Responsive image
博碩士論文 etd-0723125-112428 詳細資訊
Title page for etd-0723125-112428
論文名稱
Title
動態競爭下競爭對手研發密度對企業存貨行為之影響:以電腦服務業為例
The Impact of Competitor R&D Intensity on Firm Inventory Behavior under Dynamic Competition: Evidence from the Computer Services Industry
系所名稱
Department
畢業學年期
Year, semester
語文別
Language
學位類別
Degree
頁數
Number of pages
45
研究生
Author
指導教授
Advisor
召集委員
Convenor
口試委員
Advisory Committee
口試日期
Date of Exam
2025-07-10
繳交日期
Date of Submission
2025-08-23
關鍵字
Keywords
動態競爭、研發強度、競爭信號、存貨管理、營運資金管理
Dynamic Competition, R&D Intensity, Competitive Signals, Inventory Management, Working Capital Management
統計
Statistics
本論文已被瀏覽 230 次,被下載 10
The thesis/dissertation has been browsed 230 times, has been downloaded 10 times.
中文摘要
本研究以動態競爭理論為基礎,探討在研發驅動的產業環境中,競爭對手的研發強度是否會影響焦點企業的存貨管理行為。儘管過去已有研究指出企業研發活動對自身創新、績效及市場表現具有多重影響,但對競爭對手研發投入如何作為一種外部競爭信號,進一步影響企業營運資金決策,尤其是庫存管理策略的影響,仍屬文獻上的缺口。為填補此一空白,本研究以電腦服務業(SIC: 7370-7379)為對象,選取年營收前兩大的企業為焦點公司,並使用2010年至2023年間COMPUSTAT資料,檢驗競爭對手研發密度對焦點公司存貨對總資產比的影響。研究結果顯示,在控制公司規模、托賓Q、毛利率與現金流穩定性等變數後,競爭對手研發強度對焦點企業存貨水準具有邊際負向影響,意味企業可能因應技術更迭與市場競爭壓力而調整其庫存策略。此結果不僅延伸了動態競爭理論於營運資金管理領域的應用,亦為企業在高研發強度環境中優化庫存配置與應對市場變動提供實證依據與管理意涵。



Abstract
This study adopts the dynamic competition perspective to examine whether a rival firm's R&D intensity influences the inventory management strategies of focal firms, particularly within R&D-driven industries. While prior research has extensively explored how a firm’s own R&D activities affect innovation, performance, and market outcomes, limited attention has been paid to how rivals’ R&D efforts function as competitive signals that shape firms’ working capital decisions, especially inventory allocation. Addressing this gap, this study focuses on the computer services industry (SIC: 7370–7379), selecting the top two firms by annual revenue as focal firms. Using panel data from COMPUSTAT spanning 2010 to 2023, the study investigates the impact of competitor R&D intensity on focal firms’ inventory-to-asset ratios. After controlling for firm size, Tobin’s Q, gross margin, and cash flow volatility, regression results reveal a marginally significant negative relationship between competitor R&D intensity and focal firm inventory levels. This suggests that focal firms may respond to accelerated technological change and increased competitive pressure by optimizing inventory strategies. The findings not only extend the application of dynamic competition theory into the domain of working capital management, but also provide empirical insights for firms aiming to adjust inventory policies in high-R&D, fast-evolving markets.


目次 Table of Contents
⽬ 錄
論⽂審定書………………………………………………………… i
誌謝………………………………………………………………… ii
摘要………………………………………………………………… iii
Abstract……………………………………………………………… iv
第 ⼀ 章、緒論……………………………………………………… 1
第 ⼆ 章、⽂獻探討………………………………………………… 5
第⼀節、動態競爭理論………………............………………… 5
第⼆節、研發強度…………………………………………... 7
第三節、影響存貨的因素………………………….......…… 8
第四節、假設發展.............................................…… 10
第 三 章、研究⽅法……………………………………………… 12
第⼀節、樣本與資料來源……………………….............. 12
第⼆節、研究設計.................................................. 13
第三節、研究⽅法................................................. 17
第 四 章、實證結果……………………………………………… 19
第⼀節、 變數之敘述統計................................... 1 9
第⼆節、 變數之相關係數................................... 2 0
第三節、 迴歸分析............................................... 23
第四節、 穩健性檢驗………………………………............. 25
第 五 章、研究討論………….………………………………….. 27
第⼀節、研究貢獻……………………………………............ 27
第 六 章、研究建議…………….......................………………… 30
第⼀節、研究結論……………………..........……………… 30
第⼆節、限制與研究建議……………….........….…………. 31
參考⽂獻………………………………………….………….……… 34

表 次
表 4-1 敘述統計表………………………………………………… 20
表 4-2 Pearson 相關係數……………………………………………. 22
表 4-3 競爭對⼿研發投⼊與焦點企業存貨之實證結果………….. 24
表 4-4 競爭對⼿研發投⼊與焦點企業存貨之穩健度測試……….. 26
參考文獻 References
Acs, Z. J., & Audretsch, D. B. (1988). Innovation in large and small firms: An empirical analysis. The American Economic Review, 78(4), 678–690.
Aghion, P., & Howitt, P. (1992). A model of growth through creative destruction. Econometrica, 60(2), 323–351.
Ak, B. K., & Patatoukas, P. N. (2016). Customer-base concentration and inventory efficiencies: Evidence from the manufacturing sector. Haas School of Business, University of California at Berkeley.
Bates, T. W., Kahle, K. M., & Stulz, R. M. (2009). Why do U.S. firms hold so much more cash than they used to? The Journal of Finance, 64(5), 1965–2002.
Baum, J. A., & Korn, H. J. (1996). Competitive dynamics of interfirm rivalry. Academy of Management Journal, 39(2), 255–255.
Bendig, D., Strese, S., & Brettel, M. (2016). The link between operational leanness and credit ratings. Journal of Operations Management, 52(1), 46–55.
Bloom, N., Schankerman, M., & Van Reenen, J. (2013). Identifying technology spillovers and product market rivalry. Econometrica: Journal of the Econometric Society, 81(4), 1347–1393.
Brown, Z. Y., & MacKay, A. (2021). Competition in pricing algorithms (Working Paper No. 28860). National Bureau of Economic Research.
Caglayan, M., Maioli, S., & Mateut, S. (2012). Inventories, sales uncertainty, and financial strength. Journal of Banking & Finance, 36(9), 2512-2521.
Chen, M.-J. (1996). Competitor analysis and interfirm rivalry: Toward a theoretical integration. Academy of Management Review, 21(1), 100–134.
Chen, M.-J. (2009). Competitive dynamics research: An insider’s odyssey. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 26(1), 5–26.
Chen, M.-J., & Miller, D. (2012). Competitive dynamics: Themes, trends, and a prospective research platform. The Academy of Management Annals, 6(1), 135–210.
Chen, M.-J., & Miller, D. (2015). Reconceptualizing competitive dynamics: A multidimensional framework. Strategic Management Journal, 36(8), 758–775.
Chen, M.-J., & Miller, K. D. (2015). The new age of competition: Competitive dynamics research in the millennium. Journal of Management, 41(4), 861–887.
Chen, S. S., Hung, W., & Wang, Y. (2014). R&D increases and long-term performance of rivals. Financial Review, 49(4), 765–792.
Chen, T., Tribbitt, M. A., Yang, Y., & Li, X. (2017). Does rivals' innovation matter? A competitive dynamics perspective on firms' product strategy. Journal of Business Research, 76, 1–7.
Cohen, W. M., & Levinthal, D. A. (1990). Absorptive capacity: A new perspective on learning and innovation. Administrative Science Quarterly, 35(1), 128–152.
Eroglu, C., & Hofer, C. (2011a). Inventory types and firm performance: Vector autoregressive and vector error correction models. Journal of Business Logistics, 32(3), 268–282.
Eroglu, C., & Hofer, C. (2011b). Lean, leaner, too lean? The inventory-performance link revisited. Journal of Operations Management, 29(4), 356–369.
Falk, M. (2012). Quantile estimates of the impact of R&D intensity on firm performance. Small Business Economics, 39(1), 19–37.
Ferrier, W. J., Smith, K. G., & Grimm, C. M. (1999). The role of competitive action in market share erosion and industry dethronement: A study of industry leaders and challengers. Academy of Management Journal, 42(4), 372–388.
Gaur, V., Fisher, M. L., & Raman, A. (2005). An econometric analysis of inventory turnover performance in retail services. Management Science, 51(2), 181–194.
Gilbert, R. J. (2006). Competition and innovation. Journal of Industrial Organization Education, 1(1), 1–23.
Grabowski, H. G., & Baxter, N. D. (1973). Rivalry in industrial research and development: An empirical study. The Journal of Industrial Economics, 21(3), 209–235.
Griliches, Z. (1992). The search for R&D spillovers. Scandinavian Journal of Economics, 94(Supplement), 29–47.
Hirsch, S., & Bijaoui, I. (1985). R&D intensity and export performance: A micro view. Review of World Economics (Weltwirtschaftliches Archiv), 121(2), 238–251.
Hutzschenreuter, T., & Israel, S. (2008). A review of empirical research on dynamic competitive strategy. Journal of Management, 34(4), 421–461.
Jhang, S. S. S., Ogden, J. P., & Suresh, N. C. (2019). Operational and financial configurations contingent on market power status. Omega, 88, 91-109.
Katehakis, M. N., Melamed, B., & Shi, J. (2016). Cash-flow based dynamic inventory management. Production and Operations Management, 25(9), 1558–1575.
Ketchen, D. J., Jr., Snow, C. C., & Hoover, V. L. (2004). Research on competitive dynamics: Recent accomplishments and future challenges. Journal of Management, 30(6), 779–804.
Lin, B., Lee, Y., & Hung, S. (2006). R&D intensity and commercialization orientation effects on financial performance. Journal of Business Research, 59(5), 679–685.
Loury, G. C. (1979). Market structure and innovation. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 93(3), 395–410.
Maggitti, P. G. (2006). Competitive dynamics. In S. Porth (Ed.), Strategic management: A cross functional approach. Prentice Hall.
Moudud, J., Bina, C., & Mason, P. (2013). The political economy of the world-system: The next 25 years. Routledge.
Padgett, R. C., & Galan, J. I. (2010). The effect of R&D intensity on corporate social responsibility. Journal of Business Ethics, 93(3), 407–418.
Porter, M. E. (1980). Competitive strategy: Techniques for analyzing industries and competitors. Free Press.
Roumiantsev, S., & Netessine, S. (2005). Should inventory policy be lean or responsive? Evidence for US public companies. The Wharton School, University of Pennsylvania.
Roumiantsev, S., & Netessine, S. (2007). What can be learned from classical inventory models? A cross-industry exploratory investigation. Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, 9(4), 409–429.
Smith, K. G., Ferrier, W. J., & Ndofor, H. (2001). Competitive dynamics research: Critique and future directions. In M. Hitt, R. E. Freeman, & J. Harrison (Eds.), Handbook of strategic management (pp. 315–361). Blackwell Publishers.
Spence, M. (1984). Cost reduction, competition, and industry performance. Econometrica, 52(1), 101–122.
Young, G., Smith, K. G., & Grimm, C. (1996). "Austrian" and industrial organization perspectives on firm-level competitive activity and performance. Organization Science, 7(2), 243–254.
電子全文 Fulltext
本電子全文僅授權使用者為學術研究之目的,進行個人非營利性質之檢索、閱讀、列印。請遵守中華民國著作權法之相關規定,切勿任意重製、散佈、改作、轉貼、播送,以免觸法。
論文使用權限 Thesis access permission:校內校外完全公開 unrestricted
開放時間 Available:
校內 Campus: 已公開 available
校外 Off-campus: 已公開 available


紙本論文 Printed copies
紙本論文的公開資訊在102學年度以後相對較為完整。如果需要查詢101學年度以前的紙本論文公開資訊,請聯繫圖資處紙本論文服務櫃台。如有不便之處敬請見諒。
開放時間 available 已公開 available

QR Code