論文使用權限 Thesis access permission:校內校外完全公開 unrestricted
開放時間 Available:
校內 Campus: 已公開 available
校外 Off-campus: 已公開 available
論文名稱 Title |
可持續性的支持、自信與咖啡消費類型之間的關係 Relationship between the support of sustainability, self-confidence and types of coffee consumption |
||
系所名稱 Department |
|||
畢業學年期 Year, semester |
語文別 Language |
||
學位類別 Degree |
頁數 Number of pages |
59 |
|
研究生 Author |
|||
指導教授 Advisor |
|||
召集委員 Convenor |
|||
口試委員 Advisory Committee |
|||
口試日期 Date of Exam |
2021-10-22 |
繳交日期 Date of Submission |
2021-11-24 |
關鍵字 Keywords |
咖啡消費行為、行銷策略、精品咖啡、自信心、支持永續性 types of coffee consumption, marketing strategy, premium class coffee, self-confidence, support sustainability |
||
統計 Statistics |
本論文已被瀏覽 343 次,被下載 80 次 The thesis/dissertation has been browsed 343 times, has been downloaded 80 times. |
中文摘要 |
多項研究發現奢侈品與自信心之間存在著關聯性,其中包括咖啡消費行為和支持永續性的行為皆與其相關。然而,對於咖啡的消費行為、自信心和支持永續性之間的關聯尚未有明確的研究。因此,本研究旨在回答以下問題: 一、精品咖啡的消費行為與高自信心之間是否有關聯? 二、咖啡的消費行為與支持永續性的行為之間是否有關聯? 三、咖啡品質的感知度、價格、地點及促銷活動是否會影響到消費者對於咖啡的選擇? 此篇研究利用量化方式分析,以泰國市場為主,共蒐集了164 份線上問卷。分析結果發現,咖啡品質的感知度、咖啡價格和咖啡店的促銷皆對於消費者在咖啡的選擇上有顯著的影響。相比於一般咖啡的消費者,咖啡品質的感知度對於精品咖啡的消費者來說,具有更大的影響力。而對於一般咖啡的消費者來說,咖啡價格的影響力最大。與精品咖啡的消費者相比,咖啡店的促銷活動對於一般咖啡的消費者來說,有更大的影響力。其次,咖啡的消費行為也與消費者的自信心有關。研究結果發現,喝精品咖啡的人自信心比喝一般咖啡的消費者來的高很多。另外,自研究結果也可得知,飲用一般咖啡的消費者對永續發展的支持度較低。消費精品咖啡的人對於支持永續性的行為較高。然而,地點(咖啡店的位置)並不影響消費者對於咖啡的選擇。 |
Abstract |
Several studies have found a connection between luxury product and level of self-confidence. This includes coffee consumption behaviors and support sustainability behaviors, however, the connection between types of coffee consumption, self-confidence and support sustainability has not been clearly studied. Thus, this research has the purpose to answer the following research questions: I. Whether perceived quality, price, place of coffee shop and promotional activity affect choice of coffee consumptions? I. Is there a connection between premium coffee consumption and high level of self-confidence? III. Is there a connection between types of coffee consumption and support for sustainability? Analysis of quantitative data collected from 164 online surveys in Thailand found that perceived coffee quality, coffee price, and coffee shop promotion have significant impact on the choice of coffee consumptions. The perceived quality of coffee has a significantly greater impact on the selection of premium coffee consumers than standard coffee consumers. While the perceived price of coffee has an impact on local coffee consumers number one. This was followed by consumers of standard coffee and premium coffee respectively. Coffee shop promotion perceptions had a significantly greater impact on the selection of standard coffee consumers than premium coffee consumers. Next, different types of coffee consumption led to different levels of self-confidence. People who consumed premium coffee had significantly higher levels of self-confidence than those who consumed standard coffee. Finally, those who consumed local coffee had the least support sustainability behavior. Those who consume premium coffee have the most support sustainability behavior. However, place (location of coffee shop) does not affect choice of coffee consumptions. |
目次 Table of Contents |
Table of Content Thesis Validation Letter i Acknowledgement ii 中文摘要 iii Abstract iv Table of Content vi Table Listings ix Chapter 1: Introduction 1 1.1 Research Motivation 1 1.2 Research Background 2 1.3 Research Purpose 3 1.3.1 Research Questions 3 1.4 Research Contribution 3 Chapter 2: Literature review 4 2.1 Coffee market 4 2.2 Coffee types (Classification) 5 2.3 Consumer behavior 6 2.3.1 Personal preferences 6 2.3.2 Economic attributes 8 2.3.3 Country of origin 9 2.3.4 Coffee attributes 10 2.3.5 Lifestyle & occasion 12 2.4 Self-Confident 13 2.4.1 Self-efficacy 13 2.5 Sustainability 14 Figure 1: Research Model 16 Chapter 3: Methodology 17 3.1 Research Approach 17 3.2 Measures and Questionnaire 17 3.3 Sample 18 3.4 Research ethics 21 Chapter 4 Data analysis and result 22 4.1 Descriptive Statistic 22 4.1.1. Test of reliability of scale 23 4.2 Group Difference 24 4.2.1. Factors affecting the choice of coffee consumption 24 4.2.2. Self-Confidence and Support sustainability 27 Chapter 5: Discussion and Conclusion 31 5.1 Research Conclusion 31 5.2 Research Implications 32 5.3 Limitation and Future Research 33 5.4. Summary of research objectives and research contribution 34 Reference 36 Appendix I 46 I. Questionnaire introduction 46 Table Listings Table 1. Coffee consumption preference 19 Table 2. Demographic background 19 Table 3. Descriptive Statistics of factor 23 Table 4. Reliability of statistics 24 Table 5. One-way ANOVA 27 Table 6. One-way ANOVA 29 Table 7. Result of hypothesis 30 |
參考文獻 References |
Reference Ágoston, C., Urbán, R., Király, O., Griffiths, M. D., Rogers, P. J., & Demetrovics, Z. (2017). Why do you drink Caffeine? The development of the motives for caffeine consumption questionnaire (MCCQ) and its relationship with gender, age and the types of caffeinated beverages. International Journal of Mental Health and Addiction, 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11469-017-9822-3. Aguirre, J. (2016). Culture, health, gender and coffee drinking: A Costa rican perspective. British Food Journal, 118(1), 150–163. https://doi.org/10.1108/BFJ-08-2015-0298. Ajzen, I. (2002). Residual effects of past on later Behavior. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 6(2), 107–122. Andorfer, V. A., & Liebe, U. (2013). Consumer behavior in moral markets. On the relevance of identity, justice beliefs, social norms, status, and trust in ethical consumption. European Sociological Review, 29(6), 1251–1265. https://doi.org/10.1093/esr/jct014 Asioli, D., Almli, V. L., & Næs, T. (2016a). Comparison of two different strategies for investigating individual differences among consumers in choice experiments. A case study based on preferences for iced coffee in Norway. Food Quality and Preference, 54, 79–89. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodqual.2016.07.005. Asioli, D., Næs, T., Granli, B. S., & Lengard Almli, V. (2014). Consumer preferences for iced coffee determined by conjoint analysis: An exploratory study with Norwegian consumers. International Journal of Food Science and Technology, 49(6), 1565–1571. https://doi.org/10.1111/ijfs.12485. Asioli, D., Næs, T., Øvrum, A., & Almli, V. L. (2016b). Comparison of rating-based and choice-based conjoint analysis models. A case study based on preferences for iced coffee in Norway. Food Quality and Preference, 48, 174–184. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodqual.2015.09.007. Basu, A. K., & Hicks, R. L. (2008). Label performance and the willingness to pay for fair trade coffee: A cross-national perspective. International Journal of Consumer Studies,32(5), 470–478. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1470-6431.2008.00715.x. Bhumiratana, N., Adhikari, K., & Chambers, E. (2014). The development of an emotion lexicon for the coffee drinking experience. Food Research International, 61, 83–92. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodres.2014.03.008. Bookman, S. (2013). Branded cosmopolitanisms: “Global” coffee brands and the cocreation of “Cosmopolitan cool.”. Cultural Sociology, 7(1), 56–72. https://doi.org/10.1177/1749975512453544. Cailleba, P., & Casteran, H. (2009). A quantitative study on the fair trade coffee consumer. Journal of Applied Business Research (JABR), 25(6), 31–46. https://doi.org/10.19030/jabr.v25i6.993. Cailleba, P., & Casteran, H. (2010). Do ethical values Work? A quantitative study of the impact of fair trade coffee on consumer behavior. Journal of Business Ethics, 97(4), 613–624. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-010-0528-8. Carvalho, N. B., Minim, V. P. R., Nascimento, M., Vidigal, M. C. T. R., Ferreira, M. A. M., Gonçalves, A. C. A., et al. (2015). A discriminant function for validation of the cluster analysis and behavioral prediction of the coffee market. Food Research International, 77, 400–407. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodres.2015.10.013. Cranfield, J. (2010). An assessment of consumer preference for fair trade coffee in toronto and vancouver. Agribusiness, 26(2), 307–325. https://doi.org/10.1002/agr. De Pelsmacker, P., Janssens, W., Sterckx, E., & Mielants, C. (2005b). Consumer preferences for the marketing of ethically labelled coffee. International Marketing Review, 22(5), 512–530. https://doi.org/10.1108/02651330510624363. de Ferran, F., & Grunert, K. G. (2007). French fair trade coffee buyers' purchasing motives: Anexploratory study using means-end chains analysis. Food Quality and Preference, 18(2), 218–229. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodqual.2005.11.00. Etikan, I., Abubakar Musa, S., & Sunusi Alkassim, R. (2016). Comparison of convenience sampling and purposive sampling. American Journal of Theoretical and Applied Statistics, 5(1), 1–4. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajta s.20160501.1. Festinger, L. (1954). "A theory of social comparison processes". Human Relations. 7 (2): 117–140. doi:10.1177/001872675400700202 Fray, S.D., R.K. Johnson., M.Q. Wang. (2005) Food sources and intakes of caffeine in the diets of persons in the United States J. Am. Diet. Assoc., 105 (2005), pp. 110-113 Giacalone, D., Fosgaard, T. R., Steen, I., & Münchow, M. (2016). Quality does not sell itself. British Food Journal, 118(10), 2462–2474. https://doi.org/10.1108/BFJ-03-2016-0127 Harith, Z. T., Ting, C. H., & Zakaria, N. N. A. (2014). Coffee packaging: Consumer perception on appearance, branding and pricing. International Food Research Journal,21(3), 849–853. Hsu, J. L., & Hung, W. C. (2005). Packed coffee drink consumption and product attribute preferences of young adults in Taiwan. Food Quality and Preference, 16(4), 361- 367.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodqual.2004.06.004. Huang, H.-C., Chang, Y.-T., Yeh, C.-Y., & Liao, C.-W. (2014). Promote the price promotion. International Journal of Contemporary Hospitality Management, 26(7), 1065–1082. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJCHM-05-2013-0204 International Coffee Organization (ICO) (2015). Global coffee Forum, 2015. Milan, Accessed date: 19 April 2018. Judge, T. A., Erez, A., Bono, J. E., & Thoresen (2002). Are measures of self-esteem, neuroticism, locus of control, and generalized self-efficacy indicators of a common core construct? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 83, 693–710. https://psycnet.apa.org/doiLanding?doi=10.1037%2F0022-3514.83.3.693 Kang, J., Tang, L., Lee, J.Y., Bosselman, R.H., (2011). Understanding customer behaviour in name-brand Korean coffee shops: the role of self-congruity and functional congruity. Int. J. Hosp. Manage. 31 (3), 809–818. Klimas, C. A., & Webb, E. (2018). Comparing stated and realized preferences for shade-grown vs. conventionally grown coffee. International Journal of Consumer Studies, 42(1), 76–92. https://doi.org/10.1111/ijcs.12399 Lanfranchi, M., Giannetto, C., & Dimitrova, V. (2016). Evolutionary aspects of coffee consumers' buying habits: Results of a sample survey. Bulgarian Journal of Agricultural Science, 22(5), 705–712. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodchem.2009.07.051. Luszczynska, A., & Schwarzer, R. (2005). Social Cognitive Theory. In M. Conner, & P. Norman (Eds.), Predicting Health Behaviour (2nd Ed., pp. 127-169). Buckingham, UK: Open University Press. https://www.scirp.org/(S(i43dyn45teexjx455qlt3d2q))/reference /ReferencesPapers.aspx?ReferenceID=2269529 Lee, K. H., Bonn, M. A., & Cho, M. (2015). Consumer motives for purchasing organic coffee. International Journal of Contemporary Hospitality Management, 27(6), 1157–1180. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJCHM-02-2014-0060. Manzo, J. (2014). Machines, people, and social interaction in “third-wave” coffeehouses. Journal of Arts and Humanities (JAH), 3(8) August, 2014. Obermiller, C., Burke, C., Talbott, E., & Green, G. P. (2009). Taste great or more fulfilling: The effect of brand reputation on consumer social responsibility advertising for fairtrade coffee. Corporate Reputation Review, 12(2), 159–176. https://doi.org/10.1057/crr.2009.11. Park, C. L., & Folkman, S. (1997). Meaning in the context of stress and coping. Review of General Psychology, 1, 115−144. https://doi.org/10.1037/1089-2680.1.2.115 Phetniam, W. (2015). Factors affecting consumer behavior in Bangkok premium coffee shops. An independent study of business administration, Faculty of Commerce and Accountancy, Thammasat University Phau, I., Teah, M., & Chuah, J. (2015). Consumer attitudes towards luxury fashion apparel made in sweatshops. Journal of Fashion Marketing and Management, 19(2), 169–187. https://www.emerald.com/insight/content/doi/10.1108/JFMM-01-2014-0008/full/html Poole, R., Kennedy, O. J., Roderick, P., Fallowfield, J. A., Hayes, P. C., & Parkes, J. (2017). Coffee consumption and health: Umbrella review of meta-analyses of multiple health outcomes. BMJ, 359, 1–18. j5024 https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.j5024. Portney, L. G., & Watkins, M. P. (1993). Foundations of clinical research: Applications topractice. Norwalk, CT: Appleton and Lange. Reis, Harry T. (2008-11-01). "Reinvigorating the Concept of Situation in Social Psychology". Personality and Social Psychology Review. 12 (4): 311–329. https://doi:10.1177/1088868308321721 Richelieu, A., & Korai, B. (2014). The consumption experience of Tim Hortons' coffee fans. Qualitative Market Research: An International Journal, 17(3), 192–208. https://doi.org/10.1108/QMR-06-2012-0032. Rousmans, S., Robin, O., Dittmar, A., & Vernet-Maury, E. (2000). Autonomic nervous system responses associated with primary tastes. Chemical Senses, 25(6), 709-718. Rosenberg M. (1965). Society and the adolescent self-image. Princeton NJ: Princeton University Press. https://www.degruyter.com/document/doi/10.1515/9781400876136/html Samoggia, A. (2016). Wine and health: Faraway concepts? British Food Journal, 118(4) https://doi.org/10.1108/BFJ-07-2015-0267. Samoggia, Antonella, & Castellini, Alessandra (2018). Health-orientationand socio-demographic characteristics as determinants of fish consumption. Journal International food & Agribusiness Marketing, 30, 211–226. Samoggia, A., & Riedel, B. (2018). Coffee consumption and purchasing behavior review: Insights for further research. Appetite, 129, 70–81. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.appet.2018.07.002. Sepúlveda, W. S., Chekmam, L., Maza, M. T., & Mancilla, N. O. (2016). Consumers'preference for the origin and quality attributes associated with production of specialty coffees: Results from a cross cultural study. Food Research International, 89, 997–1003. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodres.2016.03.039. Snyder, C. R.; Lopez, Shane J. (2009-01-01). Oxford Handbook of Positive Psychology. Oxford University Press. ISBN 978-0-19-518724-3. Sousa, G. B., Machado, M., Maria, L., da Silva, F., da Costa, M., & Helena, T. (2016). Personal characteristics of coffee consumers and non-consumers, reasons and preferences for foods eaten with coffee among adults from the Federal District, Brazil. Food Sci. Technol, Campinas, 36(3), 432–438. https://doi.org/10.1590/1678-457X.10015. Tumanan, M. A. R., & Lansangan, J. R. G. (2012). More than just a cuppa coffee: A multidimensional approach towards analyzing the factors that define place attachment. International Journal of Hospitality Management, 31(2), 529–534. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhm.2011.07.012. Van Loo, E. J., Caputo, V., Nayga, R. M., Seo, H. S., Zhang, B., & Verbeke, W. (2015). Sustainability labels on coffee: Consumer preferences, willingness-to-pay and visual attention to attributes. Ecological Economics, 118, 215–225. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2015.07.011. Van der Merwe, K., & Maree, T. (2016). The behavioural intentions of specialty coffee consumers in South Africa. International Journal of Consumer Studies, 40(4), 501-508.https://doi.org/10.1111/ijcs.12275. Wang, E. S.-T., & Yu, J.-R. (2016). Effect of product attribute beliefs of ready-to-drink coffee beverages on consumer-perceived value and repurchase intention. British Food Journal, 118(12), 2963–2980. https://doi.org/10.1108/BFJ-03-2016-0128. Wang, C., Sun, J., Lassabliere, B., Yu, B., & Liu, S. Q. (2020). Coffee flavour modification through controlled fermentations of green coffee beans by Saccharomyces cerevisiae and Pichia kluyveri: Part I. Effects from individual yeasts. Food Research International, 136, 109588. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodres.2020.109588 Xu, Y.J., Summers, T.A., Belleau, B.D., 2004. Who buys American alligator? Predicting purchase intention of a controversial product. J. Bus. Res. 57, 1189–1198. Zellner, M. (1970). Self-esteem, reception, and influenceability. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 15(1), 87–93. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0029201 Zhang, X., Kuchinke, L., Woud, M. L., Velten, J., & Margraf, J. (2017). Survey method matters: Online/offline questionnaires and face-to-face or telephone interviews differ. Computers in Human Behavior, 71, 172–180. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2017.02.006. |
電子全文 Fulltext |
本電子全文僅授權使用者為學術研究之目的,進行個人非營利性質之檢索、閱讀、列印。請遵守中華民國著作權法之相關規定,切勿任意重製、散佈、改作、轉貼、播送,以免觸法。 論文使用權限 Thesis access permission:校內校外完全公開 unrestricted 開放時間 Available: 校內 Campus: 已公開 available 校外 Off-campus: 已公開 available |
紙本論文 Printed copies |
紙本論文的公開資訊在102學年度以後相對較為完整。如果需要查詢101學年度以前的紙本論文公開資訊,請聯繫圖資處紙本論文服務櫃台。如有不便之處敬請見諒。 開放時間 available 已公開 available |
QR Code |