Responsive image
博碩士論文 etd-0207123-190348 詳細資訊
Title page for etd-0207123-190348
論文名稱
Title
非家庭員工對家族企業雇主品牌之知覺與離職意願:採用工作鑲嵌角度之中介與調節模型
Nonfamily Employees' Perceptions of Family Employer Brand and Turnover Intention: a Mediation and Moderation Model from the Job Embeddedness Perspective
系所名稱
Department
畢業學年期
Year, semester
語文別
Language
學位類別
Degree
頁數
Number of pages
115
研究生
Author
指導教授
Advisor
召集委員
Convenor
口試委員
Advisory Committee
口試日期
Date of Exam
2023-01-13
繳交日期
Date of Submission
2023-03-07
關鍵字
Keywords
雇主品牌、動機、職級、離職意願、工作敬業、非家族員工
employer brand, motivation, occupational rank, turnover intention, work engagement, nonfamily employee
統計
Statistics
本論文已被瀏覽 164 次,被下載 0
The thesis/dissertation has been browsed 164 times, has been downloaded 0 times.
中文摘要
本研究主要目的是以組織功能屬性與象徵屬性進行調查在職非家族員工對家族企業的品牌之評價,並檢驗家族企業雇主品牌之感知對其目前工作和組織的態度與行為;另檢驗在工作敬業的中介作用之下,非家族員工對功能屬性及象徵屬性之感知對其離職意願的影響。此外,本研究亦檢驗了非家族員工的職級及動機對功能屬性與象徵屬性與工作敬業關係之調節影響。本研究採量化研究法,進行蒐集越南家族企業之實徵數據,由非家族員工與其直屬主管共同作答,共收集209份之問卷。所獲得資料以偏最小平方法的結構方程模型(PLS-SEM),與SMARTPLS 3.0軟體進行資料分析。研究結果如下:(1)非家族員工對其所在的家族企業有相當正面的評價;(2)非家族員工對家族企業的功能屬性感知與其離職意願未達顯著相關,而對象徵屬性的感知達顯著相關;(3)工作敬業在非家族員工的功能屬性感知與離職意願之間有完全中介作用,在非家族員工象徵屬性感知與離職意願之間有部分中介作用;(4)非家族員工動機的調節作用未得到支持;(5)當職級為非家族員工感知與工作敬業的調節變項,結果顯示藍領員工在功能屬性感知與工作敬業之關係較好,而白領員工在象徵屬性感知與工作敬業之關係較好。本研究之結果提供相關理論及管理內涵,並供家族企業研究及管理其雇主品牌與如何保有家族企業之優質勞動力作為參考。

Abstract
The objective of this study is to investigate the impact of nonfamily employees’ perceptions of the family employer brand (FEB), based on the organizational instrumental and symbolic attributes, on turnover intention, and the mediator (i.e., work engagement) and moderator (i.e., work motivation and occupational rank) for this relationship. More specifically this study assesses the evaluation of incumbent nonfamily employees in the family business on the employer brand based on the organizational instrumental and symbolic attributes. In addition, the impact of nonfamily employees’ perceptions of instrumental attributes and symbolic attributes on their turnover intention with the mediating role of work engagement. In addition, the moderating effects of occupational rank and motivation of nonfamily employees in the relationship between their perceptions of instrumental attributes and symbolic attributes on work engagement were tested.
This study used the quantitative research approach with empirical data collected from a survey of target respondents working in family businesses in Vietnam. 209 pairs of nonfamily employees and their direct managers data was collected by structured questionnaires with two raters (nonfamily employees and their direct managers).
The results of the Partial Least Squares-Structural Equation Modeling (PLS-SEM) with SMARTPLS 3.0 found that: (1) nonfamily employees had a relatively positive evaluation on the family business where they are working for; (2) nonfamily employees’ perceptions of instrumental attributes of family business are not correlated to their turnover intention while their perceptions of symbolic attributes are significantly correlated; (3) work engagement fully mediates the relationship between nonfamily employees’ perceptions of instrumental attributes and their turnover intention while partially mediates the relationship between nonfamily employees’ perceptions of symbolic attributes and their turnover intention; (4) the moderating effect of nonfamily employees’ motivation were not supported; (5) the occupational rank moderates the relationship between nonfamily employees’ perceptions and work engagement, such that, the relationship between nonfamily employees’ perceptions instrumental attributes and work engagement stronger for blue-collar workers while the relationship between nonfamily employees’ perceptions of symbolic attributes and work engagement stronger for white-collar workers.
These findings are expected to benefit theoretical and managerial implications for employer brand research as well as managing and retaining the workforce in family businesses.
目次 Table of Contents
Dissertation validation letter i
Acknowledgements ii
摘要 iii
Abstract iv
Table of content vi
Table of figures viii
Table of tables ix
Chapter 1. Introduction 1
Chapter 2. Literature review and hypotheses development 12
2.1. Definition of family business 12
2.2. Theory and hypothesis development 13
2.2.1. The job embeddedness theory 13
2.2.2. Family business employer brand, work engagement, and turnover intention 14
2.2.3. Moderating effects of nonfamily employee heterogeneity 21
Chapter 3. Research methodology 27
3.1. Research framework and research process 27
3.2. Samples 29
3.3. Measures 34
3.4. Data analysis 38
3.4.1. The measurement model assessment 39
3.4.2. The structural model assessment 42
Chapter 4. Results 45
4.1. Measurement items descriptive and correlation analysis 45
4.2. Measurement model assessment 50
4.2.1. First-order construct measurement model assessment 50
4.2.2. Seccond-order construct measurement model assessment 56
4.2.3. Common method variance. 59
4.3. Structural model assessment and hypotheses testing 60
4.4. Robustness check 70
Chapter 5. Discussion and Conclusion 72
5.1. Discussion 72
5.2. Theoretical Contributions 76
5.3. Limitations and future recommendations 77
5.4. Managerial and Practical Implications 79
References 83
Appendix 91
Appendix 1. Questionnaire for Employees 92
Appendix 2. Questionnaire for managers 95
Appendix 3. Measurement Scales 96
Appendix 4. Robustness check model 99
Appendix 5. The results of statistical analysis model – Robustness check 100
Appendix 6. Consent forms of the experts participating in this study 102
Appendix 7. Recommendation letter to the target companies 104

參考文獻 References
Acikgoz, Y. (2019). Employee recruitment and job search: Towards a multi-level integration. Human Resource Management Review, 29(1), 1-13. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hrmr.2018.02.009
Aldousari, A. A., Robertson, A., Yajid, M. S. A., & Ahmed, Z. U. (2017). Impact of employer branding on organization’s performance. Journal of Transnational Management, 22(3), 153-170. https://doi.org/10.1080/15475778.2017.1335125
Alfes, K., Shantz, A. D., Truss, C., & Soane, E. C. (2013). The link between perceived human resource management practices, engagement and employee behaviour: a moderated mediation model. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 24(2), 330-351. https://doi.org/10.1080/09585192.2012.679950
Ambler, T., & Barrow, S. (1996). The employer brand. Journal of Brand Management, 4(3), 185-206. https://doi.org/10.1057/bm.1996.42
Arijs, D., Botero, I. C., Michiels, A., & Molly, V. (2018). Family business employer brand: Understanding applicants' perceptions and their job pursuit intentions with samples from the US and Belgium. Journal of Family Business Strategy, 9(3), 180-191. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfbs.2018.08.005
Ashforth, B., & Mael, F. (1996). Organizational identity and strategy as a context for the individual. Advances in Strategic Management, 13, 19-64.
Astrachan, C. B., Botero, I., Astrachan, J. H., & Prügl, R. (2018). Branding the family firm: A review, integrative framework proposal, and research agenda. Journal of Family Business Strategy, 9(1), 3-15. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfbs.2018.01.002
Astrachan, J. H., & Shanker, M. C. (2003). Family businesses’ contribution to the U.S. economy: a closer look. Family Business Review, 16(3), 211-219. https://doi.org/10.1177/08944865030160030601
Azoury, A., Daou, L., & Sleiaty, F. (2013). Employee engagement in family and non-family firms. International Strategic Management Review, 1(1), 11-29. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ism.2013.08.002
Bagozzi, R. P., Yi, Y., & Phillips, L. W. (1991). Assessing construct validity in organizational research. Administrative science quarterly, 36(3), 421-458. https://doi.org/10.2307/2393203
Barroso Martínez, A., Sanguino Galván, R., Botero, I. C., González-López, Ó. R., & Buenadicha Mateos, M. (2019). Exploring family business brands: Understanding predictors and effects. Journal of Family Business Strategy, 10(1), 57-68. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfbs.2019.01.005
Bell, E., Bryman, A., & Harley, B. (2018). Business research methods. Oxford university press.
Bernhard, F., & O'Driscoll, M. P. (2011). Psychological ownership in small family-owned businesses: leadership style and nonfamily-employees' work attitudes and behaviors. Group & Organization Management, 36(3), 345-384. https://doi.org/10.1177/1059601111402684
Berrone, P., Cruz, C., & Gomez-Mejia, L. R. (2012). Socioemotional wealth in family firms: Theoretical dimensions, assessment approaches, and agenda for future research. Family Business Review, 25(3), 258-279.
Block, J. H., Fisch, C. O., Lau, J., Obschonka, M., & Presse, A. (2016). Who prefers working in family firms? An exploratory study of individuals’ organizational preferences across 40 countries. Journal of Family Business Strategy, 7(2), 65-74. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfbs.2016.04.001
Botero, I. C. (2014). Effects of communicating family ownership and organisational size on an applicant's attraction to a firm: An empirical examination in the USA and China. Journal of Family Business Strategy, 5(2), 184-196. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfbs.2014.01.004
Bracken, B. A., & Barona, A. (1991). State of the Art Procedures for Translating, Validating and Using Psychoeducational Tests in Cross-Cultural Assessment. School Psychology International, 12(1-2), 119-132. https://doi.org/10.1177/0143034391121010
Brunner, M., & SÜβ, H.-M. (2005). Analyzing the reliability of multidimensional measures: an example from intelligence research. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 65(2), 227-240. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013164404268669
Carlson, D. S., Upton, N., & Seaman, S. (2006). The impact of human resource practices and compensation design on performance: an analysis of family-owned SMEs. Journal of Small Business Management, 44(4), 531-543. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-627X.2006.00188.x
Cascio, W. F. (2014). Leveraging employer branding, performance management and human resource development to enhance employee retention. Human Resource Development International, 17(2), 121-128. https://doi.org/10.1080/13678868.2014.886443
Chen, G., Ployhart, R. E., Thomas, H. C., Anderson, N., & Bliese, P. D. (2011). The power of momentum: a new model of dynamic relationships between job satisfaction change and turnover intentions. Academy of Management Journal, 54(1), 159-181. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2011.59215089
Chin, W. W. (1998). The partial least squares approach to structural equation modeling. Modern methods for business research, 295(2), 295-336.
Chrisman, J. J., Memili, E., & Misra, K. (2014). Nonfamily managers, family firms, and the winner's curse: The influence of noneconomic goals and bounded rationality. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 38(5), 1-25.
Chrisman, J. J., & Patel, P. C. (2012). Variations in R&D investments of family and nonfamily firms: behavioral agency and myopic loss aversion perspectives. The Academy of Management Journal, 55(4), 976-997. http://www.jstor.org/stable/23317622
Christian, M. S., Garza, A. S., & Slaughter, J. E. (2011). Work engagement: A quantitative review and test of its relations with task and contextual performance. Personnel Psychology, 64, 89-136. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-6570.2010.01203.x
Chua, J. H., Chrisman, J. J., Steier, L. P., & Rau, S. B. (2012). Sources of heterogeneity in family firms: an introduction. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 36(6), 1103-1113. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6520.2012.00540.x
Cohen, A., & Diamant, A. (2019). The role of justice perceptions in determining counterproductive work behaviors. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 30(20), 2901-2924. https://doi.org/10.1080/09585192.2017.1340321
De Masi, S., Słomka-Gołębiowska, A., & Paci, A. (2022). Women on boards and corporate environmental performance in Italian companies: The importance of nomination background [https://doi.org/10.1111/beer.12467]. Business Ethics, the Environment & Responsibility, 31(4), 981-998. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/beer.12467
Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (2002). Handbook of self-determination research. University of Rochester Press.
Eberly, M. B., Bluhm, D. J., Guarana, C., Avolio, B. J., & Hannah, S. T. (2017). Staying after the storm: How transformational leadership relates to follower turnover intentions in extreme contexts. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 102, 72-85. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvb.2017.07.004
Eddleston, K. A., Kellermanns, F. W., & Sarathy, R. (2008). Resource configuration in family firms: Linking resources, strategic planning and technological opportunities to performance [https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6486.2007.00717.x]. Journal of Management Studies, 45(1), 26-50. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6486.2007.00717.x
Edwards, M. R. (2010). An integrative review of employer branding and OB theory. Personnel Review, 39(1), 5-23. https://doi.org/10.1108/00483481011012809
Fang, H., Memili, E., Chrisman, J. J., & Welsh, D. H. (2012). Family firms' professionalization: Institutional theory and resource-based view perspectives. Small Business Institute® Journal (SBIJ), 8(2).
Fang, H. C., Memili, E., Chrisman, J. J., & Penney, C. (2017). Industry and information asymmetry: the case of the employment of non-family managers in small and medium-sized family firms [https://doi.org/10.1111/jsbm.12267]. Journal of Small Business Management, 55(4), 632-648. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/jsbm.12267
Farrington, S., Venter, E., & Sharp, G. (2014). Extrinsic rewards in family businesses: Perspectives of nonfamily employees. South African Journal of Business Management, 45(3), 67-79.
Flack, J., & Klein, R. (2022). Family Businesses Have a Talent-Acquisition Advantage. Harvard Business Review. https://hbr.org/2022/09/family-businesses-have-a-talent-acquisition-advantage
Fornell, C., & Bookstein, F. L. (1982). Two structural equation models: LISREL and PLS applied to consumer exit-voice theory. Journal of Marketing Research, 19(4), 440-452. https://doi.org/10.1177/002224378201900406
Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981). Structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error: algebra and statistics. Journal of Marketing Research, 18(3), 382-388. https://doi.org/10.1177/002224378101800313
Gagneo, M., Chemolli, E., Forest, J., & Koestner, R. (2008). A temporal analysis of the relation between organisational commitment and work motivation. Psychologica Belgica, 48(2-3), 219-241. https://doi.org/10.5334/pb-48-2-3-219
Ghosh, D., & Gurunathan, L. (2015). Job embeddedness: a ten-year literature review and proposed guidelines. Global Business Review, 16(5), 856-866. https://doi.org/10.1177/0972150915591652
Gómez-Mejía, L. R., Haynes, K. T., Núñez-Nickel, M., Jacobson, K. J., & Moyano-Fuentes, J. J. A. s. q. (2007). Socioemotional wealth and business risks in family-controlled firms: Evidence from Spanish olive oil mills. 52(1), 106-137.
Gomez-Mejia, L. R., Larraza-Kintana, M., & Makri, M. (2003). The determinants of executive compensation in family-controlled public corporations. The Academy of Management Journal, 46(2), 226-237. https://doi.org/10.2307/30040616
Gottschalck, N., Guenther, C., & Kellermanns, F. (2020). For whom are family-owned firms good employers? An exploratory study of the turnover intentions of blue- and white-collar workers in family-owned and non-family-owned firms. Journal of Family Business Strategy, 11(3), 100281. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfbs.2019.02.004
Gupta, M., & Shaheen, M. (2017). Impact of work engagement on turnover intention: Moderation by psychological capital in India. Business: Theory and Practice, 18, 136-143. https://doi.org/10.3846/btp.2017.014
Habbershon, T. G., & Williams, M. L. J. F. b. r. (1999). A resource-based framework for assessing the strategic advantages of family firms. 12(1), 1-25.
Hair, J. F., Matthews, L. M., Matthews, R. L., & Sarstedt, M. (2017). PLS-SEM or CB-SEM: updated guidelines on which method to use. International Journal of Multivariate Data Analysis, 1(2), 107-123. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJMDA.2017.087624
Hair, J. F., Risher, J. J., Sarstedt, M., & Ringle, C. M. (2019). When to use and how to report the results of PLS-SEM. European Business Review, 31(1), 2-24. https://doi.org/10.1108/EBR-11-2018-0203
Hair Jr, J. F., Sarstedt, M., Ringle, C. M., & Gudergan, S. P. (2017). Advanced issues in partial least squares structural equation modeling. Sage publications.
Hall, A., & Nordqvist, M. (2008). Professional management in family businesses: toward an extended understanding. Family Business Review, 21(1), 51-69. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1741-6248.2007.00109.x
Harju, L. K., Hakanen, J. J., & Schaufeli, W. B. (2016). Can job crafting reduce job boredom and increase work engagement? A three-year cross-lagged panel study. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 95-96, 11-20. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvb.2016.07.001
Henseler, J., Ringle, C. M., & Sarstedt, M. (2015). A new criterion for assessing discriminant validity in variance-based structural equation modeling. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 43(1), 115-135. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11747-014-0403-8
Hiebl, M. R., & Li, Z. (2018). Non-family managers in family firms: review, integrative framework and future research agenda. Review of Managerial Science, 1-45.
Jaufenthaler, P. (2022). A safe haven in times of crisis: The appeal of family companies as employers amid the COVID-19 pandemic. Journal of Family Business Strategy, 100520. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfbs.2022.100520
Kahlert, C., Botero, I. C., & Prügl, R. (2017). Revealing the family: Effects of being perceived as a family firm in the recruiting market in Germany. Journal of Family Business Management, 7(1), 21-43. https://doi.org/10.1108/JFBM-10-2015-0037
Kashyap, V., & Rangnekar, S. (2016). Servant leadership, employer brand perception, trust in leaders and turnover intentions: a sequential mediation model. Review of Managerial Science, 10(3), 437-461. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11846-014-0152-6
Kashyap, V., & Verma, N. (2018). Linking dimensions of employer branding and turnover intentions. International Journal of Organizational Analysis, 26(2), 282-295. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJOA-03-2017-1134
Khanin, D., Turel, O., & Mahto, R. V. (2012). How to increase job satisfaction and reduce turnover intentions in the family firm: The family–business embeddedness perspective. Family Business Review, 25(4), 391-408.
Kjærgaard, A. L. (2009). Organizational identity and strategy: an empirical study of organizational identity's influence on the strategy-making process. International Studies of Management & Organization, 39(1), 50-69. http://www.jstor.org/stable/40397751
Kline, R. B. (2011). The SAGE Handbook of Innovation in Social Research Methods. In. SAGE Publications Ltd. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781446268261
Kooij, D. T. A. M., Tims, M., & Akkermans, J. (2017). The influence of future time perspective on work engagement and job performance: the role of job crafting. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 26(1), 4-15. https://doi.org/10.1080/1359432X.2016.1209489
Landay, K., & DeArmond, S. (2018). Recruitment Process Outsourcing and Recruiter and Hiring Firm Characteristics: A Two Study Investigation. Journal of Personnel Psychology, 17, 183-192. https://doi.org/10.1027/1866-5888/a000206
Lee, T. W., Mitchell, T. R., Sablynski, C. J., Burton, J. P., & Holtom, B. C. (2004). The effects of job embeddedness on organizational citizenship, job performance, volitional absences, and voluntary turnover. The Academy of Management Journal, 47(5), 711-722. https://doi.org/10.2307/20159613
Lievens, F. (2007). Employer branding in the Belgian Army: The importance of instrumental and symbolic beliefs for potential applicants, actual applicants, and military employees [https://doi.org/10.1002/hrm.20145]. Human Resource Management, 46(1), 51-69. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1002/hrm.20145
Lievens, F., & Highhouse, S. (2003). The relation of instrumental and symbolic attributes to a company's attractiveness as an employer. Personnel Psychology, 56, 75-102.
Lievens, F., & Slaughter, J. E. (2016). Employer image and employer branding: what we know and what we need to know. Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior, 3(1), 407-440. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-orgpsych-041015-062501
Lumpkin, G. T., Martin, W., & Vaughn, M. (2008). Family orientation: individual-level influences on family firm outcomes. Family Business Review, 21(2), 127-138. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1741-6248.2008.00120.x
Luo, X., & Chung, C.-N. (2005). Keeping it all in the family: the role of particularistic relationships in business group performance during institutional transition. Administrative science quarterly, 50(3), 404-439. https://doi.org/10.2189/asqu.2005.50.3.404
Martin, G. (2008). Employer branding and corporate reputation management: A model and some evidence. The Peak Performing Organization. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203971611
Memili, E., & Barnett, T. (2008). Nonfamily employees' perceptions of person-organization fit and voluntary turnover in family firms. Academy of Management Proceedings, 2008(1), 1-6. https://doi.org/10.5465/ambpp.2008.33650251
Memili, E., & Welsh, D. H. B. (2012). Towards a theory of nonfamily employees' organizational identification and attachment in family firms. Journal of Technology Management in China, 7(3), 255-269. https://doi.org/10.1108/17468771311325167
Miller, D., Le Breton-Miller, I., Lester, R. H., & Cannella Jr, A. A. (2007). Are family firms really superior performers? Journal of Corporate Finance, 13(5), 829-858.
Mitchell, T. R., Holtom, B. C., Lee, T. W., Sablynski, C. J., & Erez, M. (2001). Why people stay: using job embeddedness to predict voluntary turnover. Academy of Management Journal, 44(6), 1102-1121. https://doi.org/10.5465/3069391
Morrell, K. M., Loan-Clarke, J., & Wilkinson, A. J. (2004). Organisational change and employee turnover. Personnel Review, 33(2), 161-173. https://doi.org/10.1108/00483480410518022
Neckebrouck, J., Schulze, W., & Zellweger, T. (2018). Are family firms good employers? Academy of Management Journal, 61(2), 553-585. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2016.0765
Neubaum, D. O. (2018). Family business research: Roads travelled and the search for unworn paths. Family Business Review, 31(3), 259-270. https://doi.org/10.1177/0894486518792948
Nguyen, B., & Vu, N. (2021). Achievements, challenges, and new directions of family business in Vietnam. In The Routledge Companion to Asian Family Business (pp. 407-424). Routledge.
Nunnally, J. C., & Bernstein, I. H. (1994). Psychometric theory (3rd Edition ed.). McGraw-Hill Inc.,.
Pett, M. A., Lackey, N. R., & Sullivan, J. J. (2003). Making sense of factor analysis: The use of factor analysis for instrument development in health care research. sage.
Pinder, C. C. (2014). Work motivation in organizational behavior. psychology press.
Pittino, D., Visintin, F., Lenger, T., & Sternad, D. (2016). Are high performance work practices really necessary in family SMEs? An analysis of the impact on employee retention. Journal of Family Business Strategy, 7(2), 75-89. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfbs.2016.04.002
Podsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, S. B., Lee, J. Y., & Podsakoff, N. P. (2003). Common method biases in behavioral research: a critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88(5), 879-903. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.88.5.879
Podsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, S. B., & Podsakoff, N. P. (2012). Sources of method bias in social science research and recommendations on how to control it. Annual review of psychology, 63(1), 539-569.
Putra, E. D., Cho, S., & Liu, J. (2015). Extrinsic and intrinsic motivation on work engagement in the hospitality industry: Test of motivation crowding theory. Tourism and Hospitality Research, 17(2), 228-241. https://doi.org/10.1177/1467358415613393
PWC. (2021). From trust to impact Vietnam Report - Why family businesses need to act now to ensure their legacy tomorrow. https://www.pwc.com/vn/en/publications/vietnam-publications/family-business-survey.html
Rigdon, E. E. (2012). Rethinking partial least squares path modeling: In praise of simple methods. Long Range Planning, 45(5), 341-358. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lrp.2012.09.010
Ringle, C. M., Sarstedt, M., Mitchell, R., & Gudergan, S. P. (2020). Partial least squares structural equation modeling in HRM research. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 31(12), 1617-1643. https://doi.org/10.1080/09585192.2017.1416655
Rovelli, P., Benedetti, C., Fronzetti Colladon, A., & De Massis, A. (2022). As long as you talk about me: The importance of family firm brands and the contingent role of family-firm identity. Journal of Business Research, 139, 692-700. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2021.09.075
Sarstedt, M., Hair, J. F., Cheah, J.-H., Becker, J.-M., & Ringle, C. M. (2019). How to specify, estimate, and validate higher-order constructs in PLS-SEM. Australasian Marketing Journal (AMJ), 27(3), 197-211. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ausmj.2019.05.003
Sarstedt, M., Ringle, C. M., Smith, D., Reams, R., & Hair, J. F. (2014). Partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM): A useful tool for family business researchers. Journal of Family Business Strategy, 5(1), 105-115. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfbs.2014.01.002
Schaubroeck, J., Shaw, J. D., Duffy, M. K., & Mitra, A. (2008). An under-met and over-met expectations model of employee reactions to merit raises. J Appl Psychol, 93(2), 424-434. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.93.2.424
Schaufeli, W. B., Bakker, A. B., & Salanova, M. (2006). The measurement of work engagement with a short questionnaire: A cross-national study. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 66(4), 701-716. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013164405282471
Schaufeli, W. B., Martínez, I. M., Pinto, A. M., Salanova, M., & Bakker, A. B. (2002). Burnout and engagement in university students: A cross-national study. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 33(5), 464-481. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022022102033005003
Schaufeli, W. B., Salanova, M., González-romá, V., & Bakker, A. B. (2002). The measurement of engagement and burnout: A two sample confirmatory factor analytic approach. Journal of Happiness Studies, 3(1), 71-92. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1015630930326
Schneider, B., Smith, D. B., & Paul, M. C. (2012). P–E fit and the attraction-selection-attrition model of organizational functioning: Introduction and overview. In Work motivation in the context of a globalizing economy (pp. 233-248). Psychology Press.
Schreurs, B., Druart, C., Proost, K., & De Witte, K. (2009). Symbolic attributes and organizational attractiveness: The moderating effects of applicant personality. International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 17(1), 35-46. https://doi.org/doi:10.1111/j.1468-2389.2009.00449.x
Shane-Simpson, C., Schwartz, A. M., Abi-Habib, R., Tohme, P., & Obeid, R. (2020). I love my selfie! An investigation of overt and covert narcissism to understand selfie-posting behaviors within three geographic communities. Computers in Human Behavior, 104, 106158.
Sharma, N., & Kamalanabhan, T. J. (2012). Internal corporate communication and its impact on internal branding. Corporate Communications: An International Journal, 17(3), 300-322. https://doi.org/10.1108/13563281211253548
Sharma, P. (2004). An overview of the field of family business studies: Current status and directions for the future. Family Business Review, 17(1), 1-36. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1741-6248.2004.00001.x
Sieger, P., Bernhard, F., & Frey, U. (2011). Affective commitment and job satisfaction among non-family employees: Investigating the roles of justice perceptions and psychological ownership. Journal of Family Business Strategy, 2(2), 78-89. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfbs.2011.03.003
Slaughter, J. E., Zickar, M. J., Highhouse, S., & Mohr, D. C. (2004). Personality trait inferences about organizations: Development of a measure and assessment of construct validity. Journal of Applied Psychology, 89(1), 85-103. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.89.1.85
Swystun, J. (2007). F. In J. Swystun (Ed.), The Brand Glossary (pp. 47-50). Palgrave Macmillan UK. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230626409_6
Tabor, W., Chrisman, J. J., Madison, K., & Vardaman, J. M. (2017). Nonfamily members in family firms: A review and future research agenda. Family Business Review, 31(1), 54-79. https://doi.org/10.1177/0894486517734683
Tekleab, A. G., Sims, H. P., Yun, S., Tesluk, P. E., & Cox, J. (2007). Are we on the same page? Effects of self-awareness of empowering and transformational leadership. Journal of Leadership & Organizational Studies, 14(3), 185-201. https://doi.org/10.1177/1071791907311069
Tinsley, H. E. A., & Tinsley, D. J. (1987). Uses of factor analysis in counseling psychology research. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 34, 414-424. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0167.34.4.414
Tremblay, M. A., Blanchard, C. M., Taylor, S., Pelletier, L. G., & Villeneuve, M. (2009). Work extrinsic and intrinsic motivation scale: Its value for organizational psychology research. Canadian Journal of Behavioural Science / Revue canadienne des sciences du comportement, 41(4), 213-226. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0015167
Vallerand, R. J. (1997). Toward a hierarchical model of intrinsic and extrinsic motivation. In M. P. Zanna (Ed.), Advances in Experimental Social Psychology (Vol. 29, pp. 271-360). Academic Press. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/S0065-2601(08)60019-2
Van Hoye, G., Bas, T., Cromheecke, S., & Lievens, F. (2013). The instrumental and symbolic dimensions of organisations' image as an employer: A large-scale field study on employer branding in turkey. Applied Psychology, 62, 543-557. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1464-0597.2012.00495.x
Van Hoye, G., & Saks, A. (2011). The instrumental-symbolic framework: Organisational image and attractiveness of potential applicants and their companions at a job fair. Applied Psychology, 60, 311-335. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1464-0597.2010.00437.x
Vardaman, J. M., Allen, D. G., & Rogers, B. L. (2018). We are friends but are we family? Organizational identification and nonfamily employee turnover. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 42(2), 290-309. https://doi.org/10.1177/1042258717749235
Zahari, N., & Kaliannan, M. (2022). Antecedents of Work Engagement in the Public Sector: A Systematic Literature Review. Review of Public Personnel Administration, 0734371X221106792. https://doi.org/10.1177/0734371X221106792

電子全文 Fulltext
本電子全文僅授權使用者為學術研究之目的,進行個人非營利性質之檢索、閱讀、列印。請遵守中華民國著作權法之相關規定,切勿任意重製、散佈、改作、轉貼、播送,以免觸法。
論文使用權限 Thesis access permission:自定論文開放時間 user define
開放時間 Available:
校內 Campus:開放下載的時間 available 2026-03-07
校外 Off-campus:開放下載的時間 available 2026-03-07

您的 IP(校外) 位址是 44.211.26.178
現在時間是 2024-06-13
論文校外開放下載的時間是 2026-03-07

Your IP address is 44.211.26.178
The current date is 2024-06-13
This thesis will be available to you on 2026-03-07.

紙本論文 Printed copies
紙本論文的公開資訊在102學年度以後相對較為完整。如果需要查詢101學年度以前的紙本論文公開資訊,請聯繫圖資處紙本論文服務櫃台。如有不便之處敬請見諒。
開放時間 available 2026-03-07

QR Code