本研究探討基礎教育補助與高等教育補助對工資溢酬與所得不均度的影響。我們建立一個結合異質性家庭、教育選擇與政策干預的動態一般均衡模型，並透過比較靜態模擬分析不同補助的政策效果。結果顯示：
首先，高等教育補助在水準較低時能提高高學歷族群工資，但隨補助擴張，工資溢酬逐漸縮小；其次，基礎教育補助在適度範圍內能直接提升基礎學歷族群報酬，而高等教育補助則透過技術進步產生涓滴效果，使其間接受益；但當基礎教育補助過高時，不僅該族群報酬反而下降，高等教育補助的正向作用也隨之消失，最終兩類補助同時對其帶來不利影響；最後，若補助水準過度擴張，尤其兩類補助同時維持高水準時，所得不均度顯著加劇。綜合而言，教育補助不應集中於單一階段，政策設計需兼顧基礎與高等教育，避免過度擴張，方能兼顧教育公平與經濟效率，確保政策發揮正面作用並促進社會與經濟的穩定發展。

This thesis investigates the impact of basic and higher education subsidies on wage premiums and income inequality. A dynamic general equilibrium model is constructed, incorporating heterogeneous households, endogenous education choices, and government interventions. Comparative static simulations are employed to evaluate the policy effects of different subsidy arrangements. The results reveal three main findings:
First, higher education subsidies, at lower levels, raise the wages of highly educated workers; however, as subsidies expand, the wage premium gradually narrows.
Second, moderate basic education subsidies directly increase the earnings of low-educated workers, while higher education subsidies indirectly benefit them through technological progress, generating a trickle-down effect. Yet, when basic education subsidies become excessively large, not only do the returns of low-educated workers decline, but the positive effects of higher education subsidies also vanish, leading both subsidies to exert adverse impacts.
Finally, if subsidy levels expand excessively particularly when both types of subsidies are simultaneously high—income inequality increases significantly.
In conclusion, education subsidies should not be concentrated on a single stage. Policy design must strike a balance between basic and higher education, avoid excessive expansion, and ensure both equity and efficiency, so as to enhance the positive effects of subsidies and foster stable social and economic development.

論文審定書 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . i
誌謝 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ii
摘要 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . iii
Abstract . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . iv
目錄 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . v
圖次 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . vii
表次 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .viii
第一章 緒論 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1
1.1 研究動機 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1
1.2 文獻回顧 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4
1.3 本文架構 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5
第二章 基本模型 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7
2.1 家戶部門 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7
2.1.1 效用函數. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .8
2.1.2 人力資本累積 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8
2.1.3 資產累積 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10
2.1.4 家戶最適控制條件 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 12
2.2 廠商 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 16
2.2.1 最終財貨部門 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 17
2.2.2 中間財貨部門 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 17
2.2.3 機器製造部門 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 19
2.2.4 研發部門 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 21
2.3 政府部門 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 23
2.4 總體均衡 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 24
2.4.1 市場均衡條件 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 25
2.4.2 內生變數與方程式之整合 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 26
2.5 經濟成長 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 27
2.6 工資結構與衡量方式 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 29
第三章 主要結果 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 32
3.1 參數校準 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 32
3.2 比較靜態分析 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 33
3.2.1 基礎教育補助的擴張 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 34
3.2.2 高等教育補助的調整與交互效果 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 38
第四章 結論 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 43
圖形與表格 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 46
參考文獻 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 58
附錄 A-商品市場均衡條件 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 61
附錄 B-變數整合 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 62
附錄 C-成長率推導 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 66
附錄 D-轉換變數 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 68
附錄 E-靜止均衡 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 72
附錄 F-家庭效用分析 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 79

Acemoglu, D. (1998). Why do new technologies complement skills? directed technical change and
wage inequality. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 113(4):1055–1089.
Acemoglu, D. (2002). Directed technical change. The Review of Economic Studies, 69(4):781–809.
Aghion, P. and Bolton, P. (1997). A theory of trickle-down growth and development. The Review of
Economic Studies, 64(2):151–172.
Barone, C. and Ortiz, L. (2011). Overeducation among european university graduates: a comparative
analysis of its incidence and the importance of higher education differentiation. Higher Education,
61(3):325–337.
Blanden, J. and Gregg, P. (2004). Family income and educational attainment: a review of approaches
and evidence for britain. Oxford Review of Economic Policy, 20(2):245–263.
Böhm, S., Grossmann, V., and Steger, T. M. (2015). Does expansion of higher education lead to
trickle-down growth? Journal of Public Economics, 132:79–94.
Card, D. (2001). Estimating the return to schooling: Progress on some persistent econometric prob-
lems. Econometrica, 69(5):1127–1160.
Card, D. and Krueger, A. B. (1992). Does school quality matter? returns to education and the charac-
teristics of public schools in the united states. Journal of Political Economy, 100(1):1–40.
Castleman, B. L. and Long, B. T. (2016). Looking beyond enrollment: The causal effect of need-based
grants on college access, persistence, and graduation. Journal of Labor Economics, 34(4):1023–
1073.
Corak, M. (2013). Income inequality, equality of opportunity, and intergenerational mobility. Journal
of Economic Perspectives, 27(3):79–102.
Croce, G. and Ghignoni, E. (2012). Demand and supply of skilled labour and overeducation in europe:
a country-level analysis. Comparative Economic Studies, 54(2):413–439.
Dynarski, S. M. (2003). Does aid matter? measuring the effect of student aid on college attendance
and completion. American Economic Review, 93(1):279–288.
Fredriksson, P. G. (1999). The political economy of trade liberalization and environmental policy.
Southern Economic Journal, 65(3):513–525.
Goldin, C. and Katz, L. F. (2007). Long-run changes in the wage structure: Narrowing, widening,
polarizing. Brookings Papers on Economic Activity, (2):135–165.
Grossman, G. M. and Helpman, E. (1991). Trade, knowledge spillovers, and growth. European
Economic Review, 35(2-3):517–526.
Harmon, C., Oosterbeek, H., and Walker, I. (2003). The returns to education: Microeconomics. Jour-
nal of Economic Surveys, 17(2):115–156.
Hirsch, P. M. (1980). The “scary world”of the nonviewer and other anomalies: A reanalysis of
gerbner et al.’s findings on cultivation analysis part i. Communication Research, 7(4):403–456.
Jones, C. I. (1995). R & d-based models of economic growth. Journal of Political Economy,
103(4):759–784.
Kuznets, S. (1955). International differences in capital formation and financing. In Capital Formation
and Economic Growth, pages 19–111. Princeton University Press.
Lucas Jr, R. E. (1988). On the mechanics of economic development. Journal of Monetary Economics,
22(1):3–42.
Oreopoulos, P. (2006). Estimating average and local average treatment effects of education when
compulsory schooling laws really matter. American Economic Review, 96(1):152–175.
Oreopoulous, P. and Petronijevic, U. (2013). Making college worth it: A review of the returns to
higher education. The Future of Children, 23(1):41–65.
Piketty, T. (1997). The dynamics of the wealth distribution and the interest rate with credit rationing.
The Review of Economic Studies, 64(2):173–189.
Psacharopoulos, G. (1981). Returns to education: An updated international comparison. Comparative
Education, 17(3):321–341.
Psacharopoulos, G. (1994). Returns to investment in education: A global update. World Development,
22(9):1325–1343.
Romer, P. M. (1990). Endogenous technological change. Journal of Political Economy, 98(5, Part
2):S71–S102.
Thornton, J. R., Agnello, R. J., and Link, C. R. (1978). Poverty and economic growth: Trickle down
peters out. Economic Inquiry, 16(3):385–394.