000)譯,Arthur Anderson Business Consulting(1999)著,知識管理的第一本書,商周出版。
    22.教育部網站,http://www.edu.tw/EDU_WEB/EDU_MGT/SECRETARY/EDU8559001/guide/94guide.htm。
    23.劉常勇(1999),對於知識管理的基本認識,http://www.cme.org.tw/know/start.htm。
    24.數位台灣計畫辦公室(2005),2004年為止我國資訊科技輔助教育應用之概況。取自http://www.etaiwan.nat.gov.tw/content/application/etaiwan/general/guest-cnt-browse.php?sn=3&cnt_id=927。
    英文參考文獻
    1. Adams, J.S. (1965). Inequity in social exchange. In Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, Vol.2, pp. 267-299. New York: Academic Press.
    2. Addleson, M. (2000). Organizing to know and to learn: Reflections on Organization and Knowledge Management. In T. K. Srikantaiah, & M. Koenig (Eds.), Knowledge Management for the Information Professional. Medford: asis.
    3. Ajzen, I. (1985). From Intention to Actions: A Theory of Planned Behavior, In J.      Kuhl, & J. Bechmann (Eds), Action-Control: From Cognition to Behavior (pp. 11-39).  Heidelberg: Springer.
    4. Ajzen, I. (1989). Attitude Structure and Behavior. In A.R. Pratkanis, S. J. Breckler, & A. G. Greenwald (Eds.), Attitude structure and function (pp. 241-274). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
    5. Ajzen, I. (1991). The Theory of Planned Behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 50, pp.179-211.
    6. Barki, H., & Hartwick., J. (1989). Rethinking the concept of user involvement. MIS Quarterly, 13(1), pp.53-63.
    7. Biggam, J. (2001). Defining Knowledge:an Epistemological Foundation for Knowledge Management. Proceedings of the 34th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences. Hawaii: IEEE.
    8. Davenport, T. H., & Prusak, L. (1998). How Organizations Manage What They Know. Working Knowledge, Boston: Harvard Business School.
    9. Davis, F. D. (1986). A Technology Acceptance Model for Empirically Testing New End-User Information System: Theory and Results. Doctoral Dissertation, MIT Sloan School of Management ,Cambridge, MA.
    10. Davis, F. D., Bagozzi, R. P., & Warshaw , P. R. (1989). User acceptance of computer technology: A comparison of two theoretical model. Management Science, 35(8), pp. 982-1003.
    11. Davis, F. D., (1989), Perceived Usefulness, Perceived Ease of Use, and User Acceptance of Information Technology, MIS Quarterly, Vo. 13, Sep.1989, pp.318-340.
    12. DeLone, W. H., & McLean, E. R. (1992). Information Systems Success: The Quest for the Dependent Variable. Information Systems Research, Vo. 3, No. 1, 1992, pp. 60-95.
    13. Dickson, G. W., & Wetherbe, J. (1985). The Management of Information Systems. Macgraw-Hill.
    14. Doll, W. J., & Torkzadeh, G. (1988). The Measurement of End-User Computing Satisfaction, MIS Quarterly , 12(2), pp. 259-274.
    15. Gido, J., & Clements, J. (2003). Successful Project Management (2nd Ed.). Thomson Software.
    16. Hamilton, S., & Chervany, N. L. (1981). Evaluating Information System Effectiveness – Part I: Comparing Evaluating Approaches. MIS Quarterly, Vol. 5, No. 3, pp. 55-69.
    17. Jarboe, K. P. (2001). Knowledge Management As an Economic Development Strategy, Washington DC: Athena Alliance.
    18. Keen, P. G. W. (1981). Information Systems and Organizational Change. Communications of the ACM, Vol. 24, No. 1, pp. 24-33.
    19. Kwon, T. H., & Zmud, R. W. (1987). Unifying the Fragmented Models of Information Systems Implementation. In R. J. Boland and R. Hirschheim (Eds.), Critical Issues in Information Systems Research (pp. 227-251), John Wiley, Chichester, England.
    20. Leonard-Barton D. (1992). Core capabilities and core rigidities: A Paradox in Managing New Product Development. Strategic management Journal. Vol.13, pp. 111-125。
    21. Lewin, K. (1952). Group Decision and Social Change. In E. Newcombe and R. Harley (Eds.), Readings in Social Psychology (pp. 459-473). New York: Henry Holt.
    22. Ploanyi, M. (1966). The Tacit Dimension. Garden City, New York: Doubleday & Co.
    23. Nonaka, I., & Takerchi, H. (1995). The knowledge creating company: How Japanese companies create the dynamics of innovation. New York: Oxford University Press.
    24. Major Projects Association (2003). Learning from Project Failures: An MPA Seminar. Retrieved June 15, 2005, from http://www.majorprojects.org/pubdoc/692.pdf
    25. O’Dell, C., & Grayson, C. J. (1998). If Only We Knew What We Know: The Transfer of Internal Knowledge and Best Practice. New York: Free Press.
    26. Jalote, P. (2002). Software Project Management in Practice. Addison-Wesley.
    27. Pitt, L. F., Watson R. T., & Kavan C. B. (1995). Service Quality: A Measure of Information Systems Effectiveness. MIS Quarterly, 19(2), pp. 173-187.
    28. Porter, L.W. (1976). Organizations as political animals. Presidential address, Division of Industry Organizational Psychology, 84th Annual Meeting of the American Psychological Association, Washington D.C.
    29. Project Management Institute, Inc. (2000). A Guide to the Project Management Body of Knowledge -- 2000 Edition. USA.
    30. Robert K. Yin (1994). Case Study Research: Design and Methods (2nd ed. ). SAGE Publications.
    31. Robert K. Yin (2002). Case Study Research: Design and Methods (3rd ed. ). SAGE Publications.
    32. Robey, D. (1979). User Attitudes and Management Information System Use.
    Academy of Management Journal ,22(3), pp. 527-538.
    33. Rogers, E. M. (1995). Diffusion of Innovations (4th ed.). New York: Free Press.
    34. Goodhue, D.L., & Thompson, R.L. (1995). Task-Technology Fit and Individual Performance. MIS Quarterly, Vol. 19, No. 2, pp. 213-236.
    35. Scapens, R. W. (1990). Researching Management Accounting Practice: The Role of Case Study. British Accounting Review, Vol. 22, pp. 259-281.
    36. Schein, V. E. (1997). Individual Power and Political Behaviors in Organizations: An Inadequately Explored Reality. Academy of Management Review, Vol. 2, pp. 64-72.
    37. Stewart, T.A. (1997). Intellectual Capital : The New Wealth of Organizations. New York : Bantam Doubleday Dell Publishing Group Inc.
    38. Timothy Driscoll (2001). Christensen and the Case Method. Retrieved June 10, 2005, from http://hbswk.hbs.edu/item.jhtml?id=2334&t=bizhistory
    39. Uma Sekaran (2003). Research Methods for Business (4th ed. ). WILEY.
    40. Vessey, I. and Galletta, D. (1991). Cognitive Fit: An Empirical Study of Information Acquisition. Information Systems Research, Vol. 2, No. 1, pp. 63-84.
    口試委員
  • 吳仁和 教授 - 召集委員
  • 周照偉 教授 - 委員
  • 林信惠 教授 - 指導教授
  • 口試日期 2005-07-15 繳交日期 2005-07-21

    [回到前頁查詢結果 | 重新搜尋]


    如有任何問題請與論文審查小組聯繫