論文使用權限 Thesis access permission:自定論文開放時間 user define
開放時間 Available:
校內 Campus: 已公開 available
校外 Off-campus: 已公開 available
論文名稱 Title |
慷慨行為對組織自發性的影響:正向心情與感知義務的中介效果 The Impact of Generous Behavior Organizational Spontaneity: The Mediation Effects of Positive Moods and Felt Obligation |
||
系所名稱 Department |
|||
畢業學年期 Year, semester |
語文別 Language |
||
學位類別 Degree |
頁數 Number of pages |
60 |
|
研究生 Author |
|||
指導教授 Advisor |
|||
召集委員 Convenor |
|||
口試委員 Advisory Committee |
|||
口試日期 Date of Exam |
2021-08-17 |
繳交日期 Date of Submission |
2021-09-12 |
關鍵字 Keywords |
慷慨行為、組織自發性、正向心情、感知義務、社會學習理論 generous behavior, organizational spontaneity, positive moods, felt obligation, social learning theory |
||
統計 Statistics |
本論文已被瀏覽 288 次,被下載 0 次 The thesis/dissertation has been browsed 288 times, has been downloaded 0 times. |
中文摘要 |
本研究立基社會交換理論以及資源保存理論觀點,探討慷慨行為與組織自發性的關係,並檢驗正向心情與感知義務這兩個中介機制,用來說明慷慨行為對組織自發性的作用歷程。本研究採用便利抽樣問卷調查,有效問卷共計288份。研究結果顯示,慷慨行為與部屬組織自發性呈顯著正相關;部屬正向心情與感知義務可以中介主管慷慨行為與部屬組織自發性之間的關係;亦即慷慨行為可以透過部屬正向心情與感知義務進而激發員工的組織自發性。本研究依此結果加以討論,並提出具體管理意涵與未來研究方向。 |
Abstract |
Drawing on the social exchange theory and conservation of resource theory, this research examined the relationship between generous behavior and employee organizational spontaneity, and tested the mediating roles of positive moods and felt obligation. This study employed the convenience- sampling questionnaires and 288 valid responses were collected. The results showed that generous behavior has a positive effect on employee organizational spontaneity, while positive moods and felt obligation play the mediating roles between the relationship of generous behavior and employee organizational spontaneity. This indicates that generous behavior can stimulate employee organizational spontaneity through the positive moods and felt obligation. Base on the finding, we have the discussion, deliver the conclusion, provide management implications and suggest future research directions. |
目次 Table of Contents |
論文審定書………………………………………………….ⅰ 中文摘要……………………………………………………. ⅱ Abstract……………………………………………………....ⅲ 目錄…………………………………………………………...ⅳ 圖次…………………………………………………………..ⅵ 表次………………………………………………………….. vii 第一章 緒論……………………………………………….1 第一節 研究背景與動機…………………………………1 第二節 研究目的…………………………………………4 第二章 文獻探討…………………………………………5 第一節 慷慨行為…………………………………………5 第二節 組織自發性………………………………………7 第三節 正向心情..………………………………………12 第四節 感知義務..………………………………………16 第三章 研究方法..………………………………………18 第一節 研究架構與假設.………………………………18 第二節 研究樣本與施測程序.…………………………19 第三節 測量工具..………………………………………20 第四節 資料分析方法..…………………………………23 第四章 研究結果..………………………………………24 第一節 樣本特性..………………………………………24 第二節 敘述性統計與相關係數分析....………………27 第三節 迴歸分析..………………………………………29 第五章 討論與建議..……………………………………31 第一節 研究結果與討論..………………………………31 第二節 管理意涵..……………………………………….33 第三節 研究限制與未來研究建議.……………………35 參考文獻.....……………………………………………...37 附錄.……………………………………………………...48 |
參考文獻 References |
今日新聞編輯中心(2021/03/02)。當主管常被要求請客?台人揭職場《暗黑文化》全場戰翻。今日新聞NOW news。 台灣PTT看板b122771四川缽缽雞(2021/03/01)。當主管一定要請客嗎?台灣PTT看板Tech_Job¬。 吳同凰(2019/08/14)。主管一定要請客吃飯,跟同事拉近關係嗎? 從《君王論》看領導者的請客行為。經理人月刊 林庭安(2016/11/04)。主管就要請客吃飯,和員工聊天說笑?想贏得死忠部屬,有更好的做法!經理人月刊 吳欣蓓、陸洛(2014)。當我們同在一起: 個人與團隊契合, 情感性承諾與知識分享行為之關聯。臺大管理論叢,25(1),287-324。DOI: 10.6226/NTURM2014. DEC. GE49 彭台光,高月慈,林鉦棽,2006。管理研究中的共同方法變異︰問題本質、影響、測試 與補救,管理學報,23 卷 1 期,77-98。 經理人編輯部 (2019.07)。向歷史學職場生存術。經理人月刊(176期)。臺北市:巨思文化。 錢宛玲、紀乃文、廖學華(2020),喝了再上?手搖杯飲用量在每日初始負向心情與後續正向心情關係間的修復角色:員工情緒穩定性的干擾效果。人力資源管理學報, 20 ( 2 ),91-118。DOI:10.6147/JHRM.202012_20(2).0004 Algoe, S. B., & Haidt, J. (2009). Witnessing excellence in action: The ‘other-praising’ emotions of elevation, gratitude, and admiration. Journal of Positive Psychology, 4, 105−127. Allen, N. J., & Meyer, J. P. (1990). The measurement and antecedents of affective, continuance, and normative commitment to the organization, Journal of Occupational Psychology, 53, 337-348. Astakhova, M.N. (2015), The curvilinear relationship between work passion and organizational citizenship behavior, Journal of Business Ethics, Vol. 130 No. 2, pp. 361-374. Baker, W. E., & Bulkley, N. (2014). Paying it forward vs. rewarding reputation: Mechanisms of generalized reciprocity. Organization Science, 25(5), 1493–1510. Bandura, A. (1986). The explanatory and predictive scope of self-efficacy theory. Journal of social and clinical psychology, 4(3), 359-373. Bateman, T. S., & Organ, D. W. 1983. Job satisfaction and the good soldier: The relationship between affect and employee “citizenship.” Academy of Management Journal, 26: 587–595. Bateman, T. S., & Porath, C. (2003). Transcendent behavior. In K. S. Cameron, J. E. Dutton, & R. E. Quinn (Eds.), Positive organizational scholarship: Foundations of a new discipline (pp. 122–137). San Francisco, CA: Berrett-Koehler. Baviera, T., English, W., & Guillén, M. (2016). The “Logic of Gift”: Inspiring behavior in organizations beyond the limits of duty and exchange. Business Ethics Quarterly, 26(2), 159–180. Bearman, P.S., 1997. Generalized exchange. American Journal of Sociology 102, 1383–1415. Blau, P. M. (1964). Exchange and power in social life. New York: Wiley. Blau, P. M. (1968). Social exchange. In D. L. Sills (Ed.), International encyclopedia of the social sciences. Vol. 7. New York: Macmillan. Borman, W. C., & Motowidlo, S. J. (1993). Expanding the criterion domain to include elements of extrarole performance. In N. Schmitt & W. C. Borman (Eds.), Personnel selection in organizations (pp. 71-98). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass. Bower, G. H. (1981). Mood and memory. American Psychologist, 36, 129-148. Bower, G. H., & Cohen, P. R. (1982). Emotional influences in memory and thinking: Data and theory. In M. S. Clark & S. T. Fiske (Eds.), Affect and cognition (pp. 291-332). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum. Bozionelos, N., Lin, C.H., & Lee, K.Y. (2019). Enhancing the sustainability of employees’ careers through training: The roles of career actors’ openness and of supervisor support. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 10, 33-43. doi.org/10.1016/j. jvb.2019.103333 Brief, A. P., & Motowidlo, S. J. (1986). Prosocial organizational behaviors. Academy of Management Review, 11, 710–725. Bryan, J., Tuckey, M., Einöther, S. J. L., Garczarek, U., Garrick, A., & De Bruin, E. A. (2012). Relationships between tea and other beverage consumption to work performance and mood. Appetite, 58, 339-346. doi:10.1016/j.appet.2011.11.009 Burgess, E. E., Turan, B., Lokken, K. L., Morse, A., & Boggiano, M. M. (2014). Profiling motives behind hedonic eating. Preliminary validation of the Palatable Eating Motives Scale. Appetite, 72, 66-72. doi:10.1016/j.appet.2013.09.016 Cacioppo JT, Gardner WL. 1999. Emotion. Annu. Rev. Psychol. 50:191–214 Cacioppo, J. T., Gardner, W. L., & Berntson, G. G. (1999). The affect system has parallel and integrative processing components: Form follows function. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 76, 839-855. Caplan, G. (1974). Support systems and community mental health. New York: Behavioral Publications. Carmeli, A., McKay, A. S., & Kaufman, J. C. (2013). Emotional intelligence and creativity: The mediating role of generosity and vigor. The Journal of Creative Behavior, 48(4), 290–309. Carmines EG, Zeller RA (1991) Reliability and Validity Assessment. Sage University Papers on Quantitative Applications in the Social Sciences. 07-001. Beverly Hills and London: Sage Publications Chancellor, J., Jacobs Bao, K., & Lyubomirsky, S. (2013). Ripples of generosity in the workplace: The benefits of giving, getting, and glimpsing. Manuscript submitted for publication. University of California, Riverside. ProQuest Dissertations Publishing, 2013. 3610899. Coleman, V. I., & Borman, W. C.(2000).Investigation The Underlying Structure of The Citizenship Performance Domain. Human Resourse Management Review,26-44. Florida:South Collett, J. L., & Morrissey, C. A. (2007). The Social Psychology of Generosity: The State of Current Interdisciplinary Research. Notre Dame. Coyle-Shapiro, J. A. M., & Morrow, P. C. (2006). Organizational and client commitment among contracted employees. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 68, 416–431. DeLamater, J., Myers, D., & Collett, J. (2015). Social Psychology (8th ed.) Boulder, Colarado: Westview Press. Deluga, R. J. (1994). Supervisor trust building, leader-member exchange, and organizational citizenship behavior. Journal of Occupational & Organizational Psychology, 67, 315—326. Donald, C. P.: 2003, Essential Personality (Arnold, Clearwater, FL). Dovidio, J. F., Piliavin, J. A., Schroeder, D. A., & Penner, L. (2006). The social psychology of prosocial behavior. New York: Taylor & Francis. Edmondson, A. C. (1999). Psychological safety and learning behavior in work teams. Administrative Science Quarterly, 44, 350-383. doi:10.2307/2666999 Edmondson, A. C. (2003). Speaking up in the operating room: How team leaders promote learning in interdisciplinary action teams. Journal of Management Studies, 40, 1419-1452. doi:10.1111/1467-6486.00386 Eisenberger, R., Armeli, S., Rexwinkel, B., Lynch, P. D., & Rhoades, L. (2001). Reciprocation of perceived organizational support. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86(1), 42–51. Eisenberger, R., Cotterell, N., & Marvel, J. (1987). Reciprocation ideology. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 53, 743–750. Eisenberger, R., Huntington, R., Hutchison, S., & Sowa, D. (1986). Perceived organizational support. Journal of Applied Psychology, 71, 500-507. Faldetta, G. (2011). The Logic of Gift and Gratuitousness in Business Relationships. Journal of Business Ethics, Supl. 100, pp. 67‐77. Flynn, F. 2003. What have you done for me lately? Temporal adjustments in favor evaluations. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 91: 38–50. Flynn, F. J. (2005). Identity orientations and forms of social exchange in organizations. Academy of Management Review, 30(4), 737–750. Flynn, F. J. 2003. How much should I give and how often? The effects of generosity and frequency of favor exchange on social status and productivity. Academy of Management Journal, 46: 539-553 Fredrickson, B. L. (2001). The role of positive emotions in positive psychology: The broaden-and-build theory of positive emotions. American Psychologist, 56, 218- 226. George, J. M. (1991). State or trait: Effects of positive mood on prosocial behaviors at work. Journal of Applied Psychology, 76, 299-307. George, J. M. (2011). Dual tuning: A minimum condition for understanding affect in organizations? Organizational Psychology Review, 1, 147-164. doi:10.1177/2041386610390257 George, J. M., & Brief, A. P. (1992). Feeling good-doing good: A conceptual analysis of the mood at work-organizational spontaneity relationship. Psychological Bulletin, 112, 310-329. George, J. M., & Jones, G. R. (1997).Organizational Spontaneity in Context. Human Performance, 10(2), 153–170. doi:10.1207/s15327043hup1002_6 Ghoshal, S. (2005). Bad management theories are destroying good management. Academy of Management Learning and Education, 4, 1, 75–91. Gouldner, H. P. (1960). Dimensions of organizational commitment. Administrative Science Quarterly, 4, 468-490. Gur, S. S. (2017). Generosity at work: Generous identity, organizational context, and organizational citizenship behaviors. (in press). A dissertation of the University of North Carolina at Charlotte. Hakanen, J. J., Peeters, M. C. W., & Perhoniemi, R. 2011. Enrichment processes and gain spirals at work and home: A 3-year cross-lagged panel study. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 84: 8-30. Halbesleben JR,Wheeler AR. 2015. To invest or not? The role of coworker support and trust in daily reciprocal gain spirals of helping behavior. J. Manag. 41(6):1628–50 Halbesleben, J. R. B., Neveu, J.-P., Paustian-Underdahl, S. C., & Westman, M. (2014). Getting to the “COR”: Understanding the role of resources in conservation of resources theory. Journal of Management, 40(5), 1334–1364 Harlos, K. P. (2001). When organizational voice systems fail: More on the deaf-ear syndrome and frustration effects. The Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 37, 324-342. doi:10.1177/0021886301373005 Hobfoll, S. E. (1989). Conservation of resources: A new attempt at conceptualizing stress. American Psychologist, 44(3), 513-524. Hobfoll, S. E. (2002). Social and psychological resources and adaptation. Review of General Psychology, 6, 307–324. Hobfoll, S. E., Halbesleben, J., Neveau, J.-P., & Westman, M. (2018). Conservation of resources in the organizational context: The reality of resources and their consequences. Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior, 5, 103–128. Holmes, J. G. 1981. The exchange process in close relationships: Microbehavior and macromotives. In M. J. Learner & S. C. Lerner (Eds.), The justice motive in social behavior: 261-284. New York: Plenum Homans, G. C. (1961). The humanities and the social sciences: Joint concern with “individual” and values the arts distinct from social science distinctions of social status. The American Behavioral Scientist, 4(8), 3–6. House, J. S. (1981). Workstress and social support. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley. Kark R, Van Dijk D. 2007. Motivation to lead, motivation to follow: the role of the selfregulatory focus in leadership processes. Acad. Manage. Rev. 32:500–28 Katz, D The motivational basis of organizational behavior. Behavioral Science, 1964,9, 131-133. Keller, C., & Siegrist, M. (2015). Does personality influence eating styles and food choices? Direct and indirect effects. Appetite, 84, 128-138. doi:10.1016/j.appet.2014.10.003 Konovsky, M. A., & Organ, D. W. (1996). Dispositional and contextual determinants of organizational citizenship behavior. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 17, 253–266. Konovsky, M. A., & Pugh, S. D. 1994. Citizenship behavior and social exchange. Academy of Management Journal, 37: 656–669. Liao, H., & Chuang, A. C. (2007). Transforming service employees and climate: A multilevel, multisource examination of transformational leadership in building long-term service relationships. Journal of Applied Psychology, 92,1006-1019. Meyer, J. P., & Allen, N. J. (1991). A three-component conceptualization of organizational commitment. Human Resource Management Review, 1, 61-89. Molm, L. D. (2003). Theoretical comparisons of forms of exchange. Sociological Theory, 21, 1, 1-17. Organ, D. W. (1997). Organizational citizenship behavior: It’s construct clean-up time. Human Performance, 10, 85-97. Organ, Dennis W. (1988), Organizational Citizenship Behavior. Lexington, MA: Lexington Books. Ozer, M.(2011). A moderated mediation model of the relationship between organizational citizenship behaviors and job performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 96, 1328-1336. Peterson, C., & Seligman, M. E. P. (2003). Character Strengths and Virtues: A Handbook and Classification, American Psychological Association. Podsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, S. B., Lee, J., & Podsakoff, N. P. (2003). Common methods biases in behavioral research: A critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88, 879–903. Podsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, S. B., Paine, J. B., & Bachrach, D. G. (2000). Organizational citizenship behavior: A critical review of the theoretical and empirical literature and suggestions for future research. Journal of Management, 26, 513–563. Rhoades, L., Eisenberger, R., & Armeli, S. (2001). Affective commitment to the organization: The contribution of perceived organizational support. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86, 825-836. Robinson, S.L., & Morrison, E.W. 1995. Psychological contracts and OCB: The effect of unfulfilled obligations on civic virtue behavior. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 16: 289-298. Robbins, P. S., & Timothy, A. J. (2016). Organization Behavior (17th ed.) published by Pearson Education Limited. Sahlins, M. (1972). Stone Age Economics. Chicago, IL: Aldine Atherton. Schaufeli, WB, Salanova, M., González-Romá, V., & Bakker, AB (2002). The measurement of engagement and burnout: A two sample confirmatory factor analytic approach. Journal of Happiness studies, 3( 1), 71-92. Smith, C. A, Organ, D. W. & Near, J. P. (1983). Organizational Citizenship Behavior : Its Nature and Antecedent. Journal of Applied Psychology. 68(4), 653-663. Sonnentag, S., Pundt, A., & Venz, L. (2017). Distal and proximal predictors of snacking at work: A dailysurvey study. Journal of Applied Psychology, 102, 151-162. doi:10.1037/apl0000162 Spangler, W.D., & Braiotta Jr., L. (1990). Leadership and corporate audit committee effectiveness. Group and Organization Studies, 15(2), 134-157. Steinberg, D. M.: 2004, The Social Work Student’s Research Handbook. Haworth Social Work Practice, New York. Strickland, O.L. (1999), ‘When is Internal Consistency Reliability Assessment Inappropriate?’, Journal of Nursing Measurement 7(1), 3–4. Ten Brummelhuis, L. L., & Bakker, A. B. (2012). A resource perspective on the work-home interface: The work-home resources model. American Psychologist, 67(7), 545-556. Vohs, K. D., & Heatherton, T. F. 2000. Self-regulatory failure: A resource-depletion approach. Psychological Science, 11: 249-254. Walumbwa FO, Luthans F, Avey JB, Oke A. (2011). Authentically leading groups: The mediating role of positivity and trust. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 32, 4–24. Warneken, F., & Tomasello, M. (2009). Varieties of altruism in children and chimpanzees. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 13, 397. Watson, D., Clark, L. A., & Tellegen, A. (1988). Development and validation of the brief measures of positive and negative affect: The PANAS scales. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54, 1063-1070. Wayne, S., Shore, L., and Liden, R. (1997). Perceived organizational support and leader-member exchange: A social exchange perspective. Academy of Management Journal, February, 82-111. Werner, J. M. (1994). Dimensions that make a difference: Examining the impact of in-role and extrarole behaviors on supervisory ratings. Journal of Applied Psychology, 79, 98 –107. Whiteley, P.,Sy, T.,Johnson, S. K.(2012).Leaders' conceptions of followers: Implications for naturally occurring Pygmalion effects. The Leadership Quarterly,23,822-834. Whiting, S. W.,Podsakoff, P. M.,Pierce, J. R.(2008).Effects of task performance, helping, voice, and organizational loyalty on performance appraisal ratings. Journal of Applied Psychology,93,125-139. Yammarino, F. J., & Dubinsky, A. J. 1994. Transformational leadership theory: Using levels of analysis to determine boundary conditions. Personnel Psychology, 47: 787–811. Yammarino, F. J., Spangler, W. D., & Bass, B. M. (1993). Transformational leadership and performance: A longitudinal investigation. Leadership Quarterly, 4, 81-102. Yoshikawa, K., Wu, C.-H., & Lee, H.-J. (2020). Generalized Exchange Orientation: Conceptualization and Scale Development. Journal of Applied Psychology, 105(3), 294-311 Zhu, Y. & Akhtar, S. (2014), How transformational leadership influences follower helping behavior: The role of trust and prosocial motivation. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 35, 373–392. |
電子全文 Fulltext |
本電子全文僅授權使用者為學術研究之目的,進行個人非營利性質之檢索、閱讀、列印。請遵守中華民國著作權法之相關規定,切勿任意重製、散佈、改作、轉貼、播送,以免觸法。 論文使用權限 Thesis access permission:自定論文開放時間 user define 開放時間 Available: 校內 Campus: 已公開 available 校外 Off-campus: 已公開 available |
紙本論文 Printed copies |
紙本論文的公開資訊在102學年度以後相對較為完整。如果需要查詢101學年度以前的紙本論文公開資訊,請聯繫圖資處紙本論文服務櫃台。如有不便之處敬請見諒。 開放時間 available 已公開 available |
QR Code |