博碩士論文 etd-0822121-201352 詳細資訊


[回到前頁查詢結果 | 重新搜尋]

姓名 黃偉嘉(Wei-Chia Huang) 電子郵件信箱 E-mail 資料不公開
畢業系所 人力資源管理研究所(Institute of Human Resource Management)
畢業學位 碩士(Master) 畢業時期 109學年第2學期
論文名稱(中) 工作使命感對職業承諾及任務績效之影響—家長式領導的調節角色
論文名稱(英) The Influence of Calling on Occupational Commitment and Task Performance: The Moderating Role of Paternalistic Leadership
檔案
  • etd-0822121-201352.pdf
  • 本電子全文僅授權使用者為學術研究之目的,進行個人非營利性質之檢索、閱讀、列印。
    請遵守中華民國著作權法之相關規定,切勿任意重製、散佈、改作、轉貼、播送,以免觸法。
    論文使用權限

    紙本論文:立即公開

    電子論文:校內校外完全公開

    論文語文/頁數 中文/94
    統計 本論文已被瀏覽 82 次,被下載 30 次
    摘要(中) 當今企業面臨著全球化所造成的艱困複雜情勢,危急關頭需要的是組織成員的同心協力,藉由其對於工作的職業承諾感,為組織帶來良好績效表現與實質價值。而其中組織成員對於工作所抱持的使命感,是否可能會對於職業承諾與任務績效造成良好影響,本研究欲探討其中的關係。另外家長式領導作為華人文化中最具代表性的影響因素,又會對使命感與職業承諾、任務績效之間的關係造成甚麼樣的影響呢?
    本研究所使用的是問卷調查法,蒐集由台灣國軍組織中而得,380份主管部屬對偶問卷,接著採用階層迴歸分析之方式,探討部屬工作使命感對其職業承諾以及任務績效的影響,另外也探討家長式領導對上述關係之調節效果。研究結果發現:(1)工作使命感對於職業承諾具有正向影響;(2) 工作使命感對於任務績效並不具顯著影響;(3)工作使命感與威權領導的交互作用,對職業承諾與任務績效均不具有調節效果;(4) 工作使命感與仁慈領導的交互作用,對職業承諾與任務績效均不具有調節效果;(5) 工作使命感與德行領導的交互作用,對職業承諾與任務績效均不具有調節效果。
    摘要(英) Today's enterprises are faced with difficult and complicated situations caused by globalization. What is needed at a critical moment is the concerted efforts of the members in the organization. With their occupational commitment to the work, they can bring good performance and substantial value to the organization. And does the sense of calling held by the members of the organization for work have influences on occupational commitment and task performance, this study intends to explore the relationship between them. In addition, as the most representative influencing factor in Chinese culture, what impact will paternalistic leadership have on the relationship between sense of calling, occupational commitment, and task performance?
    This study used survey techniques to collect 380 supervisor-subordinate dual questionnaires obtained from the Military organization of ROC, Taiwan, and then uses a hierarchical regression analysis method to explore the influence of subordinates’ sense of calling on their occupational commitments and task performances. In addition, it also explores the effect of paternalistic leadership on the above-mentioned relationships. The results of the study show that: (1) the sense of calling has a significant positive effect on occupational commitment; (2) the sense of calling does not have significant impact on task performance; (3) the interaction between the sense of calling and authoritarian leadership has no significant impact on occupational commitment and task performance as the moderating role; (4) The interaction between calling and benevolent leadership has no moderating effect on occupational commitment and task performance; (5) The interaction between calling and moral leadership has no moderating effect on occupational commitment and task performance.
    Keywords: , , , , , ,
    關鍵字(中)
  • 工作使命感
  • 職業承諾
  • 任務績效
  • 家長式領導
  • 威權領導
  • 仁慈領導
  • 德行領導
  • 關鍵字(英)
  • calling
  • occupational commitment
  • task performance
  • paternalistic leadership
  • authoritarian leadership
  • benevolent leadership
  • moral leadership
  • 論文目次 論文審定書………………………………………………………………………………i
    中文摘要…………………………………………………………………………….......ii
    英文摘要………………………………………………………………………………..iii
    目錄……………………………………………………………………………………..iv
    圖目次…………………………………………………………………………………...v
    表目次…………………………………………………………………………………..vi
    第一章 緒論…………………………………………………………………………...1
    第一節 研究背景與動機………………………………………………………...1
    第二節 研究目的………………………………………………………………...4
    第二章 文獻探討……………………………………………………………………...5
    第一節 工作使命感(Calling)………………………………………………...5
    第二節 職業承諾(Occupational Commitment)……………………................9
    第三節 任務績效(Task Performance)………………………………………12
    第四節 家長式領導(Paternalistic Leadership)……………………………...14
    第五節 威權領導、使命感與職業承諾、任務績效之關係………………….19
    第六節 仁慈領導、使命感與職業承諾、任務績效之關係………………….21
    第七節 德行領導、使命感與職業承諾、任務績效之關係………………….23
    第三章 研究方法…………………………………………………………………….24
    第一節 研究架構與假設……………………………………………………….24
    第二節 研究樣本……………………………………………………………….26
    第三節 研究工具……………………………………………………………….28
    第四節 研究程序……………………………………………………………….36
    第五節 資料分析……………………………………………………………….37
    第四章 研究結果…………………………………………………………………….38
    第一節 各變項間之關係……………………………………………………….38
    第二節 工作使命感對職業承諾與任務績效之影響………………………….44
    第三節 家長式領導對工作使命感與職業承諾、任務績效之間之交互作用效
    果………………………………………………………………………………….46
    第五章 討論與建議………………………………………………………………….55
    第一節 研究結論……………………………………………………………….55
    第二節 結果討論……………………………………………………………….58
    第三節 研究貢獻……………………………………………………………….63
    第四節 研究限制……………………………………………………………….65
    第五節 研究建議……………………………………………………………….67
    參考文獻……………………………………………………………………………….68
    附錄一、部屬問卷…………………………………………………………………….78
    附錄二、主管問卷…………………………………………………………………….85
    參考文獻 一、中文文獻
    王世明 (2017) 。仁慈的雙面刃:仁慈領導對創造力績效的雙路徑模式(碩士論文)。
    王安智 (2014) 。德行領導:本土概念或普同現象?。中華心理學刊,56 (2),149-164。
    王錦堂 (2002) 。人際和諧、領導行為與效能之探討。高雄醫學大學行為科學研究所碩士論文。
    任金剛 (2003) 。組織行為研究在台灣:三十年回顧與展望。臺北:桂冠。
    朱美珍 (1994) 。社會工作在部隊的運用。台北:華泰。
    余一鳴 (2007) 。我國軍文種化差異之比較研究—以Hofstede的文化測量為架構。復興崗學報,90,1-36 。
    李芸蘋、陳以亨、陳先郡、陳啟文 (2014) 。台灣警務人員之工作使命感研究。公共行政學報,(46),29-58。
    李鴻文、陳芬儀 (2009) 。人格特質與任務績效關係之研究。運動休閒餐旅研究,4(4),225-236。
    周婉茹、周麗芳、鄭伯壎、任金剛 (2010) 。專權與尚嚴之辨:再探威權領導的內涵與恩威並濟的效果。本土心理學研究,(34),223-284。
    周麗芳、鄭伯壎、任金剛 (2006) 。情境脈絡影響。見鄭伯壎、樊景立、周麗芳(主編),家長式領導:模式與證據。臺北:華泰文化公司。
    林川博、林秀吟、陳淑 (2016) 。護理人員社會支持與職業承諾關係之研究:以工作-家庭平衡為中介變數。華人前瞻研究,12(2),39-63。
    林俊瑩 (2010) 。工作滿意度、組織承諾與離職意圖:中小學教師與其他職業之比較。教育實踐與研究,23(1),1-30。
    林姿葶、姜定宇、蕭景鴻、鄭伯壎 (2014) 。家長式領導效能:後設分析研究。本土心理學研究,(42),181-249。
    林姿葶、鄭伯壎 (2012) 。華人領導者的噓寒問暖與提攜教育:仁慈領導之雙構面模式。本土心理學研究,(37),253-302。
    林姿葶、鄭伯壎、周麗芳 (2014) 。家長式領導二十年:問題與解答。本土心理學研究,(42),147-177。
    邱發忠、陳學志 (2003) 。軍事服從態度量表發展暨其效度之研究。復興崗學報,(79),79-106。
    姜定宇、丁捷、林伶瑾 (2012) 。家長式領導與部屬效能: 信任主管與不信任主管的中介效果。中華心理學刊,54 (3), 269-291。
    柯佑宗 (2014) 。威權領導與不當督導對績效的影響-自我監控的調節效果。國防大學資源管理及決策研究所碩士論文。
    徐瑋伶、黃敏萍、鄭伯壎、樊景立 (2006) :〈德行領導〉。見鄭伯壎、姜定宇 (編) :《華人組織行為-議題、作法及出版》,頁122-149。台北:華泰文化公司。
    張火燦、紀乃文 (2006) 。人力資源主管角色與高階主管情感型信任對人力資源部門績效指標的影響。交大管理學報,26(2),49-90。
    張國義、陳淑玲、呂依璇 (2015) 。團隊競爭氣候對業務人員任務績效之影響歷程:察覺-動機-能耐觀點。臺大管理論叢,25(3),133-162。
    莫大華 (2008) 。批判性地緣政治戰略之研究。問題與研究,47(2),57-85。
    郭均誠、林姿葶、周婉茹、鄭伯壎 (2015) 。領導者之差序對待幅度與部屬效能:平均德行領導的調節效果。本土心理學研究,(43),125-172。
    陳嵩、陳光偉、李佩芬 (2011) 。垂直人際信任對部屬工作績效之影響:上司家長式領導的角色。管理學報,28(1),1-29。
    黃婉玲 (2019) 。為何選擇就讀軍警院校?公共服務動機的角色。公共行政學報,57,83-118。
    黃婉菁 (2003) 。從工作生活品質、工作壓力觀點探討社會工作者對專業生涯承諾之相關研究 (碩士論文) 。
    趙安安、高尚仁 (2005) 。台灣地區華人企業家長式領導風格與員工壓力之關聯。應用心理研究,(27),111-131。
    劉淑芬、高靖秋、楊素月 (2016) 。組織結構會影響護理人員的離職與任務績效嗎?-以台灣醫院照護體系為例。領導護理,17(2),3-12。
    劉嘉仁 (2011) 。護理人員角色壓力、工作滿意、職業承諾與離職傾向關聯性之研究 (碩士論文) 。
    樊景立、鄭伯壎 (1997) 。華人自評式績效考核中的自謙偏差:題意、謙虛價值及自尊之影響。中華心理學刊,39 (2),103-118。
    樊景立、鄭伯壎 (2000) 。華人組織的家長式領導:一項文化觀點的分析。本土心理學研究,13,127-180。
    鄭伯壎 (1995a) 。家長權威與領導行為之關係:一個台灣民營企業主持人的個案研究。中央研究院民族學研究所集刊,119-173。
    鄭伯壎 (1995b) 。差序格局與華人組織行為。本土心理學研究,(3),142-219。
    鄭伯壎 (1995c) 。不同家長權威價值與領導作風的關係:台灣民營企業的實徵研究。
    鄭伯壎 (2017) 。華人領導的十堂必修課。臺北 : 五南圖書出版公司。
    鄭伯壎、周麗芳、樊景立 (2000) 。家長式領導:三元模式的建構與測量。本土心理學研究,(14),3-64。
    鄭伯壎、郭建志、徐瑋伶、胡秀華 (2003) 。人治主義、家長式領導及部屬效能:中介模式的驗證。教育部資助華人本土心理學研究追求卓越計畫之研究報告,報告編號89-H-FA01-2-4-4,台北 : 教育部。
    鄭伯壎、黃敏萍、周麗芳 (2002) 。家長式領導及其效能:華人企業團隊的證據。華人心理學報,3(1),85-112。
    鄭伯壎、樊景立、周麗芳 (2006) 。家長式領導 : 模式與證據。臺北 : 華泰文化公司。
    鄭伯壎、謝佩鴛、周麗芳 (2002) 。校長領導作風、上下關係品質及教師角色外行為:轉型式與家長式領導的效果。本土心理學研究,17,105-161。
    鄭珮姍 (2016) 。華人人際壓力與員工績效 : 家長式領導的調節效果 (碩士論文) 。
    鄭淵全、李秀如 (2010) 。國小教師組織承諾與人力資本關係之研究-知識分享策略之中介效果。國立新竹教育大學學報,27(1),1-31。
    賴宛苓 (2013) 。職業承諾與工作投入的相關研究。工業科技教育學刊,(6),91-99。
    錢淑芬 (1991) 。從軍隊「角色訓練制度」論「角色認知」對軍隊生活適應的影響。復興崗學報,45,443-462。
    錢淑芬、廖帝涵 (2009) 。軍隊的階級倫理如何框住人際互動:憲兵義務役士兵的軍事社會化經驗。復興崗學報,(96),79-105。
    二、英文文獻
    Aiken, L.S., West, S.G., Reno, R.R. (1991). Multiple Regression: Testing and Interpreting Interactions. New York, US: SAGE.
    Aranya, N. & Pollock, J. & Amernic, J. (1981). An examination of professional commitment in public accounting. Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, 6:4, 271-280.
    Aryee, S., & Tan, K. (1992). Antecedents and outcomes of career commitment. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 40:3, 288-305.
    Ashill, N. J., & Rod, M., & Carruthers, J. (2008). The effect of management commitment to service quality on frontline employees' job attitudes, turnover intentions and service recovery performance in a new public management context. Journal of Strategic Marketing, 16:5, 437-462.
    Baron, R. M., Kenny, D. A. (1986). The moderator–mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51(6), 1173-1182.
    Bateman, T., & Organ, D. (1983). Job Satisfaction and the Good Soldier: The Relationship Between Affect and Employee "Citizenship". Academy of Management Journal, 26.
    Baumeister, R. F. (1991) Meanings of Life. Guilford Press.
    Becker, H. S. (1960). Notes on the concept of commitment. American Journal of Sociology, 66, 32-40.
    Bellah, R. N., & Madsen, R., & Sullivan, W. M., & Swidler, A., & Tipton, S. M. (1985). Habits of the heart: Individualism and commitment in American life, The Social Science Journal, 24:2, 229-231.
    Borman, W. C. (1991). Job Behavior, Performance, and Effectiveness. Psychology Faculty Publications, 1117.
    Borman, W. C., & Motowidlo, S. J. (1993). Expanding the Criterion Domain to Include Elements of Contextual Performance. San Francisco, Jossey-Bass, Personnel Selection in Organizations, 71-98.
    Brashear, T., & Lepkowska-White, E., & Chelariu, C. (2003). An empirical test of antecedents and consequences of salesperson job satisfaction among Polish retail salespeople. Journal of Business Research, 56, 971-978.
    Bunderson, J. S., & Thompson, J. A. (2009). The Call of the Wild: Zookeepers, Callings, and the Double-edged Sword of Deeply Meaningful Work. Administrative Science Quarterly, 54:1, 32-57.
    Cao, X., & Chen, L. & Tian, L., & Diao, Y., & Hu, X. (2015). Effect of professional self-concept on burnout among community health nurses in Chengdu, China: The mediator role of organisational commitment. Journal of clinical nursing, 24.
    Chen, H. Y., Kao, H. S. R. (2009). Chinese paternalistic leadership and non-Chinese subordinates' psychological health. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 20 (12), 2533-2546.
    Cohen, J., & Cohen, P. (1983). Applied Multiple Regression/Correlation Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
    Colarelli, S. M., & Bishop, R. C. (1990). Career commitment: Functions, correlates, and management. Group & Organization Studies, 15:2, 158-176.
    Conway, N., & Briner, R. B. (2012). Investigating the effect of collective organizational commitment on unit-level performance and absence. Journal of occupational and organizational psychology, 85:3, 472-486.
    Dalton, J. C. (2001). Career and calling: Finding a place for the spirit in work and community. New Directions for Student Services, 95, 17-25.
    Dik, B. J., & Duffy, R. D. (2009). Calling and vocation at work: Definitions and prospects for research and practice. The Counseling Psychologist, 37:3, 424-450.
    Dik, B. J., & Eldridge, B. M., & Steger, M. F., & Duffy, R. D. (2012). Development and validation of the Calling and Vocation Questionnaire (CVQ) and Brief Calling Scale (BCS). Journal of Career Assessment, 20:3, 242-263.
    Dobrow, S. R., & Tosti-kharas, J. (2011). Calling: The Development of a Scale measure. Personnel Psychology, 64:4, 1001-1049.
    Duffy, R. D., & Sedlacek, W. E. (2007). The presence of and search for a calling: Connections to career development. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 70:3, 590-601.
    Farh, J. L., & Cheng, B. S. (2000). A cultural analysis of paternalistic leadership in Chinese organizations. In J. T. Li, A. S. Tsui, & E. Weldon (Eds.), Management and organizations in the Chinese context (pp. 84- 131). London: Macmillan.
    Farh, J. L., Cheng, B. S., Chou, L-F., & Chu, X. P. (2006). Authority and Benevolence: Employees’ Responses to Paternalistic Leadership in China. In A. S. Tsui, Y. Bian, & L. Cheng (Eds.), China’s domestic private firms: multidisciplinary perspectives on management and performance (pp. 230-260).
    Farh, J. L., Liang, J., Chou, L. F., & Cheng, B. S. (2008). Paternalistic leadership in Chinese organizations: Research progress and future research directions. In C. C. Chen & Y. T. Lee (Eds.), Leadership and management in China: Philosophies, theories, and practices (pp. 171-205). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
    Hair, J. F., Anderson, R. E., Tatham, R. L., & Black, W. C. (1995). Multivariate data analysis (4th ed.). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
    Hall, D. T., & Chandler, D. E. (2005). Psychological success: When the career is a calling. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 26:2, 155-176.
    Kim, Y. G., & Kim, S., & Yoo, J. L. (2012). Travel agency employees' career commitment and turnover intention during the recent global economic crisis. The Service Industries Journal, 32:8, 1247-1264.
    Lee, A. Y. P., & Wang, Y. H., & Chen, I. H., & Yeh, Y. T. (2019). Calling and Organizational Commitment: A Moderated Mediation Model of Career Commitment and Person-Organization Fit. 管理學報, 36:4, 369-389.
    Lee, Y. D., & Lain, J. W. & Chen, C. Y. (1999). A Study on the Measurement of Productivity for White-Collar Employees-A Case of Electronic Industry in Taiwan. The Chinese Military Academy Journal, 14, 345-361.
    Lee, Y. P., & Wang, Y. H., & Chen, I. H., & Yeh, Y. T. (2019). Calling and organizational commitment: A moderated mediation model of career commitment and person-organization fit. Journal of management and business research, 36:4, 369-389.
    Mael, F., & Ashforth, B. E. (1992). Alumni and their alma mater: A partial test of the reformulated model of organizational identification. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 13(2), 103-123.
    Meyer, J. P., & Allen, N. J. (1991). A three-component conceptualization of organizational commitment. Human Resource Management Review, 1:1, 61-89.
    Mrayyan, M. T., & Al-Faouri, I. (2008). Career commitment and job performance of Jordanian nurses. Nurs Forum, 43:1, 24-37.
    Porter, L. W., & Steers, R. M., & Mowday, R. T., & Boulian, P. V. (1974). Organizational commitment, job satisfaction, and turnover among psychiatric technicians. Journal of Applied Psychology, 59:5, 603-609.
    Praskova, A., & Creed, P., & Hood, M. (2015). Career identity and the complex mediating relationships between career preparatory actions and career progress markers. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 87, 145–153.
    Redding, S. G. (1990). The spirit of Chinese capitalism. New York: Walter de Gruyter.
    Rotundo, M., & Sackett, P. R. (2002). The relative importance of task, citizenship, and counterproductive performance to global ratings of job performance: A policy-capturing approach. Journal of Applied Psychology, 87:1, 66-80.
    Shamir, B., Zakay E., Breinin, E., & Popper, M. (1998). Correlates of Charismatic Leader Behavior in Military Units: Subordinates' Attitudes, Unit Characteristics, And Superiors' Appraisals of Leader Performance. AMJ, 41, 387-409.
    Shamir, B., Zakay, E., Brainin, E. and Popper, M. (2000), Leadership and Social Identification in Military Units: Direct and Indirect Relationships. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 30, 612-640.
    Silin, R. H. (1976). Leadership and value: The organization of large-scale Taiwan enterprises. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
    Thompson, J. A., & Bunderson, J. S. (2019). Research on work as a calling. . . and how to make it matter. Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior, 6, 421-443.
    Wang, A. C., Chiang, J. T. J., Chou, W. J., & Cheng, B. S. (2017). One definition, different manifestations: Investigating ethical leadership in the Chinese context. Asia Pac J Manag 34, 505–535.
    Wang, A.-C., Chiang, J. T.-J., Chou, W.-J., & Cheng, B.-S. (2017). One definition, different manifestations: Investigating ethical leadership in the Chinese context. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 34(3), 505-535.
    Weber, M. (1930). The Protestant Ethic and the Spirit of Capitalism, trans. T. Parsons. New York: Routledge Classics.
    Weiss, J., & Skelley, M., & Haughey, J., & Hall, D. (2003). Calling, New Careers and Spirituality a Reflective Perspective for Organizational Leaders and Professionals. Research in Ethical Issues in Organizations, 5, 175-201.
    Westwood, R. I. (1997). Harmony and patriarchy: The cultural basis for paternalistic headship among overseas Chinese. Organization Studies, 18, 445-480.
    Westwood, R. I., & Chan, A. (1992). Headship and leadership. In R. I. Westwood (Ed.), Organizational behaviour: A Southeast Asian perspective. Hong Kong: Longman Group.
    Williams, L. J., & Anderson, S. E. (1991). Job Satisfaction and Organizational Commitment as Predictors of Organizational Citizenship and In-Role Behaviors. Journal of Management, 17:3, 601-617.
    Wrzesniewski, A., & McCauley, C., & Rozin, P., & Schwartz, B. (1997). Jobs, careers, and callings: People's relations to their work. Journal of research in personality, 31(1), 21-33.
    口試委員
  • 周麗芳 - 召集委員
  • 李明彥 - 委員
  • 任金剛 - 指導教授
  • 口試日期 2021-09-10 繳交日期 2021-09-22

    [回到前頁查詢結果 | 重新搜尋]


    如有任何問題請與論文審查小組聯繫