Responsive image
博碩士論文 etd-1024123-221421 詳細資訊
Title page for etd-1024123-221421
論文名稱
Title
商品期貨市場金融化對交易者行為與流動性供需意願之影響
The Impact of Financialization in Commodity Futures Markets on Trader Behavior and Liquidity Supply and Demand
系所名稱
Department
畢業學年期
Year, semester
語文別
Language
學位類別
Degree
頁數
Number of pages
51
研究生
Author
指導教授
Advisor
召集委員
Convenor
口試委員
Advisory Committee
口試日期
Date of Exam
2023-06-20
繳交日期
Date of Submission
2023-11-24
關鍵字
Keywords
大宗商品期貨、大宗商品金融化、流動性、金融危機、商品指數
Commodity futures, Commodity financialization, Liquidity supply and demand, Financial crisis, Commodity Index
統計
Statistics
本論文已被瀏覽 43 次,被下載 4
The thesis/dissertation has been browsed 43 times, has been downloaded 4 times.
中文摘要
大宗商品期貨長期被生產者及消費者當成避險的工具,並且近年來是深受投資人喜愛的資產類別,可為投資組合帶來多樣化的好處。自2004年起,大量資金從金融機構、保險公司、養老基金等流入商品期貨市場,促使商品期貨市場金融化,使得價格行為及交易量都產生了大幅度的改變。在期貨市場中,握有現貨部位的商業交易者為非商業交易者提供流動性並賺取流動性溢酬,於金融危機時期或是商品價格波動率上升時,商業交易者提供流動性的意願降低,非商業交易者須支付更高的成本才能獲取流動性。本文自Bloomberg和CFTC取得商品期貨交易資料進行研究,探討商品期貨流動性供給者提供流動性的意願在金融化前後是否有產生改變。
本研究發現商品期貨市場中的商業交易者為逆勢交易者,非商業交易者和其他交易者為順勢交易者,三者順逆勢交易行為在金融化前後皆相同,但由於市場參與者的數量與種類增加,使得市場深度及流動性上升,因此在金融化後各類交易者順逆勢交易的幅度皆顯著下降。商業交易者於金融化後的危機期間持續為非商業交易者提供流動性,本研究進一步探討可能之原因,發現唯有編列於指數內的商品溢酬發生改變,加大了指數投資者於危機期間為了調整投資部位而增加短期流動性的需求之可能性。
Abstract
Commodity futures have long been regarded as hedging tools by producers and consumers, and in recent years, they have become increasingly popular among investors as an asset class that offers diversification benefits to investment portfolios. Since 2004, a significant amount of capital has flowed into the commodity futures market from financial institutions, insurance companies, pension funds, and others, leading to the financialization of the market and substantial changes in price behavior and trading volume. In the commodity futures market, commercial traders who hold spot positions provide liquidity to noncommercial traders and earn liquidity premiums. During financial crises or periods of increased price volatility, commercial traders become less willing to provide liquidity, requiring non-commercial traders to pay higher premiums to obtain liquidity. In this study, we examine commodity futures trading data obtained from Bloomberg and CFTC to investigate whether there have been changes in the willingness of liquidity providers to supply liquidity before and after the financialization.
This study found that commercial traders in the commodity futures market act as contrarian traders, while noncommercial traders and nonreportables act as momentum traders. The contrarian and momentum trading behaviors of these three groups remained consistent before and after the financialization. However, the increase in the number and types of market participants resulted in higher market depth and liquidity, leading to a significant decrease in the extent of both contrarian and momentum trading by all types of traders after financialization. Commercial traders continued to provide liquidity to noncommercial traders during crisis after financialization. This study further explores the possible reasons and finds that only the premiums of the commodities listed in the index have changed, which increases the possibility that index investors need to increase short-term liquidity demand in order to adjust their investment positions during the crisis.
目次 Table of Contents
頁次
論文審定書 i
致謝 ii
中文摘要 iii
Abstract iv
目錄 vi
圖目錄 viii
表目錄 ix
第一章 緒論 1
1.1研究動機 1
1.2研究目的 3
1.3研究流程 5
第二章 文獻回顧 6
2.1商品市場金融化 6
2.2商品期貨流動性 7
2.3金融危機 9
第三章 資料與研究方法 11
3.1 資料說明 11
3.2變數定義 11
3.2.1主要變數 12
3.2.2其他變數 13
3.2.3控制變數 15
3.3實證模型 16
第四章 實證分析 18
4.1敘述統計 18
4.2金融化對交易者行為造成之影響 21
4.3金融化前後股市崩盤對流動性供給造成影響之改變 23
4.4金融化後指數內外商品之差異 29
4.5穩健性測試 32
第五章 結論 36
參考文獻 37
附錄一 40

參考文獻 References
Aart Kraay and Jaume Ventura.(2007). The Dot-Com Bubble, the Bush Deficits, and the U.S. Current Account. G7 Current Account Imbalances: Sustainability and Adjustment, University of Chicago Press, 457-496.
Albert S. Kyle, and Wei Xiong. (2001). Contagion as a Wealth Effect. The Journal of Finance, 81(4), 1401-1440.
Annastiina Silvennoinen and Susan Thorp. (2013). Financialization, crisis and commodity correlation dynamics. Journal of International Financial Markets, Institutions & Money, 24, 42-65.
Ben R. Marshall, Nhut H. Nguyen, Nuttawat Visaltanachoti. (2012). Commodity liquidity measurement and transaction costs. Review of Financial Studies, 25 (2), 599– 638.
Ben R. Marshall, Nhut H. Nguyen, Nuttawat Visaltanachoti. (2013). Liquidity commonality in commodities. Journal of Banking & Finance,37, 11-20.
Bessembinder, Hendrik. (1992). Systematic Risk, Hedging Pressure, and Risk Premiums in Futures Markets. Review of Financial Studies, 5(4), 637–667.
Brian J. Henderson, Neil D. Pearson, Li Wang. (2015). New Evidence on the Financialization of Commodity Markets, The Review of Financial Studies, 28(5), 1285–1311.
Chordia, Tarun, Richard Roll, and Avanidhar Subrahmanyam, (2002). Order imbalance, liquidity and market returns. Journal of Financial Economics, 65, 111–130.
Claude B. Erb and Campbell R. Harvey. (2006). The Tactical and Strategic Value of Commodity Futures. Financial Analysts Journal, 62, 69-97.
Dunsby, A., Eckstein, J., Gaspar, J., Mulholland, S. (2008). Commodity Investing: Maximizing Returns Through Fundamental Analysis. New York. John Wiley and Sons Inc.
Eugene F. Fama, and Kenneth R. French. (1987). Commodity futures prices: Some evidence on forecast power, premiums, and the theory of storage. Journal of Business, (60), 55–73.
Frans A. de Roon, Theo E. Nijman, and Chris Veld. (2000). Hedging Pressure Effects in Futures Markets. The Journal of Finance, 55(3), 1437-1456.
Gary B. Gorton, Fumio Hayashi, and K. Geert Rouwenhorst. (2013). The fundamentals of commodity futures returns. Review of Finance, 17, 35–105.
Gary B. Gorton, and K. Geert Rouwenhorst. (2006). Facts and Fantasies About Commodity Futures. Financial Analysts Journal, 62, no. 2 April, 47–68.
Gerald F. Davis, and Suntae Kim. (2015). Financialization of the Economy. Annual Review of Sociology, 41, 203-221.
Ing-Haw Cheng, Andrei Kirilenko, and Wei Xiong. (2015). Convective Risk Flows in Commodity Futures Markets. Review of Finance, 19, 1733-1781.
James D. Hamilton. (2009). Understanding crude oil prices. The Energy Journal, 30(2), 179–206.
Jean-Baptiste Bonnier. (2021). Speculation and informational efficiency in commodity futures markets. Journal of International Money and Finance, 117, 102457.
Junmao Chiu, Donald Lien. (2022). Funding constraints and liquidity of VIX futures. Working Paper, National Sun Yat-sen University.
Kaniel, Ron, Gideon Saar, and Sheridan Titman. (2008). Individual investor trading and stock returns, Journal of Finance 63, 273–310.
Ke Tang, Wei Xiong. (2012). Index Investment and the Financialization of Commodities. Financial Analysts Journal, 68(6), 54-74.
Krugman, Paul. 2008. Fuels on the Hill. New York Times (27 June), A19.
Marcel Prokopczuk, Andrei Stancu, and Lazaros Symeonidis. (2019). The economic drivers of commodity market volatility. Journal of International Money and Finance, 98, 102063.
Markus K. Brunnermeier and Lasse Heje Pedersen. (2009). Market liquidity and funding liquidity. Review of Financial Studies, 22, 2201–2238.
Nicholas Barberis, and Andrei Shleifer. (2003). Style Investing. Journal of Financial Economics, 68(2), 161-199.
Philippe Charlot, Olivier Darné, Zakaria Moussa. (2016). Commodity returns co-movements: Fundamentals or “style” effect? Journal of International Money and Finance, 68, 130–160.
Ron Alquist, Saroj Bhattarai, Olivier Coibion. (2020). Commodity-price co-movement and global economic activity. Journal of Monetary Economics, 112, 41-56.
Terence Tai-Leung Chong, Sunny Chun Tsui,and Wing Hong Chan. (2017). Factor pricing in commodity futures and the role of liquidity. Quantitative Finance, 17(11), 1745-1757.
Till, H., (2008). Amaranth lessons thus far. Journal of Alternative Investments, Spring, 82–98.
VV Chari and Lawrence J. Christiano. (2017). Financialization in Commodity Markets. FRB of Chicago Working Paper, No. WP-2017-15.
Wenjin Kang, K. Geert Rouwenhorst, and Ke Tang. (2020). A Tale of Two Premiums: The Role of Hedgers and Speculators in Commodity Futures Markets. Journal of Finance, 75(1), 377-417.
Yan-Ran Ma, Qiang Ji, and Fei Wu, and Jiao feng Pan. (2021). Financialization, idiosyncratic information and commodity co-movements. Energy Economics, 94, 105083.
電子全文 Fulltext
本電子全文僅授權使用者為學術研究之目的,進行個人非營利性質之檢索、閱讀、列印。請遵守中華民國著作權法之相關規定,切勿任意重製、散佈、改作、轉貼、播送,以免觸法。
論文使用權限 Thesis access permission:校內校外完全公開 unrestricted
開放時間 Available:
校內 Campus: 已公開 available
校外 Off-campus: 已公開 available


紙本論文 Printed copies
紙本論文的公開資訊在102學年度以後相對較為完整。如果需要查詢101學年度以前的紙本論文公開資訊,請聯繫圖資處紙本論文服務櫃台。如有不便之處敬請見諒。
開放時間 available 已公開 available

QR Code