Responsive image
博碩士論文 etd-1115124-173953 詳細資訊
Title page for etd-1115124-173953
論文名稱
Title
工作價值觀與職家平衡對主動加班意願的影響-以職涯規劃與個人工作適配為調節變數
The Impact of Work Values and Job-Family Balance on the Willingness to Engage in Proactive Overtime: The Moderating Roles of Career Planning and Person-Job Fit
系所名稱
Department
畢業學年期
Year, semester
語文別
Language
學位類別
Degree
頁數
Number of pages
68
研究生
Author
指導教授
Advisor
召集委員
Convenor
口試委員
Advisory Committee
口試日期
Date of Exam
2024-11-28
繳交日期
Date of Submission
2024-12-15
關鍵字
Keywords
工作價值觀、職家平衡、職涯規劃、個人工作適配、主動加班意願
Work values, work-family balance, career planning, personal job fit, willingness to work overtime
統計
Statistics
本論文已被瀏覽 80 次,被下載 0
The thesis/dissertation has been browsed 80 times, has been downloaded 0 times.
中文摘要
本研究旨在探討工作價值觀、職家平衡、職涯規劃與個人工作適配對員工主動加班意願的影響。隨著工作環境的快速變化,企業在招募人才時越來越重視員工的工作價值觀及其對公司文化的契合程度。在台灣,員工面臨的工時長度和工作壓力持續增加,因此深入了解加班意願的成因具有重要意義。

研究目的包括:探討工作價值觀對主動加班意願的影響;分析職家平衡在此關係中的中介作用;研究個人工作適配對職家平衡與主動加班意願間的調節影響;以及探討職涯規劃的調節作用。

本研究採用問卷調查法,針對台灣全職工作者進行便利取樣,最終回收217份有效問卷。量表顯示良好的可靠性,內部一致性信度均在0.77以上。
研究結果顯示,目的性工作價值觀對主動加班意願無顯著正相關,而工具性工作價值觀顯示顯著的負相關,表明員工在高壓環境下更重視即時回報。職家平衡未證實在工作價值觀與主動加班意願之間的中介效果,反映出特定高壓文化下,員工更注重工作成果。

職涯規劃未顯示顯著調節效果,提示傳統職涯觀點在當前靈活的職場環境中可能不再適用。相對地,個人工作適配顯著調節了職家平衡與主動加班意願的關係,強調了個人特質與工作環境匹配度對工作滿意度的影響。

本研究為企業人力資源管理提供新視角,特別是在提升員工個人特質與工作環境匹配方面,以促進員工的投入與滿意度。未來研究可進一步探討其他影響加班行為的潛在因素。
Abstract
This study aims to explore the impact of work values, work-family balance, career planning, and personal job fit on employees' willingness to work overtime. With the rapid changes in the work environment, companies increasingly value employees' work values and their fit with corporate culture during recruitment. In Taiwan, employees are facing longer working hours and increasing work pressure, making it significant to understand the underlying causes of overtime willingness.

The objectives of this research include: investigating the influence of work values on willingness to work overtime; analyzing the mediating role of work-family balance in this relationship; studying the moderating effect of personal job fit on the relationship between work-family balance and overtime willingness; and exploring the moderating role of career planning.

This study employed a questionnaire survey method, targeting full-time workers in Taiwan through convenience sampling, ultimately retrieving 217 valid responses. The scales demonstrated good reliability, with internal consistency reliability above 0.77.

The results revealed that purpose-oriented work values did not show a significant positive correlation with overtime willingness, while instrumental work values indicated a significant negative correlation, suggesting that employees in high-pressure environments prioritize immediate rewards. Work-family balance was not confirmed as a mediating effect between work values and overtime willingness, reflecting that in certain high-pressure cultures, employees focus more on work outcomes.

Career planning did not show a significant moderating effect, indicating that traditional career perspectives may no longer apply in today’s flexible work environments. In contrast, personal job fit significantly moderated the relationship between work-family balance and overtime willingness, highlighting the importance of the fit between personal traits and the work environment in enhancing job satisfaction.

This research provides new insights for corporate human resource management, particularly in improving the match between employees' personal traits and their work environment to enhance employee engagement and satisfaction. Future research could further explore other potential factors influencing overtime behavior.
目次 Table of Contents
論文審定書i
中文摘要ii
Abstractiii
圖次 vii
表次 viii

第一章 緒論1
第一節 研究動機與背景1
第二節 研究目的2

第二章 文獻探討3
第一節 加班3
第二節 工作價值觀5
第三節 職家平衡8
第四節 職涯規劃12
第五節 個人工作適配14

第三章 研究方法18
第一節 研究架構18
第二節 研究假設19
第三節 研究對象19
第四節 研究工具20

第四章 研究結果25
第一節 樣本特性分析 25
第二節 各研究變項之結果分析29
第三節 各研究變項之相關分析31
第四節 職家平衡對工作價值觀與加班意願中介效果分析34
第五節 職涯規劃與個人工作適配之調節效果分析36
第六節 假設檢定小結39

第五章 研究討論與建議40
第一節 研究結果討論40
第二節 管理意涵42
第三節 研究限制43
第四節 未來研究與建議44

參考文獻45
附錄53
參考文獻 References
參考文獻
一、中文文獻
1. 曾芳代(2004)。免費加班之國際比較-免費加班之成因及影響。行政院國家科學委員會專題研究計畫 成果報告。
2. 勞動部(2019)。國際勞動統計,107。
3. 吳鐵雄、李坤崇、劉佑星、歐慧敏(1996),工作價值觀量表編制研究,行政院青年輔導委員會專題研究計畫成果報告。
4. 黃淑玟(2018)。加班對工作滿意度及工作績效影響之研究-以人格特質為干擾變數。淡江大學企業管理學系碩士論文,未出版,新北。
5. 邱炳文(2020)。又在加班嗎?加班、加班動機與工作生活平衡之相關研究。國立中山大學人力資源管理研究所碩士論文,未出版,高雄。
6. 劉曼欣(2009)。加班與工作滿意度及工作倦怠感之相關研究:以工作動機與加班自願性為調節變項。私立世新大學社會心理學系研究所碩士論文,未出版,台北。
7. 林瓊瀛(2006)。如何面對「加班文化」。Cheers,2006, 29-3.
8. 紀炳南(2007)。我國企業員工加班問題探討。科技諮詢導報,4,188-189。
9. 許喬智、李誠(2009)。疆界理論與職場家庭生活平衡 疆界理論與職場家庭生活平衡 疆界理論與職場家庭生活平衡-以工研院為例。國立中央大學碩士論文,未出版,桃園。
10. 曾文彥(2010)。公務人員職家衝突、工作滿意影響留任意願、工作績效與組織 公民行為之研究-以工作中心性為干擾變項。銘傳大學公共事務學系,碩士論文,未出版,桃園。
11. 彭台光、高月慈、林鉦棽(2016)。管理研究中的共同方法變異: 問題本質、影響、測試和補救。管理學報,23(1),77-98。
12. 紀乃文、陳皓怡、楊美玉、鄭妃君、蔡維奇(2008)。個人─工作適配量表發展:多元構面觀點。管理學報。25,577-598。
13. 邱淑媛(1992),工作價值觀對員工工作態度及工作表現的影響,中原大學企業管理研究所碩士論文,未出版,桃園。
14. 徐富珍、呂庭慧(2009)。加班現象的成因與影響之研究。第四屆「社會學與心理學的對話」學術研討會。
15. 徐嘉惠(2009)。超時工作動機、認知與超時工作行為之研究-以知識工作者為例。國立中山大學人力資源管理研究所碩士論文,未出版,高雄。

二、 英文文獻
Adams, J. S. (1963). Towards an Understanding of Inequity. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 67(5), 422-436.
Allen, T. D., Johnson, R. C., Kiburz, K. K., & Poelmans, S. (2015). Work–Family Conflict and Flexible Work Arrangements: A Meta-Analysis. Journal of Management, 41(2), 949-976.
Aryee., Srinivas., & Tan (2005). Rhythms of Life: Antecedents and Outcomes of Work-Family Balance in Employed Parents. Journal of Applied Psychology, 90(1), 132–146.
Arnold B. Bakker., Simon L. Albrecht., & Michael Leiter (2011). Key questions regarding work engagement. European Journal of Work and Organisational Psychology, 20(1):4-28
Bakker, A. B. (2014). Daily fluctuations in work engagement: An overview and current directions. European Psychologist, 19(4), 227–236.
Brown, S. D., & Krane, N. E. (2000). Four (or five) sessions and a cloud of dust: Old assumptions and new observations about career counseling. In S. D. Brown & R. W. Lent (Eds.), Handbook of Counseling Psychology (3rd ed., pp. 740-766). John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
Byron, K. (2005). A meta-analytic review of work-family conflict and its antecedents. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 67(2), 169–198.
Cable, D.M., & Judge, T.A. (1996). Person-Organization Fit, Job Choice Decisions, and Organizational Entry. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes Volume 67, Issue 3, Pages 294-311.
Cable, D. M., & Judge, T. A. (1997). Interviewers' perceptions of person–organization fit and organizational selection decisions. Journal of Applied Psychology, 82(4), 546–561.
Carlson, D. S., Kacmar, M. K., & Williams, L. J. (2000). Construction and validation of a multidimensional measure of work–family conflict. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 56(2), 249-276
Demerouti, E., Bakker, A. B., Nachreiner, F., & Schaufeli, W. B. (2001). The job demands-resources model of burnout. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86(3), 499–512.
Dawis, R. V. & Lofquist, L. H. (1984). A Psychological Theory of Work Adjustment: An Individual-Differences Model and Its Applications. Minnesota, MI: University of Minnesota Press.
Edwards, J.R. (1991). Person-Job Fit Theory: Review and Meta-Analysis
Edwards, J. R., & Rothbard, N. P. (2000). Mechanisms linking work and family: Clarifying the relationship between work and family constructs. The Academy of Management Review, 25(1), 178–199.
Frone, M. R. (2003). Work-family balance. In Handbook of Occupational Health Psychology.
Greenhaus ,& Beutell (1985). Source of Conflict Between Work and Family Roles. Academy of Management Review 10(1):76-88.
Gutek, B. A., Searle, S., & Klepa, L. (1991). Rational versus gender role explanations for workfamily conflict. Journal of Applied Psychology, 76, 560-568.
Hall, D. T., & Mirvis, P. H. (1995). The new career contract: Developing the whole person at midlife and beyond. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 47(3), 269-289.
Haar, J. M., Russo, M., Suñe, A., & Ollier-Malaterre, A. (2014). The Relationship Between Work-Family Conflict and Life Satisfaction: A Meta-Analysis. Journal of Family Studies, 20(1), 1-16.
Herzberg, F. (1959). The Motivation to Work. John Wiley & Sons.
Hirschi, A. (2012). The career resources model: An integrative framework for career counsellors. British Journal of Guidance & Counselling, 40(4), 369–383.
Holland, J. L. (1997). Making vocational choices: A theory of vocational personalities and work environments (3rd ed.). Psychological Assessment Resources.
Kahn, R. L., Wolfe, D. M., Quinn, R. P., Snoek, J. D., & Rosenthal, R. A. (1964). Organizational stress: Studies in role conflict and ambiguity. John Wiley.
Kahn, W. A. (1990). Psychological Conditions of Personal Engagement and Disengagement at Work. Academy of Management Journal, 33, 692-724.
Kristof-Brown, A.L. (2007). Person-Environment Fit: An Integrative Review of Its Conceptualizations, Measurement, and Implications.
Kristof-Brown, A. L., Zimmerman, R. D., & Johnson, E. C. (2005). Consequences of individual's fit at work: A meta-analysis of person-job, person-organization, person-group, and person-supervisor fit. Personnel Psychology, 58(2), 281–342.
Lapierre, L. M., et al. (2008). The relationship between work-family conflict and job satisfaction: A meta-analysis. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 72(2), 262-276.
Lawson, C. A. (2006). Career theory and practice: Learning through case studies. Sage Publications.
Lent, R. W., & Brown, S. D. (2006). Integrating person and situation perspectives on work satisfaction: A social cognitive view. Journal of Career Assessment, 14(1), 5-22.
Mark L. Savickas., & Erik J. Porfeli (2012). Career Adapt-Abilities Scale: Construction, reliability, and measurement equivalence across 13 countries. Journal of Vocational Behavior, Volume 80, Issue 3, 661-673
Maslow, A. H. (1943). A Theory of Human Motivation. Psychological Review, 50(4), 370-396.
Mitchell, K. E., Levin, A. S., & Krumboltz, J. D. (1999). Planned happenstance: Constructing unexpected career opportunities. Journal of Counseling & Development, 77(2), 115-124.
Netemeyer, R. G., Boles, J. S., & McMurrian, R. (1996). Development and validation of work–family conflict and family–work conflict scales. Journal of Applied Psychology, 81(4), 400–410.
Ng, T. W. H., & Sorensen, K. L. (2008). Toward a Better Understanding of Employee Engagement: A Multilevel Perspective. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 29(4), 509-530.
Parker, S. K., & Collins, C. G. (2010). Taking stock: Integrating and differentiating multiple proactive behaviors. Journal of Management, 36(3), 633–662.
Savickas, M. L. (1997). Career Adaptability: An Integrative Construct for Life-Span, Life-Space Theory. The Career Development Quarterly.
Savickas, M. L. (2005). The Theory and Practice of Career Adaptability. Career Development Quarterly.
Savickas, M. L. (2013). Career construction theory and practice. In Brown, S. D. & Lent, R. W., Career development and counseling: Putting theory and research to work (pp. 147-183). New York, NY: John Wiley & Sons Inc.
Savickas, M. L., & Porfeli, E. J. (2012). Career Adapt-Abilities Scale: Construction, Reliability, and Validity. Journal of Vocational Behavior.
Schaufeli, W.B., Salanova, M., González-romá, V. et al. (2002) The Measurement of Engagement and Burnout: A Two Sample Confirmatory Factor Analytic Approach. Journal of Happiness Studies 3, 71–92.
Siu, O.-l., Spector, P. E., Cooper, C. L., Lu, L., & Yu, S. (2002). Managerial stress in greater China: The direct and moderator effects of coping strategies and work locus of control. Applied Psychology: An International Review, 51 (4): 608-632.
Sonnentag, S. (2018). The Recovery Experience Questionnaire: Development and Validation of a Measure for Assessing Recovery from Work. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 23(2), 149-162.
Super, D. E. (1957). The psychology of careers. Harper & Row.
Super, D. E. (1990). A life-span, life-space approach to career development. In D. Brown & L. Brooks, Career choice and development: Applying contemporary theories to practice (2nd ed., pp. 197–261).
Vroom, V. H. (1964). Work and Motivation. John Wiley & Sons.
Wang, H. J., Liu, Y., & Yang, Y. (2020). Work–family conflict and job performance: The mediating role of job satisfaction and emotional exhaustion. Journal of Family Issues, 41(7), 1027-1050.
電子全文 Fulltext
本電子全文僅授權使用者為學術研究之目的,進行個人非營利性質之檢索、閱讀、列印。請遵守中華民國著作權法之相關規定,切勿任意重製、散佈、改作、轉貼、播送,以免觸法。
論文使用權限 Thesis access permission:自定論文開放時間 user define
開放時間 Available:
校內 Campus:開放下載的時間 available 2027-12-15
校外 Off-campus:開放下載的時間 available 2027-12-15

您的 IP(校外) 位址是 216.73.216.89
現在時間是 2025-06-24
論文校外開放下載的時間是 2027-12-15

Your IP address is 216.73.216.89
The current date is 2025-06-24
This thesis will be available to you on 2027-12-15.

紙本論文 Printed copies
紙本論文的公開資訊在102學年度以後相對較為完整。如果需要查詢101學年度以前的紙本論文公開資訊,請聯繫圖資處紙本論文服務櫃台。如有不便之處敬請見諒。
開放時間 available 2027-12-15

QR Code