論文使用權限 Thesis access permission:校內校外完全公開 unrestricted
開放時間 Available:
校內 Campus: 已公開 available
校外 Off-campus: 已公開 available
論文名稱 Title |
從公司控制型態與股權結構來解釋台灣上市上櫃公司的薪資差異 Explaining the Wage Differences of Listed Companies in Taiwan from the Perspective of Corporate Control Types and Equity Structures |
||
系所名稱 Department |
|||
畢業學年期 Year, semester |
語文別 Language |
||
學位類別 Degree |
頁數 Number of pages |
82 |
|
研究生 Author |
|||
指導教授 Advisor |
|||
召集委員 Convenor |
|||
口試委員 Advisory Committee |
|||
口試日期 Date of Exam |
2023-06-12 |
繳交日期 Date of Submission |
2023-06-16 |
關鍵字 Keywords |
公司控制型態、股權結構、台灣、薪資差異、分量迴歸 Corporate Control Types, Equity Structure, Taiwan, Wage Disparity, Quantile Regression |
||
統計 Statistics |
本論文已被瀏覽 191 次,被下載 20 次 The thesis/dissertation has been browsed 191 times, has been downloaded 20 times. |
中文摘要 |
過去已有不少文獻研究台灣低薪的成因,多由產業結構與勞動市場條件等原因切入,本研究則從公司控制型態與股權結構出發,推論具有家族色彩之公司是導致低薪的原因之一。本研究從台灣上市上櫃公司財報、以及台灣經濟新報資料庫收集資料,建立一公司追蹤資料庫進行實證估計,估計方法為普通最小平方法與分量迴歸。估計結果顯示家族控制型態、二團體以上共治型態之公司其平均員工薪酬水準均顯著較低,專業經理人治理型態的公司平均員工薪酬水準居中,而公股主導型態之公司之平均員工薪酬水準最高;其中,家族控制型態與公股主導公司之平均員工年薪酬水準相差達30萬左右。此外,在相對低薪的樣本公司族群中,家族控制型態、二團體以上共治型態的公司往往提供更低的薪酬水準,在相對高薪的樣本公司族群中,其抑制效果則更為強烈。台灣的上市上櫃企業中有高達近七成是屬於家族控制型態,在中小企業中由家族持有的情況更是普遍,要如何有效改善低薪現象,是政府與全民的一大挑戰。 在其他股權結構方面,估計結果顯示當董監持股比例有提升時,員工薪酬水準往往會被壓低,在相對高薪的公司,其壓縮效果更為強烈;當外資持股比例有提升時,員工薪酬水準往往會被抬高,在相對低薪的公司,其拉抬效果更為強烈;當機構法人持股比例有提升時,在相對低薪的公司,其會對員工薪酬水準產生負面影響,在相對高薪的公司,其會對員工薪酬水準產生正面影響。其他變數,包含股東權益報酬率、Tobin’s Q、負債比、公司治理評鑑等級、員工生產力、公司規模、公司年齡、服務業對於員工薪酬水準均有顯著的影響。 |
Abstract |
Numerous studies in the past have investigated the causes of low wages in Taiwan, largely focusing on industry structure and labor market conditions. This study, however, proposes that the prevalence of family-controlled companies is one of the contributing factors to low wages. Using financial reports from publicly listed companies in Taiwan, as well as data from the Taiwan Economic News Database, a company panel database was created to empirically estimate the impact. Both Ordinary Least Squares (OLS) and quantile regression methods were used for estimation. The estimation results indicate that companies with a family-controlled structure, or those governed by two or more groups, tend to have significantly lower average employee salary levels. Companies managed by professional managers have median wage levels, while state-controlled companies have the highest average wage levels. The average annual wage of family-controlled companies is about 300,000 less than that of state-controlled companies. Moreover, within the sample of relatively low-paying companies, family-controlled and jointly governed companies often provide lower wage levels, and this suppressive effect is even more pronounced in relatively high-paying companies. Nearly 70% of publicly listed companies in Taiwan are family-controlled, a trend even more common in small and medium-sized enterprises. Addressing this challenge of low wages is a significant issue for both the government and the public. As for other equity structures, the results show that as the proportion of shares held by directors and supervisors increases, the wage level is often suppressed, with this effect being more pronounced in relatively high-paying companies. When the proportion of shares held by foreign investors increases, the wage level are often elevated, with this uplifting effect more noticeable in relatively low-paying companies. When institutions and legal persons increase their shareholding, it has a negative impact on wages in low-paying companies, and a positive impact in high-paying companies. Other variables, including shareholder return on equity, Tobin's Q, debt ratio, corporate governance rating, employee productivity, company size, company age, and service industry, all have a significant impact on employee wage levels. |
目次 Table of Contents |
目錄 論文審定書i 致謝ii 中文摘要iii 英文摘要iv 目錄vi 圖次viii 表次ix 第一章 研究問題與動機1 第二章 文獻與理論回顧8 2-1 控制型態與員工薪酬8 2-2 其他可能影響員工薪酬水準的因素18 2-3 小結23 第三章 資料與研究方法24 3-1 資料來源24 3-2 研究方法24 3-2-1 研究假說24 3-2-2 估計模型25 3-2-3 變數的定義與衡量27 3-3 資料初析31 第四章 估計結果與討論36 4-1 敘述性統計、共線性檢定與相關性分析36 4-1-1 敘述性統計36 4-1-2 共線性問題之檢測38 4-1-3 相關性分析39 4-2 迴歸分析結果討論43 4-3 分量迴歸結果討論48 第五章 結論與建議56 參考文獻59 圖次 圖 3 1. 2012−2021年平均每人用人費用與平均每人薪酬水準(仟元)31 圖 3 2. 2012−2021年基層與高管薪酬水準差異圖(仟元)32 圖 3 3. 持股比例之歷年平均數(單位:%)34 圖 3 4. 獨立董事比例之歷年平均數(單位:%)35 表次 表 1 1. 台灣受僱者薪資與企業利潤相對比例(單位:百萬台幣)1 表 1 2. 工業及服務業受僱員工全年總薪資中位數2 表 2 1. 各屆評鑑指標及分配權重22 表 3 1. 四種控制型態之企業占全體的歷年百分比(%)32 表 4 1. 敘述性統計表36 表 4 2. VIF檢定表39 表 4 3. Pearson相關係數表41 表 4 4. OLS估計結果:影響員工薪酬之因素47 表 4 5. 分量迴歸估計結果:以平均每人用人費用為被解釋變數54 表 4 6. 分量迴歸估計結果:以平均每人薪酬水準為被解釋變數55 |
參考文獻 References |
一、中文 于學宇,2003,高階經理人報酬、公司治理與經營績效之研究,國立中山大學企業管理研究所碩士論文。 王士豪,2018,高階主管與基層員工間薪酬差距對公司績效之影響,國立中正大學會計與資訊科技學系碩士論文。 王雪梅、邱盈俊,2017,工作價值觀、個人控制與工作滿意度關係之探討—以台灣金融機構為例,華夏財務。 王維菁,2018,勞動薪資議題之媒體再現與定錨影響初探:以人力銀行青年起薪調查新聞為例,中華傳播學刊,33期,219−256。 王憲志、徐韶甯、洪嘉茵、林珮瑜,台灣銀行業創新能力、經營績效與金融科技之關聯性研究」,管理學報,35期,207−227。 池祥麟、陳庭萱,2004,銀行業企業社會責任之探討,台灣金融財務季刊,5(2),111−127。https://www.airitilibrary.com/Publication/alDetailedMesh?docid=16079256-200406-5-2-111-127-a 吳怡華、鄭伯壎,2004,家族企業治理、家族特性與財務績效之研究:以臺灣地區為例,國科會研究計畫報告。 吳承恩、王傳凱、林錦慧,2017,國有企業員工薪酬之研究─以臺灣銀行為例,管理學報,34(4),339−361。 李冠廷,2016,台灣股票市場中長期動能策略之績效研究,管理學報,33期,463−484。 李冠皓、黃培琳,2010,公司治理模組解釋(四)集團控制型態—以上市櫃公司為例,貨幣觀測與信用評等2010年5月。 李思瑩,2003,高階經理人薪酬決定因素之實證研究,國立中央大學人力資源所碩士論文。 李誠、成之約、辛炳隆,2000,勞動市場彈性化與非典型僱用,台北:行政院勞委會編印。 沈立平,2003,台灣上市公司股權結構、財務決策與公司價值之關聯性研究,國立中正大學企業管理研究所碩士論文。 林文政、陳慧娟與周淑儀,2007,台灣資訊電子產業之企業人力資本、薪資與組織績效之關聯性研究:薪資中介效果之檢驗,東吳經濟商學學報,第59期,57−100。 林秀鳳、李建然,2008,家族企業的社會資本、制度環境與績效研究—以台灣地區為例,管理世界。 林宛瑩和許崇源,台灣集團企業之控股形態及公司治理衡量指標之研究與建議,交大管理學報,28(1),269 −312。 林美鳳,2010,論股權結構、公司治理與公司績效之關聯性研究,國立中正大學企業管理研究所學位論文。 林進財、張銘祥、曾寶儀、林玟孜,2019,國有企業員工薪資比較:以中華電信與台灣大哥大為例,人力資源管理學報,19(2),71−101。 林語沛,2017,員工薪酬與公司市場績效間之關聯性,國立成功大學會計學研究所碩士論文。 林穎芬、劉維琪,2003,從高階主管薪酬的研究探討代理理論在台灣的適用程度,管理學報,20(2),365−395。 金宇祥,2016,員工薪酬與公司的市場績效之關聯性研究 ,國立台灣大學財務金融研究所碩士論文。 洪世馨,2003,設立外部董事與企業經營績效之關係,成功大學會計研究所碩士論文。 洪世馨,2003,設立外部董事與企業經營績效之關係,國立成功大學會計學系碩博士班論文。 翁紫玲,2021,非主管全時員工平均薪資與中位數薪資之研究-台灣上市櫃公司為例,國立成功大學財務金融研究所碩士論文。 許珂、王啟榮、楊曉飛,2019,最終控制權與員工薪酬:來自中國上市公司的實證研究,《經濟研究》54(7),107−121。 陳明園、石雅慧,2004,高階經理人薪酬-代理理論與競賽理論之實證研究,台大管理論叢,15(1),131−166。 陳東華、廖志峰、黃瑞坤,2004,公股的工資結構與經濟績效研究—以上市公司為例,南開管理評論文,7(2),20−28。 陳秉華、楊淑芬、陳怡安,2017,創新資本、經驗資本、人力資本與經營績效—兼論創新資本之調節效果,管理評論,36,1−25。 陳建宏、楊志翔、張銘祥,2018,國有企業與民營企業薪資比較:以臺灣地區為例,管理學報,35(1),69−88。 陳建良、管中閔,2006,台灣工資函數與工資性別歧視的分量迴歸分析,《經濟論文》,34(4),435−468。https://www.airitilibrary.com/Publication/alDetailedMesh?docid=1018161x-200612-34-4-435-468-a 陳美華、洪世炳,2005,公司治理、股去哪結構與公司績效關係之實證研究,企業管理學報,65,129−153。 陳裴紋,2018,台灣薪資成長低緩問題及因應對策,中央銀行經濟研究處。https://www.tpefx.com.tw/uploads/download/tw/Low%20wage%20growth%20and%20response.pdf 單驥、吳玉瑩,2004,台灣管理階層薪資結構:Tournament Theory之實證研究,管理評論,23(2),45−68。 黃譯漫,2020,以分量迴歸探討貿易條件對薪資脫鉤的影響,成功大學政治學系學位論文。 楊雪芳、李蘭芬、張玉梅,2018,獨立董事比例對企業員工薪酬的影響研究—以上市公司為例,會計之友,第19期,106−107。 葉旻其,2008,公司治理機制對企業績效與董監薪酬之影響,國立政治大學會計學研究所碩士論文。 葉銀華、邱顯比,1996,資本結構、股權結構與公司價值關聯性之實證研究:代理成本理論,臺大管理論叢,7(2),57−90。 葛俊佑、蔡岳霖,2019,海外來台第一上市櫃企業公司治理與股利政策之關聯,當代會計,20(2),265−295。 劉秀曦、黃家凱,2011,高等教育擴張後我國大學畢業生人力運用之研究,國家教育研究院。 蔡秉翰,2014,員工薪酬與績效之關聯性——企業社會責任之調節效果,東海大學會計學研究所碩士論文。 盧怡妏,2020,非主管職員工薪酬之決定因素,輔仁大學會計學系在職專班論文 蕭雅琳,2019,董事會獨立董事比例、薪酬委員會與員工薪酬水準之關聯性研究,管理與系統,26,155−174。 賴炳麟、陳永芳,2016,獨立董事比例、董事會規模與員工薪酬之關聯性研究,會計評論,63,85−106。 簡淑珠,2019,員工薪酬對於企業競爭力之影響,政治大學行政管理碩士學程學位論文。 二、英文 Alan S. Blinder,1998, Pay for Productivity: A Literature Review, Journal of Labor Economics,16, (1), 71−114. Al-Omar, M. K., & Dahawy, K., 2016, The relationship between perceived corporate social responsibility and employee organizational commitment: Evidence from the banking sector in Jordan. Sustainability, 8(3), 173. Babecky, Caju, Kosma, Lawless, Messina and Room,2009, The margins of labor cost adjustment: Survey evidence from European firms, National Bank of Belgium Working Paper No. 183. Bartling, B., Fehr, E., & Schmidt, K. M. ,2012, Screening, competition, and job design: Economic origins of good jobs. American Economic Review, 102(2), 834−864. https://www.aeaweb.org/articles?id=10.1257/aer.102.2.834 Bertrand & Mullainathan, 2001, Are CEOs rewarded for luck? The ones without principals are, The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 116(3), 901–932. https://doi.org/10.1162/00335530152466269 Bertrand, M., & Schoar, A. ,2006, The role of family in family firms. Journal of economic perspectives, 20(2), 73−96. https://www.aeaweb.org/articles?id=10.1257/jep.20.2.73 Boyd, J. H., 1994, The credit channel of monetary policy transmission: A technical analysis. In Monetary policy (pp. 13−143). University of Chicago Press. Brick, I. E., Palmon, O. & Wald, J. K., 2006, CEO compensation, director compensation, and firm performance: Evidence of cronyism? ", Journal of Corporate Finance, pp. 403−423. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcorpfin.2005.08.005 Brickley, J. A., Lease, R. C., & Smith, Jr, C. W. ,1988, Ownership structure and voting on antitakeover amendments. Journal of financial economics, 20(1−2), 267−291. http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/0304-405X(88)90047-5 Chaganti, R., & Damanpour, F. ,1991, Institutional ownership, capital structure, and firm performance. Strategic Management Journal, 12(7), 479−491. https://www.jstor.org/stable/2486521 Chan, S. H., Lee, Y. D., & Wang, K. C.,2020, The impact of Tobin's Q on executive compensation: Evidence from US manufacturing firms, Journal of Business Research. Chauna Brocht, Jared Bernstein & Lawrence Mishel ,2000, Any Way You Cut It: Income Inequality on the Rise Regardless of how it's Measured, Economic Policy Institute. https://www.epi.org/publication/briefingpapers_inequality_inequality/ Chen, C. X., Chen, X., & Su, X. ,2018, Executive compensation, managerial power, and the “fat cat” phenomenon in China. Journal of Corporate Finance, 48, 597−615. Claessens, Stijn & Djankov, Simeon & Joseph P. H. Fan & Lang, Larry H. P., 1999. Expropriation of minority shareholders : evidence from East Asia, Policy Research Working Paper Series 2088, The World Bank. https://ssrn.com/abstract=620647 Clifford G. Holderness & Dennis P. Sheehan 1988, The role of majority shareholders in publicly held corporations: An exploratory analysis, Journal of Financial Economics, 20(1−2), 317−346. http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/0304-405X(88)90049-9 Core, J. E., Guay, W., & Rusticus, T. O. ,2006, Does weak governance cause weak stock returns? An examination of firm operating performance and investors' expectations. Journal of Finance, 61(2), 655−687. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6261.2006.00851.x Delaney, J. T., & Huselid, M. A. ,1996, The Impact of Human Resource Management Practices on Perceptions of Organizational Performance. Academy of Management Journal, 39, 949−969. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/256718 Dikolli, S. S., Vaysman, I., & Wilkins, M. S. ,2018, Family firms, institutional investors, and executive compensation: Evidence from the Netherlands." International Review of Accounting, Banking and Finance, 10(3), 61−75. Ding & Chea ,2021, The impact of Tobin's Q on CEO compensation: Evidence from China, Journal of Business Research. Eriksson, T., & Pytlikova, M.,2010, Firm-Level Consequences of Large Minimum Wage Increases in the Czech and Slovak Republics. LABOUR, CEIS, vol. 18(1), 75−103 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1121-7081.2004.00259.x Frydman, C., & Jenter, D. ,2010, CEO compensation. Annual Review of Financial Economics, 2(1), 75−102. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-financial-120209-133958 Gómez-Mejía, L. R., Makri, M., & Kintana, M. L. ,2010, Diversification decisions in family-controlled firms. Journal of Management Studies, 47(2), 223−252. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6486.2009.00889.x Haltiwanger, J., Lane, J., Spletzer, J., & Jankowski, J. ,2009, Wages, productivity, and the dynamic interaction of businesses and workers. American Economic Review, 99(2), 791−823. https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/labeco/v14y2007i3p575-602.html Huang, Y., & Xu, Y.,2018, Political connections and corporate innovation: Evidence from a natural experiment in China. Journal of Corporate Finance, 50, 519−534 JEAN HELWEGE, CHRISTO PIRINSKY & RENÉ M. STULZ, 2007, Why Do Firms Become Widely Held? An Analysis of the Dynamics of Corporate Ownership, 62(3), 995−1028. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6261.2007.01229.x Jiraporn, P., & Chintrakarn, P. ,2015, The impact of board ownership, CEO-Chair duality, and institutional investor on firm performance and dividend policy: Evidence from Thailand. Journal of Asian Economics, 41, 20−38. Joel Harper & Li Sun, 2019, CEO power and corporate social responsibility, American Journal of Business. https://doi.org/10.1108/AJB-10-2018-0058 Johnson, Simon, Rafael La Porta, Florencio Lopez-de-Silanes, and Andrei Shleifer. 2000. "Tunneling." American Economic Review, 90(2): 22−27. https://www.aeaweb.org/articles?id=10.1257/aer.90.2.22 Jun, Y., Chung, S., & Yoon, S. ,2021, The effect of CEO family status on innovation: Evidence from Korean family firms. Journal of Family Business Strategy, 12(1), 100354. Kang, Chen & Liang,2016, The impact of family control on the salary levels of listed companies: Evidence from China, Emerging Markets Review. Khanna, T., & Palepu, K., 1999, Policy shocks, market intermediaries, and corporate strategy: The evolution of business groups in Chile and India. Journal of Economics & Management Strategy, 8(2), 271−310. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1430-9134.1999.00271.x Kim, D., & Kwon, O.,2018, CEO power and corporate social responsibility (CSR): Evidence from Korea. Sustainability, 10(5), 1595. Koenker and Bassett, 1978, Regression quantiles, journal Econometrica, 46(1), 33−50. https://www.jstor.org/stable/1913643 Kwok, C. C. Y., & Tadesse, S. ,2006, The MNC as an agent of change for corporate social responsibility in developing countries: A study of China and Ethiopia. Journal of International Business Studies, 37(6), 767−785. http://www.palgrave-journals.com/jibs/journal/v37/n6/pdf/8400228a.pdf Lin, C.-L. ,2020, The effects of foreign ownership on employee compensation: Evidence from Taiwan. International Journal of Human Resource Management, 31(22), 2877−2902 Loderer, C., & Waelchli, U. ,2010, Firm age and performance. Journal of Business Finance & Accounting, 37(9‐10), 1249−1272. Long, R. J. ,2000, The effect of incentives on workplace performance: A meta-analytic review of research studies. Performance Improvement Quarterly, 13(3), 4−22. Luo, X. R., & Chung, C. N., 2012, FDI spillovers in an emerging market: The role of foreign firms’ country origin diversity and domestic firms’ absorptive capacity. Strategic Management Journal, 33(11), 1324−1343. Matsumura, E. M., Prasad, S., & Vera-Muñoz, S. C., 2005, Firm ownership structure and CEO compensation: Evidence from Japan. Journal of Business Research, 58(4), 466−474. McConnell, J. J., & Servaes, H., 1990, Additional evidence on equity ownership and corporate value. Journal of Financial Economics, 27(2), 595−612. https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-405X(90)90069-C Mishel, L., & Schiedler, J. 2017. CEO pay remains high relative to the pay of typical workers and high-wage earners., Economic Policy Institute. https://www.epi.org/publication/ceo-pay-remains-high-relative-to-the-pay-of-typical-workers-and-high-wage-earners/ Murat Sari & Suleyman Serdar Karaca, 2019, The Determinants of Economic Growth in Turkey: An Empirical Investigation Using ARDL Bounds Testing Approach, Journal of Economics, Finance and Administrative Science (JEFA). OECD. 2015. Growing unequal? Income distribution and poverty in OECD countries. http://www.oecd.org/els/soc/growingunequalincomed Olivier Blanchard & Francesco Giavazzi,2003, Macroeconomic Effects of Regulation and Deregulation in Goods and Labor Markets,The Quarterly Journal of Economics ,118(3), 879−907. https://doi.org/10.1162/00335530360698450 Petra Dünhaupt, 2013, The effect of financialization on labor's share of income, IPE Working Papers. https://www.econstor.eu/bitstream/10419/68475/1/734374437.pdf Pound, J., 1988, Proxy contests and the efficiency of shareholder oversight. Journal of Financial Economics, 20(1−2), 237−265. https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-405X(88)90046-3 Qi, L., & Wu, J., 2013, Foreign ownership, state ownership and wage premiums in China's manufacturing sector. China Economic Review, 24, 66−75. Rafael La Porta, Florencio Lopez-de-Silanes, Andrei Shleifer & Robert W. Vishny, 1999, The Quality of Government, Journal of Law, Economics, & Organization. https://scholar.harvard.edu/files/shleifer/files/qualilty_govt_jleo.pdf Rajesh K. Aggarwal and Andrew A. Samwick, 1999, Executive compensation, strategic competition, and relative performance evaluation: theory and evidence. Journal of Finance, 54(6), 1999−2043. https://www.jstor.org/stable/797986 Ronald C. Anderson & David M. Reeb ,2003, Founding-Family Ownership and Firm Performance: Evidence from the S&P 500, Journal of Finance. https://doi.org/10.1111/1540-6261.00567 Rouen, E. ,2020, A Brief History of CEO Pay. Harvard Business Review. https://hbr.org/2020/01/a-brief-history-of-ceo-pay Shin, Y., Yu, B. and Greenwood-Nimmo, M. ,2014, Modeling Asymmetric Cointegration and Dynamic Multipliers in a Nonlinear ARDL Framework., Festschrift in Honor of Peter Schmidt: Econometric Methods and Applications, Springer Science & Business Media, New York, 281−314. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4899-8008-3_9 Shleifer & Vishny, 1997, A Survey of Corporate Governance, Journal of Finance, 52(2), 737−783. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6261.1997.tb04820.x Steen Thomsen, 2004,Corporate values and corporate governance, Corporate Governance: The international journal of business in society, 4(4) , 29−46. http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/14720700410558862 Stephen Prowse, 1998, Angel investors and the market for angel investments, Journal of Banking & Finance, 22(6−8), 785−792. http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0378-4266(98)00044-2 Sydney Finkelstein & Donald C. Hambrick, 2006, Strategic leadership: Top executives and their effects on organizations, The Academy of Management Review, Vol. 22(3),802−805. https://doi.org/10.2307/259414 Thomas Piketty & Emmanuel Saez, 2003, Income Inequality in the United States, 1913–1998, The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 118(1),1–41. https://doi.org/10.1162/00335530360535135 Tsai, H.-H., & Wu, Y.-C. J. ,2019, Foreign Ownership, Wage Premiums, and Job Mobility in Taiwanese Manufacturing Firms. Sustainability, 11(7), 1901 Ungson, G.R. and Steers, R.M. ,1984, Motivation and Politics in Executive Compensation. Academy of Management Review, 9, 313−323. https://doi.org/10.2307/258444 Villalonga, B., & Amit, R. ,2006, How do family ownership, control and management affect firm value? Journal of financial economics, 80(2), 385−417. https://pages.stern.nyu.edu/~bvillalo/VillalongaAmit_JFE2006.pdf Villalonga, B., & Amit, R. ,2006, How do family ownership, control and management affect firm value? Journal of Financial Economics, 80(2), 385−417. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfineco.2004.12.005 Wagner, J., Cockburn, I., & Henderson, R. ,1998, Scale and scope effects on technology adoption and learning: Evidence from the chemical industry. The Journal of Industrial Economics, 46(2), 133−165. Wang, H., & Zhou, X. ,2019, The impact of independent directors' shareholding on employee wages: Evidence from China. Journal of Corporate Finance, 58, 372−394. Wang, X., & Zhao, X. ,2017, Does foreign ownership explain company pay premiums in China's private sector? The World Economy, 40(6), 1176−1195. Wilkinson, R. D., & Pickett, K., 2009, The spirit level: Why more equal societies almost always do better., Allen Lane/Penguin Group UK; Bloomsbury Publishing. https://psycnet.apa.org/record/2009-11878-000 Williams, S. M. 2000. Relationship between board structure and firm's intellectual capital performance in emerging economy. Haskayne. School of Business, the University of Calgary. Yeh, Y.H., Lee, T.S.& Woidtke, T. ,2001, Family Control and Corporate Governance: Evidence from Taiwan. International Review of Finance, 2, 21−48. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-2443.00014 Yi-Jen Chen & Chia-Jung Lee,2008, Internal Control and the Performance of Family Firms Following the Asian Financial Crisis, Corporate Governance: An International Review. Yong, K., & Kong, H. ,2006, Corporate governance and firm performance: evidence from Korea before the economic crisis. Journal of Corporate Finance, 12(3), 393−413 三、網站 Danny Lin,2014,台灣的低薪困境。https://foolishbits.com/c576be72d300 中央社財經,2017,年輕人應忍耐低薪?徐重仁其實是這樣說,中央社。https://www.chinatimes.com/realtimenews/20170412005300-260410?chdtv 中華民國法務部,公開發行公司董事監察人股權成數及查核實施規則,97,全國法規資料庫。https://law.moj.gov.tw/LawClass/LawAll.aspx?pcode=G0400051 中華民國經濟部,110,公司法第197條,商工行政法規。https://gcis.nat.gov.tw/elaw/lawDtlAction.do?method=lawToCons&pk=19&art=197&dash=0 台灣經濟新報,台灣經濟新報資料庫。http://schplus.tej.com.tw/ 台灣董事會,2014、2018,2014、2018華人家族關鍵報告。http://twiod.org/index.php/tw/?option=com_sppagebuilder&view=page&id=80 行政院主計總處,109,人力運用調查統計結果。中華民國統計資訊網。https://www.stat.gov.tw/News_Content.aspx?n=2799&s=27260 行政院主計總處,2013−2021工業及服務業受僱員工每人每月平均薪資,中華民國統計資訊網。https://www.stat.gov.tw/ 行政院主計總處,2020,工業及服務業受僱員工全年總薪資中位數及分布統計。中華民國統計資訊網。https://www.stat.gov.tw/News_Content.aspx?n=3703&s=27505 呂伊萱、吳柏緯,2016,破除低薪 立委促企業公開薪資,自由時報。http://news.ltn.com.tw/news/business/paper/1026963 李沃牆,2021,台灣經濟好的不得了 為何多數勞工還低薪,ETtoday新聞雲。https://forum.ettoday.net/news/1973586 財團法人中華民國證券暨期貨市場發展基金會,上市上櫃公司治理實務守則 第二十四條 111,證券暨期貨法令判解查詢系統。http://www.selaw.com.tw/LawArticle.aspx?LawID=G0100259 財團法人中華民國證券暨期貨市場發展基金會,證券暨期貨市場發展基金會網站公司治理評鑑資料專區。https://webline.sfi.org.tw/CGE/index_2.asp 國家發展委員會2021,全球競爭力報告。https://www.ndc.gov.tw/cp.aspx?n=A6A3B06EC0D0770B&s=8E466CABC4454633 教育部統計處,2022,大專校院概況統計。https://stats.moe.gov.tw/files/ebook/higher/111/111higher.pdf 郭重附,2018,淺談台灣服務業面臨的問題及解決之道。 陳振東,2013,勞工低薪化原因與破解之道(下)。https://www.thinkingtaiwan.com/content/435 趙文衡,2017,台灣低薪問題為何無解?分配才是真正關鍵,全球政經研究。https://www.globalpes.org/-20171226.html 考選部,2020,109年考選統計提要分析。https://wwwc.moex.gov.tw/main/content/wHandMenuFile.ashx?file_id=2867 |
電子全文 Fulltext |
本電子全文僅授權使用者為學術研究之目的,進行個人非營利性質之檢索、閱讀、列印。請遵守中華民國著作權法之相關規定,切勿任意重製、散佈、改作、轉貼、播送,以免觸法。 論文使用權限 Thesis access permission:校內校外完全公開 unrestricted 開放時間 Available: 校內 Campus: 已公開 available 校外 Off-campus: 已公開 available |
紙本論文 Printed copies |
紙本論文的公開資訊在102學年度以後相對較為完整。如果需要查詢101學年度以前的紙本論文公開資訊,請聯繫圖資處紙本論文服務櫃台。如有不便之處敬請見諒。 開放時間 available 已公開 available |
QR Code |