面對越趨複雜的全球環境議題，國際陸續提出整合性跨領域之環境管理制度或工法，期望減輕因人類開發對環境造成的影響。公共建設為配合國家發展、推動社會經濟及促進公共利益的基礎，在民主與環保意識與時俱進的現今社會，對公共建設成果有舉足輕重影響的權益關係人，扮演參與、檢視並監督公共建設多種目標價值之角色。本研究以都市河川治理為主體，探究專業權益關係人參與都市河川治理計畫之意向，因在高密度的都市環境，河川治理受到不同專業領域的關注，也往往需要跨領域專業的合作。研究以多目標空間情境決策架構，透過半結構式問卷與深入訪談，並納入虛擬基地的概念，將專業權益關係人治理方案可視化，並進行意向分析，藉此瞭解各專業認知在都市河川治理的落差。研究成果顯示不同專業權益關係人對都市河川治理觀念，以民眾權益為首要考量，專業者的專長特性影響治理規劃趨勢，而非河川相關因素則阻礙了跨領域合作。各專業領域對彼此的誤解會影響公共建設從規劃設計到成果的過程，研究證實多目標空間情境決策的架構及操作，有助釐清各專業領域認知競合狀況、各專業領域困境，據以提出促進各專業領域溝通、公共建設執行機制及公部門納入專業評估等建議。

Facing the complicated global environmental issues, integrated and cross-disciplinary environmental management systems or construction methods have been proposed to reduce the impact of human development on the environment. Public construction is the foundation to support national development, socio-economic improvement and public well-being. In today's society where democracy and environmental awareness are advancing with the times, stakeholders with multiple-criteria play critical roles in participating, inspecting and supervising public construction. This thesis focuses on urban river governance and examines the explores the participate intention of professional stakeholders in urban river governance projects. Because of the high-density in the urban environments, urban river governance has received attention from different professional fields, and cross-disciplinary cooperation is highly required. Based on geodesign framework, which is a multi-objective spatial situational decision-making framework, this research conducts intention analysis to understand the impact of professional cognition in urban river governance. Semi-structured questionnaires, in-depth interviews, and virtual visualization model site are used to analyze the planning and design gaps among stakeholders. The results show that the concept of urban river governance based on stakeholders’ professional training, but public right is always the primary consideration. The expertise of professionals affects the governance strategies, while non-river-related factors may interfere the cross-disciplinary cooperation. Misunderstanding of each other among various professional fields will affect the planning process of public construction from planning, design to final results. The research clarifies that the structure of multi-objective spatial situational decision-making can help to clarify the cognitive competition and cooperation among professional fields. Based on findings from this research, recommendations to promote communication among various professional fields, implementation mechanism of public involvement for public construction, and how to include public sectors in professional evaluation are provided.

論文審定書 i
摘要 ii
Abstract iii
目錄 v
圖次 viii
表次 x
第1章 緒論1
1.1 研究背景與動機1
1.2 研究問題與目的2
1.3 研究方法與整體流程2
1.4 章節架構3
第2章 文獻回顧5
2.1 公共建設5
2.2 河川治理觀念12
2.3 公共建設之權益關係人參與16
2.4 臺灣公共建設之權益關係人參與河川治理衝突33
2.5 可視化模型與情境式參與決策45
第3章 研究方法50
3.1 研究設計流程50
3.2 半結構式問卷53
3.3 深入訪談56
3.4 空間可視化模擬61
3.5 資料收集操作過程62
3.6 治理規劃方案數位化63
第4章 瞭解都市河川關注面向64
4.1 空間規劃專業者基本意向分析64
4.2 第二階段成果分析與權重配置65
4.3 第二個循環的研究方法方向68
第5章 都市河川治理虛擬基地建構69
5.1 都市河川條件篩選69
5.2 都市河川條件設定71
5.3 都市河川治理替選方案83
第6章 都市河川治理專業認知分析87
6.1 專業權益關係人對都市河川認知分析87
6.2 專業權益關係人對都市河川治理規劃與執行策略分析108
6.3 專業權益關係人面對社會衝突之反應144
第7章 都市河川專業權益關係人規劃意向149
7.1 都市河川不同面向優先考量次序分析149
7.2 都市河川情境變遷因子及權重分析151
7.3 保護堤內標的分析153
7.4 可承洪土地分析158
7.5 嵌塊密度指數分析161
7.6 三大面向權重綜合分析165
第8章 專業權益關係人於都市河川治理認知落差分析166
8.1 各專業領域特性與差異166
8.2 不同面向的認知落差與矛盾167
8.3 對各專業領域的刻板印象169
8.4 規劃設計措施的認知共識與落差170
8.5 各專業領域空間規劃方案呈現能力172
8.6 各專業領域整合173
第9章 研究結論、研究限制與建議174
9.1 研究結論174
9.2 研究限制176
9.3 研究後續建議177
參考文獻178
附錄1 論文附圖192
附錄2 論文附表196
附錄3 第一階段半結構式問卷205
附錄4 第二階段訪談大綱210
附錄5 第三階段半結構式問卷與訪談大綱211
附錄6 第三階段各專業規劃方案成果227

A Standard City Planning Enabling Act, (1928).
Akintoye, A. S., & MacLeod, M. J. (1997). Risk analysis and management in construction. International Journal of Project Management, 15(1), 31-38. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/S0263-7863(96)00035-X
Allen, R., & Slotterback, C. S. (2021). Building immigrant engagement practice in urban planning: The case of Somali refugees in the Twin Cities [Article]. Journal of Urban Affairs, 43(6), 740-755. https://doi.org/10.1080/07352166.2017.1360745
André, P., Enserink, B., Connor, D., & Croal, P. (2006). Public Participation International Best Practice Principles.
Arnstein, S. R. (1969). A Ladder Of Citizen Participation. Journal of the American Institute of Planners, 35(4), 216-224. https://doi.org/10.1080/01944366908977225
Berčič, J. (2015). The state of public participation in spatial planning in the European union: public participation in spatial planning between theory and practice. Igra ustvarjalnosti - Creativity game, 2015(01), 054-061. https://doi.org/10.15292/iu-cg.2015.03.054-061
Boutilier, R. G., & Zdziarski, M. (2017). Managing stakeholder networks for a social license to build. Construction Management and Economics, 35(8-9), 498-513. https://doi.org/10.1080/01446193.2017.1289229
Caglioni, M., & Campagna, M. (2021). Chapter 12 - Geodesign for collaborative spatial planning: three case studies at different scales. In E. Garbolino & C. Voiron-Canicio (Eds.), Ecosystem and Territorial Resilience (pp. 323-345). Elsevier. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-818215-4.00012-2
Chang, K.-T. (2018). INTRODUCTION TO GEOGRAPHIC INFORMATION SYSTEMS (9th ed.). McGraw-Hill Education.
Cheung, S. O., & Li, K. Y. (2019). Biases in construction project dispute resolution [Article]. Engineering Construction and Architectural Management, 26(2), 321-348. https://doi.org/10.1108/ecam-03-2018-0109
Davis, J., Pijawka, D., Wentz, E. A., & Hale, M. (2020). Evaluation of community-based land use planning through Geodesign: Application to American Indian communities. Landscape and Urban Planning, 203, 103880. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2020.103880
Davis, J., Pijawka, K. D., Wentz, E., Hale, M., & King, D. A. (2021). Evaluating Geodesign for Community-Based Tribal Planning The Role of Planners in Marginalized Communities [Article]. Journal of the American Planning Association, 87(4), 527-541. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/01944363.2021.1873168
De Feo, G., & De Gisi, S. (2014). Using MCDA and GIS for hazardous waste landfill siting considering land scarcity for waste disposal. Waste Management, 34(11), 2225-2238. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wasman.2014.05.028
Dong, Q., Zhang, B., Cai, X. M., & Morrison, A. M. (2021). Do Local Residents Support the Development of a National Park? A Study from Nanling National Park Based on Social Impact Assessment (SIA) [Article]. Land, 10(10), 16, Article 1019. https://doi.org/10.3390/land10101019
Eckerd, A. (2017). Citizen Language and Administrative Response: Participation in Environmental Impact Assessment [Article]. Administration & Society, 49(3), 348-373. https://doi.org/10.1177/0095399714548272
Eckerd, A. (2017). Citizen Language and Administrative Response:Participation in Environmental Impact Assessment. Administration & Society, 49(3), 348-373. https://doi.org/10.1177/0095399714548272
Eckerd, A., & Heidelberg, R. L. (2020). Administering Public Participation. The American Review of Public Administration, 50(2), 133-147. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/0275074019871368
Eikelboom, T., & Janssen, R. (2015). Comparison of Geodesign Tools to Communicate Stakeholder Values [Article]. Group Decision and Negotiation, 24(6), 1065-1087. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10726-015-9429-7
Ernst, A., & Fuchs, D. (2022). Power dynamics, shifting roles, and learning: Exploring key actors in participation processes in the German energy transformation (Energiewende). Energy Research & Social Science, 85, 102420. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2021.102420
Estevez, R. A., Walshe, T., & Burgman, M. A. (2013). Capturing social impacts for decision-making: a Multicriteria Decision Analysis perspective. Diversity and Distributions, 19(5-6), 608-616. https://doi.org/10.1111/ddi.12058
Farrin, K., Laranjo, J. R., & Dela Cruz, N. A. (2021). Community-based feedback to improve land pooling for planned urbanization: A case study of Thimphu, Bhutan [Article]. Land Use Policy, 110, 12, Article 104257. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2019.104257
Ferguson, D. B., Meadow, A. M., & Huntington, H. P. (2022). Making a Difference: Planning for Engaged Participation in Environmental Research [Article]. Environmental management, 69(2), 227-243. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00267-021-01585-5
Franco-Torres, M., Rogers, B., & Ugarelli, R. (2020). A framework to explain the role of boundary objects in sustainability transitions. Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions, 36, 34-48. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eist.2020.04.010
Freeman, R. E. (1984). Strategic management : a stakeholder approach. Pitman.
Germain, R. H., & Floyd, W. (1999). Developing resource-based social conflict models for assessing the utility of negotiation in conflict resolution [Article]. Forest Science, 45(3), 394-406. <Go to ISI>://WOS:000082008600011
Glass, J. J. (1979). Citizen Participation in Planning: The Relationship Between Objectives and Techniques. Journal of the American Planning Association, 45(2), 180-189. https://doi.org/10.1080/01944367908976956
Godschalk, D. R., & Paterson, R. G. (1999). Collaborative conflict management comes of age [Article]. Journal of Architectural and Planning Research, 16(2), 91-95. <Go to ISI>://WOS:000081507200001
Gottwald, S., Brenner, J., Janssen, R., & Albert, C. (2020). Using Geodesign as a boundary management process for planning nature-based solutions in river landscapes [Article; Early Access]. Ambio, 20. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13280-020-01435-4
Griffiths, J., Chan, F. K. S., Shao, M., Zhu, F. F., & Higgitt, D. L. (2020). Interpretation and application of Sponge City guidelines in China [Article]. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society a-Mathematical Physical and Engineering Sciences, 378(2168), 20, Article 20190222. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsta.2019.0222
Guldi, J. (2017). A History of the Participatory Map [Article]. Public Culture, 29(1), 79-112. https://doi.org/10.1215/08992363-3644409
Hammond, M. J., Chen, A. S., Djordjevic, S., Butler, D., & Mark, O. (2015). Urban flood impact assessment: A state-of-the-art review [Article; Proceedings Paper]. Urban Water Journal, 12(1), 14-29. https://doi.org/10.1080/1573062x.2013.857421
Heffernan, A. (2022). Development, Conservation, Empowerment: The Trilemma of Community-Based Natural Resource Management in Namibia [Article; Early Access]. Environmental management, 12. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00267-021-01589-1
Hermans, C., Erickson, J., Noordewier, T., Sheldon, A., & Kline, M. (2007). Collaborative environmental planning in river management: An application of multicriteria decision analysis in the White River Watershed in Vermont. Journal of Environmental Management, 84(4), 534-546. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2006.07.013
Herrera, P. A., Van Huylenbroeck, G., & Espinel, R. L. (2006). Asymmetric Information on the Provision of Irrigation through a Public Infrastructure: The Case of the Peninsula of Santa Elena, Ecuador. Water Resources Management, 20(3), 431-447. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11269-006-1292-5
Irfan, M., Thaheem, M. J., Gabriel, H. F., Malik, M. S. A., & Nasir, A. R. (2019). Effect of stakeholder's conflicts on project constraints: a tale of the construction industry [Article]. International Journal of Conflict Management, 30(4), 538-565. https://doi.org/10.1108/ijcma-04-2019-0074
Jelokhani-Niaraki, M., & Malczewskil, J. (2015). A group multicriteria spatial decision support system for parking site selection problem: A case study. Land Use Policy, 42, 492-508. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2014.09.003
Karlsen, J. T., Graee, K., & Massaoud, M. J. (2008). Building trust in project-stakeholder relationships [Article]. Baltic Journal of Management, 3(1), 7-22. https://doi.org/10.1108/17465260810844239
Kartam, N. A. (1996). Making effective use of construction lessons learned in project life cycle [Article; Proceedings Paper]. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management-Asce, 122(1), 14-21. https://doi.org/10.1061/(asce)0733-9364(1996)122:1(14)
Kiker, G. A., Bridges, T. S., Varghese, A., Seager, T. P., & Linkov, I. (2005). Application of Multicriteria Decision Analysis in Environmental Decision Making. Integrated Environmental Assessment and Management, 1(2), 95-108. https://doi.org/10.1897/IEAM_2004a-015.1
Kinzer, K. (2018). Picking up speed: public participation and local sustainability plan implementation [Article]. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, 61(9), 1594-1611. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/09640568.2017.1358154
Ko, C. H., & Li, S. C. (2014). Enhancing submittal review and construction inspection in public projects [Review]. Automation in Construction, 44, 33-46. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2014.03.027
Lane, M. B. (2005). Public participation in planning: an intellectual history [Article]. Australian Geographer, 36(3), 283-299. https://doi.org/10.1080/00049180500325694
Lee, C., Won, J. W., Jang, W., Jung, W., Han, S. H., & Kwak, Y. H. (2017). Social conflict management framework for project viability: Case studies from Korean megaprojects [Article]. International Journal of Project Management, 35(8), 1683-1696. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2017.07.011
Lemar, A. S. (2021). OVERPARTICIPATION: DESIGNING EFFECTIVE LAND USE PUBLIC PROCESSES [Review]. Fordham Law Review, 90(3), 1083-1150. <Go to ISI>://WOS:000727135200002
Li, T. H. Y., Ng, S. T., & Skitmore, M. (2012). Conflict or consensus: An investigation of stakeholder concerns during the participation process of major infrastructure and construction projects in Hong Kong [Article]. Habitat International, 36(2), 333-342. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.habitatint.2011.10.012
Mahanta, N. R., & Rajput, B. (2019, 26 March-10 April 2019). Landscape Interventions for Resilience and Sustainability in Urban Wetland Parks: a review. 2019 Advances in Science and Engineering Technology International Conferences (ASET),
Marimbaldo, F. J. M., Manso-Callejo, M. A., & Alcarria, R. (2018). A Methodological Approach to Using Geodesign in Transmission Line Projects [Article]. Sustainability, 10(8), 30, Article 2757. https://doi.org/10.3390/su10082757
Mathie, E., Antony, A., Killett, A., Darlington, N., Buckner, S., Lafortune, L., Mayrhofer, A., Dickinson, A., Woodward, M., & Goodman, C. (2022). Dementia-friendly communities: The involvement of people living with dementia [Article; Early Access]. Dementia-International Journal of Social Research and Practice, 20, Article 14713012211073200. https://doi.org/10.1177/14713012211073200
Mitchell, A. (1999). The Esri Guide to GIS Analysis：Geographic Patterns & Relationships (1st ed., Vol. 1). ESRI Press.
Moura, A. C. M., & Freitas, C. R. (2021). Scalability in the Application of Geodesign in Brazil: Expanding the Use of the Brazilian Geodesign Platform to Metropolitan Regions in Transformative-Learning Planning. 13(12), 6508. https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/12/6508
Orland, B., & Steinitz, C. (2019). Improving our Global Infrastructure: The International Geodesign Collaboration. Digital Landscape Architecture, 4, 213-219. https://doi.org/10.14627/537663023
Otamendi-Irizar, I., Grijalba, O., Arias, A., Pennese, C., & Hernández, R. (2022). How can local energy communities promote sustainable development in European cities? Energy Research & Social Science, 84, 102363. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2021.102363
Paul, M., & Meyer, J. L. (2001). Streams in the Urban Landscape. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics, 32, 333-365. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.ecolsys.32.081501.114040
Pearce, D. G. (1998). Tourism development in Paris: Public intervention. Annals of Tourism Research, 25(2), 457-476. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/S0160-7383(97)00096-0
Perlingeiro, R. M., Perlingeiro, M., Chinelli, C. K., Vazquez, E. G., Qualharini, E. L., Haddad, A. N., Hammad, A. W. A., & Soares, C. A. P. (2020). Sustainable Assessment of Public Works through a Multi-Criteria Framework [Article]. Sustainability, 12(17), 28, Article 6896. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12176896
Pettit, C. J., Hawken, S., Ticzon, C., Leao, S. Z., Afrooz, A. E., Lieske, S. N., Canfield, T., Ballal, H., & Steinitz, C. (2019). Breaking down the silos through geodesign - Envisioning Sydney's urban future [Article]. Environment and Planning B-Urban Analytics and City Science, 46(8), 1387-1404. https://doi.org/10.1177/2399808318812887
Reynolds, J. (2014). A Geodesign Inspired Multiple Criteria Decision Tool for Prioritizing Levee Setback Project Sites Washington]. http://hdl.handle.net/1773/26840
Rius-Ulldemolins, J., Moreno, V. F., & Marti, G. (2019). The dark side of cultural policy: economic and political instrumentalisation, white elephants, and corruption in Valencian cultural institutions [Article]. International Journal of Cultural Policy, 25(3), 282-297. https://doi.org/10.1080/10286632.2017.1296434
Schulz, C., Martin-Ortega, J., & Glenk, K. (2018). Value landscapes and their impact on public water policy preferences. Global Environmental Change, 53, 209-224. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2018.09.015
Schulz, C., Martin-Ortega, J., Ioris, A. A. R., & Glenk, K. (2017). Applying a ‘Value Landscapes Approach’ to Conflicts in Water Governance: The Case of the Paraguay-Paraná Waterway. Ecological Economics, 138, 47-55. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2017.03.033
Simoneti, M. (2014). Landscape Development-What Really Matters Are The People Behind The Landscape. Proceedings of the 2nd GreenNet Conference, 18, 92.
Simpson, I., Winston, R., & Brooker, M. (2021). Effects of land use, climate, and imperviousness on urban stormwater quality: A meta-analysis. Science of the Total Environment, 809. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.152206
Steinitz, C. (2012). A Framework for Geodesign: Changing Geography. Esri Press.
Steinitz, C. (1990). A Framework for Theory Applicable to the Education of Landscape Architects (and Other Environmental Design Professionals). Landscape Journal, 9(2), 136-143. http://www.jstor.org/stable/43324049
Stuart Meck, F. (2002). Growing Smart Legislative Guidebook. American Planning Association.
Sullivan, L. M., Manfredo, M. J., & Teel, T. L. (2022). Technocracy in a time of changing values: Wildlife conservation and the "relevancy" of governance reform [Article]. Conservation Science and Practice, 4(2), 10, Article e545. https://doi.org/10.1111/csp2.545
Tammi, I., & Kalliola, R. (2014). Spatial MCDA in marine planning: Experiences from the Mediterranean and Baltic Seas. Marine Policy, 48, 73-83. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpol.2014.03.015
Uhde, B., Hahn, W. A., Griess, V. C., & Knoke, T. (2015). Hybrid MCDA Methods to Integrate Multiple Ecosystem Services in Forest Management Planning: A Critical Review. Environmental management, 56(2), 373-388. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00267-015-0503-3
van Maasakkers, M., Oh, J., & Knox, E. (2020). Shrinking democracy? Analyzing participatory planning for vacancy and abandonment in Ohio [Article]. Journal of Urban Affairs, 42(8), 1242-1261. https://doi.org/10.1080/07352166.2019.1694414
Walsh, C. J., Roy, A., Feminella, J., Cottingham, P., Groffman, P., & Morgan Ii, R. (2005). The Urban Stream Syndrome: Current Knowledge and the Search For A Cure. Am. Benthol. Soc, 24, 706-723. https://doi.org/10.1899/0887-3593(2005)024\[0706:TUSSCK\]2.0.CO;2
Wang, N., Ma, M., Wu, G., Liu, Y., Gong, Z., & Chen, X. (2019). Conflicts concerning construction projects under the challenge of cleaner production – case study on government funded projects. Journal of Cleaner Production, 225, 664-674. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.03.315
Wu, C.-L., & Chiang, Y.-C. (2018). A geodesign framework procedure for developing flood resilient city. Habitat International, 75, 78-89. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.habitatint.2018.04.009
Wu, L. F., Jia, G. S., & Zhang, P. W. (2020). Improving the effectiveness of public participation in public infrastructure megaprojects [Article]. International Journal of Managing Projects in Business, 13(7), 1522-1536. https://doi.org/10.1108/ijmpb-12-2018-0281
Yu, J., Zhang, C., Huang, D., Shao, Y., & Ren, H. (2021). Explore the Conflict and Resolution of Pollution NIMBY Facility Construction in the Context of New Media: An Evolutionary Game Theoretical Approach. Complexity, 2021, 9978968. https://doi.org/10.1155/2021/9978968
Zheng, G., & Liu, W. (2018). Same projects, different endings—Comparative case studies on NIMBY facility construction in Beijing. Cities, 73, 63-70. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2017.10.010
Zhu, D. M. (2018). Effects and Drawbacks of Environmental Impact Assessment in Avoiding NIMBY [Article]. Ekoloji, 27(106), 149-154, Article UNSP e106014. <Go to ISI>://WOS:000454073800019
柏林都市發展局. (2022a). Explanatory comments on the Land Use Plan and the involvement of the public: Modification procedures. Senate Department for Urban Development, Building and Housing. Retrieved 2022/2/17 from https://www.stadtentwicklung.berlin.de/planen/fnp/en/erlaeuterungen_fnp/verfahrenstypen.shtml
柏林都市發展局. (2022b). Explanatory comments on the Land Use Plan and the involvement of the public:The planning process. Senate Department for Urban Development, Building and Housing. Retrieved 2022/2/17 from https://www.stadtentwicklung.berlin.de/planen/fnp/en/erlaeuterungen_fnp/verfahrensablauf.shtml
柏林都市發展局. (2022c). FNP- Modifications. Senate Department for Urban Development, Building and Housing. Retrieved 2022/2/17 from https://www.stadtentwicklung.berlin.de/planen/fnp/pix/erlaeuterungen_fnp/process_sequence.pdf
柏林都市發展局. (2020). Guidelines for the participation of citizens in urban spatial development / Short version. Senate Department for Urban Development, Building and Housing. Retrieved 2022/2/17 from https://www.stadtentwicklung.berlin.de/planen/leitlinien-buergerbeteiligung/download/Leitlinien-BuergerbeteiligungSTADT-Flyer_englisch.pdf
柏林都市發展局. (2015). Land Use Plan Berlin 2015 - Background and Contents. Senate Department for Urban Development, Building and Housing. Retrieved 2022/2/17 from https://www.stadtentwicklung.berlin.de/planen/fnp/pix/fnp/background_contents_2015.pdf
美國規劃協會. (2021). AICP Code of Ethics and Professional Conduct. In: American Planning Association.
美國環境保護署. (2022, 2022/1/12). Flow Chart: Select an Appropriate Level of Public Participation. United States Enviromental Protection Agency. Retrieved 2022/1/27 from https://www.epa.gov/international-cooperation/flow-chart-select-appropriate-level-public-participation
美國環境保護署. (2021, 2021/7/12). Public Participation Guide: Process Planning. United States Enviromental Protection Agency. Retrieved 2022/1/27 from https://www.epa.gov/international-cooperation/public-participation-guide-process-planning
國際自然保護聯盟. (2021). IUCN基于自然的解决方案全球标准使用指南 (第1版 ed.). 國際自然保護聯盟. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.2305/IUCN.CH.2020.09.zh
國際自然保護聯盟. (2022, 2022/8/13). Nature-based Solutions. Retrieved 8/12 from https://www.iucn.org/our-work/nature-based-solutions
聯合國. (2013, 2013/5/8). What is Water Security? Infographic. Retrieved 2022/8/29 from https://www.unwater.org/publications/water-security-infographic/
Dramstad, W. E., Olson, J. D., & Forman, R. T. T. (2001). 景觀建築及土地使用計畫之景觀生態原則 (張俊彥, 洪佳君, & 曾心嫻, Trans.; 初版 ed.). 地景.
Fraenkel, J. R., Wallen, N. E., & Hyun, H. H. (2017). 教育研究法：研究設計實務 (第二版 ed.). 心理. (麥格羅希爾)
Kumar, R. (2010). 研究方法：步驟化學習指南 (潘中道 & 胡龍騰, Trans.; 第二版 ed.). 學富文化.
Lynch, K. (1984). GOOD CITY FORM [優質城市型態] (一版 ed.). 六合. (Massachusetts Institute of Technology)
Ritchie, J., & Lewis, J. (2008). 質性研究方法 (藍毓仁, Trans.; 初版 ed.). 巨流.
中華民國內政部國土測繪中心(2021, 2021/6/17)。土地利用分類105~108年。Retrieved 2022/3/17 from https://www.nlsc.gov.tw/cp.aspx?n=13720
尹智剛、潘建任(2019, 2019/10/15)。前瞻水環境建設 "金.爛蘋果獎"揭曉。華視新聞。Retrieved 2022/2/13 from https://news.cts.com.tw/cts/society/201910/201910151977947.html
方偉達(2009)。城鄉—生態規劃、設計與批判 (第一版 ed.)。六合。
水利規劃試驗所(2019)。曾文溪流域水文化探採小旅行。Retrieved 2022/9/10 from https://epaper.wra.gov.tw/Article_Detail.aspx?s=5305&n=30177
王志弘(2020)。原址本真性或襲產基礎設施化？ 臺北市道路建設與歷史保存爭議辨析。地理研究(72)，107-137。https://doi.org/10.6234/JGR.202011_(72).0005
王志弘、黃若慈、李涵茹(2014)。臺北都會區水岸意義與功能的轉變 [Transformation of the Waterfront's Meaning and Function in the Taipei Metropolitan Area]。地理學報(74)，63-86。https://doi.org/10.6161/jgs.2014.74.03
王明志(2019)。臺北市地理設計。臺北市立大學通識學報, 5, 21-40。http://utaipeir.lib.utaipei.edu.tw/dspace/handle/987654321/16661
王章逸、闕河嘉(2020)。大埔之歌－臺灣主流報紙中的「土地徵收」 [The DaPu incident and mainstream newspaper coverage of eminent domain in Taiwan, 2008-2015]。資訊社會研究(38), 19-49。https://doi.org/10.29843/jccis.202001_(38).0004
王毓正(2010)。從奧爾胡斯公約檢視我國環境影響評估法制中民眾參與之規範 [Survey the Law of Public Participation in the Environmental Impact Assessment Act from Arhus Convention]。公共行政學報(35)，61-117。https://doi.org/10.30409/jpa.201006_(35).0003
王韻茹(2019)。接近司法之權利內涵的擴張--以歐洲環境法與德國環境救濟法作為觀察。國立中正大學法學集刊, 171-249。https://tpl.ncl.edu.tw/NclService/JournalContentDetail?SysId=A19017267
台灣石虎保育協會(2018)。台灣石虎保育協會聲明稿：關於卓蘭濕地公園爭議。環境資訊中心。https://e-info.org.tw/node/215676
民事廳(2019, 2021/4/19)。訴訟外紛爭解決機制ADR簡介。Retrieved 2022/9/10 from https://www.judicial.gov.tw/tw/cp-1497-57069-fceff-1.html
江瑞祥(2018)。公共建設計畫成本效益評估方法。國土及公共治理季刊，6(3)，26-39。https://www.AiritiLibrary.com/Publication/Index/P20150327001-201809-201809180007-201809180007-26-39
行政院(2022, 2022/7/7)。前瞻基礎建設。https://www.ey.gov.tw/achievement/CD1789C4E4A29FF6
行政院(2021)。前瞻基礎建設計畫(核定本)。In.
公共工程生態檢核注意事項(2017)。https://lawweb.pcc.gov.tw/LawContentSource.aspx?id=GL000049#lawmenu
公共工程生態檢核注意事項(2021)。https://lawweb.pcc.gov.tw/LawContent.aspx?id=GL000049#lawmenu
行政院公共工程委員會(2020)。政府採購全生命週期概論。 Retrieved from https://www.pcc.gov.tw/DL.aspx?sitessn=297&nodeid=500&u=LzAwMS9VcGxvYWQvMjk3L2NrZmlsZS80N2FlOTNkMy04OGI0LTQ5ZjktYmUwOS0xMGU4OTI1M2ZhOTAucGRm&n=5pS%2f5bqc5o6h6LO85YWo55Sf5ZG96YCx5pyf5qaC6KuW57Ch5aCxKDEwOTAzMjDnsKHloLHniYgpLnBkZg%3d%3d&icon=.pdf
行政院研究發展考核委員會(2012)。因應氣候變遷都市水患問題探討與因應對策.
行政院農業委員會水土保持局(2018)。民眾參與工作指引。南投市中興: 行政院農業委員會水土保持局 Retrieved from https://tech.swcb.gov.tw/Content/Upload/EducationManual/%E6%B0%91%E7%9C%BE%E5%8F%83%E8%88%87%E5%B7%A5%E4%BD%9C%E6%8C%87%E5%BC%95.pdf
環境影響評估法(2003)。https://law.moj.gov.tw/LawClass/LawAll.aspx?pcode=O0090001
環境影響評估法施行細則(2018)。https://law.moj.gov.tw/LawClass/LawAll.aspx?pcode=O0090002
何立智(2017)。Geodesign應用於環境設計課程之行動研究－以台大心理系周遭環境為例。華梵藝術與設計學報，12，19。
何彥陞(2021)。論市地重劃對於建築物所有權補償規範之合理性－有屋無地者等於拆遷戶？ [Discussion on the Rational Compensation Norms of Building Ownership in the Urban Consolidation: House Owners without Land Titles are Deemed as Relocation Households?]。24(2)，171-212。https://doi.org/10.6677/jtlr.202111_24(2).0003
吳宏謀(2017)。公共建設績效管理新作法。國土及公共治理季刊，5(3)，20-33。
吳俊緯、林貝珊(2021)。都市河岸部落居民的洪患風險與防洪工程識覺 [Urban Riverbank Tribal Residents' Flooding Risk and Perception of Flood Control Project]。人文社會科學研究，15(2)，1-18。https://doi.org/10.6284/npusthssr.202106_15(2).1
吳美智(2012)。從奧爾胡斯公約論國際環境法中的民眾參與 現代國際法與超國界法學術研討會暨中華民國國際法學會101年年會。
李永展(2018)。海綿城市之展望。經濟前瞻(177)，41-45。
李永展(2008, 2008/1/12)。清溪川的死亡與再生：我們學到了什麼？。環境資訊中心。https://e-info.org.tw/node/29770
李柏澔(2020, 2020/10/14)。水環境改善計畫不如預期 民團憂與水環境理念背道而馳。中時新聞網。Retrieved 2/13 from https://www.chinatimes.com/realtimenews/20201014002633-260405?chdtv
李美慧(2013)。都市化河川水質時空變化－以基隆河為例 [Spatial and Temporal Changes in Water Quality of an Urbanized River-A Case Study of Keelung River]。環境與世界(27)，77-95，https://doi.org/10.6304/eaw.2013.27.4
李靖童、凃宏明(2020)。景觀工程的社會爭議與衝擊 [Impact of Landscape Engineering and Its Disputes on Society]。造園景觀學報，24(1)，23-40。https://www.airitilibrary.com/Publication/alDetailedMesh?DocID=P20170301001-202003-202007010015-202007010015-23-40
李錦育、余博瀅 (2001)。河川近自然生態工法之理論與應用。第三屆台灣環境資源永續發展研討會。http://www.tasder.org.tw/meeting/2001/E-2%E4%BD%99%E5%8D%9A%E7%80%85.pdf
周廷彰、徐瑞旻、陳宏安、莊文南(2018)。海綿城市低衝擊開發應用於河川整治工程－以葫蘆墩圳為例。土木水利，45(6)，14-25。https://doi.org/10.6653/MoCICHE.201812_45(6).0004
周婉茹、鄭伯壎、連玉輝(2014)。威權領導：概念源起、現況檢討及未來方向 [Authoritarian Leadership: A Review and Agenda for Future Research]. 中華心理學刊，56(2)，165-189。https://doi.org/10.6129/cjp.20140103
宜蘭縣政府(2020)。流域綜合治理計畫縣管區排冬山河排水系統(茅仔寮地區)規劃檢討。經濟部水利署。Retrieved from https://ws.e-land.gov.tw/001/2015yilan/183/ckfile/b793c33d-e885-400f-a4b9-31ba0952996e.pdf
房婧如(2009)。博物館規劃階段民眾參與研究：以嘉義市美術館為例。國立臺南藝術大學。台南市。https://hdl.handle.net/11296/79z4aw
林文隆、蔡顯修、吳雪如(2007)。水圳水泥化對其間生物數量變動之影響 [Effect of Ditch Living Thing by Process of Original Structure Replacement by RC Irrigation Ditch]。中華水土保持學報，38(1)，31-42。https://doi.org/10.29417/jcswc.200703_38(1).0003
林妍君(2002)。社區參與在台北市社區環境改造應用之研究─以東榮社區與萬和社區為例。國立臺北大學。新北市。https://hdl.handle.net/11296/g9uj6d
林美秀(2018)。我國公民參與實踐現況初探─以台北市政府為例。國立臺灣大學。台北市。https://hdl.handle.net/11296/f8uf9v
林英彥(2003)。臺灣之市地重劃問題與對策。土地問題研究季刊，2(1)，50-54。https://doi.org/10.29604/bgyy.200303.0005
林賢文、郭吉生(2018)。日本公共建設計畫評價制度。國土及公共治理季刊，6(3)，72-87。
林靜梅、陳柏諭(2021, 2021/10/29)。前瞻水環境改善案 台灣河溪網揭執行成效.。公視新聞網。Retrieved 2/13 from https://news.pts.org.tw/article/5515
林鎮洋(2018, 2018/5/19)。生態工法之緣起與演變。Retrieved 2022/1/8 from https://www.rb.gov.tw/public/files/artsinfo/1527240947-0.pdf
邱大昕、羅淑霞(2011)。鄰避與被鄰避：身心障礙機構與設施抗爭處理經驗之研究 [Avoiding and Being Avoided: The Management of Community Protests against Service Agencies for the Disabled in Taiwan]。社會政策與社會工作學刊，15(1)，167-198。https://doi.org/10.6785/spsw.201106.0167
邱宏彬、陳虹琪、孫建平(2015)。人工棲所的設置對水生生物的影響 [The Effects of Artificial Shelters on Aquatic Organisms]。農業工程學報，61(1)，29-44。https://doi.org/10.29974/jtae.201503_61(1).0003
邱孟秋(2018)。政府採購法上預算效益之評估。國立中興大學。台中市。https://hdl.handle.net/11296/8y2k37
俞國華(1988)。環境保護和經濟建設齊頭並進。鑛冶：中國鑛冶工程學會會刊，32(4)，9-11。
施上粟(2022)。漫談生態水利自然解方。土木水利，49(2)，6-10。https://doi.org/10.6653/MoCICHE.202204_49(2).0003
柯金源、賴冠丞、于立平、陳慶鍾(2018)。【我們的島】水劫 圍村之水。環境資訊中心。Retrieved 2022/9/10 from https://e-info.org.tw/node/213779
徐年盛、劉宏仁、劉振宇(2014)。台灣都市減洪治水之道。營建知訊(373)，18-25。
徐忠民(2006)。台灣公共建設閒置之成因與解決之道。東海大學。台中市。https://hdl.handle.net/11296/wdn753
徐義人(1995)。應用水文學 (一版 ed.)。大中國圖書公司.
徐銘謙、林宗弘(2011)。山不轉路轉：公民社會與台灣步道工程技術的轉型 [Changing the Path: Civil Society and Technological Change of Taiwan's Tourist Trail]。科技醫療與社會(13)，119-169。https://doi.org/10.6464/tjsstm.201110.0119
浦忠勇(2012)。河川公共性的轉化：曾文溪上游治理的人文反思. 台灣原住民研究論叢(12)，93-128。https://doi.org/10.29763/tisr.201212.0003
財團法人成大研究發展基金會(2017)。韌性水城市評估與調適研究(1/2)。經濟部水利署。https://www.grb.gov.tw/search/planDetail?id=12210311
高郁婷(2018)。應用可及性指標於公共設施空間公平性之研究－以原臺中市都市公園為例。國立成功大學。台南市。https://hdl.handle.net/11296/7876bt
高雄市政府(2013)。變更高雄多功能經貿園區特定區細部計畫（第二次通盤檢討）案。https://urbangis.kcg.gov.tw/UBA//web_upload/PlanFile/06590/06590_%E9%9B%BB%E5%AD%90%E5%BB%BA%E6%AA%94_%E9%83%BD%E5%B8%82%E8%A8%88%E7%95%AB%E6%9B%B8.pdf
高雄市政府水利局(2018)。護‧海綿城市 親水滯洪。城市發展，25，8-21。
國家教育研究院(2002)。民眾參與 Public Participation。國家教育研究院。Retrieved 2/5 from http://terms.naer.edu.tw/detail/1316679/
國家發展委員會(2022, 2022/1/18)。前瞻基礎建設計畫。Retrieved 1/18 from https://www.ndc.gov.tw/cp.aspx?n=608FE9340FE6990D
國家發展委員會國土區域離島發展處(2021)。都市及區域發展統計彙編。國家發展委員會。Retrieved from https://ws.ndc.gov.tw/Download.ashx?u=LzAwMS9hZG1pbmlzdHJhdG9yLzEwL3JlbGZpbGUvMC8xNDY5MC9hY2Q1OWQ0Mi1iYmQzLTQ3MmEtYjAzMy1lMmEwOTk2NDAxZTcucGRm&n=MTEwX1BERi5wZGY%3d&icon=..pdf
國發會國土區域離島發展處(2014)。擘劃治水新策略邁向國土永續發展。https://ws.ndc.gov.tw/Download.ashx?u=LzAwMS9hZG1pbmlzdHJhdG9yLzEwL1JlbEZpbGUvNTU2Ni82MTQzLzAwNTk1NzQucGRm&n=54m55Yil5aCx5bCOLnBkZg%3D%3D&icon=..pdf
國發會產業發展處(2020)。推動國家融資保證，協助資金導向重大經濟建設。台灣經濟論衡，18(4)，44-50。
張知本(1952)。地方自治與經濟建設。法令月刊，3(8)，3-5。https://doi.org/10.6509/tlm.195208_3(8).0001
張英磊(2009)。多元移植與民主轉型過程中我國環評司法審查之發展 -一個以回應本土發展脈絡為目的之比較法分析。國立臺灣大學。台北市。https://hdl.handle.net/11296/t7r8ej
張紹勳(2008)。研究方法：理論與統計。(初版 ed.)。滄海。
張莉欣、黃文彬(2021)。臺中市低碳生態城樂活水岸綠色基盤再生願景計畫 [Vision Plan for Revitalizing Green Infrastructure of Leisure Waterfront of Low Carbon Eco-city Taichung]。(94)，11-23。
張學聖、徐敏純(2021)。堤防效應下之水災風險變遷與風險認知研究 [Flood Risk Evolution and Risk Perception under Levee Effects]。48(2)，107-132。https://doi.org/10.6128/cp.202106_48(2).0001
張豐年(2019)。如何提升都會河川之治理－以臺中市旱溪排水萬安橋至樹王橋段為例。生態臺灣。(65)，21-28。
戚淑芳(2005)。工程爭議之有效管理。國立成功大學。台南市。https://hdl.handle.net/11296/u9bcc2
莊永忠、廖學誠(2011)。PPGIS與傳統民眾參與方式在社區議題討論與居民參與程度上之比較研究：以宜蘭縣龜山島社區為例 [A Comparative Study of PPGIS-Based Approach and Traditional Public Participation Approaches on Community Discussions and Participation: The Evaluation of Guishan Island Community in Yilan County]。(55)，89-120。https://doi.org/10.6234/jgr.2011.55.05
許志義(1995)。多目標決策 (1 ed.)。五南圖書出版有限公司。
許哲瑜、歐聖榮(2014)。應用地理資訊系統與景觀結構指數分析得子口溪流域景觀變遷之研究。興大園藝，39(2)，83-96。http://hort.nchu.edu.tw/public/ckfinder/files/7-39-2-7-%E8%88%88%E5%A4%A7%E5%9C%92%E8%97%9D-%E8%A8%B1%E5%93%B2%E7%91%9C-%E6%87%89%E7%94%A8%E5%9C%B0%E7%90%86%E8%B3%87%E8%A8%8A%E7%B3%BB%E7%B5%B1-MJT-OK-%E5%8A%A0%E5%AF%86.pdf
許時雄(2003)。治河防洪與海岸防護 (初版 ed.)。科技圖書。
許登盛、林貝珊(2021)。都市河岸部落洪患風險認知與韌性：桃園市崁津部落的個案 [Urban riverside tribes' flood risk perception and resilience: A case study of pamatangan in taoyuan city]。災害防救科技與管理學刊，10(2)，1-13。https://doi.org/10.6149/jdm.202109_10(2).0001
郭志榮(2018, 2018/6/4)。消失的自然河流。財團法人公共電視文化事業基金會。Retrieved 2021/7/12 from https://ourisland.pts.org.tw/content/2783
郭翡玉、謝慧娟(2014)。以跨域加值方式推動公共建設之做法與推動成效。國土及公共治理季刊，2(4)，26-36。
陳文福、曹鎮、林志憲(2007)。淺談韓國清溪川復育計畫。中興工程，(94)，117-122。https://doi.org/10.30154/se.200701.0015
陳向明(2002)。社會科學質的研究。五南。
陳有祺(2005)。濕地生態工程。(初版 ed.)。滄海。
陳俐穎(2020, 2020/10/14)。環團公布水環境計畫「爛蘋果獎」　金門就佔２件. 蘋果新聞網。Retrieved 9/5 from https://tw.appledaily.com/life/20201014/G4CVVPHE2JAOLDN3WHYR7DXEVM/
彭仁隆(2007)。圈養野生動物的倫理爭議－從動物園的存在價值談起。弘誓雙月刊，(87),59-73。https://doi.org/10.29665/hs.200706.0015
彭振聲、林士斌、余世凱(2016)。永續臺北 海綿城市。土木水利，43(5)，38-54。https://doi.org/10.6653/MoCICHE/2016.04305.06
曾惠斌(2002)。建立公共建設調查需求與管理之研究(91-研-01)。行政院公共工程委員會。Retrieved from https://www.grb.gov.tw/search/planDetail?id=789027
黃信勳、徐世榮(2017)。從大埔事件省思我國空間計畫體系發展侷限 [A Reflection on Limitations of Taiwan's Spatial Planning System through the Dapu Incident]。35(3)，121-178。
黃國文、詹錢登(2022)。專輯序言：推動與落實生態水利的方法與案例。土木水利，49(2)，5-5。https://doi.org/10.6653/MoCICHE.202204_49(2).0002
黃嗣博(2015)。我國環境影響評估法中民眾參與機制之研究-以台北市北投纜車環評過程為例。中國文化大學。台北市。https://hdl.handle.net/11296/9j22jm
楊松岳、陳葦庭、林政浩(2017)。逕流分擔規劃打造韌性城市－以嘉義縣故宮南院周邊排水路為例 [Building Resilient Cities with Runoff Distribution Planning - A Case Study of Drainages for the Southern Branch of the National Palace Museum]。土木水利，44(5)，48-55。https://doi.org/10.6653/MoCICHE.201710_44(5).0007
楊博安(2020)。民眾參與水環境營造機制之探討─以台中市綠川與黎明溝為例。國立臺北大學。https://hdl.handle.net/11296/9anvyn
節水紀實編輯室(2020)。極端氣候下城市韌性足夠嗎？專訪水利署副署長王藝峰談怎樣才能成為「不怕水淹」的韌性城市。節水紀實，28，2-5。
經濟部(2016)。105年全國水論壇正式大會手冊。105年全國水論壇, 臺北.
經濟部水利署(2022, 2022/3/14)。中央管河川治理計畫。經濟部水利署。Retrieved 2022/2/24 from https://www.wra.gov.tw/cl.aspx?n=3371
經濟部水利署(2021a, 2021/10/22)。水環境改善整體空間發展藍圖規劃參考手冊介紹短片。經濟部水利署。Retrieved 11/4 from https://www.wrap.gov.tw/News_Video_Content.aspx?n=26384&s=93694
經濟部水利署(2021b)。「全國水環境改善計畫」縣市水環境改善整體空間發展藍圖規劃參考手冊 (草案)。經濟部水利署。
全國水環境改善計畫執行作業注意事(2021c)。https://law.moea.gov.tw/LawContent.aspx?id=GL000581
經濟部水利署(2020)。逕流分擔技術手冊。https://www-ws.gov.taipei/Download.ashx?u=LzAwMS9VcGxvYWQvMzQyL3JlbGZpbGUvMzY5NjcvODE5NTc1NS9kYTJlZmI2Ni1lZGZkLTQxNmMtOWUwOC1lZjFiMWJlZjQzYjEucGRm&n=6YCV5rWB5YiG5pOULnBkZg%3D%3D&icon=..pdf
鄒敏惠(2020, 2020/10/15)。整體進步、亂象仍在 民間揭曉前瞻水環境第二屆「金蘋果、爛蘋果獎」。環境資訊中心。 Retrieved 2/13 from https://e-info.org.tw/node/227381
鄔建國(2003)。景觀生態學：格局、過程、尺度與等級 (田惠敏, Ed. 初版 ed.). 五南。
廖禹婷(2021, 2021/10/29)。拒絕媚俗建設 貴仔坑溪、新竹漁港抱回水環境工程第三屆「爛蘋果獎」。環境資訊中心。Retrieved 2/13 from https://e-info.org.tw/node/232615
廖靜蕙(2011, 2011/1/20)。農田水圳「控固力」 每年300公里！。環境資訊中心。Retrieved 2022/5/16 from https://e-info.org.tw/node/63016
臺北市政府公共工程落實公民參與制度作業程序(2021)。https://www.laws.taipei.gov.tw/Law/LawSearch/LawArticleContent?lawId=P06C3008-20210604&realID=26-02-2021&lawArticleContentButton=
臺北市政府(2020)。臺北市都市計畫研擬規劃階段民眾參與執行手冊。臺北市政府都市發展局 Retrieved from https://www.udd.gov.taipei/document/PublicParticipation/%E9%83%BD%E5%B8%82%E8%A8%88%E7%95%AB%E6%B0%91%E7%9C%BE%E5%8F%83%E8%88%87_%E6%89%8B%E5%86%8A.pdf
臺南市議會(2018, 2021/8/30)。請落實海綿城市防災，增加防洪系數承載。臺南市議會。https://www.tncc.gov.tw/motionpage1.asp?mainid=7DF1051D-9692-45BA-8A48-EACB9158FA91
劉怡廷、駱尚廉(2005)。環境保護永續評量系統建置方法與問題剖析 [Methods for Measuring the Sustainability of the Environment]。都市與計劃，32(2)，125-144. https://doi.org/10.6128/cp.32.2.125
劉烘昌(2017)。談臺灣溪流整治的「生態工法」。生態臺灣(55)，37-42。
蕭力偉(2018)。都市空間發展結構歷程與治理的困局－以高速鐵路苗栗車站特定區為例 [The Structuration of Urban Spatial Development and Its Governing Predicament -A Case Study of the High Speed Rail Miaoli Station Special District]。中國地理學會會刊(60)，25-50。https://doi.org/10.29972/bgsc.201806_(60).0002
賴宗福(2009)。各國環境影響評估系統之檢視：兼論臺灣環評制度現況 [An Examination of the Environmental Impact Assessment Systems in Various Countries: Including a Discussion of the Current Police in Taiwan]。實踐博雅學報(12)，109-140。https://doi.org/10.7041/scjla.200907.0109
謝君臨(2020, 2020/10/14)。民團評選水環境改善 「金蘋果」、「爛蘋果」得主出爐。自由時報。Retrieved 2/13 from https://news.ltn.com.tw/news/life/breakingnews/3320913
謝雯凱(2003)。當代德國都市規劃中之民眾參與。淡江大學。https://hdl.handle.net/11296/6ktfht
簡佑丞(2019)。日據初期的台灣河川治水事業與土木技師十川嘉太郎的貢獻。土木水利，46(1)。https://doi.org/10.6653/MoCICHE.201902_46(1).0006
蘇維翎、林笈克、田志仁、黃于玻 (2020)。生態檢核機制發展與展望 [Development and Prospects of Ecological Check in Taiwan]。水保技術，14(1)，50-67。