本文延伸Turnovsky and Fisher (1995)的模型，主要特色在於探討政府對支出的分配會對經濟體系造成如何的影響。本文假設總支出不變，當政府消費性支出佔總支出的比例減少時，因總支出等於政府消費性支出與政府投資性支出的總和，所以政府投資性支出佔總支出的比例反而呈現增加的現象。據此，本文將探討當未預料到暫時性政府消費性支出比例的減少(且政府投資性支出比例呈現增加)時，相關經濟變數會產生何種型態的動態調整。接著，本文放寬勞動力固定的假設，將勞動內生化之下，來探討當未預料到暫時性政府消費性支出比例的變動對經濟體系的影響。

none

目 錄
第一章 緒論 1
第二章 本文模型
第一節 模型設定 3
第二節 長期均衡及動態特質分析 5
第三節 未預料到暫時性政府消費性支出比例減少之效果 10
註釋 24
第三章 勞動供給內生化後的模型
第一節 模型設定 28
第二節 長期均衡及動態特質分析 29
第三節 未預料到暫時性政府消費性支出比例減少之效果 36
註釋 50
第四章 結論 53
參考文獻 55

賴景昌 (1994), 《國際金融理論:進階篇》，台北:茂昌。
呂俊慧 (1996), 《政府支出與資本累積效果:內生化勞動供給的意涵》，輔大經濟研究所，碩士論文。
Abel, A. B. and Blanchard, O. J. (1983), “An Intertemporal Model of Saving and Investment,” Econometrica 51, pp.675-692.
Aschauer, D. A (1988), “The Equilibrium Approach to Fiscal Policy,” Journal of Money Credit and Banking 20, pp. 41-62.
Aschauer, D. A (1989), “Is Public Expenditure Productive?,” Journal of Monetary Economics 23, pp.177-200.
Aschauer, D. A (1990), Why is Infrastructure Important?, in A.H. Munnell,ed., Is there a shortfall in public capital investment, MA: Federal Reserve Bank of Boston, pp. 21-68.
Aschauer, D. A. and Greenwood, J. (1985), “Macroeconomics Effects of Fiscal Policy,” Carnegie- Rochester Conference Series on Public Policy 23, pp.91-138.
Bailey, M. J. (1971), National Income and the Price Level, 2nd ed., New York: McGraw -Hill.
Barro, R. J. (1981), “Output Effects of Government Purchases,” Journal of Political Economy 89, pp.1086-1121.
Barro, R. J. (1989), The Neoclassical Approach to Fiscal Policy, in: R.J.Barro ,ed., Modern Business Cycle Theory, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Barro, R. J. (1990), “Government Spending in a Simple Model of Endogenous Growth,” Journal of Political Economy 98, S103-S125
Barro, R. J. and King, R. G. (1984), “Time Separable Preferences and Intertemporal- Substitution Models of Business Cycles,” Quarterly Journal of Economics 99, pp.817-839.
Baxter, M. and King, R. G. (1993), “Fiscal Policy in General Equilibrium,” American Economic Review 83, pp.315-334.
Blanchard, O. J. and Fischer, S. (1989), Lectures on Macroeconomics, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Chang, W. Y. (1999), “Government Spending, Endogenous Labor, and Capital Accumulation,” Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control 23, pp.1225-1242.
Chiang, A. C. (1984), Fundamental Methods of Mathematical Economics, 3rd ed., New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.
Christiano, L. J. and Eichenbaum, M. (1992), “Current Real Business-Cycle Theories and Aggregate Labor-Market Fluctuations,” American Economic Review 82, pp.432-450.
Djajic, S. (1987), “Government Spending and the Optimal Rates of Consumption and Capital Accumulation,” Canadian Journal of Economics 20, pp.544-554.
Djajic, S. (1989), “Current-Account Effects of a Temporary Changes in Government Expenditure,” Scandinavian Journal of Economics 91, pp.83-96.
Gandolfo, G. (1980), Economic Dynamics: Methods and models, Amsterdam: North-Holland.
Ihori, T. (1990), “Government Spending and Private Consumption,” Canadian Journal of Economics 23, pp.60-69.
Judd, K. L. (1985), “Short-Run Analysis of Fiscal Policy in a Simple Perfect Foresight Model,” Journal of Political Economy 93, pp.298-319.
Mankiw, N. G. (1987), “Government Purchases and Real Interest Rates,” Journal of Political Economy 95, pp.407-419.
Sen, P. and Turnovsky, S. J. (1989), “Deterioration of the Terms if Trade and Capital
Accumulation: A Re-examination of Laursen-Metzler Effect,” Journal of
International Economics 26, pp.227-250.
Turnovsky, S. J. (1987), “Monetary Growth, Inflation, and Economic Activity in a
Dynamic Macro Model,” International Economic Review 28, pp.707-730.
Turnovsky, S. J. (1990), “The Effect of Taxes and Dividend Policy on Capital
Accumulation and Macroeconomic Behavior,” Journal of Economic Dynamics and
Control 14, pp.491-521.
Turnovsky, S. J. and Fischer, W. H. (1995), “The Composition of Government
Expenditure and its Consequences for Macroeconomic Performance,” Journal of
Economic Dynamics and Control 19, pp.747-786.