Responsive image
博碩士論文 etd-0529122-160329 詳細資訊
Title page for etd-0529122-160329
論文名稱
Title
品牌信任度調查及三年調查結果比較
The Brand Trust Survey Research and Three-Year-Survey-Result Comparison
系所名稱
Department
畢業學年期
Year, semester
語文別
Language
學位類別
Degree
頁數
Number of pages
78
研究生
Author
指導教授
Advisor
召集委員
Convenor
口試委員
Advisory Committee
口試日期
Date of Exam
2022-06-20
繳交日期
Date of Submission
2022-06-29
關鍵字
Keywords
品牌信任、功能信任、關係信任、價值信任、企業社會責任、連續調查、個人消費品
brand trust, functional trust, relationship trust, value trust, corporate social responsibility, continuous surveys, consumer brands
統計
Statistics
本論文已被瀏覽 203 次,被下載 0
The thesis/dissertation has been browsed 203 times, has been downloaded 0 times.
中文摘要
現代的行銷方式與以前有所不同,若單純依靠產品性能是難以成功的,現代消費者更加重視企業社會責任及顧客關係,因此有許多企業嘗試與消費者建立長期穩定的品牌信任關係,以達到企業穩定發展並提升營利的目的。
為了解2022年的臺灣消費品之品牌信任度,本研究利用Peter B. Gustavson商學院之品牌信任度模型,透過線上發放問卷,對40個臺灣個人消費品相關品牌進行調查,共回收1813份有效問卷,透過排名發現2022年消費者較信任的品牌為百貨批發零售品牌、家電品牌及餐飲品牌,消費者對於軟體品牌或汽車品牌等平時不會密切接觸的品牌信任度較低。
另外,本研究團隊針對台灣市場的品牌信任度研究從2020年開始已執行三年,因此本研究將今年研究結果納入,並對三年研究結果進行統整排名,透過歷年排名發現的重點如下,星巴克歷年皆位於前10名,而今年終於拿下第一;臺灣高鐵從第20名上升至第2名;中華郵政排名從第 19 名上升至第8名;百貨批發零售業品牌、家電品牌歷年皆位於前10名;捷安特排名雖然後退,但在價值信任與功能信任中仍是第一;中華航空與長榮航空2020年時排名不佳,但之後逐漸上升;在前兩年調查中,企業社會責任對品牌信任的影響並不顯著,但在2022年的調查中是顯著的,這可能與COVID-19有關,在疫情的催化下,消費者更加重視品牌是否能負起企業社會責任,若品牌能履行自身的企業社會責任,將提高消費者對品牌的態度,並提升品牌形象。
Abstract
Modern marketing methods are different from before. It is difficult to succeed if you rely solely on product performance. Modern consumers pay more attention to corporate social responsibility and customer relationships. Therefore, many companies try to establish long-term and stable brand trust relationships with consumers to achieve The purpose of stable development of enterprises and improvement of profits.

To understand the brand trust of Taiwan's consumers in 2022, this study used the brand trust model of the Peter B. Gustavson School of Business to survey 40 Taiwanese personal consumer goods-related brands through online questionnaires. A total of 1813 valid questionnaires were collected. Through the rankings, it is found that in 2022, the most trusted brands by consumers are department store wholesale and retail brands, home appliance brands, and catering brands. Consumers have lower trust in brands such as software brands or automobile brands that they do not usually have close contact with.

In addition, the research team's brand trust research on the Taiwan market has been carried out for three years since 2020. Therefore, this research will include the results of this year's study and conduct a comprehensive ranking of the three-year research results. The critical points found through the rankings over the years are as follows: Starbucks has always been in the top 10 over the years, and this year finally won the first place; Taiwan's high-speed rail rose from 20th to 2nd; Chunghwa Post rose from 19th to 8th; department store wholesale and retail brands, home appliance brands over the years They are all in the top 10; Giant's ranking has fallen back, but it still ranks first in value trust and functional trust; China Airlines and EVA Air ranked poorly in 2020, but have gradually risen since then; The impact of responsibility on brand trust is not significant, but it is substantial in the 2022 survey, which may be related to COVID-19. Under the catalysis of the epidemic, consumers pay more attention to whether brands can take corporate social responsibility. Being able to fulfill its corporate social responsibility will improve consumers' attitudes towards the brand and enhance the brand image.
目次 Table of Contents
論文審定書 i

摘要 ii

Abstract iii

第一章 緒論 1
1.1 研究背景 1
1.2 研究動機與目的 2
1.3 研究範圍 3
1.4 研究方法與流程 4

第二章 文獻探討 5
2.1 Gustavson Brand Trust Index(GBTI)歷年調查結果 5
2.2 價值信任(Values-based Trust) 6
2.3 功能信任(Functional Trust) 9
2.4 關係信任(Relationship Trust) 11
2.5 品牌信任(Brand Trust) 13
2.6 口碑推薦(Word of mouth) 15
2.7 數位轉型對品牌影響 15

第三章 研究設計 17
3.1 研究對象 17
3.2 品牌選擇 17
3.3 研究模型 20
3.4 研究問卷 21
3.5 資料收集方法 22
3.6 統計分析方法 23

第四章 統計分析 24
4.1 樣本敘述性統計分析 25
4.2 變量敘述性統計分析 26
4.3 信度分析 28
4.4 效度分析 28
4.5 路徑分析 30

第五章 分析與討論 32
5.1 歷年樣本分析 32
5.2 品牌信任度排名 33
5.3 價值信任度排名 34
5.4 功能信任度排名 34
5.5 關係信任度排名 34
5.6 口碑推薦度排名 35
5.7 部分品牌分析 35
5.7.1 捷安特 35
5.7.2 中華郵政 36
5.7.3 王品 37
5.7.4 日立 38
5.7.5 松下 38
5.7.6 臺灣高鐵 39
5.7.7 星巴克 41
5.7.8 中華航空與長榮航空 42
5.7.9 全家、全聯、家樂福與7-eleven 42
5.7.10 中華電信、臺灣大哥大與遠傳電信 44
5.7.11 PChome與momo 44

第六章 結論 46
6.1 研究貢獻與結論 46
6.2 研究限制與未來展望 47

參考文獻 48
附錄 56

參考文獻 References
Atulkar, S. (2020). Brand trust and brand loyalty in mall shoppers. Marketing Intelligence & Planning.
2. Becerra, E. P., & Korgaonkar, P. K. (2011). Effects of trust beliefs on consumers' online intentions. European Journal of Marketing.
3. Caceres, R. C., & Paparoidamis, N. G. (2007). Service quality, relationship satisfaction, trust, commitment and business‐to‐business loyalty. European Journal of Marketing.
4. Chaudhuri, A., & Holbrook, M. B. (2001). The chain of effects from brand trust and brand affect to brand performance: the role of brand loyalty. Journal of Marketing, 65(2), 81-93.
5. Chenet, P., Dagger, T. S., & O'Sullivan, D. (2010). Service quality, trust, commitment, and service differentiation in business relationships. Journal of Services Marketing.
6. Choi, B., & La, S. (2013). The impact of corporate social responsibility (CSR) and customer trust on the restoration of loyalty after service failure and recovery. Journal of Services Marketing.
7. Choi, J., Park, Y., & Sohn, Y. W. (2020). Corporate social responsibility and job seekers' application intention: a mediated moderation model of calling and value congruence. Career Development International.
8. Dam, T. C. (2020). Influence of brand trust, the perceived value on brand prefer,ence and purchase intention. The Journal of Asian Finance, Economics, and Business, 7(10), 939-947.
9. De Wulf, K., Odekerken-Schröder, G., & Iacobucci, D. (2001). Investments in consumer relationships: A cross-country and cross-industry exploration. Journal of Marketing, 65(4), 33-50.
10. Delgado‐Ballester, E., & Munuera‐Alemán, J. L. (2001). Brand trust in the context of consumer loyalty. European Journal of Marketing.
11. Delgado‐Ballester, E., & Munuera‐Alemán, J. L. (2005). Does brand trust matter to brand equity? Journal of product & brand management.
12. Drennan, J., Bianchi, C., Cacho-Elizondo, S., Louriero, S., Guibert, N., & Proud, W. (2015). Examining the role of wine brand love on brand loyalty: A multi-country comparison. International Journal of Hospitality Management, 49, 47-55.
13. Fam, K. S., Foscht, T., & Collins, R. D. (2004). Trust and the online relationship—an exploratory study from New Zealand. Tourism Management, 25(2), 195-207.
14. Fatma, M., Rahman, Z., & Khan, I. (2015). Building company reputation and brand equity through CSR: the mediating role of trust. International Journal of Bank Marketing.
15. Grewal, D., Roggeveen, A. L., & Nordfält, J. (2017). The future of retailing. Journal of retailing, 93(1), 1-6.
16. Han, H., Yu, J., Chua, B.-L., Lee, S., & Kim, W. (2019). Impact of core-product and service-encounter quality, attitude, image, trust and love on repurchase: Full-service vs low-cost carriers in South Korea. International Journal of Contemporary Hospitality Management.
17. Hennig-Thurau, T., Gwinner, K. P., Walsh, G., & Gremler, D. D. (2004). Electronic word-of-mouth via consumer-opinion platforms: what motivates consumers to articulate themselves on the internet? Journal of interactive marketing, 18(1), 38-52.
18. He, H., & Harris, L. (2020). The impact of Covid-19 pandemic on corporate social responsibility and marketing philosophy. Journal of business research, 116, 176-182.
19. Huang, M., Cai, F., Tsang, A. S., & Zhou, N. (2011). Making your online voice loud: the critical role of WOM information. European Journal of Marketing.
20. Kim, H., Hur, W.-M., & Yeo, J. (2015). Corporate brand trust is a mediator in the relationship between consumer perception of CSR, corporate hypocrisy, and corporate reputation. Sustainability, 7(4), 3683-3694.
21. Kwon, J.-H., Jung, S.-H., Choi, H.-J., & Kim, J. (2020). Antecedent factors that affect restaurant brand trust and brand loyalty: focusing on US and Korean consumers. Journal of product & brand management.
22. Leeflang, P. S., Verhoef, P. C., Dahlström, P., & Freundt, T. (2014). Challenges and solutions for marketing in a digital era. European Management Journal, 32(1), 1-12.
23. Lien, C.-H., Wen, M.-J., Huang, L.-C., & Wu, K.-L. (2015). Online hotel booking: The effects of brand image, price, trust and value on purchase intentions. Asia Pacific Management Review, 20(4), 210-218.
24. Liu, C.-T., Guo, Y. M., & Lee, C.-H. (2011). The effects of relationship quality and switching barriers on customer loyalty. International Journal of Information Management, 31(1), 71-79.
25. Liu, F., Meng, L., Zhao, Y., & Duan, S. (2020). The influence of the corporate social responsibility disclosures on consumer brand attitudes under the impact of COVID-19. Frontiers of Business Research in China, 14(1), 1-22.
26. Matzler, K., Grabner‐Kräuter, S., & Bidmon, S. (2008). Risk aversion and brand loyalty: the mediating role of brand trust and brand affect. Journal of product & brand management.
27. McWilliams, A., Siegel, D. S., & Wright, P. M. (2006). Corporate social responsibility: Strategic implications. Journal of Management Studies, 43(1), 1-18.
28. Molina-Castillo, F.-J., Jimenez-Jimenez, D., & Munuera-Aleman, J.-L. (2011). Product competence exploitation and exploration strategies: The impact on new product performance through quality and innovativeness. Industrial Marketing Management, 40(7), 1172-1182.
29. Nguyen, N., & Pervan, S. (2020). Retailer corporate social responsibility and consumer citizenship behavior: The mediating roles of perceived consumer effectiveness and consumer trust. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 55, 102082.
30. Reimer, T., & Benkenstein, M. (2016). When good WOM hurts and bad WOM gains: The effect of untrustworthy online reviews. Journal of Business Research, 69(12), 5993-6001.
31. Reinartz, W., Wiegand, N., & Imschloss, M. (2019). The impact of digital transformation on the retailing value chain. International Journal of Research in Marketing, 36(3), 350-366.
32. Sashi, C. M. (2012). Customer engagement, buyer‐seller relationships, and social media. Management decision.
33. Servera-Francés, D., & Piqueras-Tomás, L. (2019). The effects of corporate social responsibility on consumer loyalty through consumer perceived value. Economic research-Ekonomska istraživanja, 32(1), 66-84.
34. Sharma, R., & Jain, V. (2019). CSR, trust, brand loyalty, and brand equity: Empiricalevidences from sportswear industry in the NCR region of India. Metamorphosis, 18(1), 57-67.
35. Sivaraks, P., Krairit, D., & Tang, J. C. (2011). Effects of e-CRM on custthe omer–bank relationship quality and outcomes: The case of Thailand. The Journal of High Technology Management Research, 22(2), 141-157.
36. Soltani, Z., Zareie, B., Milani, F. S., & Navimipour, N. J. (2018). The impact the customer relationship management on theorganization'sn performance. The Journal of High Technology Management Research, 29(2), 237-246.
37. Tata, S. V., Prashar, S., & Gupta, S. (2020). An examination of the role of review valence and review source in varying consumption contexts the on purchase decision. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 52, 101734.
38. Turker, D. (2009). Measuring corporate social responsibility: A scale development study. Journal of Business Ethics, 85(4), 411-427.
39. Westbrook, R. A. (1987). Product/consumption-based affective responses and postpurchase processes. Journal of marketing research, 24(3), 258-270.
40. Wong, A., & Sohal, A. (2002). An examination of the relationship between trust, com,mitment and relationship quality. International journal of retail & distribution management.
41. Wu, W. Y., Lu, H. Y., Wu, Y. Y., & Fu, C. S. (2012). The effects of product scarcity and consumers' need for uniqueness on purchase intention. International journal of consumer studies, 36(3), 263-274.
42. Yang, J., Kim, W., Amblee, N., & Jeong, J. (2012). The heterogeneous effect of WOM on product sales: why the effect of WOM valence is mixed? European Journal of Marketing.
43. 2020年度營運報告(2121年3月30)。GIANT GROUP HEADQUARTERS。取自https://www.giantgroup-cycling.com/ir-financial
44. 2020全聯福利中心企業社會責任績效報告書(無日期)。全聯福利中心。取自http://event.pxmart.com.tw/activity/CSR/pxreport/assets/2020.pdf
45. 2020企業社會責任報告(2021年8月)。王品集團。取自 https://www.wowprime.com/2020-CSR.pdf
46. 2020臺灣Panasonic集團企業社會責任報告書(2021年7月)。Panasonic企業社會責任網。取自
http://www.panasonic.com.tw/csr/interactive?_ga=2.69329811.2083328736.1652344849-800774148.1650860828#i1
47. 2020遠傳電信企業社會責任報告書(2021年6月)。遠傳電信FETnet。取自https://corporate.fetnet.net/content/corp/tw/CSR/ReportDownload.html
48. momo 2020企業社會責任報告書(無日期)。富邦媒體科技股份有限公司。取自 https://corp.momo.com.tw/file/csr/csrReport/csrReport_2020.pdf
49. PChome2020企業社會責任報告書(2021年7月)。網路家庭國際資訊股份有限公司。取自 https://corp.pchome.tw/wp-content/uploads/2021/08/PChome-2020CSR_Report.pdf
50. 潘智義(2022年3月25日)。巨大去年獲利創高每股賺15.8元 配息10元同締新猷。經濟日報。取自https://money.udn.com/money/story/5618/6192090
51. 統一超商股份有限公司110年年度報告書(2022年2月28日)。統一超商股份有限公司。取自https://www.ir-cloud.com/taiwan/2912/irwebsite_c/index.php?mod=annual
52. 台灣大哥大2021永續暨整合性報告/永續報告書(無日期)。台灣大哥大。 取自 https://corp.taiwanmobile.com/pdf/2021_C_ESG.pdf
53. 臺灣高鐵企業社會責任報告書2020(2021年6月)。臺灣高鐵。取自 https://corp.thsrc.com.tw/Corp/47d838f6-dc86-4860-94d8-3e2d663ff82c
54. 企業社會責任報告書2020(2021年6月)。臺灣日立江森自控股份有限公司。取自http://www.taiwan-hitachi.com.tw/images/liability/pdf/2020csr.pdf
55. 林芬慧, 陳冠如, 林幸佳(2021)。2021跨國合作研究品牌調查。國立中山大學舊振南品牌研究中心。取自 https://jzn.nsysu.edu.tw/p/406-1043-265921,r11.php
56. 黃彥棻(2021年10月14日)。打造虛實整合全通路,家樂福逆勢成長120%。iThome。取自https://www.ithome.com.tw/people/147176
57. 華航機師罷工 勞資爭議重點(無日期)。中央通訊社。取自 https://www.cna.com.tw/topic/newstopic/1447.aspx
58. 陳君毅, 陳映璇(2021年8月9日)。家樂福數位轉型提早發功,疫情下電商成長178%!量販巨擘如何拚「快商務」佈局?。數位時代。取自
https://www.bnext.com.tw/article/64358/carrefour-digital-transformation-plan
59. 企業責任|星巴克(無日期)。星巴克| Starbucks Taiwan。取自https://www.starbucks.com.tw/responsibility/catalog.jspx
60. 全家便利商店股份有限公司2020年年報(2021年3月22日)。FamilyMart全家便利商店企業網站。取自
https://www.family.com.tw/web_enterprise/PDFWebShow.ashx?Lagu=0&ID=202113
61. 謝明彧. (2020年5月19日)。力拚20年追上日韓鐵道技術!高科大要讓高鐵在臺灣土地上奔馳。遠見雜誌.。取自 https://www.gvm.com.tw/article/72759
62. 中華電信企業社會責任報告書 2020 ESG Report(無日期)。中華電信。取自 https://www.cht.com.tw/zh-TW/home/cht/-/media/Web/PDF/Sustainability/CSR-Report-Download/CSR/2020/2020_CSR_Rerport_CH.pdf
63. 中華航空股份有限公司民國109年度年報(2021年3月27日)。中華航空。取自https://www.china-airlines.com/tw/zh/Images/annual_2020-zh_tcm303-44461.pdf
64. 中華郵政 企業社會責任網站(無日期)。中華郵政 企業社會責任網站。取自 https://csr.post.gov.tw/post/default.jsp
65. 朱永蕙, 王儒堅 (2021)。企業社會責任對顧客知覺價值之影響-以 W 餐飲集團為例。 觀光與休閒管理期刊, 9(1), 94-105.
66. 長榮罷工落幕 勞資簽團協(無日期)。中央通訊社。取自 https://www.cna.com.tw/topic/newstopic/1658.aspx
67. 長榮航空2020年報(2021年4月30日)。長榮航空。取自 https://www.evaair.com/images/zhtw/Annual%20Reports%20Year%20109%20zh_tcm27-77242.pdf
68. 楊永妙(2021年11月28日)。共好的智慧!遠見民調:ESG將帶領臺灣邁向2022。遠見研究調查。取自https://gvsrc.cwgv.com.tw/articles/index/14866
69. 姚舜(2022年1月10日)。王品2021年12月營收18.4億元 後市營運動能強。中時新聞網。 取自 https://www.chinatimes.com/realtimenews/20220110003505-260410?chdtv
70. 王延斌(2020)。個人消費品牌信任度調查。國立中山大學資訊管理學系研究所碩士論文。 取自https://hdl.handle.net/11296/vvys2m

電子全文 Fulltext
本電子全文僅授權使用者為學術研究之目的,進行個人非營利性質之檢索、閱讀、列印。請遵守中華民國著作權法之相關規定,切勿任意重製、散佈、改作、轉貼、播送,以免觸法。
論文使用權限 Thesis access permission:自定論文開放時間 user define
開放時間 Available:
校內 Campus:開放下載的時間 available 2025-06-29
校外 Off-campus:開放下載的時間 available 2025-06-29

您的 IP(校外) 位址是 3.141.30.162
現在時間是 2024-04-25
論文校外開放下載的時間是 2025-06-29

Your IP address is 3.141.30.162
The current date is 2024-04-25
This thesis will be available to you on 2025-06-29.

紙本論文 Printed copies
紙本論文的公開資訊在102學年度以後相對較為完整。如果需要查詢101學年度以前的紙本論文公開資訊,請聯繫圖資處紙本論文服務櫃台。如有不便之處敬請見諒。
開放時間 available 已公開 available

QR Code