Responsive image
博碩士論文 etd-0725124-163325 詳細資訊
Title page for etd-0725124-163325
論文名稱
Title
員工應得權益感對心理賦權與創新行為之中介效果:以創意自我效能為調節變項
A study of the Mediation Effect of Employee Entitlement on the Relationship between Psychological Empowerment and Innovation Behavior: The Moderation Effect of Creative Self-Efficacy
系所名稱
Department
畢業學年期
Year, semester
語文別
Language
學位類別
Degree
頁數
Number of pages
73
研究生
Author
指導教授
Advisor
召集委員
Convenor
口試委員
Advisory Committee
口試日期
Date of Exam
2024-06-24
繳交日期
Date of Submission
2024-08-25
關鍵字
Keywords
心理賦權、員工應得權益感、創新行為、創意自我效能、部分中介效果
Psychological Empowerment, Employee Entitlement, Innovation Behavior, Creative Self-efficacy, Partial Mediation Effect
統計
Statistics
本論文已被瀏覽 326 次,被下載 9
The thesis/dissertation has been browsed 326 times, has been downloaded 9 times.
中文摘要
在當前變化迅速、競爭激烈且注重創新的社會環境中,企業的成功很大程度上依賴於員工的表現和創新能力。在此環境下,隨著勞動法規的完善和社會價值觀的提升,員工逐漸期望獲得公平的薪資、合理的工時安排和職業發展機會,並重視自身權益與待遇。員工對於權益的要求也引起了學者的廣泛關注。過去學者多探究應得權益感所造成的不利觀點,而近年來開始有學者提出,員工若具備應得權益感這一特質,可以為企業產生有利的結果,並探討應得權益感之前因。
因此,為探究心理賦權、員工應得權益感及創新行為間之關聯性,並且檢視創意自我效能對此段關係的調節影響,本研究的研究對象以在職人員為主,採兩階段問卷進行發放,最後有效問卷共回收243份。研究結果顯示:心理賦權和創新行為間具正向的關聯性、心理賦權和員工應得權益感間具正向的關聯性,而員工應得權益感與創新行為具正向的關聯性,此外,員工應得權益感在心理賦權和創新行為間的正向關聯性中,具有中介效果,最後,創意自我效能在員工應得權益感和創新行為的正向關聯性中,具調節效果。依據研究結果提出實際運用與建議,以及研究限制,供企業界與學術界參考。
Abstract
In today's rapidly evolving and competitive environment, the success of enterprises hinges on employee performance and innovation. As labor regulations improve and social values shift, employees increasingly expect fair compensation, reasonable hours, and career development, emphasizing their rights. Employee entitlement demands have garnered scholarly interest, with recent studies suggesting that a sense of entitlement may positively contribute to organizational success. This research explores the relationships between psychological empowerment, employee entitlement, and innovation behavior, with creative self-efficacy as a moderating factor. Using a two-stage survey, 243 valid responses were analyzed via IBM SPSS 24 and Mplus 6. The findings reveal that: Psychological empowerment is positively related to Innovation Behavior; Psychological empowerment is positively related to employee entitlement; Employee entitlement is positively related to innovation behavior; Employee entitlement mediates the positive relationship between psychological empowerment and innovation behavior; Creative self-efficacy moderates the positive association between employee entitlement and innovative behavior. Based on the findings, this study offers practical and management-related suggestions for businesses and directions for future research.
目次 Table of Contents
論文審定書 ........................................................................................... i
摘要 ...................................................................................................... ii
Abstract ............................................................................................... iii
目錄 ..................................................................................................... iv
第一章 緒論 ......................................................................................... 1
第一節 研究背景與動機 ..................................................................... 1
第二節 研究目的 ................................................................................. 3
第二章 文獻探討 ................................................................................. 4
第一節 心理賦權 ................................................................................. 4
第二節 創新行為 ................................................................................. 6
第三節 員工應得權益感 ..................................................................... 8
第四節 創意自我效能 ........................................................................ 11
第三章 研究方法 ................................................................................ 13
第一節 研究架構 ................................................................................ 13
第二節 研究各假設 ............................................................................ 14
第三節 研究樣本 ................................................................................ 15
第四節 研究工具 ................................................................................ 17
第五節 研究控制變項 ........................................................................ 21
第六節 資料分析 ................................................................................ 23
第七節 共同方法變異檢測 ................................................................ 25
第四章 討論結果 ................................................................................ 27
第一節 各變項之現況分析 ................................................................ 27
第二節 人口變項與主要變項之差異檢定 ........................................ 29
第三節 相關係數分析 ........................................................................ 35
第四節 中介模型..................................................................................37
第五節 調節模型..................................................................................39
第六節 調節模型:強弱分配............................................................. 41
第五章 討論與建議 ............................................................................ 43
第一節 研究發現與討論 .................................................................... 43
第二節 實務管理意涵 ........................................................................ 45
第三節 研究限制與未來建議 ............................................................ 47
參考文獻 ............................................................................................. 49
附錄:問卷 ......................................................................................... 60
參考文獻 References
王農凱(2023)。探討心理賦能、工作壓力、離職傾向與工作幸福感之關係:以知覺其他工作機會與外控人格特質為調節變項。國立中山大學人力資源管理研究所碩士論文,高雄市。
李澄賢(2004)。大學生的情緒調節、調節焦點、樂觀與創造力之關係。國立政治大學教育研究所,台北市。
吳靜吉、陳淑惠、李慧賢、郭俊賢、王文中、劉鶴龍 (1996),創新行為量表之編制與修訂,未出版。
林孟筠(2020)。我世代的組織公民行為?工作塑造與獨特感需求的中介效果及主動性人格的調節效果。國立中山大學人力資源管理研究所碩士論文,高雄市。
彭于萍(2016)。大學圖書館館員之領導者-成員交換關係、創意自我效能與館員創新行為之關係模式探析。教育資料與圖書館學,53(1),27-61。
游銘仁、吳靜吉(2019)。應得權益感與創新行為關係之研究:以創意自我效能為中介變項。科技管理學刊,24(1),1-29。
黃荷婷(2003)。研發團隊成員目標導向與創新行為、創新績效-自我效能與集體效能的中介效果。東吳大學企業管理學系碩士論文,台北市。
黃君堯(2022)。自大型應得權益感對向下比較與創新行為之中介效果:以團隊凝聚力作為調節變項。國立中山大學人力資源管理研究所碩士論文,高雄市。
蔡啟通(2008)。內在動機與員工創新行為之關係:Amabile三元交互效果及Shin中介效果之驗證。管理學報,25(5),549-575。
蔡啟通(2012)。互動正義與員工創新行為:自我效能及主管部屬交換之干擾效果。修平學報,(25),137-159。
Aggarwal, A., Chand, P. K., Jhamb, D., & Mittal, A. (2020). Leader-Member Exchange, Work Engagement, and Psychological Withdrawal Behavior: The Mediating Role of Psychological Empowerment. Frontiers in psychology, 11, 423. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.00423
Akbari, M., Bagheri, A., Imani, S., & Asadnezhad, M. (2021). Does entrepreneurial leadership encourage innovation work behavior? The mediating role of creative self-efficacy and support for innovation. European Journal of Innovation Management, 24(1), 1-22.
Amabile, T. M. (1988). A model of creativity and innovation in organizations. Research in organizational behavior, 10(1), 123-167.
Amabile, T. M. (1996). Creativity and innovation in organizations (Vol. 5). Boston: Harvard Business School.
Amabile, T. M., Conti, R., Coon, H., Lazenby, J., & Herron, M. (1996). Assessing the work environment for creativity. Academy of management journal, 39(5), 1154-1184.
Anastasio, P. A., & Rose, K. C. (2014). Beyond deserving more: Psychological entitlement also predicts negative attitudes toward personally relevant out-groups. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 5(5), 593–600. https://doi.org/10.1177/1948550613519683
Arciniega, L. M., & Menon, S. T. (2013). The power of goal internalization: Studying psychological empowerment in a Venezuelan plant. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 24(15), 2948–2967. https://doi.org/10.1080/09585192.2013.763846
Bakan, D. (1966). The duality of human existence: An essay on psychology and religion. Rand Mcnally.
Bandura, A. (1977). Self-efficacy: Toward a unifying theory of behavioral change. Psychological Review, 84(2), 191–215. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.84.2.191
Barton H., Barton L. C. (2011). Trust and psychological empowerment in the Russian work context. Hum. Resour. Manage. Rev. 21 201–208. 10.1016/j.hrmr.2011.02.001
Blau, J. R., & Alba, R. D. (1982). Empowering Nets of Participation. Administrative Science Quarterly, 27(3), 363–379. https://doi.org/10.2307/2392317
Bowen, D.E. & Lawler, E.E. (1992). The empowerment of service workers: what, why, how, and when, Sloan Management Review, 33(3), 31-39.
Campbell, W. K., & Foster, J. D. (2007). The narcissistic self: Background, an extended agency model, and ongoing controversies. In C. Sedikides & S. J. Spencer (Eds.), The self (pp. 115–138). Psychology Press.
Campbell, W. K., Bonacci, A. M., Shelton, J., Exline, J. J., & Bushman, B. J. (2004). Psychological entitlement: Interpersonal consequences and validation of a self-report measure. Journal of personality assessment, 83(1), 29-45.
Campbell, W. K., Brunell, A. B., & Finkel, E. J. (2006). Narcissism, Interpersonal Self-Regulation, and Romantic Relationships: An Agency Model Approach.
Campbell, W. K., Goodie, A. S., & Foster, J. D. (2004). Narcissism, confidence, and risk attitude. Journal of behavioral decision making, 17(4), 297-311.
Černe, M., Bunjak, A., Wong, S. I., & Moh'd, S. S. (2022). I'm creative and deserving! From self‐rated creativity to creative recognition. Creativity and Innovation Management, 31(4), 664-679.
Chen, A. S. Y., & Hou, Y. H. (2016). The effects of ethical leadership, voice behavior and climates for innovation on creativity: A moderated mediation examination. The leadership quarterly, 27(1), 1-13.
Chen, J., Yin, X., Fu, X., & McKern, B. (2021). Beyond catch-up: could China become the global innovation powerhouse? China’s innovation progress and challenges from a holistic innovation perspective. Industrial and Corporate Change, 30(4), 1037-1064.
Chiang, C.-F., & Hsieh, T.-S. (2012). The impacts of perceived organizational support and psychological empowerment on job performance: The mediating effects of organizational citizenship behavior. International Journal of Hospitality Management, 31(1), 180–190. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhm.2011.04.011
Cicolini, G., Comparcini, D., & Simonetti, V. (2014). Workplace empowerment and nurses' job satisfaction: a systematic literature review. Journal of nursing management, 22(7), 855–871. https://doi.org/10.1111/jonm.12028
De Hauw, S., & De Vos, A. (2010). Millennials’ career perspective and psychological contract expectations: does the recession lead to lowered expectations?. Journal of business and psychology, 25, 293-302.
Deci, E. L., Olafsen, A. H., & Ryan, R. M. (2017). Self-determination theory in work organizations: The state of a science. Annual review of organizational psychology and organizational behavior, 4, 19-43.
Eylon, D. (1998), "Understanding empowerment and resolving its paradox: Lessons from Mary Parker Follett", Journal of Management History (Archive), Vol. 4 No. 1, pp. 16-28. https://doi.org/10.1108/13552529810203905
Gagné, M., & Deci, E. L. (2005). Self‐determination theory and work motivation. Journal of Organizational behavior, 26(4), 331-362.
Haase, J., Hoff, E. V., Hanel, P. H. P., & Innes-Ker, Å. (2018). A meta-analysis of the relation between creative self-efficacy and different creativity measurements. Creativity Research Journal, 30(1), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1080/10400419.2018.1411436
Harvey, P., & Harris, K. J. (2010). Frustration-based outcomes of entitlement and the influence of supervisor communication. Human Relations, 63(11), 1639-1660.
Harvey, P., & Martinko, M. J. (2009). An empirical examination of the role of attributions in psychological entitlement and its outcomes. Journal of organizational behavior: the international journal of industrial, Occupational and Organizational Psychology and Behavior, 30(4), 459-476.
Hsu, M. L. A., Hou, S.-T., & Fan, H.-L. (2011). Creative self-efficacy and innovative behavior in a service setting: Optimism as a moderator. The Journal of Creative Behavior, 45(4), 258-272. doi:10.1002/j.2162-6057.2011.tb01430.x
Jiang, W., & Gu, Q. (2015). Leader creativity expectations motivate employee creativity: a moderated mediation examination. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 28(5), 724–749. https://doi.org/10.1080/09585192.2015.1109535
John, O. P., & Robins, R. W. (1994). Accuracy and bias in self-perception: Individual differences in self-enhancement and the role of narcissism. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 66(1), 206–219. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.66.1.206
Kanter, R. M. (1988). Three tiers for innovation research. Communication research, 15(5), 509-523.
Kazlauskaite, R., Buciuniene, I., & Turauskas, L. (2011). Organisational and psychological empowerment in the HRM‐performance linkage. Employee Relations, 34(2), 138-158.
Knol, J., & van Linge, R. (2009). Innovative behaviour: The effect of structural and psychological empowerment on nurses. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 65(2), 359–370. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2648.2008.04876.x
Langerud, D. H., & Jordan, P. J. (2020). Entitlement at work: Linking positive behaviors to employee entitlement. Journal of Management & Organization, 26(1), 75-94.
Lee, A., Schwarz, G., Newman, A., & Legood, A. (2019). Investigating when and why psychological entitlement predicts unethical pro-organizational behavior. Journal of Business Ethics, 154, 109-126.
Li, C.-H., & Wu, J.-J. (2011). The structural relationships between optimism and innovative behavior: Understanding potential antecedents and mediating effects. Creativity Research Journal, 23(2), 119-128. doi:10.1080/10400419.2011.571184
Mainiero, L. A. (1986). Coping with powerlessness: The relationship of gender and job dependency to empowerment-strategy usage. Administrative Science Quarterly, 31(4), 633–653. https://doi.org/10.2307/2392967
Manojlovich, M. (2007). Power and empowerment in nursing: Looking backward to inform the future. Online Journal of Issues in Nursing, 12(1).
Montoya-Ramírez, M. F., Ostos, J. & Saenz Arteaga, A. R. (2020). Role of empowerment and identification with work teams in innovation climate. RAE Revista de Administracao de Empresas, 60(3), 183-194. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0034-759020200302
More flexible and more innovative: the impact of flexible work arrangements on the innovation behavior of knowledge employees
Neilsen, E. H. (1986). Empowerment strategies: Balancing authority and responsibility. Executive power : [how executives influence people and organizations].
Newman, A., Herman, H. M., Schwarz, G., & Nielsen, I. (2018). The effects of employees' creative self-efficacy on innovative behavior: The role of entrepreneurial leadership. Journal of business research, 89, 1-9.
Norena-Chavez, D., & Guevara, R. (2020). Entrepreneurial passion and self-efficacy as factors explaining innovative behavior: A mediation model.
Oladipo, S.E. (2009). Psychological empowerment and development. Edo Journal of Conselling, 2(1), 118-126
Pardo-del-Val M., Martínez-Fuentes C., Roig-Dobón S. (2012). Participative management and its influence on organizational change. Manage. Decis. 50 1843–1860. 10.1108/00251741211279639
Paulhus, D. L., & John, O. P. (1998). Egoistic and moralistic biases in self-perception: The interplay of self-deceptive styles with basic traits and motives. Journal of Personality, 66(6), 1025–1060. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-6494.00041
Prilleltensky, I. (2008). The role of power in wellness, oppression, and liberation: The promise of psychopolitical validity. Journal of Community Psychology, 36(2), 116–136. https://doi.org/10.1002/jcop.20225
Puente-Díaz, R. (2016). Creative self-efficacy: An exploration of its antecedents, consequences, and applied implications. The Journal of Psychology: Interdisciplinary and Applied, 150(2), 175–195. https://doi.org/10.1080/00223980.2015.1051498
Ramírez, M. F. M., Ostos, J., & Arteaga, A. R. S. (2020). Role of empowerment and worker’s identification with their teams for an innovative climate. RAE - Revista De Administracao De Empresas, 60(3), 183–194. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0034-759020200302
Randolph, W. A. (1995). Navigating the journey to empowerment. Organizational dynamics, 23(4), 19-32.
Raskin, R., & Terry, H. (1988). A principal-components analysis of the Narcissistic Personality Inventory and further evidence of its construct validity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54(5), 890–902. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.54.5.890
Rhodewalt, F., & Morf, C. C. (1995). Self and interpersonal correlates of the Narcissistic Personality Inventory: A review and new findings. Journal of Research in Personality, 29(1), 1–23. https://doi.org/10.1006/jrpe.1995.1001
Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2019). Brick by brick: The origins, development, and future of self-determination theory. In Advances in motivation science (Vol. 6, pp. 111-156). Elsevier.
Schermuly, C. C., Deller, J., & Büsch, V. (2014). A research note on age discrimination and the desire to retire: The mediating effect of psychological empowerment. Research on aging, 36(3), 382-393.
Schwarz, G., Newman, A., Yu, J., & Michaels, V. (2023). Psychological entitlement and organizational citizenship behaviors: the roles of employee involvement climate and affective organizational commitment. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 34(1), 197-222.
Scott, S. G., & Bruce, R. A. (1994). Determinants of innovative behavior: A path model of individual innovation in the workplace. Academy of Management Journal, 37(3), 580–607. https://doi.org/10.2307/256701
Sedikides, C., Ntoumanis, N., & Sheldon, K. M. (2019). I am the chosen one: Narcissism in the backdrop of self‐determination theory. Journal of Personality, 87(1), 70–81. https://doi.org/10.1111/jopy.12402
Segarra-Ciprés, M., Escrig-Tena, A.B., & García-Juan, B. (2019). Employees’ proactive behavior and innovation performance. European Journal of Innovation Management.
Seibert, S. E., Wang, G., & Courtright, S. H. (2011). Antecedents and consequences of psychological and team empowerment in organizations: A meta-analytic review. Journal of Applied Psychology, 96(5), 981–1003. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0022676
Spence Laschinger, H. K., Leiter, M., Day, A., & Gilin, D. (2009). Workplace empowerment, incivility, and burnout: impact on staff nurse recruitment and retention outcomes. Journal of nursing management, 17(3), 302–311. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2834.2009.00999.x
Spreitzer, G. (2007). Giving peace a chance: Organizational leadership, empowerment, and peace. Journal of Organizational Behavior: The International Journal of Industrial, Occupational and Organizational Psychology and Behavior, 28(8), 1077-1095.
Spreitzer, G. M. (1995). Psychological empowerment in the workplace: Dimensions, measurement, and validation. Academy of Management Journal, 38(5), 1442–1465. https://doi.org/10.2307/256865
Spreitzer, G.M., Bamberger, P.A., Dutton, J.E., Eylon, D., Kirkman, B.L., & Rosen, B. (2007). Taking Stock: A review of more than twenty years of research on empowerment at work.
Stajkovic, A. D., & Luthans, F. (1998). Self-efficacy and work-related performance: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 124(2), 240–261. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.124.2.240
Tierney, P., & Farmer, S. M. (2002). Creative self-efficacy: Its potential antecedents and relationship to creative performance. Academy of Management Journal, 45(6), 1137–1148. https://doi.org/10.2307/3069429
Umrani, W. A., & Afsar, B. (2019). How transformational leadership impacts innovative work behaviour among nurses. British Journal of Healthcare Management, 25(12), 1-16.
Wang, C., & Han, Y. (2011). Linking properties of knowledge with innovation performance: the moderate role of absorptive capacity. Journal of Knowledge management, 15(5), 802-819.
Westerlaken, K. M., Jordan, P. J., & Ramsay, S. (2017). What about ‘MEE’: A Measure of Employee Entitlement and the impact on reciprocity in the workplace. Journal of Management & Organization, 23(3), 392–404. https://doi.org/10.1017/jmo.2016.5
Wiggins, J. S. (1991). Agency and communion as conceptual coordinates for the understanding and measurement of interpersonal behavior.
Wisse, B., Barelds, D. P. H., & Rietzschel, E. F. (2015). How innovative is your employee? The role of employee and supervisor Dark Triad personality traits in supervisor perceptions of employee innovative behavior. Personality and Individual Differences, 82, 158–162. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2015.03.020
Yazdi, A.M., & Mustamil, N. (2015). Empowerment Potential: Big-Five Personality Traits and Psychological Empowerment. International Business Management, 11, 62-69.
Yuan, F., & Woodman, R. W. (2010). Innovative behavior in the workplace: The role of performance and image outcome expectations. Academy of Management Journal, 53(2), 323–342. https://doi.org/10.5465/AMJ.2010.49388995
Zhang, X., & Bartol, K. M. (2010). Linking empowering leadership and employee creativity: The influence of psychological empowerment, intrinsic motivation, and creative process engagement. Academy of Management Journal, 53(1), 107–128. https://doi.org/10.5465/AMJ.2010.48037118
Zhou, J., & George, J. M. (2001). When job dissatisfaction leads to creativity: Encouraging the expression of voice. Academy of Management Journal, 44(4), 682–696. https://doi.org/10.2307/3069410
Zitek, E. M., & Vincent, L. C. (2015). Deserve and diverge: Feeling entitled makes people more creative. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 56, 242–248. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2014.10.006
電子全文 Fulltext
本電子全文僅授權使用者為學術研究之目的,進行個人非營利性質之檢索、閱讀、列印。請遵守中華民國著作權法之相關規定,切勿任意重製、散佈、改作、轉貼、播送,以免觸法。
論文使用權限 Thesis access permission:校內校外完全公開 unrestricted
開放時間 Available:
校內 Campus: 已公開 available
校外 Off-campus: 已公開 available


紙本論文 Printed copies
紙本論文的公開資訊在102學年度以後相對較為完整。如果需要查詢101學年度以前的紙本論文公開資訊,請聯繫圖資處紙本論文服務櫃台。如有不便之處敬請見諒。
開放時間 available 已公開 available

QR Code