Responsive image
博碩士論文 etd-0721124-150823 詳細資訊
Title page for etd-0721124-150823
論文名稱
Title
發展型家長式領導對工作投入與創造性投入的正向效果:一項台灣與美國的跨文化檢驗
Positive effects of development-oriented paternalistic leadership on work and creative engagement: A cross-cultural examination between Taiwan and the States
系所名稱
Department
畢業學年期
Year, semester
語文別
Language
學位類別
Degree
頁數
Number of pages
77
研究生
Author
指導教授
Advisor
召集委員
Convenor
口試委員
Advisory Committee
口試日期
Date of Exam
2024-04-26
繳交日期
Date of Submission
2024-08-21
關鍵字
Keywords
家長式領導、發展型家長式領導、LMX、工作投入、權力距離
paternalistic leadership, developmental-oriented paternalistic leadership, LMX, engagement, power distance
統計
Statistics
本論文已被瀏覽 71 次,被下載 0
The thesis/dissertation has been browsed 71 times, has been downloaded 0 times.
中文摘要
鑒於家長式式領導已盛行數十年,發展型家長式領導(DPL)的提出,調和理論與實證之間的矛盾。先前研究主要聚焦於量表的發展,並發現DPL與角色內外工作績效之間存在正向關係。本研究探討了領導者部屬交換關係(LMX)作為DPL與追隨者工作投入和創造性投入之間關係的關鍵中介機制。此外,本研究將國家作為不同文化價值的載體,檢視DPL與LMX之間的調節關係。通過線上問卷數據平台,共收集了289名台灣樣本和237名美國全職工作者樣本。結果顯示了LMX的中介效果,在台灣樣本中,DPL對LMX的效果更強。此外,本研究更進一步揭示了部屬權力距離導向作為調節變項的效果。本文有助於擴展DPL的邏輯關係網絡並凸顯其文化特定性。
Abstract
Given that paternalistic leadership has prevailed for several decades, developmental-oriented paternalistic leadership (DPL) has emerged to reconcile the contradiction between the theory and empirical evidence. Previous research has primarily focused on scale development and has found a positive relationship between DPL and both in- and extra-role performance. In this study, I investigated leader–member exchange (LMX) as a crucial mediator in the relationship between DPL and two follower engagements (work engagement and creative process engagement). Furthermore, I propose using country as a proxy for culture values to moderate the relationship between DPL and LMX. A sample of 289 followers from Taiwan and 237 from the United States was collected via an online data collection platform. The result indicates that DPL is positively related to two follower engagements and shows a mediation effect of LMX, with DPL showing a stronger effect on LMX in the Taiwan sample. Moreover, the findings were consistently confirmed with power distance orientation as a moderator. This study contributes to the expansion of the nomological network of DPL and highlights its cultural specificity.
目次 Table of Contents
論文審定書 i
摘要 ii
Abstract iii
Contents iv
Table of figures v
Table of tables vi
Chapter 1 Introduction 1
Chapter 2 Theory and Hypotheses 7
2.1 Revisiting the Complexity of Combined Paternalistic Control and Paternalistic Care of Classical Paternalistic Leadership 7
2.2 Developmental-Oriented Paternalistic Leadership: The Effect of Integration of Paternalistic Control and Care in the Contexts of Development 10
2.3 LMX and DPL 16
2.4 LMX Mediates the Relationship Between DPL and Work Engagement 18
2.5 LMX Mediates the Relationship Between DPL and Creative Process Engagement 21
2.6 The Moderation Role of Culture Value 23
Chapter 3 Method 27
3.1 Procedure and Sample 27
3.2 Measurement 30
3.3 Analysis Strategy 33
Chapter 4 Result 36
Chapter 5 Discussion 47
Reference 55

參考文獻 References
Adler, E., & Crawford, B. (2002). Constructing a Mediterranean region: A cultural approach. In Conference: The Convergence of Civilizations.
Agarwal, U. A., Datta, S., Blake‐Beard, S., & Bhargava, S. (2012). Linking LMX, innovative work behaviour and turnover intentions: The mediating role of work engagement. Career Development International, 17(3), 208-230. https://doi.org/10.1108/13620431211241063
Amabile, T. M. (1983). The social psychology of creativity: A componential conceptualization. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 45(2), 357-376. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.45.2.357
Ashforth, B. E., & Humphrey, R. H. (1995). Emotion in the workplace: A reappraisal. Human Relations, 48(2), 97-125. https://doi.org/10.1177/001872679504800201
Aycan, Z. (2006). Human resource management in Turkey. In Managing Human Resources In The Middle-east (pp. 160-179). UK: Routledge.
Bakker, A. B., & Leiter, M. P. (2010). Work engagement: A handbook of essential theory and research. Psychology press.
Bakker, A. B., Demerouti, E., & Sanz-Vergel, A. I. (2014). Burnout and work engagement: The JD–R approach. Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior, 1, 389–411. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurevorgpsych-031413-091235
Bass, B. M. (1985). Leadership: Good, better, best. Organizational Dynamics, 13(3), 26-40. https://doi.org/10.1016/0090-2616(85)90028-2
Bauer, T. N., & Green, S. G. (1996). Development of leader-member exchange: A longitudinal test. Academy of Management Journal, 39(6), 1538-1567. https://doi.org/10.5465/257068
Bhal, K. T. (2006). LMX‐citizenship behavior relationship: justice as a mediator. Leadership & Organization Development Journal, 27(2), 106-117. https://doi.org/10.1108/01437730610646615
Blau, P. (1964). Exchange and power in social life. Wiley, NY.
Brislin, R. W. (1970). Back-translation for cross-cultural research. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 1(3), 185-216. https://doi.org/10.1177/135910457000100301
Campbell, D. J., Bommer, W., & Yeo, E. (1993). Perceptions of appropriate leadership style: participation versus consultation across two cultures. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 10, 1-19. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01732221
Carasco-Saul, M., Kim, W., & Kim, T. (2015). Leadership and employee engagement: Proposing research agendas through a review of literature. Human Resource Development Review, 14(1), 38-63. https://doi.org/10.1177/1534484314560406
Chan, S.C.H., Mak, Wm. (2012). Benevolent leadership and follower performance: The mediating role of leader–member exchange (LMX). Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 29, 285–301. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10490-011-9275-3C
Chen, X. P., Eberly, M. B., Chiang, T. J., Farh, J. L., & Cheng, B. S. (2014). Affective trust in Chinese leaders: Linking paternalistic leadership to employee performance. Journal of Management, 40(3), 796-819. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206311410604
Chen, T., Li, F., & Leung, K. (2017). Whipping into shape: Construct definition, measurement, and validation of directive-achieving leadership in Chinese culture. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 34, 537-563. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10490-017-9511-6
Cheng, B. S. (1995). Paternalistic authority and leadership: A case study of a Taiwanese CEO. Bulletin of the Institute of Ethnology Academic Sinica, 79,119-73. (In Chinese).
Cheng, B. S., Chou, L. F., Wu, T. Y., Huang, M. P., & Farh, J. L. (2004). Paternalistic leadership and subordinate responses: Establishing a leadership model in Chinese organizations. Asian Journal of Social Psychology, 7(1), 89-117. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-839X.2004.00137.x
Cheng, B.S., Wang, A. C., Huang, M.P., (2009). The Road More Popular versus the Road Less Travelled: An ‘Insider’s’ Perspective of Advancing Chinese Management Research. Management and Organization Review, 5(1):91-105. http://doi:10.1111/j.1740-8784.2008.00133.x
Cheng, C., & Yang, M. (2019). Creative process engagement and new product performance: The role of new product development speed and leadership encouragement of creativity. Journal of Business Research, 99, 215-225. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2019.02.067
Chiou, J. S. (2001). Horizontal and vertical individualism and collectivism among college students in the United States, Taiwan, and Argentina. The Journal of Social Psychology, 141(5), 667-678. https://doi.org/10.1080/00224540109600580
Chua, R. Y., Roth, Y., & Lemoine, J. F. (2015). The impact of culture on creativity: How cultural tightness and cultural distance affect global innovation crowdsourcing work. Administrative Science Quarterly, 60(2), 189-227. https://doi.org/10.1177/0001839214563595
Dawar, N., & Parker, P. (1994). Marketing universals: Consumers’ use of brand name, price, physical appearance, and retailer reputation as signals of product quality. Journal of Marketing, 58(2), 81-95. https://doi.org/10.1177/002224299405800207
Day, D. V., & Miscenko, D. (2015). Leader-member exchange (LMX): Construct evolution, contributions, and future prospects for advancing leadership theory. The Oxford Handbook of Leader-Member Exchange, 9-28.
Deluga, R. J. (1994). Supervisor trust building, leader‐member exchange and organizational citizenship behaviour. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 67(4), 315-326. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-8325.1994.tb00570.x
Drazin, R., Glynn, M. A., & Kazanjian, R. K. (1999). Multilevel theorizing about creativity in organizations: A sensemaking perspective. Academy of Management Review, 24(2), 286-307. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.1999.1893937
Dvir, T., Eden, D., Avolio, B. J., & Shamir, B. (2002). Impact of transformational leadership on follower development and performance: A field experiment. Academy of Management Journal, 45(4), 735-744. https://doi.org/10.5465/3069307
Epitropaki, O., & Martin, R. (2005). From ideal to real: a longitudinal study of the role of implicit leadership theories on leader-member exchanges and employee outcomes. Journal of Applied Psychology, 90(4), 659. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.90.4.659
Farh, J. L., & Cheng, B. S. (2000). A cultural analysis of paternalistic leadership in Chinese organizations. Management and Organizations in the Chinese Context, 84-127.
Farh, J. L., Hackett, R. D., & Liang, J. (2007). Individual-level cultural values as moderators of perceived organizational support–employee outcome relationships in China: Comparing the effects of power distance and traditionality. Academy of Management Journal, 50(3), 715-729. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2007.25530866
Farh, J. L., Cheng, B. S., Chou, L. F., & Chu, X. P. (2014). Authority and benevolence: Employees' responses to paternalistic leadership in China. In China's Domestic Private Firms: (pp. 230-260). Routledge.
Gannon, M. J. (Ed.). (2001). Cultural metaphors: Readings, research translations, and commentary. Sage.
Gouldner, A. W. (1960). The norm of reciprocity: A preliminary statement. American Sociological Review, 25(2), 161-178. https://doi.org/10.2307/2092623
Graen, G. B. (1976). Role-making processes within complex organizations. In Dunnette, M. D., Handbook of Industrial and Organizational Psychology (Ed., 1201-1245). Chicago, IL: Rand McNally.
Graen, G. B., & Scandura, T. A. (1987). Toward a psychology of dyadic organizing. Research in Organizational Behavior, 9, 175-208.
Graen, G. B., & Uhl-Bien, M. (1995). Relationship-based approach to leadership: Development of leader-member exchange (LMX) theory of leadership over 25 years: Applying a multilevel multi-domain perspective. Leadership Quarterly, 6(2), 219-247. https://doi.org/10.1016/1048-9843(95)90036-5
Guo, L., Decoster, S., Babalola, M. T., De Schutter, L., Garba, O. A., & Riisla, K. (2018). Authoritarian leadership and employee creativity: The moderating role of psychological capital and the mediating role of fear and defensive silence. Journal of Business Research, 92, 219-230. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2018.07.034
Hakanen, J. J., Bakker, A. B., & Schaufeli, W. B. (2006). Burnout and work engagement among teachers. Journal of School Psychology, 43(6), 495-513. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsp.2005.11.001
Hall, R. J., Snell, A. F., & Foust, M. S. (1999). Item parceling strategies in SEM: Investigating the subtle effects of unmodeled secondary constructs. Organizational Research Methods, 2(3), 233-256. https://doi.org/10.1177/109442819923002
Hernandez, M., Eberly, M. B., Avolio, B. J., & Johnson, M. D. (2011). The loci and mechanisms of leadership: Exploring a more comprehensive view of leadership theory. The Leadership Quarterly, 22(6), 1165-1185. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2011.09.009
Ho, D. Y. (1989). Socialization in contemporary mainland China. Asian Thought and Society, 14(41-42), 136-149.
Ho, D. Y. F. (1994). Filial piety, authoritarian moralism, and cognitive conservatism in Chinese societies. Genetic, social, and general psychology monographs.
Ho, D. Y. (1995). Selfhood and identity in Confucianism, Taoism, Buddhism, and Hinduism: Contrasts with the West. Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour, 25(2), 115–134. https://doi: 10.1111/j.1468-5914.1995.tb00269.x
Hofstede, G. (1980). Motivation, leadership, and organization: do American theories apply abroad?. Organizational Dynamics, 9(1), 42-63. https://doi.org/10.1016/0090-2616(80)90013-3
Hofstede, G. (1983). The cultural relativity of organizational practices and theories. Journal of International Business Studies, 14, 75-89. https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.jibs.8490867
Hwang, K. K., & Chang, J. (2009). Self-cultivation: Culturally sensitive psychotherapies in Confucian societies. The Counseling Psychologist, 37(7), 1010-1032. https://doi.org/10.1177/0011000009339976
Huang, K. Y., & Mujtaba, B. G. (2010). Stress, task, and relationship orientations of Taiwanese adults: an examination of gender in this high-context culture. Journal of International Business and Cultural Studies, 3(1), 1-12.
Huang, X., Xu, E., Chiu, W., Lam, C., & Farh, J. L. (2015). When authoritarian leaders outperform transformational leaders: Firm performance in a harsh economic environment. Academy of Management Discoveries, 1(2), 180-200. https://doi.org/10.5465/amd.2014.0132
Kahn, W. A. (1992). To be fully there: Psychological presence at work. Human Relations, 45(4), 321-349. https://doi.org/10.1177/001872679204500402
Kankaraš, M., Vermunt, J. K., & Moors, G. (2011). Measurement equivalence of ordinal items: A comparison of factor analytic, item response theory, and latent class approaches. Sociological Methods & Research, 40(2), 279-310. https://doi.org/10.1177/0049124111405301
Kirkman, B. L., Chen, G., Farh, J. L., Chen, Z. X., & Lowe, K. B. (2009). Individual power distance orientation and follower reactions to transformational leaders: A cross-level, cross-cultural examination. Academy of Management Journal, 52(4), 744-764. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2009.43669971
Kwon, K., & Kim, T. (2020). An integrative literature review of employee engagement and innovative behavior: Revisiting the JD-R model. Human Resource Management Review, 30(2), 100704. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hrmr.2019.100704
Lanaj, K., Gabriel, A. S., & Jennings, R. E. (2023). The importance of leader recovery for leader identity and behavior. Journal of Applied Psychology, 108(10), 1717-1736. https://doi.org/10.1037/apl0001092
Liden, R. C., & Graen, G. (1980). Generalizability of the vertical dyad linkage model of leadership. Academy of Management Journal, 23(3), 451-465. https://doi.org/10.5465/255511
Lin, Y. C. (2021). Developmental leadership: scale development, validation, and the role of development orientation. [Doctoral Dissertation]. National Sun Yat-sen University, Kaohsiung. https://hdl.handle.net/11296/fydt2x
Macey, W. H., & Schneider, B. (2008). The meaning of employee engagement. Industrial and Organizational Psychology, 1(1), 3-30. https://doi:10.1111/j.1754-9434.2007.0002.x
May, D. R., Gilson, R. L., & Harter, L. M. (2004). The psychological conditions of meaningfulness, safety and availability and the engagement of the human spirit at work. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 77(1), 11-37. https://doi.org/10.1348/096317904322915892
Mumford, M. D. (2000). Managing creative people: Strategies and tactics for innovation. Human Resource Management Review, 10(3), 313-351. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1053-4822(99)00043-1
Mumford, M. D., Scott, G. M., Gaddis, B., & Strange, J. M. (2002). Leading creative people: Orchestrating expertise and relationships. The Leadership Quarterly, 13(6), 705–750. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1048-9843(02)00158-3
Palan, S., & Schitter, C. (2018). Prolific. ac—A subject pool for online experiments. Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Finance, 17, 22-27. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbef.2017.12.004
Pellegrini, E. K., & Scandura, T. A. (2006). Leader–member exchange (LMX), paternalism, and delegation in the Turkish business culture: An empirical investigation. Journal of International Business Studies, 37, 264-279. https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.jibs.8400185
Pellegrini, E. K., & Scandura, T. A. (2008). Paternalistic leadership: A review and agenda for future research. Journal of Management, 34(3), 566-593. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206308316063
Pellegrini, E. K., Scandura, T. A., & Jayaraman, V. (2010). Cross-cultural generalizability of paternalistic leadership: An expansion of leader-member exchange theory. Group & Organization Management, 35(4), 391-420. https://doi.org/10.1177/1059601110378456
Podsakoff, P. M., & Organ, D. W. (1986). Self-reports in organizational research: Problems and prospects. Journal of Management, 12(4), 531-544. https://doi.org/10.1177/014920638601200408
Putnick, D. L., & Bornstein, M. H. (2016). Measurement invariance conventions and reporting: The state of the art and future directions for psychological research. Developmental Review, 41, 71-90. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dr.2016.06.004
Rawat, P. S., & Lyndon, S. (2016). Effect of paternalistic leadership style on subordinate’s trust: an Indian study. Journal of Indian Business Research, 8(4), 264-277. https://doi.org/10.1108/JIBR-05-2016-0045
Redding, S. G., & Hsiao, M. (1990). An empirical study of overseas Chinese managerial ideology. International Journal of Psychology, 25(3-6), 629-641. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207599008247917
Reiter-Palmon, R., & Illies, J. J. (2004). Leadership and creativity: Understanding leadership from a creative problem-solving perspective. The Leadership Quarterly, 15(1), 55-77. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2003.12.005
Rich, B. L., Lepine, J. A., & Crawford, E. R. (2010). Job engagement: Antecedents and effects on job performance. Academy of Management Journal, 53(3), 617-635. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2010.51468988
Rockstuhl, T., Dulebohn, J. H., Ang, S., & Shore, L. M. (2012). Leader–member exchange (LMX) and culture: A meta-analysis of correlates of LMX across 23 countries. Journal of Applied Psychology, 97(6), 1097-1130. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0029978
Rosseel, Y. (2012). lavaan: An R package for structural equation modeling. Journal of Statistical Software, 48(2), 1-36. https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v048.i02
Rousseau, D. M., & Greller, M. M. (1994). Human resource practices: Administrative contract makers. Human Resource Management, 33(3), 385-401. https://doi.org/10.1002/hrm.3930330308
Runco, M. A. (1986). Divergent thinking and creative performance in gifted and nongifted children. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 46(2), 375-384. https://doi.org/10.1177/001316448604600211
Saeed, B. B., Afsar, B., Cheema, S., & Javed, F. (2019). Leader-member exchange and innovative work behavior: The role of creative process engagement, core self-evaluation, and domain knowledge. European Journal of Innovation Management, 22(1), 105-124. https://doi.org/10.1108/EJIM-11-2017-0158
Saks, A. M. (2006). Antecedents and consequences of employee engagement. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 21(7), 600-619. https://doi.org/10.1108/02683940610690169
Schaubroeck, J. M., Shen, Y., & Chong, S. (2017). A dual-stage moderated mediation model linking authoritarian leadership to follower outcomes. Journal of Applied Psychology, 102(2), 203-214. https://doi.org/10.1037/apl0000165
Schaufeli, W. B., Salanova, M., González-Romá, V., & Bakker, A. B. (2002). The measurement of burnout and engagement: A confirmatory factor analytic approach. Journal of Happiness Studies, 3(1), 71-92. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1015630930326
Scott, S. G., & Bruce, R. A. (1998). Following the leader in R&D: The joint effect of subordinate problem-solving style and leader-member relations on innovative behavior. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 45(1), 3-10. https://doi.org/10.1109/17.658656
Shalley, C. E., Zhou, J., & Oldham, G. R. (2004). The effects of personal and contextual characteristics on creativity: Where should we go from here?. Journal of Management, 30(6), 933-958. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jm.2004.06.007
Shi, D., Maydeu-Olivares, A., & Rosseel, Y. (2020). Assessing fit in ordinal factor analysis models: SRMR vs. RMSEA. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 27(1), 1-15. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705511.2019.1611434
Spector, P. E., Cooper, C. L., & Sparks, K. (2001). An international study of the psychometric properties of the Hofstede Values Survey Module 1994: A comparison of individual and country/province level results. Applied Psychology, 50(2), 269-281. https://doi.org/10.1111/1464-0597.00058
Takeuchi, R., Wang, A. C., & Farh, J. L. (2020). Asian conceptualizations of leadership: Progresses and challenges. Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior, 7, 233-256. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-orgpsych-012119-045307
Taras, V., Steel, P., & Kirkman, B. L. (2016). Does country equate with culture? Beyond geography in the search for cultural boundaries. Management International Review, 56, 455-487. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11575-016-0283-x
Tehseen, S., Ramayah, T., & Sajilan, S. (2017). Testing and controlling for common method variance: A review of available methods. Journal of Management Sciences, 4(2), 146-175. https://doi.org/10.20547/jms.2014.1704202
Tibshirani, R. J., & Efron, B. (1993). An introduction to the bootstrap. Monographs on Statistics and Applied Probability, 57, 1-436.
Tu, W. M. (2012). Confucian spirituality in contemporary China. In F. Yang & J. B. Tamney (Eds.), Confucianism and spiritual traditions in modern China and beyond: 75–96. Leide, The Netherlands: Brill.
Uhl-Bien, M., & Maslyn, J. M. (2003). Reciprocity in manager-subordinate relationships: Components, configurations, and outcomes. Journal of Management, 29(4), 511-532. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0149-2063(03)00023-0
Ullman, J. B., & Bentler, P. M. (2012). Structural equation modeling. Handbook of Psychology, Second Edition, 2.
Wang, A. C., & Cheng, B. S. (2010). When does benevolent leadership lead to creativity? The moderating role of creative role identity and job autonomy. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 31(1), 106-121. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.634
Wang, A. C., Chiang, J. T. J., Tsai, C. Y., Lin, T. T., & Cheng, B. S. (2013). Gender makes the difference: The moderating role of leader gender on the relationship between leadership styles and subordinate performance. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 122(2), 101-113. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.obhdp.2013.06.001
Wang, A. C., Chiang, J. T. J., Chou, W. J., & Cheng, B. S. (2017). One definition, different manifestations: Investigating ethical leadership in the Chinese context. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 34, 505-535. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10490-016-9495-7
Wang, A. C., Tsai, C. Y., Dionne, S. D., Yammarino, F. J., Spain, S. M., Ling, H. C., ... & Cheng, B. S. (2018). Benevolence-dominant, authoritarianism-dominant, and classical paternalistic leadership: Testing their relationships with subordinate performance. The Leadership Quarterly, 29(6), 686-697. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2018.06.002
Wang, A. C. (2019). Developmental or exploitative? How Chinese leaders integrate authoritarianism and benevolence to cultivate subordinates. Academy of Management Discoveries, 5(3), 291-313. https://doi.org/10.5465/amd.2018.0006
Wang, A. C., Chen, Y., Hsu, M. S., Lin, Y. C., & Tsai, C. Y. (2020). Role-based paternalistic exchange: explaining the joint effect of leader authoritarianism and benevolence on culture-specific follower outcomes. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 39, 433-455. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10490-020-09732-y
Wang, A. C., Lin, Y. C., Chen, Y., & Wang, S. B. (2022). Developmental Leadership: Scale Development and Validation. Academy of Management Proceedings 2022(1), 16715. https://doi.org/10.5465/AMBPP.2022.16715abstract
Wang, A. C., Tsai, C. Y., Wang, S. B., & Dai, H. Q. (2023). When does paternalistic control positively relate to job satisfaction and citizenship behavior in Taiwan? The role of follower expectation. Journal of Applied Psychology, 108(10), 1598-1618. https://doi.org/10.1037/apl0001097
Wang, H., Law, K. S., Hackett, R. D., Wang, D., & Chen, Z. X. (2005). Leader-member exchange as a mediator of the relationship between transformational leadership and followers' performance and organizational citizenship behavior. Academy of Management Journal, 48(3), 420-432. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2005.17407908
Watkins, T., Patel, A. S., & Antoine, G. E. (2022). You are what you eat: How and when workplace healthy eating cultivates coworker perceptions and behaviors. Journal of Applied Psychology, 107(9), 1459-1478. https://doi.org/10.1037/apl0000579
Westwood, R. (1997). Harmony and patriarchy: The cultural basis for paternalistic headship among the overseas Chinese. Organization Studies, 18(3), 445-480. https://doi.org/10.1177/017084069701800305
Whitener, E. M. (2001). Do “high commitment” human resource practices affect employee commitment?: A cross-level analysis using hierarchical linear modeling. Journal of Management, 27(5), 515-535. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0149-2063(01)00106-4
Xia, Z., Yang, F., & Xu, Q. (2021). Authoritarian–benevolent leadership and its effect on graduate student creativity: the mediating role of intrinsic motivation. The Journal of Creative Behavior, 55(1), 25-38. https://doi.org/10.1002/jocb.431
Yammarino, F. (2013). Leadership: Past, present, and future. Journal of Leadership & Organizational Studies, 20(2), 149–155. http://doi:10.1177/1548051812471559
Yan, J., & Hunt, J. G. J. (2005). A cross cultural perspective on perceived leadership effectiveness. International Journal of Cross Cultural Management, 5(1), 49-66. https://doi.org/10.1177/1470595805050824
Yoo, D. K., Rao, S. S., & Hong, P. (2006). A comparative study on cultural differences and quality practices–Korea, USA, Mexico, and Taiwan. International Journal of Quality & Reliability Management, 23(6), 607-624. https://doi.org/10.1108/02656710610672452
Zhang, X., & Bartol, K. M. (2010). Linking empowering leadership and employee creativity: The influence of psychological empowerment, intrinsic motivation, and creative process engagement. Academy of Management Journal, 53(1), 107-128. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2010.48037118
Zhu, W., Zheng, X., He, H., Wang, G., & Zhang, X. (2019). Ethical leadership with both “moral person” and “moral manager” aspects: Scale development and cross-cultural validation. Journal of Business Ethics, 158, 547-565. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-017-3740-y
電子全文 Fulltext
本電子全文僅授權使用者為學術研究之目的,進行個人非營利性質之檢索、閱讀、列印。請遵守中華民國著作權法之相關規定,切勿任意重製、散佈、改作、轉貼、播送,以免觸法。
論文使用權限 Thesis access permission:自定論文開放時間 user define
開放時間 Available:
校內 Campus:開放下載的時間 available 2027-08-21
校外 Off-campus:開放下載的時間 available 2027-08-21

您的 IP(校外) 位址是 216.73.216.89
現在時間是 2025-06-25
論文校外開放下載的時間是 2027-08-21

Your IP address is 216.73.216.89
The current date is 2025-06-25
This thesis will be available to you on 2027-08-21.

紙本論文 Printed copies
紙本論文的公開資訊在102學年度以後相對較為完整。如果需要查詢101學年度以前的紙本論文公開資訊,請聯繫圖資處紙本論文服務櫃台。如有不便之處敬請見諒。
開放時間 available 2027-08-21

QR Code