Responsive image
博碩士論文 etd-0101124-060938 詳細資訊
Title page for etd-0101124-060938
論文名稱
Title
組織去人性化如何以及何時影響員工工作態度
How and When Organizational Dehumanization Influences Employee Work Attitude
系所名稱
Department
畢業學年期
Year, semester
語文別
Language
學位類別
Degree
頁數
Number of pages
46
研究生
Author
指導教授
Advisor
召集委員
Convenor
口試委員
Advisory Committee
口試日期
Date of Exam
2024-01-16
繳交日期
Date of Submission
2024-02-01
關鍵字
Keywords
組織去人性化、組織導向自尊、情感性承諾、離職意圖、內控人格特質
organizational dehumanization, organization-based self-esteem, affective commitment, turnover intention, internal locus of control
統計
Statistics
本論文已被瀏覽 135 次,被下載 0
The thesis/dissertation has been browsed 135 times, has been downloaded 0 times.
中文摘要
本研究以組織去人性化為主軸,研討其對於組織自尊所產生之負面影響,並加 入內控人格特質作為調節變項,觀察賦有內控人格特質之員工在遭受組織去人性化 對待後,其最終行為是否受到內控人格特質調節,預設結果有二,其一為正向結 果,員工情感性承諾增加,使員工反求諸己,奮而為組織效力,抑或是走向負向結 果,使員工產生離職意圖,轉而離開組織。過往組織去人性化相關文獻雖已證實, 組織去人性化確實對組織自尊造成不良影響,而影響要素,以及後續不好的影響與 員工之情感型承諾之關聯尚待釐清。本論文以自我一致性理論為根基,檢驗組織去 人性化、組織自尊與員工情感性承諾之間的相互關聯,並探討內控人格特質於上述 結構中的調節作用,其作用效果將導向員工離職意圖抑或是增強員工情感性承諾。 此研究數據主要來源為國內金融服務業,共計 251 份有效問卷。 結果顯示,內控人 格特質在員工組織自尊與員工情感性承諾之間為正向關係,表明相較於低內控人格 特質之員工,具有高內控人格特質的員工在遭受組織去人性化所產生之負面效果及 員工情感性承諾當中具有較強之調節效果,因此較不易產生離職意圖。此外,結果 亦顯示,高內控人格特質員工即使在遭受組織去人性化之情況下,亦能保持其組織 自尊,為展現對於組織之自身價值,進而提升個人績效,此舉對於組織不僅可防止 員工流失,乃企業在達成目標過程中最關鍵之員工自發性。最後,結論針對組織去 人性化對於員工及組織之影響,以及深入洞察內控人格特質從何影響員工工作態 度,為將來研究方向提出相關建議。
Abstract
This study mainly focused on organizational dehumanization (OD), exploring its negative impact on organization-based self-esteem (OBSE), and added internal locus of control (ILC) traits as moderating role to observe whether the employees’ comportments with ILC would be changed after undergoing organizational dehumanization. There are two presupposed results, the positive result where employees' affective commitment increases, causing employees to improve themselves to serve the organization, and the negative one increases employees’ turnover intentions. Although earlier research on OD has delivered that OD negatively influenced on OBSE, the elements of how it impacts on individuals’ OBSE and the correlation of the negative impact and individuals’ affective commitment have yet to be clarified. This study is based on self-consistency theory to examine the correlation among OD, OBSE as well as employees’ affective commitment (AC), and explore its moderating role of internal locus of control (ILC) within the above-mentioned structures. Our data collection was retrieved from 251 incumbents in the domestic financial services industry. The findings demonstrates that higher ILC buffers the negative effects caused by OD on employees’ OBSE. Finally, our study was concluded with relevant suggestions for the direction of future research regarding the influence of OD on personnels and organizations, as well as in-depth insights into how organizational dehumanization affects employees' work attitude.
目次 Table of Contents
論文審定書 .....................................................................i
中文摘要 ....................................................................... ii
English Abstract............................................................ iii
Table of Contents...........................................................iv
List of Figures.................................................................vi
List of Tables ................................................................ vii
1. Introduction................................................................1
2. Literature Review and Hypotheses ...........................5
2.1 Organizational Dehumanization .............................5
2.2 Self-consistency Theory...........................................6
2.3 Organizational Dehumanization and Organization Based Self Esteem .........................................................7
2.4 OBSE as A Mediator Between Organizational Dehumanization and Affective Commitment ...............9
2.5 OBSE as A Mediator Between Organizational Dehumanization and Turnover Intentions ..................10
2.6 The Moderating Role of Internal Locus of Control...........................................................................11
2.7 Moderated Mediation Model ..................................13
3. Method.......................................................................16
3.1 Sample and procedure ...........................................16
3.2 Measures..................................................................17
3.2.1 Organizational Dehumanization......................... 17
3.2.2 Organization Based Self Esteem..........................18
3.2.3 Internal Locus of Control..................................... 18
3.2.4 Affective Commitment .........................................18
3.2.5 Turnover Intentions ............................................. 19
4. Results ....................................................................... 20
4.1 Construct Validity ....................................................20
4.2 Descriptive statistics ...............................................21
4.3 Mediating effect analysis.........................................22
4.4 Moderating effect analysis......................................23
4.5 Moderated mediation model analysis....................24
5. Discussion..................................................................28
5.1 Theoretical Implication ..........................................29
5.2 Practical Implication................................................30
5.3 Limitations and future research .............................31
6. References .................................................................33
參考文獻 References
Baek, S., Yoon, J., & Won, J. U. (2022). Association between Workers’ Anxiety over Technological Automation and Sleep Disturbance: Results from a Nationally Representative Survey. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 19(16), 10051. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph191610051

Bateman, T. S., & Crant, J. M. (1993). The proactive component of organizational behavior: A measure and correlates. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 14(2), 103–118. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.4030140202

Bell, C. M., & Khoury, C. (2016). Organizational powerlessness, dehumanization, and gendered effects of procedural justice. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 31(2), 570–585. https://doi.org/10.1108/jmp-09-2014-0267

Bono, J. E., & Judge, T. A. (2003). Core self‐evaluations: a review of the trait and its role in job satisfaction and job performance. European Journal of Personality, 17(1_suppl), S5–S18. https://doi.org/10.1002/per.481

Brison, N., Stinglhamber, F., & Caesens, G. (2022). Organizational Dehumanization. Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Psychology.
https://doi.org/10.1093/acrefore/9780190236557.013.902

Caesens, G., Stinglhamber, F., Demoulin, S., & De Wilde, M. (2017). Perceived organizational support and employees’ well-being: the mediating role of organizational dehumanization. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 26(4), 527–540. https://doi.org/10.1080/1359432x.2017.1319817

Caesens, G., Nguyen, N., & Stinglhamber, F. (2018). Abusive supervision and organizational dehumanization. Journal of Business and Psychology, 34(5), 709–728. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10869-018-9592-3

Chas, A., Betancor, V., Rodríguez, A., & Delgado, N. (2022). Not Humans, but animals or machines. Social Psychology, 53(3), 121–132. https://doi.org/10.1027/1864- 9335/a000481

Chan, S. C. H., Huang, X., Snape, E., & Lam, C. K. (2012). The Janus face of paternalistic leaders: authoritarianism, benevolence, subordinates’ organization-based self- esteem, and performance. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 34(1), 108–128. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.1797

Gao‐Urhahn, X., Biemann, T., & Jaros, S. J. (2016). How affective commitment to the organization changes over time: A longitudinal analysis of the reciprocal relationships between affective organizational commitment and income. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 37(4), 515–536. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.2088

Gyensare, M. A., Otoo, E., Asare, J., & Twumasi, E. (2015). Antecedents and consequence of employee turnover intention: Empirical evidence from Ghana. Management Science Letters, 781–796. https://doi.org/10.5267/j.msl.2015.5.010

Han, S. J., Bonn, M. A., & Cho, M. (2016). The relationship between customer incivility, restaurant frontline service employee burnout and turnover intention. International Journal of Hospitality Management, 52, 97–106. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhm.2015.10.002

Homolak, J. (2023). Opportunities and risks of ChatGPT in medicine, science, and academic publishing: a modern Promethean dilemma. Croatian Medical Journal, 64(1), 1–3. https://doi.org/10.3325/cmj.2023.64.1

Hougland, J. G., & Brockner, J. (1989). Self-Esteem at work: research, theory, and practice. Contemporary Sociology, 18(5), 717. https://doi.org/10.2307/2073311

Korman, A. K. (1970). Toward an hypothesis of work behavior. Journal of Applied Psychology, 54(1, Pt.1), 31–41. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0028656

Korman, A. K. (1971). Expectancies as determinants of performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 55(3), 218–222. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0031154

Lagios, C., Caesens, G., Nguyen, N., & Stinglhamber, F. (2022). Explaining the negative consequences of organizational dehumanization: The mediating role of psychological need thwarting. Journal of Personnel Psychology, 21(2), 86– 93. https://doi.org/10.1027/1866-5888/a000286

Lopez, E. M. (1982). A test of the self-Consistency theory of the job performance--job satisfaction relationship. Academy of Management Journal, 25(2), 335–348. https://doi.org/10.2307/255995

Lecky, P. (1945). Self-consistency: A Theory of Personality.

Leary, M. R., & Downs, D. L. (1995). Interpersonal functions of the self-esteem motive.
Efficacy, Agency, and Self-Esteem, 123–144. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4899-
1280-0_7

Llamas, J. D., Morgan Consoli, M. L., Hendricks, K., & Nguyen, K. (2018). Latino/a freshman
struggles: effects of locus of control and social support on intragroupmarginalization and distress. Journal of Latina/O Psychology, 6(2), 131–148.
https://doi.org/10.1037/lat0000089

Parkes, K. R. (1984). Locus of control, cognitive appraisal, and coping in stressful episodes.
Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 46(3), 655–668.
https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.46.3.655

Pierce, J. L., Gardner, D. G., Cummings, L. L., & Dunham, R. B. (1989). Organization-based
self-Esteem: construct definition, measurement, and validation. Academy of
Management Journal, 32(3), 622–648. https://doi.org/10.5465/256437

Pierce, J. L., & Gardner, D. G. (2004). Self-esteem within the work and organizational context:
a review of the organization-based self-esteem literature. Journal of Management,
30(5), 591–622. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jm.2003.10.001

Rotter, J. B. (1966). Generalized expectancies for internal versus external control of
reinforcement. Psychological Monographs: General and Applied, 80(1), 1–28. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0092976

Solomon, Z., Mikulincer, M., & Avitzur, E. (1988). Coping, locus of control, social support, and combat-related posttraumatic stress disorder: a prospective study. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 55(2), 279–285. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-
3514.55.2.279

Stinglhamber, F., Nguyen, N., Ohana, M., Lagios, C., Demoulin, S., & Maurage, P. (2022). For whom and why organizational dehumanization is linked to deviant
behaviours. Journal of Occupational and Organizational
Psychology. https://doi.org/10.1111/joop.12409

Spector, P. E. (1988). Development of the Work Locus of Control Scale. Journal of Occupational Psychology, 61(4), 335–340. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2044- 8325.1988.tb00470.x

Spector, P. E., Cooper, C. L., Sanchez, J. I., O’Driscoll, M., Sparks, K., Bernin, P., Büssing, A., Dewe, P., Hart, P., Lu, L., Miller, K., de Moraes, L. F. R., Ostrognay, G. M., Pagon, M., Pitariu, H., Poelmans, S., Radhakrishnan, P., Russinova, V., Salamatov, V., . . . Yu, S. (2001). Do national levels of individualism and internal locus of control relate to well-being: an ecological level international study. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 22(8), 815–832. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.118

Strickland, B. R. (1978). Internal–external expectancies and health-related behaviors. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 46(6), 1192–1211. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-006x.46.6.1192

Tan, G. Y. W., & Kong, Y. P. (1997). Antecedents of Organization-Based Self-Esteem: an empirical study in Singapore. The International Journal of Management, 14(3), 375. https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/lkcsb_research/2687/

Tepper, B. J., Carr, J. C., Breaux, D. M., Geider, S. Hu, C., & Hua, W. (2009). Abusive supervision, intentions to quit, and employees’ workplace deviance: A power/dependence analysis. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes,109, 156-167. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.obhdp.2009.03.004

Tharanga Sumanasiri, E. G., Ab Yajid, M. S., & Khatibi, A. (2016). Organization-based self- Esteem (OBSE) and its influence on self-perceived employability (SPE) of IT export sector employees in Sri Lanka. European Scientific Journal, ESJ, 12(14), 124. https://doi.org/10.19044/esj.2016.v12n14p124

Thagard, P. (2018, June 20). The Psychology of Dehumanization. Psychology Today. https://www.psychologytoday.com/intl/blog/hot-thought/201806/the-psychology- dehumanization

Väyrynen, T., & Laari-Salmela, S. (2015). Men, mammals, or machines? dehumanization embedded in organizational practices. Journal of Business Ethics, 147(1), 95–113. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-015-2947-z

Xiao, L., Chen, Z. X., Ashford, S. J., Lee, C., & Qian, J. (2018). A self-consistency motivation analysis of employee reactions to job insecurity: The roles of organization-based self-esteem and proactive personality. Journal of Business Research, 92, 168– 178. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2018.07.028

Xiong Chen, Z., & Aryee, S. (2007). Delegation and employee work outcomes: an examination of the cultural context of mediating processes in China. Academy of Management Journal, 50(1), 226–238. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2007.24162389

Zhenjing, G., Chupradit, S., Ku, K. Y., Nassani, A. A., & Haffar, M. (2022). Impact of Employees’ workplace environment on Employees’ performance: A Multi- Mediation Model. Frontiers in Public
Health, 10. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2022.890400
電子全文 Fulltext
本電子全文僅授權使用者為學術研究之目的,進行個人非營利性質之檢索、閱讀、列印。請遵守中華民國著作權法之相關規定,切勿任意重製、散佈、改作、轉貼、播送,以免觸法。
論文使用權限 Thesis access permission:自定論文開放時間 user define
開放時間 Available:
校內 Campus:開放下載的時間 available 2029-02-01
校外 Off-campus:開放下載的時間 available 2029-02-01

您的 IP(校外) 位址是 3.139.235.177
現在時間是 2024-11-21
論文校外開放下載的時間是 2029-02-01

Your IP address is 3.139.235.177
The current date is 2024-11-21
This thesis will be available to you on 2029-02-01.

紙本論文 Printed copies
紙本論文的公開資訊在102學年度以後相對較為完整。如果需要查詢101學年度以前的紙本論文公開資訊,請聯繫圖資處紙本論文服務櫃台。如有不便之處敬請見諒。
開放時間 available 2029-02-01

QR Code