論文使用權限 Thesis access permission:校內校外完全公開 unrestricted
開放時間 Available:
校內 Campus: 已公開 available
校外 Off-campus: 已公開 available
論文名稱 Title |
以「計畫行為論」預測消費者購買醜水果的意向 Predicting Consumers Purchasing Intentions Toward Ugly Fruits With the Theory of Planned Behavior |
||
系所名稱 Department |
|||
畢業學年期 Year, semester |
語文別 Language |
||
學位類別 Degree |
頁數 Number of pages |
78 |
|
研究生 Author |
|||
指導教授 Advisor |
|||
召集委員 Convenor |
|||
口試委員 Advisory Committee |
|||
口試日期 Date of Exam |
2024-09-25 |
繳交日期 Date of Submission |
2024-11-12 |
關鍵字 Keywords |
醜食、次優水果、食物浪費、永續消費、SDG 12 ugly food, suboptimal fruits, food waste, sustainable consumption, SDG 12 |
||
統計 Statistics |
本論文已被瀏覽 560 次,被下載 19 次 The thesis/dissertation has been browsed 560 times, has been downloaded 19 times. |
中文摘要 |
根據聯合國糧農組織(FAO)在2011年的報告,全球每年丟棄食物量共13億噸。這其中包括許多外觀上有瑕疵或不完美,但無食用安全問題的「醜水果」被淘汰、丟棄。為減少這些醜水果的浪費,本研究以計畫行為論(TPB)作為基礎,為了探討消費者購買醜水果意向之影響因素。研究方法首先以焦點團體訪談法找出消費者認為的重要信念,之後以便利抽樣方式進行網路問卷調查。焦點團體訪談是以台灣購買蔬果的消費者為對象,共訪問了6人。問卷調查的研究對象為年齡20歲以上,有親自買過水果的一般民眾。在正式問卷中,共回收有效問卷295份,受測者有男生128人,女生167人,平均年齡40歲。 迴歸分析顯示,態度、主觀規範和知覺行為控制對消費者購買醜水果的意向均有正面影響。而且,當醜水果是買來給自己和家人吃時,主觀規範的影響較大;當醜水果是只買來給自己吃時,主觀規範的影響不顯著。此外,結果也顯示若醜水果的定價設定比一般水果便宜約30%,應該能吸引大部分的消費者,而試吃醜水果亦可以令他們放心購買。根據上述研究結果,本文提出醜水果銷售通路商可提升購買醜水果的意向之建議,例如環保宣導、提供團購和增設特賣點、試吃醜水果及提供10-30%的折扣。 |
Abstract |
According to a report of Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations in 2011, 1.3 billion tons of foods are discarded globally every year. Among these foods are “ugly fruits” that have flaws or imperfections in appearance, but are safe to eat. If we can understand what determines consumers' intention to purchase ugly fruits, we might be able to reduce food waste. This study thus used the theory of planned behavior (TPB) to explore the determinants of customers’ intention to purchase ugly fruits. I first used focus group interviews to find out the consumers’ salient beliefs regarding the purchase of ugly fruits, and then conducted an online survey using convenience sampling. The focus group were conducted with 6 consumers who purchase fruits and vegetables. The survey was target at consumers who were over 20 years old and had purchased fruits themselves. The valid sample was composed of 295 people, including 128 men and 167 women, with an average age of 40. Regression analysis showed that attitude, subjective norms and perceived behavioral control all had positive impact on consumers' intention to purchase ugly fruits. In addition, results suggest that if the price of ugly fruits was set to be about 30% cheaper than ordinary fruits, it should be able to attract most consumers. The respondents also agreed that taste testing could make them more confident about the quality of ugly fruits. Based on the above results, several recommendations were made for increasing people’s intention to purchase ugly fruits. These recommendations were green marketing, setting up of ugly-fruit counters at points of heavy pedestrian flow, taste testing and offering 10-30% discounts. |
目次 Table of Contents |
論文審定書 i 謝辭 ii 摘要 iii Abstract iv 目錄 v 圖次 vii 表次 viii 第一章 緒論 1 第一節 研究背景 1 第二節 研究動機與目的 3 第二章 文獻探討 5 第一節 食物浪費、次優食品和醜蔬果 5 第二節 蔬果消費行為 7 第三節 影響消費者購買的因素 9 第三章 研究設計 13 第一節 焦點團體訪談法 13 第二節 研究焦點與研究假說 17 第三節 預試問卷架構內容 17 第四節 預試問卷結果 20 第五節 問卷修正及預期成果 27 第六節 正式問卷內容架構 29 第四章 研究結果 32 第一節 正式問卷樣本結構 32 第二節 因素分析與信度分析 40 第三節 迴歸分析 42 第四節 人口變項與購買醜水果意向進行相關及變異數分析 43 第五節 其他輔助分析 44 第五章 討論與建議 46 第一節 描述統計所呈現的意義與討論 46 第二節 研究假設驗證結果 48 第三節 對提升醜水果購買意向之建議 49 第四節 研究限制與未來研究建議 51 參考文獻 53 附錄一 焦點團體訪談之主持備忘錄 58 附錄二 網路預試問卷 60 附錄三 預試題號2-1至14之因素結構 64 附錄四 網路正式問卷 65 |
參考文獻 References |
人間福報。(2009)。等了20年…醜蔬果可在歐盟賣了。人間福報。https://www.merit-times.com/newspage.aspx?unid=133488 王瑤芬、蘇庭玉、李依蒨、洪睿妤、莊承文、霍柏任、洪柔穗、吳茵茵(2018)。醜食知多少?小餐生對醜食的認知與接受度。輔仁民生學誌,24(1),1-24。 https://www.AiritiLibrary.com/Publication/Index/10276149-201806-201901070028-201901070028-1-24 吳宜靜。(2020)。吃餅乾救醜蔬果 「最擁抱農業的餅乾」恩居好食團隊募資中。環境資訊中心。https://e-info.org.tw/node/225952#1 林佳霈。(2020)。促進大學生蔬食意向的社會行銷實驗【碩士論文,國立中山大學】。https://hdl.handle.net/11296/ucz35t 洪子淇、古若彤。(2022)。用NG食材打造地球糧居。生命力新聞。 https://vita.tw/%e7%94%a8ng%e9%a3%9f%e6%9d%90%e6%89%93%e9%80%a0%e5%9c%b0%e7%90%83%e7%b3%a7%e5%b1%85/ 范震華。(2016)。不挑醜蔬果有理? 心理學家:原來是大腦作祟。環境資訊中心。https://e-info.org.tw/node/200778 風傳媒。(2017)。荒謬馬鈴薯、滑稽蘋果:我很醜可是我很美味!法國超市這樣絕妙行銷,減少食物浪費。風傳媒。https://www.storm.mg/lifestyle/295266 國民健康署。(2018)。健康五蔬果。國民健康署。https://www.hpa.gov.tw/Pages/Detail.aspx?nodeid=543&pid=715 張翔、謝清隆、胡俊明、張佑安。(2019)。應用計畫行為理論探討消費者對醜食產品購買意願之研究。健康科技期刊,6(1),27-44。https://doi.org/10.6979/TJHS.201909_6(1).0005 張靜貞、徐世勳。(2021)。減少糧損與食物浪費 創造雙重紅利-我國參與APEC糧食安全論壇的經驗分享。國際開發援助現場季刊(3),13-20。https://www.icdf.org.tw/wSite/ct?xItem=70270&ctNode=31854&mp=1 許哲源。(2021)。30秒談減重|蔬果大不同。好日子診所。https://agoodday.clinic/2021/12/07/30%E7%A7%92%E8%AB%87%E6%B8%9B%E9%87%8D%EF%BD%9C%E8%94%AC%E6%9E%9C%E5%A4%A7%E4%B8%8D%E5%90%8C%EF%BC%88%E6%96%87%EF%BC%9A%E8%A8%B1%E5%93%B2%E6%BA%90%E9%86%AB%E5%B8%AB%EF%BC%89/ 許雅筑。(2016)。接受不完美 醜蔬果大進擊。喀報。https://castnet.nctu.edu.tw/castnet/article/9236?issueID=602 郭育齊、張瓊婷。(2022)。消費者減少食物浪費之因素探討:以高雄市為例。應用經濟論叢,111(111),43-74。https://doi.org/10.53106/054696002022060111002 郭唐帷、林恒生。(2021)。全球糧食損失與浪費概況-盤點食物供應鏈各階段癥結點。豐年雜誌, 71(8),76-81。https://doi.org/10.6708/harvest.202108_71(8).0013 郭錦萍。(2018)。法國/醜食運動…醜蔬果 從垃圾桶回到餐桌。聯合新聞網。https://sdgs.udn.com/sdgs/story/8781/1248170 陳大樂。(2019)。蔬菜、水果可互相取代嗎?。PChome新聞。https://news.pchome.com.tw/magazine/report/li/Evergreen/13096/155413440092940028005.htm 黃建怡。(2011)。以計畫行為理論探討消費者購買有機食品之意圖【碩士論文,國立東華大學】。https://hdl.handle.net/11296/4k4n7e 黃珮蓁。(2019)。成為廚餘以前——從食物浪費到惜食的實踐。環境資訊中心。https://e-info.org.tw/node/225952#1 臺北農產運銷股份有限公司。(2021)。蔬果分級標準暨包裝規格。作者。http://www.tapmc.com.taipei/DL.ashx?f=000D1B&s=Web_News 劉俐萍。(2018)。醜食產品購買障礙與購買意願之關係【碩士論文,中山醫學大學】https://hdl.handle.net/11296/87x684 潘文涵。(2019)。國民營養健康狀況變遷調查102-105年成果報告。國民健康署。https://www.hpa.gov.tw/Pages/Detail.aspx?nodeid=3999&pid=11145 潘文涵。(2022)。國民營養健康狀況變遷調查106-109年成果報告。國民健康署。https://www.hpa.gov.tw/File/Attach/15562/File_18775.pdf 魯眞、王策玄。(2005)。臺灣水果需求及消費型態分析. 農業經濟叢刊, 10(2), 125-162。https://doi.org/10.6196/taer.2005.10.2.1 魏米秀。(2005)。大學生蔬果攝取行為影響因素模式發展之研究 【博士論文,國立臺灣師範大學】https://hdl.handle.net/11296/9v6pmm Abu Hatab, A., Tirkaso, W. T., Tadesse, E., & Lagerkvist, C.-J. (2022). An extended integrative model of behavioural prediction for examining households’ food waste behaviour in Addis Ababa, Ethiopia. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 179. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2021.106073 Ajzen, I. (1991). The theory of planned behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 50(2), 179-211. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/0749-5978(91)90020-T Ajzen, I. (2006). Constructing a Theory of Planned Behavior Questionnaire. https://people.umass.edu/~aizen/pdf/tpb.measurement.pdf Ajzen, I. (2011). The theory of planned behaviour: Reactions and reflections. Psychology & Health, 26(9), 1113-1127. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/51653805_The_theory_of_planned_behaviour_Reactions_and_reflections Aschemann-Witzel, J., Jensen, J. H., Jensen, M. H., & Kulikovskaja, V. (2017). Consumer behaviour towards price-reduced suboptimal foods in the supermarket and the relation to food waste in households. Appetite, 116, 246-258. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.appet.2017.05.013 Augustin, M. A., Sanguansri, L., Fox, E. M., Cobiac, L., & Cole, M. B. (2020). Recovery of wasted fruit and vegetables for improving sustainable diets. Trends in Food Science & Technology, 95, 75-85. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tifs.2019.11.010 de Hooge, I. E., Oostindjer, M., Aschemann-Witzel, J., Normann, A., Loose, S. M., & Almli, V. L. (2017). This apple is too ugly for me! Food Quality and Preference, 56, 80-92. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodqual.2016.09.012 FAO. (2014). Food wastage footprint fullcost accounting Final Report. FAO. https://www.fao.org/documents/card/en?details=5e7c4154-2b97-4ea5-83a7-be9604925a24%2F Gustavsson, J., Cederberg, C., Sonesson, U., Otterdijk, R., & Meybeck, A. (2011). Global Food Losses and Food Waste- Extent, Causes and Prevention. FAO. https://www.fao.org/sustainable-food-value-chains/library/details/en/c/266053/ Hartmann, T., Jahnke, B., & Hamm, U. (2021). Making ugly food beautiful: Consumer barriers to purchase and marketing options for Suboptimal Food at retail level – A systematic review. Food Quality and Preference, 90. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodqual.2021.104179 Huang, I. Y., Manning, L., James, K. L., Grigoriadis, V., Millington, A., Wood, V., & Ward, S. (2021). Food waste management: A review of retailers’ business practices and their implications for sustainable value. Journal of Cleaner Production, 285. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.125484 Jaeger, S. R., Machín, L., Aschemann-Witzel, J., Antúnez, L., Harker, F. R., & Ares, G. (2018). Buy, eat or discard? A case study with apples to explore fruit quality perception and food waste. Food Quality and Preference, 69, 10-20. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodqual.2018.05.004 Joshi, Y., & Rahman, Z. (2015). Factors affecting green purchase behaviour and future research directions. International Strategic Management Review, 3(1-2), 128-143. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ism.2015.04.001 Loebnitz, N., & Grunert, K. G. (2015). The effect of food shape abnormality on purchase intentions in China. Food Quality and Preference, 40, 24-30. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodqual.2014.08.005 Loebnitz, N., & Grunert, K. G. (2018). The impact of abnormally shaped vegetables on consumers’ risk perception. Food Quality and Preference, 63, 80-87. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodqual.2017.08.004 Loebnitz, N., Schuitema, G., & Grunert, K. G. (2015). Who buys oddly shaped food and why? Impacts of food shape abnormality and organic labeling on purchase intentions. Psychology & Marketing, 32(4), 408-421. https://doi.org/10.1002/mar.20788 Mookerjee, S., Cornil, Y., & Hoegg, J. (2021). From Waste to Taste: How “Ugly” Labels Can Increase Purchase of Unattractive Produce. Journal of Marketing, 85(3), 62-77. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022242920988656 Neff, R. A., Spiker, M. L., & Truant, P. L. (2015). Wasted Food: U.S. Consumers' Reported Awareness, Attitudes, and Behaviors. PLoS One, 10(6), e0127881. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0127881 Paisley, J., & Skrzypczyk, S. (2005). Qualitative investigation of differences in benefits and challenges of eating fruits versus vegetables as perceived by Canadian women. Journal of Nutrition Education and Behavior, 37(2), 77-82. https://doi.org/10.1016/s1499-4046(06)60019-5 Principato, L., Mattia, G., Di Leo, A., & Pratesi, C. A. (2021). The household wasteful behaviour framework: A systematic review of consumer food waste. Industrial Marketing Management, 93, 641-649. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indmarman.2020.07.010 UNEP. (2021). Food Waste Index Report 2021. UNEP. https://www.unep.org/resources/report/unep-food-waste-index-report-2021 Varela, O., Huang, W.-C., & Sanyang, S. (2009). Consumer Behavior and Preference in the Fruit Markets of Taiwan. Agricultural Economics & Marketing Journal, 2(1), 19-28. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/275521129_Consumer_Behavior_and_Preference_in_the_Fruit_Markets_of_Taiwan Varese, E., Cesarani, M. C., & Wojnarowska, M. (2022). Consumers' perception of suboptimal food: strategies to reduce food waste. British Food Journal, 125(1), 361-378. https://doi.org/10.1108/bfj-07-2021-0809 Wong, S. L., Hsu, C. C., & Chen, H. S. (2018). To Buy or Not to Buy? Consumer Attitudes and Purchase Intentions for Suboptimal Food. Int J Environ Res Public Health, 15(7). https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph15071431 Xu, Y., Jeong, E., Jang, S., & Shao, X. (2021). Would you bring home ugly produce? Motivators and demotivators for ugly food consumption. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 59. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jretconser.2020.102376 |
電子全文 Fulltext |
本電子全文僅授權使用者為學術研究之目的,進行個人非營利性質之檢索、閱讀、列印。請遵守中華民國著作權法之相關規定,切勿任意重製、散佈、改作、轉貼、播送,以免觸法。 論文使用權限 Thesis access permission:校內校外完全公開 unrestricted 開放時間 Available: 校內 Campus: 已公開 available 校外 Off-campus: 已公開 available |
紙本論文 Printed copies |
紙本論文的公開資訊在102學年度以後相對較為完整。如果需要查詢101學年度以前的紙本論文公開資訊,請聯繫圖資處紙本論文服務櫃台。如有不便之處敬請見諒。 開放時間 available 已公開 available |
QR Code |