2020年全球爆發疫情，晶片需求不斷上升，供給又因為各地的停工而減少，出現晶片危機潮，台灣的半導體產業也因此受到關注。台灣從1980年代便開始極力發展高科技產業，並陸續成立科學園區，而這些科學園區是否對當地人口結構、結婚率及女性勞動參與率帶來影響?在「新竹科學園區」、「台南科學園區」、「台中科學園區」中又分別出現什麼不同的效果?
本研究使用1981-2020年間主計處統計資訊網、政府統計資訊網、都市及區域發展統計彙編及內政部戶政司的資料，並以差異中的差異法(Difference in differences, DID)進行實證分析。實證結果顯示科學園區並未對人口結構造成顯著影響，但對結婚率有正向效果，且在「新竹科學園區」出現5%及10%統計顯著水準，在「台中科學園區」出現1%統計顯著水準，而對女性勞動參與率之影響，在「台南科學園區」出現負相關但並不顯著。

In 2020, the global outbreak of COVID-19 has led to rising demand for chips and a reduction in supply due to shutdowns in various places. There has been a wave of chip crises, and Taiwan's semiconductor industry has also attracted attention.
Taiwan has been vigorously developing high-tech industries since the 1980s, and established science parks one after another. Have these science parks affected the local Demographic Structure, Marriage Rate, and Female Labor Force Participation Rate? In "Hsinchu Science Park","Tainan Science Park" and "Taichung Science Park" and what are the different effects?
This research uses the data from the Directorate General of Budget, Accounting and Statistics, Executive Yuan, Government Statistics, Urban and Regional Development Statistics and Department of Household Registration from 1981 to 2020, and uses the differences in difference method (Difference in differences, DID) in the empirical analysis.
The empirical results show that the science park does not have a significant impact on the Demographic Structure, but it has a positive effect on the marriage rate, and it has a statistically significant level of 5% and 10% in the "Hsinchu Science Park", and statistically significant level of 1% in the "Taichung Science Park". However, the impact on the Female Labor Force Participation Rate is negatively correlated but not significant in the "Tainan Science Park".

論文審定書 i
中文摘要 ii
英文摘要 iii
第一章、緒論 1
第二章、文獻回顧 4
第三章、資料與研究方法 13
第一節、資料整理與初析 13
第二節、研究方法 17
第四章、實證結果 27
第五章、結論 37
參考文獻 41

中文文獻
1.胡太山、解鴻年、王俊堯（2002）。新竹科學園區周邊地區社經發展變遷之調查研究。都市與計畫，29（1），37-65。
2.劉小蘭、吳仁裕 (1994)。台灣地區各區域人口遷移與就業關係之研究。台灣銀行季刊, 45(2), 272-292
3.姜渝生、吳欣修(1994)。台灣地區城鄉人口遷移型態之研究。規劃學報21: 89-117。
4.姜渝生、洪棟霖(1997)。台灣地區西部走廊三級產業人口地區間遷移動向之研究。規劃學報24(1): 5-47。
5.黃仁德、姜樹翰(1999)。台北都會區的發展變遷與產業策略。台灣銀行季刊50(3): 160-183
6.張慈佳、涂保全(2008)。製造業產業發展對人口遷移的影響：台灣實證分析。建築與規劃學報 21-35。
7.劉小蘭、涂靜妮(1993)。臺灣地區產業及都巿發展與工資及就業機會關係之研究。規劃與設計學報1:2 1993.05[民82.05]頁57-73。
8.張慈佳、胡海豐(2006)。夢想的代價：區域間人口遷移決策之研究。人文及社會科學集刊, 18(3), 2006。
9.許道欣，(1992)，人口遷移決策及其影響因素：台灣地區人口內都遷移之研究。國立中興大學都市計劃研究所碩士論文。
10.李朝賢，(1995)。台灣城鄉人口遷移因染之探討。《台灣經濟》218: 1-12
11.薛立敏、李中文、曾喜鵬(2003)。台灣區域人口遷移及其與就業市場、住宅市場關係之實證研究。都市與計劃30(1): 37-61。
12.陳肇男(1990)。台灣地區各類型遷徒之選擇性與差異性。人口學刊13，43-57。
13.張慈佳(2013)。遷移與居住地點的性別選擇性。住宅學報VOL 22 NO. 1, JUNE 2013,1─24。
14.唐先梅（1999）。雙薪家庭家務工作、公平觀、與夫 妻關係滿意度之研究。中華家政學刊，28: 16-30。
15.袁詠蓁、孔祥明(2022)。結婚不結婚：臺灣適婚年齡者進入婚姻與否的考量因素。人口學刊 No. 64, June 2022, pp. 1-49。
16.楊靜利、李大正、陳寬政（2006）。臺灣傳統婚配空間的變化與婚姻行為之變遷。人口學刊，33: 1-32。
17.郭祐誠、林佳慧(2012)。勞動市場條件對結婚率下降之影響。人口學刊 No. 44, June 2012, pp. 87-124。
18.楊文山（2008）。年輕人為什麼不結婚：臺灣社會未來的婚姻趨勢研究。載於高雄圓照寺（主 編），生命教育研習營專題研習手冊－得渡鼓鐘（九十七年）（177-207 頁）。高雄市： 圓照寺九華圖書社。取自 http://www.yct.com.tw/life/publicatiom-a97.htm。
19.王德睦、張國偉（2010）。臺灣女性初婚率的量與步調。臺灣社會福利學刊，8 （2），241-278。
20.鍾秉融、謝宏仁、鍾金原(2017)。我還不想結婚： 七位女性對於婚姻的共同想像。國立臺灣科技大學 人文社會學報 民國 106 年，13 （3），191-217。
21.高月霞、陳仕偉(1994)。臺灣婦女勞動參與行為之因果關係分析，婦女與兩性學刊，5，1-41
22.吳家維(2013)。女性勞動參與率決定因素之探討-以臺灣23個縣市為例。臺北大學財政學系碩士論文。
23.翁任嬋(2003)。女性的勞動市場參與活動之研究-勞動供給面與需求面。東吳大學經濟學系碩士論文。
24.呂玉瑕(2009)。家庭存活策略與女性勞動參與選擇：以台灣家庭企業婦女為例。臺灣社會學刊，2009年6月，第42期，頁95-141。
25.張素梅(1978)。「臺灣都市生育水準對婦女勞動參奧行為的影響」。經濟論文叢刊8 P.227-273。
26.張素梅(1988)。「婦女勞動参與率的研究一聯立模型分析」。經濟論文叢刊16②175-195。
27.蔡宏進、廖正宏(1987)。人口學，台北:巨流
28. 李明軒 (2022)。「科技太太」的勞動參與情形及其影響因素。科技部計畫 (110-2420-H-110-002-HS4)「灣岸創生：高雄過渡社區的記憶再現與創新轉型」成果報告。
29.劉涵芸 (2019)。臺灣女性勞動參與決定因素之研究。國立台灣大學經濟所碩士論文。
30. 解鴻年、胡太山 (2007)。高科技城市之實質與內涵－新竹與台南科學園區/周邊之比較。行政院國家科學委員會專題研究計畫成果報告。取自 http://chur.chu.edu.tw/bitstream/987654321/37899/1/Ho_27_01.pdf
31.解鴻年、胡太山 (2009)。解析科技人才遷徙、居住、及家庭/生活模式之性別差異。行政院國家科學委員會專題研究計畫成果報告。取自 http://taiwan-gist.net/files/past_plan/97/97-27.pdf

英文文獻
1.Angrist, J., & Evans, W. N. (1996), "Schooling and labor market consequences of the 1970 state abortion reforms." NBER Working Paper W5406.
2.Angrist, J. D., & Evans, W. N. (1998), "Children and their parents' labor supply:
evidence from exogenous variation in family size," American Economic Review,
88(3), 450-477.
3.Attanasio, O., Low, H., & Sanchez-Marcos, V. (2008), "Explaining changes in female labor supply in a life-cycle model," American Economic Review, 98(4), 1517-1552.
4.Becker, Gary S. (1960)"An Economic Analysis of Fertility" in Universities-National Bureau Committee for Economic Research, Demographic and Economic Change in Developed Countries. Princeton: Princeton University Press, pp.209-236.
5.Becker, G. S. (1965),"A theory of the allocation of time," The Economic Journal,
75(299),493-517.
6.Becker, G. S. (1974),"A theory of marriage part II," Journal of Political Economy, 82,11-26.
7.Becker, G. S. (1981), A Treatise on the Family. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press“Assortive Mating in Taiwan: Changes and Persistence.” Journal of Population Studies 33: 1-32
8.Bowen, William G. and Finegan, T. Aldrich(1969).The economics of labor force participation. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
9.BJ Cushing (1987).A note on specification of climate variables in models of population migration , Journal of Regional Science, Vol27, Issue4,November 1987,pp. 641-649
10.Brueckner, Jan K. and Yves Zenou, (1999)"Harris-Todaro Models with a Land Market", Regional Science and Urban Economics, 29: 317-339.
11.Bruekner, Jan K. and Hyun Kim, (2001)"Land Markets in the Harris. Todaro Model: A New Factor Equilibrating Rural-Urban Migration," Journal of Regional Science 41: 507-520.
12.Blau, F. D., L. M. Kahn, and J. Waldfogel. 2000. “Understanding Young Women’s Marriage Decisions: The Role of Labor and Marriage Market Conditions.” Industrial and Labor Relations Review 53(4): 624-647
13.Bloom, D. E., Canning, D., Fink, G., & Finlay, J. E. (2009), "Fertility, female labor
force participation, and the demographic dividend," Journal of Economic Growth,
14, 79-101.
15.Cattan, P. 1998. “The Effect of Working Wives on the Incidence of Poverty.” Monthly Labor Review Online. http://stats.bls.gov/opub/mlr/1998/03/art2abs. htm [2004/10/28]
16.Cox, A. C. and J. M. Hermsen. 1996. The Effect of Employment Opportunities on U.S. Women’s Marriage Rates: A Metropolitan Area Analysis. Paper presented at the American Sociological Association Annual Meetings, New York Hilton and Sheraton New York, August 16-20, New York.
17.Cheng, Y.-H. A. 2014. “Changing Partner Choice and Marriage Propensities by Education in Post-Industrial Taiwan, 2000-2010.” Demographic Research 31: 1007-1042. doi:10.4054/DemRes.2014.31.33
18.Dixon, Ruth. 1971. “Explaining Cross-Cultural Variation in Age at Marriage and Proportions Never Marrying.” Population Studies 4(2): 215-233.
19.Davies, P.S., Greenwood, M.J. and Li, H., 2001, “A Conditional Logit Approach to U.S. State-to-State Migration,” Journal of Regional Science, 41: 337-360.
20.Easterlin, R. A. 1987. Birth and Fortune. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
21.Euwals, R., Knoef, M., & Vuuren, D. V. (2011), "The trend in female labour force
participation: what can be expected for the future?," Empirical Economics, 40,
729-753.
22.Goldscheider, Francis K. and Linda J. Waite. 1986. “Sex Difference in the Entry into Marriage.” American Journal of Sociology 92(1): 91-109.
23.Goldstone, J. A. 1986. “The Demographic Revolution in England: A Re-examina tion.” Population Studies 49: 5-33.
24.Hood, J. C. 1986. “The Provider Role: Its Meaning and Measurement.” Journal of Marriage and the Family 48: 349-59.
25.Hemmasi, M. & Prorok, C. V. (2002). Women’s migration and quality of life in Turkey. Geoforum, 33, 399-411.
26.Hotchkiss, J. L. (2006), "Changes in behavioral and characteristic determination of
female labor force participation, 1975-2005," Federal Reserve Bank of Atlanta
Economic Review, 91, 1-20.
27.John R. Harris, Michael P. Todaro. (1970) " Migration, Unemployment and Development: A Two-Sector Analysis", The American Economic Review, Vol. 60, No. 1 (1970), pp. 126-142 (17 pages)
28.Jackman, R. and S. Savouri. 1992. “Regional Migration in Britain : An Analysis of
Gross Flows Using NHS Central Register Data. ”The Economic Journal, 102:
1433-1450.
29.Ian Molho. (1974) A dynamic model of interregional migration flows in Great Britain, Journal of regional science, Volume24, Issue3 (Aug,1984),pp. 317-334
30.Juarez, J.P., 2000, “Analysis of Interregional Labor Migration in Spain Using Gross Flows,” Journal of Regional Science, 40: 377-399
31.Jaumotte, F. (2003), "Female labour force participation: past trends and main
determinants in OECD countries," OECD working paper, 30.
32.Knapp, T.A., White, N.E. and Clark, D.E., 2001, “A Nested Logit Approach to Household Mobility, “Journal of Regional Science, 41: 1-22.
33.Lichter, D. T., F. B. LeClere, and D. K. McLaughlin. 1991. “Local Marriage Markets and the Marital Behavior of Black and White Women.” American Journal of Sociology 96(4): 843-867.
34.Lee, J., M. B. Toney & E. H. Berry (2009) “Social Status Inconsistency and Migration,”Research in Social Stratification and Mobility. 27: 35-49.
35.Mead, M. J. (1982), “A Simultaneous Equations Model of Migration and Economic Change in Non metropolitan Areas.” journal of regional science, 22, pp.517-27

36.Mincer, Jacob(1962)"Labor Force Participation of Married Women," in H. G. Lewis, (ed.),Aspects of Labor Economics, a conference of the Universities-National Bureau of Economic Research. Princeton:Princeton University Press, pp.63-105.
37.Porell, F. W. (1982). Intermetropolitan Migration and Quality of Life. Journal of Regional Science, 22, 137-158.
38.Parkman, A. M. (1992) "Unilateral divorce and the labor-force participation rate of
married women, revisited,” American Economic Review, 76(3), 437-454.
39.Ritsila, J. and Ovaskainen, M., 2001, “Migration and Regional Centralization of Human Capital,” Applied Economics, 33: 317-325
40.Rosen, Sherwin(1974), "Hedonic Prices and Implicit Markets: Product Differentiation in Pure Com-petition," Journal of Political Economy 82: 34-55.
41.Roback, Jennifer(1988), "Wages, Rents, and Amenities: Differences among Workers and Regions," Economic Inquiry 26: 23-41.
42.Sassler, S. and R. Schoen. 1999. “The Effect of Attitudes and Economic Activity on Marriage.” Journal of Marriage and the Family 61(1): 147-159.
43.Stephens, M. (2002), "Worker displacement and the added worker effect," Journal of Labor Economics, 20(3), 504-537.
44. Theodore W. Schultz,(1961), Investment in Human Capital,
The American Economic Review, Vol. 51, No. 1 (Mar., 1961), pp. 1-17
45.Treyz G.I.,D.S. Rickman, G.I. Hunt and M.J. Greenwood(1993), “The dynamic of us international migration”, Review of Economics and Statistics, May, 209-214
46.Thompson, L. and Walker, A. J. 1989. “Gender in Families: Women and Men in Marriage, Work, and Parenthood.” Journal of Marriage and the Family 51: 845-71.
47.Todaro, Smith (2014)Economic Development Wilson, W. J. 1987. The Truly Disadvantaged: The Inner City, the Underclass, and Public Policy. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
48.White, K. J., C. K. Crowder, S. E. Tolnay & R. M. Adelman 2005 “Race, Gender, and Marriage: Destination Selection during the Great Migration,” Demography. 42(2): 215-241.
49.Zuo, J. 1997. “The Effect of Men’s Breadwinner Status on Their Changing Gender Beliefs.” Sex roles 37: 799-816.
50. Wilson, W. J. (1987). The Truly Disadvantaged: The Inner City, the Underclass, and Public Policy. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.