論文使用權限 Thesis access permission:自定論文開放時間 user define
開放時間 Available:
校內 Campus:開放下載的時間 available 2026-06-19
校外 Off-campus:開放下載的時間 available 2026-06-19
論文名稱 Title |
董監事股權質押與ESG之分析 A Study on Share Pledge of Directors and ESG |
||
系所名稱 Department |
|||
畢業學年期 Year, semester |
語文別 Language |
||
學位類別 Degree |
頁數 Number of pages |
52 |
|
研究生 Author |
|||
指導教授 Advisor |
|||
召集委員 Convenor |
|||
口試委員 Advisory Committee |
|||
口試日期 Date of Exam |
2023-06-16 |
繳交日期 Date of Submission |
2023-06-19 |
關鍵字 Keywords |
ESG、董監事股權質押、代理問題、董監事持股、公司治理 ESG, directors/supervisors' stock pledge, agency problems, directors/supervisors' shareholding, corporate governance |
||
統計 Statistics |
本論文已被瀏覽 157 次,被下載 0 次 The thesis/dissertation has been browsed 157 times, has been downloaded 0 times. |
中文摘要 |
聯合國於2005年將ESG納入企業經營的評量標準,而ESG是由環境(Environmental)、社會(Social)和公司治理(Governance)這三大議題組成,藉由改善三大層面去促使企業邁向永續經營,永續經營為近年來國內外各公司備受關注的議題,提高公司的ESG表現為公司長期穩健發展的重要因素之一,本研究宗旨在探討董監事股權質押是否會影響ESG的表現,並探討質押後產生的代理問題以及如何降低代理問題對ESG所帶來的負面影響,本研究以2015年至2022年台灣1336間上市櫃公司為樣本,實證結果指出董監事進行股權質押會產生代理問題對ESG有不利之影響,表示董監事進行股權質押,導致股權分散,並加劇代理問題,將不利於公司的永續發展。另外,本研究也發現在高質押比率的公司,扣除質押比率後的董監事實際持股比率較能有效衡量董監事的監督能力;最後發現在機構持股人與股利政策監督下,將減少董監事股權質押衍生的代理問題,並有利於ESG的表現。綜合上述,由於董監事質押對ESG具有一定的影響力,企業應該對董監事股權質押進行控管,以利後續企業ESG的發展,亦可作為投資人之投資參考依據。 |
Abstract |
In 2005, the United Nations announced that ESG will be included in the evaluation criteria of corporate operations. ESG has become a key concern for companies worldwide in recent years. Enhancing a company's ESG performance is crucial for long-term stability and development. This research aims to investigate the impact of directors/supervisors' pledge equity on ESG performance and discuss the agency problems and strategies to reduce their adverse effects on ESG. This study applied 1,336 companies in Taiwan from 2015 to 2022 to investigate the relationship between directors/supervisors' pledge and ESG. The empirical results demonstrate that the pledge of equity by directors/supervisors leads to agency problems, which adversely affect ESG performance. This suggests that when directors/supervisors pledge their equity, it creates equity dispersion and exacerbates agency problems, which could harm the company's sustainable development. Additionally, this study reveals that in companies with a high pledge ratio, the supervisory ability becomes more effective by considering the actual shareholding ratio. Furthermore, the institutional shareholders and dividend policies help reduce the agency problems. Consequently, the directors/supervisors' equity pledge has a significant effect on ESG. Thus companies must control and regulate such pledges. This will facilitate the future development of ESG within enterprises and serve as a valuable investment reference for investors. |
目次 Table of Contents |
論文審定書i 誌謝ii 中文摘要iii 英文摘要iv 目錄v 圖目錄vii 表目錄vii 第一章 緒論1 第一節 研究背景與動機1 第二節 研究目的5 第三節 研究流程6 第二章 文獻回顧與建立假說7 第一節 相關文獻7 第二節 建立研究假說10 第三章 研究方法13 第一節 資料來源13 第二節 變數解釋15 第三節 迴歸模型19 第四章 敘述統計與實證結果24 第一節 敘述統計與相關係數24 第二節 董監事股權質押對ESG之影響28 第三節董監事名目與實際持股對ESG的影響30 第四節 公司治理外部監督機制減少董監事股權質押的代理問題33 第五節 假說與實證結論分析36 第五章 研究結論與建議39 第一節 研究結果39 第二節 研究限制未來研究方向40 參考文獻41 一、中文文獻41 二、英文文獻41 圖目錄 圖 1-1 2007-2022年董監事質押比例趨勢圖3 圖 1-2各產業董監事質押比率趨勢圖4 圖 1-3研究流程圖6 圖 3-1 ESG永續發展指標架構圖13 圖 3-2 樣本之產業分布長條圖15 表目錄 表 1-1各年度董監事股權質押比率之平均2 表 1-2各產業董監事股權質押比率之平均3 表 3-1 樣本公司之產業分佈表14 表 3-2 變數、資料來源及預期符號23 表 4-1 樣本敘述統計表26 表 4-2 相關係數表27 表 4-3 董監事股權質押與ESG之估計結果29 表 4-4 不同質押比率下,董監事名目持股與實質持股之公司家數30 表 4-5 不同質押比率下,董監事名目與實際持股之關係32 表 4-6 公司治理外部監督機制降低董監事股權質押的代理衝突,對ESG的影響………………………………………………………………………………35 表 4-7 是否支持假說彙整表38 |
參考文獻 References |
一、 中文文獻 高蘭芬(2002),董監事股權質押之代理問題對會計資訊與公司績效之影響,成功大學會計學系未出版博士論文。 陳振遠、王健聰、洪世偉(2017),公司治理對於企業社會責任,公司價值之影響,中山管理評論,25(1),135-176。 二、 英文文獻 Aggarwal, R., Klapper, L., & Wysocki, P. D. (2005).“Portfolio preferences of foreign institutional investors.”, Journal of Banking & Finance, 29(12), 2919-2946. Alareeni, B.A. and Hamdan, A. (2020).“ESG impact on performance of US S&P 500-listed firms”, Corporate Governance: The International Journal of Business in Society, Vol. 20 No. 7, pp. 1409-1428. Arora, A., & Sharma, D. (2022).“Do Environmental, Social and Governance (ESG) Performance Scores Reduce the Cost of Debt? Evidence from Indian Firms.”, Australasian Business, Accounting and Finance Journal, 16(5), 4-18. Aybars, A.; Ataünal, L.; Gürbüz, A.“ESG and financial performance: Impact of environmental, social, and governance issues on corporate performance.”, In Handbook of Research on Managerial Thinking in Global Business Economics; IGI Global: Pennsylvania, PA, USA, 2019; p. 520. Balli, H. O., & Sørensen, B. E. (2013).“Interaction effects in econometrics.”, Empirical Economics, 45, 583-603. Berle, A., & Means, G. (1932).“The modern corporation and private property.”, New York,NY: Macmillan. Broadstock, D. C., Chan, K., Cheng, L. T., & Wang, X. (2021).“The role of ESG performance during times of financial crisis: Evidence from COVID-19 in China.”, Finance Research Letters, 38, 101716. Bun, M. J., & Harrison, T. D. (2019).“OLS and IV estimation of regression models including endogenous interaction terms.”, Econometric Reviews, 38(7), 814-827. Chan, K., Chen, H.-K., Hu, S.-y., & Liu, Y.-J. (2018).“Share pledges and margin call pressure.”, Journal of Corporate Finance, 52, 96-117. Chen, An-Lin, Lan-Feng Kao, Yi-Kai Chen, and Wan-Yu Chen (2013), “Share Collateralization by Directors and Corporate Governance.”, Sun Yat-Sen Management Review, 21, 299–337. Chen, G., Firth, M., Gao, D. N., & Rui, O. M. (2006).“Ownership structure, corporate governance, and fraud: Evidence from China.”, Journal of Corporate Finance, 12(3), 424-448. Dalton, D. R., & Kesner, I. F. (1987).“Composition and CEO duality in boards of directors: An international perspective. ”, Journal of International Business Studies, 18, 33-42. Dou, Y., Masulis, R. W., & Zein, J. (2019).“Shareholder wealth consequences of insider pledging of company stock as collateral for personal loans.”, The Review of Financial Studies, 32(12), 4810-4854. Drempetic, S., Klein, C., & Zwergel, B. (2019).“The influence of firm size on the ESG score: Corporate sustainability ratings under review.”, Journal of Business Ethics, 167(2), 1–28. Flammer, C. (2015).“Does corporate social responsibility lead to superior financial performance? A regression discontinuity approach.”, Management Science, 61(11), 2549-2568. Fluck, Z. (1999).“The dynamics of the management-shareholder conflict.”, The Review of Financial Studies, 12(2), 379-404. Gillan, S. L., Koch, A., & Starks, L. T. (2021).“Firms and social responsibility: A review of ESG and CSR research in corporate finance.”, Journal of Corporate Finance, 66, 101889. Grossman, Sanford, and Oliver Hart.(1982).“Corporate financial structure and managerial incentives’’, In J. J. McCall ed.:The Economics of Information and Uncertainty (University of Chicago Press, Chicago), 123–155. Halbritter, G., & Dorfleitner, G. (2015).“The wages of social responsibility—where are they? A critical review of ESG investing.’’, Review of Financial Economics, 26, 25-35. Hausman, J. A. (1978).“Specification tests in econometrics.’’, Econometrica: Journal of the Econometric Society, 46,1251-1271. Huang, W., Luo, Y., Wang, X., & Xiao, L. (2022).“Controlling shareholder pledging and corporate ESG behavior.’’, Research in International Business and Finance, 61, 101655. Jang, G.-Y., Kang, H.-G., & Kim, W. (2022).“Corporate executives’ incentives and ESG performance.’’, Finance Research Letters, 49, 103187. Jensen M. C.(1986).“Agency costs of free cash flow, corporate finance, and takeovers.’’, American Economic Review 76,323–9. Kao, L., Chiou, J. R., & Chen, A. (2004).“The agency problems, firm performance and monitoring mechanisms: the evidence from collateralised shares in Taiwan.’’, In (Vol. 12, pp. 389-402): Wiley Online Library. Khan, M. (2019).“Corporate governance, ESG, and stock returns around the world.’’, Financial Analysts Journal, 75(4), 103-123. Kim, W. S. and Sorenson, E. H. (1986) “Evidence on the impact of the agency costs of debt on corporate debt policy.’’, Journal of Financial and Quantitive Analysis, 21, 2, 131–144. Kuan, T.-H., Li, C.-S., & Chu, S.-H. (2011).“Cash holdings and corporate governance in family-controlled firms.’’, Journal of Business Research, 64(7), 757-764. Lee, T. S., & Yeh, Y. H. (2004).“Corporate governance and financial distress: Evidence from Taiwan.’’, In (Vol. 12, pp. 378-388): Wiley Online Library. Leland, H. E., & Pyle, D. H. (1977).“Informational asymmetries, financial structure, and financial intermediation.’’, The Journal of Finance, 32(2), 371-387. Li, F., Qian, J., Wang, H., & Zhu, J. (2020).“Stock pledged loans, capital markets, and firm performance in China.’’, Capital Markets, and Firm Performance in China (December 28, 2020). Li, W., Huang, J., Shi, C., & Yang, X. (2022).“ Does share pledging promote or impede corporate social responsibility? An examination of Chinese listed firms.’’, Economic Research-Ekonomska Istraživanja, 35(1), 175-195. Maignan, I. (2001).“Consumers' perceptions of corporate social responsibilities: A cross-cultural comparison.’’, Journal of Business Ethics, 30, 57-72. Nofsinger, J. R., Sulaeman, J., & Varma, A. (2019).“Institutional investors and corporate social responsibility.’’, Journal of Corporate Finance, 58, 700-725. Oswald, S. L., & Jahera Jr, J. S. (1991).“The influence of ownership on performance: An empirical study.’’, Strategic Management Journal, 12(4), 321-326. Raimo, N., Caragnano, A., Zito, M., Vitolla, F., & Mariani, M. (2021).“Extending the benefits of ESG disclosure: The effect on the cost of debt financing.’’,Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 28(4), 1412-1421. Rutherfoord, R., Blackburn, R. A., & Spence, L. J. (2000).“Environmental management and the small firm: An international comparison.’’, International Journal of Entrepreneurial Behavior & Research, 6(6), 310-326. Rutherford, M. A., Buchholtz, A. K., & Brown, J. A. (2007).“Examining the relationships between monitoring and incentives in corporate governance.’’, Journal of Management Studies, 44(3), 414-430. Singh, M., & Davidson III, W. N. (2003).“Agency costs, ownership structure and corporate governance mechanisms.’’, Journal of Banking & Finance, 27(5), 793-816. Singh, P. P. (2018).“Does pledging of shares by controlling shareholders always destroy firm value?’’, Available at SSRN 2989818. Su, Z., & Alexiou, C. (2022).“Impact of share pledging by controlling shareholders on firm value in the context of China's tightened regulatory reforms’’, Accounting & Finance. Tang, D. Y., & Zhang, Y. (2020).“Do shareholders benefit from green bonds’’, Journal of Corporate Finance, 61, 101427. Xu, J., Liu, F., & Shang, Y. (2021).“R&D investment, ESG performance and green innovation performance: evidence from China’’, Kybernetes, 50(3), 737-756. |
電子全文 Fulltext |
本電子全文僅授權使用者為學術研究之目的,進行個人非營利性質之檢索、閱讀、列印。請遵守中華民國著作權法之相關規定,切勿任意重製、散佈、改作、轉貼、播送,以免觸法。 論文使用權限 Thesis access permission:自定論文開放時間 user define 開放時間 Available: 校內 Campus:開放下載的時間 available 2026-06-19 校外 Off-campus:開放下載的時間 available 2026-06-19 您的 IP(校外) 位址是 3.147.53.90 現在時間是 2024-11-21 論文校外開放下載的時間是 2026-06-19 Your IP address is 3.147.53.90 The current date is 2024-11-21 This thesis will be available to you on 2026-06-19. |
紙本論文 Printed copies |
紙本論文的公開資訊在102學年度以後相對較為完整。如果需要查詢101學年度以前的紙本論文公開資訊,請聯繫圖資處紙本論文服務櫃台。如有不便之處敬請見諒。 開放時間 available 已公開 available |
QR Code |