博碩士論文 etd-0804108-213246 詳細資訊


[回到前頁查詢結果 | 重新搜尋]

姓名 孫和翊(Ho - i) 電子郵件信箱 hoticesun@gmail.com
畢業系所 資訊管理學系研究所(Information Management)
畢業學位 碩士(Master) 畢業時期 96學年第2學期
論文名稱(中) 以科技接受模式探討享樂型網站之縱貫研究
論文名稱(英) A Longitudinal Study of Hedonic Web adoption based on the Technology Acceptance Model
檔案
  • etd-0804108-213246.pdf
  • 本電子全文僅授權使用者為學術研究之目的,進行個人非營利性質之檢索、閱讀、列印。
    請遵守中華民國著作權法之相關規定,切勿任意重製、散佈、改作、轉貼、播送,以免觸法。
    論文使用權限

    電子論文:校內校外完全公開

    論文語文/頁數 中文/103
    統計 本論文已被瀏覽 5652 次,被下載 3055 次
    摘要(中) 時至今日,資訊科技早以普及到日常生活之中,網路上不斷地出現創新服務。本研究主要探討新使用者面對未曾使用過的享樂型網站時的預期感受與意圖以及經過一個月後的使用感受與意圖,還有這段期間內的使用程度。
    首先自行開發一套創新服務-iMemory網站,做為本研究所探討的科技。在第一次測量前先對受測者進行展示,展示後測量使用者心中的預期感受與意圖。一個月後再測量相同受測者的使用程度、使用感受與意圖。本研究以科技接受模式為基礎,加入認知有趣性,以為期一個月的縱貫性研究來探討與比較使用者前後兩次測量結果。
    研究結果發現,第二次測量的使用感受與意圖皆會受到第一次測量的使用感受與意圖顯著影響以及過去一個月使用程度的顯著影響。而第二次測量的認知易用性與認知用性對於使用意圖的影響則不顯著,但認知有趣性仍然對使用意圖有顯著影響。最後,本研究根據資料分析結果進行討論。
    摘要(英) In this day and age, information technology to daily life is now universal. The Internet is a global system that provides innovative services. This study focused on treating the feelings and intentions of new users that has not been used at the hedonic website. As well as expectations and intentions during and after a month of usage.
    Through this study, the self-developed innovative website has created called iMemory. During the first survey, the subjects were on display for users. After measuring the hearts of users show the expected feelings and intentions.A month later, the same measure by measuring the extent of use, the use of feelings and intentions. In this study, based on technology acceptance model, by adding perceived enjoyment that the period of one month longitudinal study. To compare the differences between two results.
    The results showed that the second measurement of the use of feelings and intentions are will be the first to use measurements of the feelings and intentions significant impact on the use of the past month and the remarkable degree of influence. The second measure of perceived ease of use and perceived usefulness of intent with the impact is not significant, but perceived enjoyment of intent are still significantly affected. Finally, this study based on data analysis for discussion.
    關鍵字(中)
  • iMemory網站
  • 享樂型網站
  • 科技接受模式
  • 縱貫性研究
  • 關鍵字(英)
  • Technology Acceptance Model
  • iMemory
  • Hedonic Web
  • Longitudinal Study
  • 論文目次 目錄
    第一章 緒論 ................................................................................................................1
    第一節 研究背景與動機......................................................................................1
    第二節 研究目的..................................................................................................3
    第三節 研究流程..................................................................................................3
    第二章、文獻探討........................................................................................................5
    第一節 iMemory網站介紹..................................................................................5
    第二節 科技接受模式........................................................................................12
    第三節 科技接受模型之實證研究....................................................................17
    第四節 研究模式與假說彙總............................................................................20
    第三章、研究方法......................................................................................................23
    第一節 研究對象與資料收集方法....................................................................23
    第二節 研究構念定義與問卷設計....................................................................24
    第三節 資料分析方法與工具............................................................................31
    第四章、資料分析......................................................................................................34
    第一節 基本資料分析........................................................................................34
    第二節 因素分析及信效度分析........................................................................37
    第三節 研究模式與假說檢定............................................................................62
    第四節 不同中介模式之比較............................................................................66
    第五節 TAM調查方式對於使用程度之比較...................................................72
    第六節 成對T檢定............................................................................................74
    第五章、結論與建議..................................................................................................75
    第一節 研究結果與討論....................................................................................75
    第二節 研究貢獻................................................................................................79
    第三節 研究限制................................................................................................81
    第四節 未來研究方向........................................................................................82
    參考文獻......................................................................................................................84
    附錄..............................................................................................................................88
    附錄一、第一階段問卷......................................................................................88
    附錄二、第二階段問卷......................................................................................91

    表目錄
    表2.1 情境應用範例....................................................................................................8
    表2.2 本研究假說之彙總..........................................................................................21
    表3.1 兩階段問卷回收之彙整..................................................................................24
    表3.2 認知易用性之問項..........................................................................................25
    表3.3 認知有用性之問項..........................................................................................26
    表3.4 認知有趣性之問項..........................................................................................26
    表3.5 使用意圖之問項..............................................................................................27
    表3.6 使用程度之問項..............................................................................................28
    表3.7 深度結構使用之問項......................................................................................29
    表3.8 認知專注之問項..............................................................................................29
    表3.9 本研究之構念操作型定義彙整表..................................................................30
    表4.1 研究樣本基本資料分析..................................................................................36
    表4.2 第一次橫斷面調查之驗證性因素分析及信度檢測結果..............................37
    表4.3 第二次橫斷面調查之驗證性因素分析及信度檢測結果..............................39
    表4.4 縱貫面調查之驗證性因素分析及信度檢測結果..........................................40
    表4.5 第一次橫斷面調查之一階驗證性因素分析及單一構念性檢定..................42
    表4.6 第一次橫斷面調查之一階研究構念之平均數、標準差、相關係數、AVE、CR及AVE的平方根......................................................................................43
    表4.7 第一次橫斷面調查之一階構念之交叉負荷量表...........................................44
    表4.8 第二次橫斷面調查之驗證性因素分析及單一構念性檢定...........................45
    表4.9 第二次橫斷面調查之一階研究構念之平均數、標準差、相關係數、AVE、CR及AVE的平方根........................................................................................46
    表4.10 第二次橫斷面調查之一階構念之交叉負荷量表.........................................47
    表4.11 縱貫面調查之一階驗證性因素分析及單一構念性檢定.............................48
    表4.12 縱貫面調查之一階研究構念之平均數、標準差、相關係數、AVE、CR及AVE的平方根...............................................................................................50
    表4.13 縱貫面調查之研究構念之交叉負荷量表.....................................................51
    表4.14 第一次橫斷面調查之二階驗證性因素分析及單一構念性檢定.................53
    表4.15 第一次橫斷面調查之二階研究構念之平均數、標準差、相關係數、AVE、CR及AVE的平方根.....................................................................................54
    表4.16 第一次橫斷面調查之二階研究構念之交叉負荷量表.................................54
    表4.17 第二次橫斷面調查之二階驗證性因素分析及單一構念性檢定.................55
    表4.18 第二次橫斷面調查之二階研究構念之平均數、標準差、相關係數、AVE、CR及AVE的平方根.....................................................................................57
    表4.19 第二次橫斷面調查之二階研究構念之交叉負荷量表.................................57
    表4.20 縱貫面調查之二階驗證性因素分析及單一構念性檢定.............................58
    表4.21 縱貫面調查之二階研究構念之平均數、標準差、相關係數、AVE、CR及AVE的平方...................................................................................................60
    表4.22 縱貫面調查之研究構念之交叉負荷量表.....................................................61
    表4.23 本研究假設檢定結果.....................................................................................65
    表4.24 自變數與解釋力(一) .....................................................................................66
    表4.25 自變數與解釋力(二) .....................................................................................68
    表4.26 自變數與解釋力(三) .....................................................................................70
    表4.27 成對樣本統計量.............................................................................................74
    表4.28 成對樣本檢定.................................................................................................74
    參考文獻 參考文獻
    Adams, D. A., Nelson , R. R., & Todd , P. A. (1992). Perceived usefulness, ease of use, and usage of information technology: a replication. MIS Quarterly, 16(2), 227-247.
    Agarwal, R., & Karahanna, E. (2000). Time flies when you're having fun: cognitive absorption and beliefs about information technology usage. MIS Quarterly, 24(4), 665-694.
    Ajzen, I. (1985). From intentions to actions: A theory of planned behavior. In J. Kuhl & J. Beckman (Eds.), Action-control: From cognition to behavior (pp. 11- 39). Heidelberg, Germany: Springer.
    Ajzen, I., & Fishbein, M. (1975) . Belief, attitude, intention and behavior: an introduction to theory and research. Addsion - Wesley , Reading MA.
    Bagozzi, R. P., & Yi, Y. (1988). On the Evaluation of Structural Equation Models. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 16(1), 74-94.
    Bhattacherjee, A. (2001). Understanding information systems continuance: An expectation-confirmation model. MIS Quarterly,25(3), 351–370.
    Chen, L., Gillenson, M.L., and Sherrell, D.L. (2002). Enticing online consumers: an extended technology acceptance perspective. Information & Management, 39, 705-709.
    Chin, W. W. (1998b). The Partial Least Squares Approach to Structural Equation Modeling. In G. A. Marcoulides (Ed.), Modern Methods for Business Research (pp. 295-336). Mahwah, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
    Chin, W.C. and Todd, P.A., (1995). On the use, usefulness and ease of use of structural equation modeling in MIS research: a note of caution. MIS Quarterly, 19(2), 237-246.
    Compeau, D. R., & Higgins, C. A. (1995). Computer self-efficacy: development of a measure and initial test. MIS Quarterly, 19(2), 189-211.
    Davis, F.D. (1989), Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quarterly, 13(3), 319-340.
    DeSanctis, G., & Poole, M. S. (1994). Capturing the complexity in advanced technology use : adaptive structuration theory. Organization Science, 5(2), 121-147.
    Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981). Evaluating Structural Equations with Unobservable Variables and Measurement Error. Journal of Marketing Research, 18(1), 39-50.
    Gefen, D., Karahanna, E., and Straub, D.W. (2003). Trust and TAM in Online Shopping: an Integrated Model. MIS Quarterly, 27(1), 51-90.
    Gefen, D., Straub, D. W., & Boudreau, M. (2000). Structural Equation Modeling and Regression: Guidelines for Research Practice. Communications of AIS, 4(7).
    Hair, J. F., Anderson, R. E., Tatham, R. L., & Black, W. C. (1998). Multivariate Data Analysis (5th ed.). New Jersey: Prentice-Hall, Inc.
    Hair, J., Anderson, R., Tatham, R., & Black, W. (2002). Multivariate Data Analysis (6th ed.). Upper Saddle River, N.J.: Prentice Hall.
    Heijden, H. V. D. (2003), Factors influencing the usage of websites: the case of a generic portal in the Netherlands, Information & Management, 40(6),541-549
    Heijden, H. V. D. (2004). User acceptance of hedonic information systems. MIS Quarterly, 28(4), 695-704.
    Kim, S.S.; Malhotra, N.K. (2005). A longitudinal model of continued IS use: an integrative view of four mechanisms underlying postadoption phenomena”, Management Science, 51(5), 741-755.
    Komiak, S. Y. X., & Benbasat, I. (2006). The Effects of Personalization and Familiarity on Trust and Adoption of Recommendation Agents. MIS Quarterly, 30(4), 941-960.
    Legris, P., Ingham, J., and Collerette, P. (2003). Why do people use information technology? A critical review of the technology acceptance model. Information & management, 40, 191-204.
    Lin, J.C-C. and Lu, H. (2000). Towards an understanding of the behavioural intention to use a web site. International Journal of Information Management, 20, 197-208.
    Mathieson, K., Peacock, E., and Chin, W.W. (2001). Extending the TAM: The Influence of Perceived User Resources. The DATA BASE for Advances in Information Systems, 32(3), 86-112.
    Moon, J. W., & Kim, Y. G. (2001). Extending the TAM for a World-Wide-Web context. Information & Management, 38(4), 217-230.
    Steenkamp, J. B. E. M., & Van Trijp, H. C. M. (1991). The Use of LISREL in Validating Marketing Constructs. International Journal of Research in Marketing, 8(4), 283-299.
    Straub, D., Limayem, M., & Karahanna, E. (1995). Measuring system usage: implications for IS theory testing. Management Science, 41(8), 1328-1342.
    Szajna, B. (1996). Empirical evaluation of the revised technology acceptance model. Management Science, 42(1), 85-92.
    Taylor, S., & Todd, P. (1995). Assessing IT usage: the role of prior experience. MIS Quarterly, 19(4), 561-570.
    Teo, H. H., Wei, K. K., & Benbasat, I. (2003). Predicting Intention to Adopt Interorganizational Linkages: An Institutational Perspective. MIS Quarterly, 27(1), 19-49.
    Tesser, A., & Shaffer, D. R. (1990) . Attitudes and attitude change. Annual Review of Psychology (41), 479-523.
    Venkatesh, V. and Davis, F.D. (2000), A Theoretical Extension of the Technology Acceptance Model: Four Longitudinal Field Studies. Management Science, 46(2), 186-204.
    柯秀佳(2007)。部落格自我揭露行為與主觀幸福感之理論建構。未出版之博士論文,國立中山大學資訊管理研究所,高雄市。
    曾繁絹(2007)。線上知識社群分享理論之建構與驗證。未出版之博士論文,國立中山大學資訊管理研究所,高雄市。
    資訊工業策進會(2008)。台灣網路娛樂行為分析。資訊服務產業年鑑:資策會資訊市場情報中心。
    口試委員
  • 林信惠 - 召集委員
  • 林杏子 - 委員
  • 郭峰淵 - 指導教授
  • 口試日期 2008-07-17 繳交日期 2008-08-04

    [回到前頁查詢結果 | 重新搜尋]


    如有任何問題請與論文審查小組聯繫