論文使用權限 Thesis access permission:校內校外完全公開 unrestricted
開放時間 Available:
校內 Campus: 已公開 available
校外 Off-campus: 已公開 available
論文名稱 Title |
以情緒智慧為基礎的行銷與顧客體驗:人工智慧與個人化之角色評估 Emotional Intelligence as the Core of Marketing and Customer Experience: Assessing the Role of Artificial Intelligence and Personalization |
||
系所名稱 Department |
|||
畢業學年期 Year, semester |
語文別 Language |
||
學位類別 Degree |
頁數 Number of pages |
80 |
|
研究生 Author |
|||
指導教授 Advisor |
|||
召集委員 Convenor |
|||
口試委員 Advisory Committee |
|||
口試日期 Date of Exam |
2025-12-15 |
繳交日期 Date of Submission |
2025-12-15 |
關鍵字 Keywords |
人工智慧(AI)、情緒智慧(EI)、顧客體驗、個人化、行銷、策略、情緒 Artificial Intelligence (AI), Emotional Intelligence (EI), Customer Experience, Personalization, Marketing, Strategies, Emotions |
||
統計 Statistics |
本論文已被瀏覽 235 次,被下載 5 次 The thesis/dissertation has been browsed 235 times, has been downloaded 5 times. |
中文摘要 |
摘 要 鮮少有科技如人工智慧(Artificial Intelligence, AI)般引發如此分歧的觀點:對部分人而言,它象徵希望;對另一些人而言,則引發質疑與冷漠。在對科技環繞未來的期待中,人們同時產生好奇感,然而,對於自主性、信任與控制等議題的不確定性與疲憊感亦隨之而來。當前,人工智慧已被廣泛應用於多個產業領域,尤以顧客體驗個人化與行銷策略發展最為顯著。然而,透過人工智慧所實現的個人化與情緒智慧(Emotional Intelligence, EI)之間的關聯,至今仍缺乏充分的學術探討。本文旨在分析人工智慧技術於行銷與顧客體驗個人化中的角色,並主張儘管人工智慧能夠提供對消費者行為的寶貴洞察,情緒智慧與人類的監督與介入仍是形塑真實且成功的行銷策略,以及創造令人滿意之顧客體驗的關鍵因素。 |
Abstract |
Abstract Few technologies divide opinion like AI: it inspires hope in some and cynicism in others. While feelings of curiosity arise with aspirations for a future surrounded by technology, uncertainty and weariness are elicited, regarding autonomy, trust and control. Artificial Intelligence is now being integrated in multiple sectors, particularly in the sectors of customer experience personalization and marketing strategies development. However, the interconnection between personalization through artificial intelligence (AI) and emotional intelligence (EI) remains insufficiently researched. This paper analyzes AI-technology's role in marketing and customer experience personalization, arguing that while AI can provide valuable insights into consumer behavior, emotional intelligence and human supervision remains a crucial factor in creating authentic, successful marketing approaches and satisfactory customer experience. |
目次 Table of Contents |
Thesis Validation Letter i Acknowledgements ii 摘 要 iii Abstract iv List of Tables vii Term Definition and Abbreviations viii Chapter 1 1 Introduction 1 Chapter 2 4 Literature Review 4 2.1 Introduction 4 2.2 AI Overview- Weak AI vs General AI 4 2.3 AI in Marketing 7 2.4 The AI Effect in Marketing Processes and Consumer Experience Personalization 9 2.5 Challenges of Implementing AI in Customer Experience 12 2.6 Theoretical Framework 14 2.6.1 Emotional Intelligence (EI) Theory 15 2.6.2 Artificial Intelligence under the Spectrum of Technology Acceptance Model (TAM) 17 2.6.3 Socio-Technical Systems Theory (STS)/ Human-AI Interaction Frame 20 2.7 Summary 24 Chapter 3 26 Research Methodology 26 3.1 Research Approach 26 3.2 Case Selection 27 3.3 Netflix Case 28 3.4 Facebook Case 30 3.5 Data collection 32 Chapter 4 34 Data Analysis 34 4.1 Secondary literature, Articles and Reports 34 4.2 Validity and Trustworthiness of the Analysis 36 4.3 Ethical Considerations for the Analysis 39 Chapter 5 41 Findings and Discussion 41 5.1 Introduction 41 5.2 Cross Case Thematic Findings 42 5.3 Netflix AI Integration 44 5.4 Algorithmic Regulation 44 5.5 Emotional Intelligence Implications 45 5.6 Ethical Challenges and Implications 47 5.7 Findings under the Lens of Theoretical Framework for Netflix 48 5.8 Facebook AI Integration 51 5.9 Algorithmic Regulations 51 5.10 Emotional Intelligence Implications 52 5.11 Ethical Challenges and Implications in the Context of Customer Experience 53 5.12 Findings under the Lens of Theoretical Framework for Facebook 54 5.13 Limitations 56 Chapter 6 58 Implications 58 6.1 Research Question and Confirmation of Proposition 58 6.2 Implications 59 6.2.1 Theoretical implications 59 6.2.2 Practical Implications 59 6.3 Summary 60 Conclusion 61 References 63 |
參考文獻 References |
References Abishek, M. N., & Judi, E. K. (2025). A Study on Exploring Consumer Engagement with AI-Driven Experiences on Netflix Streaming Platform. In International Conference on Artificial Intelligence in Commerce and Management (pp. 93-100). Acatrinei, C. (2025). To use or not to use artificial intelligence (AI) in marketing: Insights from qualitative research on adopters and non-adopters. In Marketing theory and practice in Romania: Model for the developing world (pp. 253–267). Springer Nature Switzerland. Al Jazeera. (2025, November 24). Are tech companies using your private data to train AI models?https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2025/11/24/are-tech-companies-using-your-private-data-to-train-ai-models Ali, N. A. B., Ahmad, S., Hamzah, A., Kashif, M., & Reaz, M. (2020). A socio-technical system perspective on sustainable organizational effectiveness: A PRISMA systematic review. International Journal of Islamic Economics and Governance, 1(1), 84–94. Allen, C., Smit, I., & Wallach, W. (2005). Artificial morality: Top-down, bottom-up, and hybrid approaches. Ethics and Information Technology, 7(3), 149–155. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10676-006-0004-4 Ang, K., Sankaran, S., Liu, D., & Scales, J. (2024). Embracing Levin’s legacy: Advancing socio-technical learning and development in human-robot team design through STS approaches. Systemic Practice and Action Research, 37(6), 661–678. Antebi, L. (2021). What is artificial intelligence? In Artificial intelligence and national security in Israel (pp. 31–40). Institute for National Security Studies. http://www.jstor.org/stable/resrep30590.7 Avgerou, C. (2013). Social mechanisms for causal explanation in social theory–based IS research. Journal of the Association for Information Systems, 14(8), Article 3. Bano, R., Azim, F., Mahmood, Z., Sanaullah, A., & Ali, O. (2025). The role of artificial intelligence in personalized marketing: Enhancing customer experience, predictive targeting, and brand engagement. The Critical Review of Social Sciences Studies, 3(2), 50-65. Bhattacharjee, B. M. S. (n.d.). Artificial intelligence in marketing: A comprehensive analysis and case study on Netflix’s success. Boyatzis, R. E., Goleman, D., & Rhee, K. (2000). Clustering competence in emotional intelligence: Insights from the Emotional Competence Inventory (ECI). In Handbook of emotional intelligence (Vol. 99, pp. 343–362). Bradley, J. (2011). If we build it they will come? The technology acceptance model. In Information systems theory: Explaining and predicting our digital society (Vol. 1, pp. 19–36). Springer. Brady, W. J., Lindstrom, B., Jackson, J. C., & Crockett, M. J. (2023). Algorithm-mediated social learning in online social networks. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 27(10), 947–960. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2023.08.001 Braun, V. and Clarke, V. (2006) Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3 (2). pp. 77-101. ISSN1478-0887 Available from: http://eprints.uwe.ac.uk/11735 Chan-Olmsted, S. M. (2019). A review of artificial intelligence adoptions in the media industry. International journal on media management, 21(3-4), 193-215. Church, R. M. (2002). The effective use of secondary data. Learning and Motivation, 33(1), 32–45. Clarke, S. P., & Cossette, S. (2000). Secondary analysis: Theoretical, methodological, and practical considerations. Canadian Journal of Nursing Research Archive. Coronado-Maldonado, I., & Benítez-Márquez, M.-D. (2021). The development of emotional intelligence in higher education: The influence of Daniel Goleman’s model. International Journal of Educational Research and Innovation, 15, 16–30. https://doi.org/10.46661/ijeri.5331 Corti, L. (2018). Data collection in secondary analysis. In The SAGE handbook of qualitative data collection (pp. 164–181). Côté, S. (2014). Emotional intelligence in organizations. Annu. Rev. Organ. Psychol. Organ. Behav., 1(1), 459-488. Cowton, C. J. (1998). The use of secondary data in business ethics research. Journal of business ethics, 17(4), 423-434. Creswell, J. W. (2014). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (4th ed.). Sage Publications. Davis, F. D., Bagozzi, R. P., & Warshaw, P. R. (1989). Technology acceptance model. Management Science, 35(8), 982–1003. Dehbi, A., Bakhouyi, A., Dehbi, R., & Talea, M. (2025). Towards technology-enhanced learning: A novel machine learning approach in Education 4.0. Telematics and Informatics Reports, 18, 100194. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.teler.2025.100194 Dehbi, A., Bakhouyi, A., Dehbi, R., & Talea, M. Towards Technology-Enhanced Learning: A Novel Machine Learning Approach in Education 4.0. Available at SSRN 4974380. Earp, B. D., Mann, S. P., Aboy, M., Awad, E., Betzler, M., Botes, M., … & Clark, M. S. (2025). Relational norms for human–AI cooperation. arXiv Preprint. arXiv:2502.12102. Edmonds, W. A., & Kennedy, T. D. (2016). An applied guide to research designs: Quantitative, qualitative, and mixed methods. Sage Publications. European Union Agency for Railways. (2024). Consolidated annual activity report 2023. [PDF]. https://www.era.europa.eu/system/files/2024-06/Consolidated%20Annual%20Activity%20Report%202023%20%28CAAR%202023%29.pdf Farzin, P. (2025). Analyzing critical factors affecting generative AI readiness for product innovation in service organizations. Fayad, R., & Paper, D. (2015). The technology acceptance model e-commerce extension: A conceptual framework. Procedia Economics and Finance, 26, 1000–1006. Feenberg, A. (2017). Critical theory of technology and STS. Thesis Eleven, 138(1), 3–12. Ganesha, H. R., & Aithal, P. S. (2022). How to choose an appropriate research data collection method during PhD programs in India. International Journal of Management, Technology, and Social Sciences, 7(2), 455–489. Gefen, D., & Straub, D. W. (1997). Gender differences in the perception and use of email: An extension to the technology acceptance model. MIS Quarterly, 21(4), 389–400. Hærem, T., Pentland, B. T., & Miller, K. D. (2015). Task complexity: Extending a core concept. Academy of Management Review, 40(3), 446–460. Hasija, A., & Esper, T. L. (2022). In artificial intelligence (AI) we trust: A qualitative investigation of AI technology acceptance. Journal of Business Logistics, 43(3), 388–412. Hirschheim, R., & Klein, H. K. (2011). Tracing the history of the information systems field. In The Oxford handbook of management information systems (pp. 16–61). Oxford University Press. Hofmann, B. (2017). Toward a method for exposing ethical issues with cognitive enhancement technologies. Science and Engineering Ethics, 23(2), 413–429. Huntinghouse, J., Franks, E., & Fife, B. (2021). Why Facebook Ads keep failing: Lessons learned from spending over US1m on Facebook Ads. Journal of Digital & Social Media Marketing, 8(4), 298-307. Irwin, S. (2013). Qualitative secondary data analysis: Ethics, epistemology and context. Progress in development studies, 13(4), 295-306. Iwuanyanwu, C. C. (2023). Facebook Artificial Intelligence Algorithm: Users’ Awareness and Response to Data Privacy Issues. Robert Morris University. Jasanoff, S., McGonigle, I., & Stevens, H. (2021). Science and technology for humanity: An STS view from Singapore. East Asian Science, Technology and Society, 15(1), 68–78. Johnson, E., & Sylvia, M. L. (2023). Secondary data collection. In Clinical analytics and data management for the DNP (pp. 41–69). Johnston, M. P. (2014). Secondary data analysis: A method of which the time has come. Qualitative and quantitative methods in libraries, 3(3), 619-626. Just AI News. (2025, July 14). Can AI really understand emotions? Emotional AI explained.https://justainews.com/blog/can-ai-really-understand-emotions-emotional-ai-explained/ Kalantzis, M., & Cope, B. (2024). Literacy in the Time of Artificial Intelligence. Reading Research Quarterly, 60(1). https://doi.org/10.1002/rrq.591 Kramer, A. D. I., Guillory, J. E., & Hancock, J. T. (2014). Experimental evidence of massive-scale emotional contagion through social networks. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 111(24), 8788–8790. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1320040111 Lauer, D. (2021). Facebook’s ethical failures are not accidental; they are part of the business model. AI and Ethics, 1(4), 395-403. Lauer, D. (2021). Facebook's ethical failures are not accidental; they are part of the business model. AI & Ethics, 1(4), 395–403. https://doi.org/10.1007/s43681-021-00068-x Lawand, C. (2021). Regulating Facebook An ethical analysis of AI run amok, political posturing, and the failure of self-regulation. Lindgren, S. (2023). Critical theory of AI. John Wiley & Sons. Lixandru, D. (2024). The use of artificial intelligence for qualitative data analysis: ChatGPT. Informatica Economica, 28(1). Madanchian, M. (2024). The impact of artificial intelligence marketing on e-commerce sales. Systems, 12(10), 429. Makarius, E. E., Mukherjee, D., Fox, J. D., & Fox, A. K. (2020). Rising with the machines: A sociotechnical framework for bringing artificial intelligence into the organization. Journal of Business Research, 120, 262–273. Maslin, J. (2022, July 5). Is Netflix’s recommendation algorithm making you depressed? Data Science W231 | Behind the Data: Humans and Values. https://blogs.ischool.berkeley.edu/w231/2022/07/05/is-netflixs-recommendation-algorithm-making-you-depressed/ Mehlhorn, T. (2020). The influence of emotional intelligence on sales performance of companies: With a particular focus on salespersons’ interactions within a selling process (DBA thesis, University of Gloucestershire). University of Gloucestershire EPrints Repository. http://eprints.glos.ac.uk/id/eprint/9985 Miele, F., & Giardullo, P. (2024). Concluding remarks: Current algorithmic times, AI and STS. In Reframing algorithms: STS perspectives to healthcare automation (p. 227). Morrow, V., Boddy, J., & Lamb, R. (2014). The ethics of secondary data analysis. Mugo, D. (2017). The technology acceptance model (TAM) and its application to the utilization of mobile learning technologies. British Journal of Mathematics and Computer Science. Müller, V. C. (2020). Ethics of artificial intelligence and robotics. Nolan, C. (Director). (2014). Interstellar [Film]. Paramount Pictures; Warner Bros. Pictures; Legendary Pictures; Syncopy. Nwachukwu, D., & Affen, M. P. (2023). Artificial intelligence marketing practices: The way forward to better customer experience management in Africa (Systematic Literature Review). International Academy Journal of Management, Marketing and Entrepreneurial Studies, 9(2), 44-62. Obeng-Asare, K. (2016). Does emotional intelligence influence employees, customers and operational efficiency? An empirical validation. International Journal of Marketing Studies. O'Neil, C. (2016, December 7). Commentary: Facebook's algorithm vs. democracy. Public Broadcasting Service. https://www.pbs.org/wgbh/nova/article/facebook-vs-democracy/ Pérez–Acuña, B., & Fernández-Aller, C. (2021). Facebook and artificial intelligence: a review of good practices. AI and Ethics, 1(3), 421-435. Petrides, K. V. (2010). Trait emotional intelligence theory. Industrial and Organizational Psychology, 3(2), 136–139. Pöhler, J., Flegel, N., Mentler, T., & Van Laerhoven, K. (2025). Keeping the human in the loop: Are autonomous decisions inevitable? i-com, 24(1), 9–25. Polcumpally, A. T. (2023). Making sense of AI-influenced geopolitics using STS theories. In Handbook of critical studies of artificial intelligence (pp. 187–197). Edward Elgar Publishing. Popescu, C. C. (2018). Improvements in business operations and customer experience through data science and Artificial Intelligence. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Business Excellence (Vol. 12, No. 1, pp. 804-815). Sciendo. Prahl, A., & Goh, W. W. P. (2021). “Rogue machines” and crisis communication: When AI fails, how do companies publicly respond?. Public Relations Review, 47(4), 102077. Pustovrh, T., & Mali, F. (2014). The social and ethical aspects of progress in the new and emerging sciences and technologies. Teorija in Praksa, 51(5), 717–734. Ramaul, L., Ritala, P., Kostis, A., & Aaltonen, P. (2025). Rethinking how we theorize AI in organization and management: A problematizing review of rationality and anthropomorphism. Journal of Management Studies. Rane, N. L., Paramesha, M., Choudhary, S. P., & Rane, J. (2024). Artificial intelligence in sales and marketing: Enhancing customer satisfaction, experience and loyalty. Journal of Advances in Artificial Intelligence, 2(2), 245–264. https://doi.org/10.18178/JAAI.2024.2.2.245-264 Rindfleisch, A., Kim, M. H., & Kim, S. (2024). Artificial intelligence and qualitative research. In Handbook of qualitative research methods in marketing (pp. 374–386). Edward Elgar Publishing. Rozell, E. J., Pettijohn, C. E., & Parker, R. S. (2004). Customer‐oriented selling: Exploring the roles of emotional intelligence and organizational commitment. Psychology & marketing, 21(6), 405-424. Ruggiano, N., & Perry, T. E. (2019). Conducting secondary analysis of qualitative data: Should we, can we, and how?. Qualitative social work, 18(1), 81-97. Sanda, E. (2022, June). Artificial Intelligence Algorithms and the Facebook Bubble. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Economics and Social Sciences (pp. 559-570). Sandberg, Å. (1985). Socio-technical design, trade union strategies and action research. In E. Mumford et al. (Eds.), Research methods in information systems. Elsevier. Sandberg, J., Dall’Alba, G., & Stephens, A. (2025). Things at work: How things contribute to performing work. Journal of Management Studies. Sarhan, S., & Manu, E. (2021). When does published literature constitute data for secondary research and how should the data be analysed?. In Secondary Research Methods in the Built Environment (pp. 69-87). Routledge. Seshappa, A. S. (2022). Impact of AI with the user’s data regarding Facebook business and targeted advertising in the United States in tourism industry (Doctoral dissertation, Dublin, National College of Ireland). Sevaslidou, J., Prassa, M. A., & Papaioannou, E. (2024, December). AI in marketing: Revolutionizing efficiency and personalization—Netflix’s AI success story. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Contemporary Marketing Issues. Sharifzadeh, R. (2024). Digital methods: An STS challenge to methodological digitization in social science research. Social Epistemology, 1–12. Shukla, S. S., & Jaiswal, V. (2013). Applicability of artificial intelligence in different fields of life. International Journal of Scientific Engineering and Research, 1(1), 28–35. Srivastava, K. (2013). Emotional intelligence and organizational effectiveness. Industrial psychiatry journal, 22(2), 97-99. https://doi.org/10.4103/0972-6748.132912 Stohr, A. P. (2023). Managing emerging technologies: A socio-technical analysis of opportunities and tensions for incumbents. University of Bayreuth. Sydorenko, T. (2025, February 5). The UX of emotion recognition: Can AI truly read feelings? UX Collective. https://uxdesign.cc/the-ux-of-emotion-recognition-can-ai-truly-read-feelings-e26f16268e96 Taherdoost, H. (2021). Data collection methods and tools for research. International Journal of Academic Research in Management, 10(1), 10–38. Thinnakkakath, G. (2024). Exploring the adoption of AI solutions in marketing: A qualitative case study (Doctoral dissertation, University of the Cumberlands). Thome, S. (1998). Ethical and representational issues in qualitative secondary analysis. Qualitative health research, 8(4), 547-555. Tims, M., & Bakker, A. B. (2013). Job design and employee engagement. In Employee engagement in theory and practice (pp. 131–148). Routledge. Trinh, Q. D. (2018, April). Understanding the impact and challenges of secondary data analysis. In Urologic Oncology: Seminars and original investigations (Vol. 36, No. 4, pp. 163-164). Elsevier. Tripathy, J. P. (2013). Secondary data analysis: Ethical issues and challenges. Iranian journal of public health, 42(12), 1478. Trist, E. L., & Bamforth, K. W. (1951). Some social and psychological consequences of the longwall method of coal-getting. Human Relations, 4(1), 3–38. Van Eyghen, H. (2021). Biases for evil and moral perfection. Religions, 12(7), 521. Vassilakopoulou, P. (2020). Sociotechnical approach for accountability by design in AI systems (ECIS 2020 preprint). Paper presented at the Twenty-Eighth European Conference on Information Systems (ECIS 2020). Waldman, K. (2014, June 28). Facebook's unethical experiment manipulated users' emotions. Slate. https://slate.com/technology/2014/06/facebook-unethical-experiment-it-made-news-feeds-happier-or-sadder-to-manipulate-peoples-emotions.html Wang, J. F. (2023). The impact of artificial intelligence (AI) on customer relationship management: A qualitative study. International Journal of Management and Accounting, 5(5), 74–88. West, D. M., & Allen, J. R. (2018). How artificial intelligence is transforming the world. Brookings Institution. Wickham, R. J. (2019). Secondary analysis research. Journal of the advanced practitioner in oncology, 10(4), 395. Williams, Z. (2021). Daniel Goleman’s emotionally intelligent contribution to organizational theory. Journal of Management and Innovation, 7(1). Winter, S., Berente, N., Howison, J., & Butler, B. (2014). Beyond the organizational “container”: Conceptualizing 21st century sociotechnical work. Information and Organization, 24(4), 250–269. Xu, W., & Gao, Z. (2024). An intelligent sociotechnical systems (iSTS) framework: Enabling a hierarchical human-centered AI (hHCAI) approach. arXiv. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2401.03223 Yang, Y., & Siau, K. (2018). A qualitative research on marketing and sales in the artificial intelligence age. AIS Transactions. Yin, R. K. (2014). Case study research: Design and methods (5th ed.). Sage Publications. Zhang, S. (2024). The role of artificial intelligence in enhancing online sales and the customer experience [Master’s thesis, Haaga-Helia University of Applied Sciences]. Haaga-Helia University of Applied Sciences. Zharova, A. V., & Krupskyi, O. P. (2025). Impact of artificial intelligence on management decision-making: The example of Netflix. https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Oleksandr-Krupskyi/publication/391661252_Impact_of_Artificial_Intelligence_on_Managerial_Decision-Making_The_Case_of_Netflix/links/68219ce5bd3f1930dd709185/Impact-of-Artificial-Intelligence-on-Managerial-Decision-Making-The-Case-of-Netflix.pdf |
電子全文 Fulltext |
本電子全文僅授權使用者為學術研究之目的,進行個人非營利性質之檢索、閱讀、列印。請遵守中華民國著作權法之相關規定,切勿任意重製、散佈、改作、轉貼、播送,以免觸法。 論文使用權限 Thesis access permission:校內校外完全公開 unrestricted 開放時間 Available: 校內 Campus: 已公開 available 校外 Off-campus: 已公開 available |
紙本論文 Printed copies |
紙本論文的公開資訊在102學年度以後相對較為完整。如果需要查詢101學年度以前的紙本論文公開資訊,請聯繫圖資處紙本論文服務櫃台。如有不便之處敬請見諒。 開放時間 available 已公開 available |
QR Code |