Responsive image
博碩士論文 etd-0605123-131624 詳細資訊
Title page for etd-0605123-131624
論文名稱
Title
主管悖論思維與正向工作行為之關聯性探討:檢視組織挫折的中介角色及員工應得權益感的調節效果
Exploring the Relationship Between Leaders’ Paradox Mindset and Positive Work Behaviors: Mediating Role of Organizational Frustration and Moderating Effect of Employee Entitlement
系所名稱
Department
畢業學年期
Year, semester
語文別
Language
學位類別
Degree
頁數
Number of pages
60
研究生
Author
指導教授
Advisor
召集委員
Convenor
口試委員
Advisory Committee
口試日期
Date of Exam
2023-06-26
繳交日期
Date of Submission
2023-07-05
關鍵字
Keywords
悖論理論、主管悖論思維、組織挫折、正向工作行為、員工應得權益感
Paradox Theory, Leaders’ Paradox Mindset, Organizational Frustration, Positive Work Behaviors, Employee Entitlement
統計
Statistics
本論文已被瀏覽 77 次,被下載 11
The thesis/dissertation has been browsed 77 times, has been downloaded 11 times.
中文摘要
在現今競爭激烈的企業環境中,正向工作行為扮演著關鍵角色,它體現了積極主動和專業負責的態度,能夠迅速應對市場的挑戰和變化,進一步提高競爭力。不論在個人層面或組織層面,正向工作行為都能幫助我們在激烈的競爭環境中脫穎而出。
本研究以悖論理論為基礎,探討主管悖論思維、員工之組織挫折和正向工作行為之間的關係,同時也檢視組織挫折的中介效果,以及員工應得權益感在主管悖論思維與組織挫折之間的調節效果。
本研究採用兩階段問卷調查方式,針對國內製造業、批發零售業和其他產業的員工,蒐集了400份有效問卷,並使用SPSS Statistics軟體進行信度分析、敘述性統計分析、相關分析和層級廻歸分析,同時,也使用AMOS結構方程模式軟體進行驗證性因素分析(CFA)。
根據分析結果,組織挫折在主管悖論思維與員工正向工作行為之間具有中介效果,意即當主管擁有較高的悖論思維時,將有效地降低部屬在組織中所面對的挫折感,進而增加其在組織中的正向工作行為。本研究最後也提出了實務意涵和未來研究建議,供企業組織和研究者參考。
Abstract
In today's intense business competition, positive work behavior plays a crucial role as a key success factor. It embodies a proactive and professionally responsible attitude, enabling individuals and organizations to quickly respond to market challenges and changes, thereby enhancing competitiveness. Whether at the individual or organizational level, positive work behavior helps individuals stand out in a competitive environment.
The objective of this study is to investigate the mutual relationships among leaders’ paradox mindset, organizational frustration, and positive work behavior. Drawing on the paradox theory as the research foundation, the study examines the mediating effect of organizational frustration and leaders’ paradox mindset on positive work behavior, as well as the moderating effect of employee entitlement on the relationship between leaders’ paradox mindset and organizational frustration.
This study conducted a survey targeting domestic manufacturing, wholesale and retail industries, and other industries. A two-stage online questionnaire was used to collect 400 valid samples. The research methodology involved using SPSS Statistics software for reliability analysis, descriptive statistics, correlation analysis, and hierarchical regression analysis. Additionally, AMOS software was utilized for confirmatory factor analysis (CFA).
The analysis implies that when leaders exhibit higher levels of paradox mindset, it effectively reduces subordinates' experience of frustration and negative impact within the organization, thereby increasing positive work behavior.
目次 Table of Contents
論文審定書 i
誌 謝 ii
中文摘要 iii
Abstract iv
目 錄 v
圖 次 vi
表 次 vii
第一章 緒論 1
第一節 研究背景與動機 1
第二節 研究目的 3
第二章 文獻探討 5
第一節 悖論理論 5
第二節 變數介紹 6
第三節 假說推導 15
第三章 研究方法 20
第一節 研究架構 20
第二節 研究樣本 21
第三節 研究假說彙整 24
第四節 操作型定義與衡量方式 24
第五節 統計分析方法 29
第四章 實證結果分析 31
第一節 模型檢測 31
第二節 相關分析 32
第三節 層級廻歸分析 34
第五章 結論與建議 39
第一節 研究分析結果 40
第二節 研究意涵 42
第三節 研究限制與未來研究建議 44
參考文獻 45
參考文獻 References
一、 中文文獻
吳明隆(2009),結構方程模式 AMOS 的操作與應用。台北: 五南圖書出版股份有限公司。
郭建志、蔡育菁(2012),組織挫折與職場退縮:主管不當督導與工作內外控之研究。中華心理學刊,54(3),293-313。

二、 英文文獻
Aiken, L. S., & West, S. G. (1991). Multiple regression: Testing and interpreting interactions. Sage Publications, Inc.
Alam, T., Ullah, Z., AlDhaen, F. S., AlDhaen, E., Ahmad, N., & Scholz, M. (2021). Towards Explaining Knowledge Hiding through Relationship Conflict, Frustration, and Irritability: The Case of Public Sector Teaching Hospitals. Sustainability, 13(22), 12598. https://doi.org/10.3390/su132212598
Amaro, L., & Scheepers, C. B. (2022). Exploring the nexus between microlevel and contextual influencers on women leaders’ paradox mindset. Gender in Management: An International Journal, 38(1), 36-56. https://doi.org/10.1108/gm-11-2021-0335
Bedi, & Akanksha. (2020). But I Deserve It! A Meta-analytic Review of Employee Entitlement. Journal of Managerial Issues, 33(2), 191-209.
Belschak, F. D., & Den Hartog, D. N. (2009). Consequences of Positive and Negative Feedback: The Impact on Emotions and Extra-Role Behaviors. Applied Psychology, 58(2), 274-303. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1464-0597.2008.00336.x
Bindl, U. K., & Parker, S. K. (2010). Feeling good and performing well? Psychological engagement and positive behaviors at work. In S. L. Albrecht (Ed.), Handbook of employee engagement: Perspectives, issues, research and practice (pp. 385–398). Edward Elgar Publishing. https://doi.org/10.4337/9781849806374.00043
Bratnicka-Myśliwiec, K., & Ingram, T. (2022). Demystifying the Role of Slack Resources and Paradox Mindset for Organizational Creativity in Family and Non-Family Firms. Problemy Zarządzania - Management Issues, 2(96), 176-196. https://doi.org/10.7172/1644-9584.96.9
Campbell, W. K., Bonacci, A. M., Shelton, J., Exline, J. J., & Bushman, B. J. (2004). Psychological entitlement: interpersonal consequences and validation of a self-report measure. Journal of Personality Assessment, 83(1), 29-45. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327752jpa8301_04
Chen, A. S.-Y., & Hou, Y.-H. (2016). The effects of ethical leadership, voice behavior and climates for innovation on creativity: A moderated mediation examination. The Leadership Quarterly, 27(1), 1-13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2015.10.007
Chu L. C. (2016). Mediating positive moods: the impact of experiencing compassion at work. Journal of nursing management, 24(1), 59–69. https://doi.org/10.1111/jonm.12272
Cropanzano, R., Howes, J. C., Grandey, A. A., & Toth, P. (1997). The relationship of organizational politics and support to work behaviors, attitudes, and stress. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 18(2), 159-180. https://doi.org/10.1002/(sici)1099-1379(199703)18:2<159::Aid-job795>3.0.Co;2-d
Cunha, M. P. e., & Putnam, L. L. (2017). Paradox theory and the paradox of success. Strategic Organization, 17(1), 95-106. https://doi.org/10.1177/1476127017739536
De Carlo, A., Dal Corso, L., Carluccio, F., Colledani, D., & Falco, A. (2020). Positive Supervisor Behaviors and Employee Performance: The Serial Mediation of Workplace Spirituality and Work Engagement. Frontiers in psychology, 11, 1834. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.01834
Deol, G., & Schermer, J. A. (2021). The dark side of MEE: The dark triad of personality and employee entitlement. Personality and Individual Differences, 170, 110415. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2020.110415
Diener, E., Thapa, S., & Tay, L. (2020). Positive Emotions at Work. Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior, 7(1), 451-477. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-orgpsych-012119-044908
Dieste, M., Sauer, P. C., & Orzes, G. (2022). Organizational tensions in industry 4.0 implementation: A paradox theory approach. International Journal of Production Economics, 251, 108532. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2022.108532
Fisk, G. M. (2010). “I want it all and I want it now!” An examination of the etiology, expression, and escalation of excessive employee entitlement. Human Resource Management Review, 20(2), 102-114. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hrmr.2009.11.001
Forster, C., Paparella, C., Duchek, S., & Guttel, W. H. (2022). Leading in the Paradoxical World of Crises: How Leaders Navigate Through Crises. Schmalenbach Z Betriebswirtsch Forsch, 74(4), 631-657. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41471-022-00147-7
George, J. M. (1991). State or trait: Effects of positive mood on prosocial behaviors at work. Journal of Applied Psychology, 76(2), 299-307. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.76.2.299
Grant, A. M., & Ashford, S. J. (2008). The dynamics of proactivity at work. Research in Organizational Behavior, 28, 3-34. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.riob.2008.04.002
Griffin, M. A., Neal, A., & Parker, S. K. (2007). A New Model of Work Role Performance: Positive Behavior in Uncertain and Interdependent Contexts. Academy of Management Journal, 50(2), 327-347. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2007.24634438
Haar, J. M., Russo, M., Suñe, A., & Ollier-Malaterre, A. (2014). Outcomes of work–life balance on job satisfaction, life satisfaction and mental health: A study across seven cultures. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 85(3), 361-373. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvb.2014.08.010
Harris, K. J., Harris, R. B., Valle, M., Carlson, J., Carlson, D. S., Zivnuska, S., & Wiley, B. (2021). Technostress and the entitled employee: impacts on work and family. Information Technology & People, 35(3), 1073-1095. https://doi.org/10.1108/itp-07-2019-0348
Harvey, P., & Harris, K. J. (2010). Frustration-based outcomes of entitlement and the influence of supervisor communication. Human Relations, 63(11), 1639-1660. https://doi.org/10.1177/0018726710362923
Harvey, P., Harris, K. J., Gillis, W. E., & Martinko, M. J. (2014). Abusive supervision and the entitled employee. The Leadership Quarterly, 25(2), 204-217. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2013.08.001
Harvey, P., & Martinko, M. J. (2009). An empirical examination of the role of attributions in psychological entitlement and its outcomes. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 30(4), 459-476. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.549
Hayes, A. F. (2009). Beyond Baron and Kenny: Statistical Mediation Analysis in the New Millennium. Communication Monographs, 76(4), 408-420. https://doi.org/10.1080/03637750903310360
Heacox, N. J., & Sorenson, R. C. (2007). Organizational Frustration and Aggressive Behaviors. Journal of Emotional Abuse, 4(3-4), 95-118. https://doi.org/10.1300/J135v04n03_07
Isen, A. M., & Reeve, J. (2006). The Influence of Positive Affect on Intrinsic and Extrinsic Motivation: Facilitating Enjoyment of Play, Responsible Work Behavior, and Self-Control. Motivation and Emotion, 29(4), 295-323. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11031-006-9019-8
Joplin, T., Greenbaum, R. L., Wallace, J. C., & Edwards, B. D. (2019). Employee Entitlement, Engagement, and Performance: The Moderating Effect of Ethical Leadership. Journal of Business Ethics, 168(4), 813-826. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-019-04246-0
Jordan, P. J., Ramsay, S., & Westerlaken, K. M. (2016). A review of entitlement: Implications for workplace research. Organizational Psychology Review, 7(2), 122-142. https://doi.org/10.1177/2041386616647121
Katz, D. (1964). The motivational basis of organizational behavior. Behavioral Science, 9(2), 131–146. https://doi.org/10.1002/bs.3830090206
Keenan, A., & Newton, T. J. (1984). Frustration in organizations: Relationships to role stress, climate, and psychological strain. Journal of Occupational Psychology, 57(1), 57-65. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-8325.1984.tb00148.x
Keller, J., Loewenstein, J., & Yan, J. (2017). Culture, Conditions and Paradoxical Frames. Organization Studies, 38(3-4), 539-560. https://doi.org/10.1177/0170840616685590
Klimchak, M., Carsten, M., Morrell, D., & MacKenzie, W. I. (2016). Employee Entitlement and Proactive Work Behaviors. Journal of Leadership & Organizational Studies, 23(4), 387-396. https://doi.org/10.1177/1548051816636790
Kuang, T. Y., Hu, Y., & Lu, Y. (2022). The effect of employee mindfulness in the new media industry on innovative behavior: The chain mediating role of positive emotion and work engagement. Frontiers in psychology, 13, 976504. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.976504
Lam, C. F., Spreitzer, G., & Fritz, C. (2014). Too much of a good thing: Curvilinear effect of positive affect on proactive behaviors. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 35(4), 530-546. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.1906
Lawlor, G. (2017). The Indirect Effect of Employee Entitlement: A Career Stage Perspective [Thesis]. Carleton University. https://doi.org/https://repository.library.carleton.ca/files/3x816n393
Lehman, W. E., & Simpson, D. D. (1992). Employee substance use and on-the-job behaviors. The Journal of applied psychology, 77(3), 309–321. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.77.3.309
Lewis, M. W. (2000). Exploring paradox: Toward a more comprehensive guide. The Academy of Management Review, 25(4), 760–776. https://doi.org/10.2307/259204
Liu, J., Hu, B., & Qu, H. (2022). Exploring the Moderating Role of Employee Entitlement: Insight into the Social Support Paradox. Journal of Hospitality & Tourism Research, 0(0). https://doi.org/10.1177/10963480221112368
Liu, Y., Xu, S., & Zhang, B. (2019). Thriving at work: How a paradox mindset influences innovative work behavior. Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 56(3), 347-366. https://doi.org/10.1177/0021886319888267
Liu, Y., & Zhang, H. (2022). Making things happen: How employees' paradox mindset influences innovative performance. Frontiers in psychology, 13. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.1009209
Miles, D. E., Borman, W. E., Spector, P. E., & Fox, S. (2002). Building an integrative model of extra role work behaviors: A comparison of counterproductive work behavior with organizational citizenship behavior. International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 10(1&2), 51-57. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-2389.00193
Miron-Spektor, E., Ingram, A., Keller, J., Smith, W. K., & Lewis, M. W. (2018). Microfoundations of organizational paradox: The problem is how we think about the problem. Academy of Management Journal, 61(1), 26-45. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2016.0594
Moon, T.-W., Hur, W.-M., Ko, S.-H., Kim, J.-W., & Yoo, D.-K. (2016). Positive work-related identity as a mediator of the relationship between compassion at work and employee outcomes. Human Factors and Ergonomics in Manufacturing & Service Industries, 26(1), 84-94. https://doi.org/10.1002/hfm.20615
Muse, L., Harris, S. G., Giles, W. F., & Feild, H. S. (2008). Work-life benefits and positive organizational behavior: is there a connection? Journal of Organizational Behavior, 29(2), 171-192. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.506
Nadiv, R. (2021). Home, work or both? The role of paradox mindset in a remote work environment during the COVID-19 pandemic. International Journal of Manpower, 43(5), 1182-1203. https://doi.org/10.1108/ijm-01-2021-0012
Naumann, S. E., Minsky, B. D., & Sturman, M. C. (2002). The use of the concept “entitlement” in management literature: A historical review, synthesis, and discussion of compensation policy implications. Human Resource Management Review, 12(1), 145-166. https://doi.org/10.1016/s1053-4822(01)00055-9
O'Connor, E. J., Peters, L. H., Rudolf, C. J., & Pooyan, A. (2016). Situational Constraints and Employee Affective Reactions: A Partial Field Replication. Group & Organization Studies, 7(4), 418-428. https://doi.org/10.1177/105960118200700405
Piotrowski, P., & Besta, T. (2022). Employee Entitlement: Is There A Universal Approach That We Can Use in the Organizational Settings? Roczniki Psychologiczne, 25(3), 209-222. https://doi.org/10.18290/rpsych2022.0014
Priesemuth, M., & Taylor, R. M. (2016). The more I want, the less I have left to give: The moderating role of psychological entitlement on the relationship between psychological contract violation, depressive mood states, and citizenship behavior. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 37(7), 967-982. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.2080
Putnam, L. L., Fairhurst, G. T., & Banghart, S. (2016a). Contradictions, dialectics, and paradoxes in organizations: A constitutive approach. Academy of Management Annals, 10(1), 65-171. https://doi.org/10.5465/19416520.2016.1162421
Putnam, L. L., Fairhurst, G. T., & Banghart, S. (2016b). Contradictions, dialectics, and paradoxes in organizations: A constitutive approach†. Academy of Management Annals, 10(1), 65-171. https://doi.org/10.5465/19416520.2016.1162421
Quinn, R. E., & Cameron, K. S. E. (1988). Paradox and transformation: Toward a theory of change in organization and management. Ballinger Publishing Co/Harper & Row Publishers.
Rachael, A. O., Nnaebue, C. I., Stephen, E. I., Chukwuemeka, E. E., & Ezeh, L. N. (2020). Association of innovative work behaviour, organizational frustration and work-family conflict among private sector employees. Asian Journal of Advanced Research and Reports, 8(2), 20–29. https://doi.org/10.9734/ajarr/2020/v8i230195
Saeed, B. B., Afsar, B., Cheema, S., & Javed, F. (2019). Leader-member exchange and innovative work behavior. European Journal of Innovation Management, 22(1), 105-124. https://doi.org/10.1108/ejim-11-2017-0158
Schad, J., Lewis, M. W., & Smith, W. K. (2018). Quo vadis, paradox? Centripetal and centrifugal forces in theory development. Strategic Organization, 17(1), 107-119. https://doi.org/10.1177/1476127018786218
Schwarz, G., Newman, A., Yu, J., & Michaels, V. (2021). Psychological entitlement and organizational citizenship behaviors: the roles of employee involvement climate and affective organizational commitment. International Journal of Human Resource Management, 34(1), 197-222. https://doi.org/10.1080/09585192.2021.1962388
Sleesman, D. J. (2019). Pushing through the tension while stuck in the mud: Paradox mindset and escalation of commitment. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 155, 83-96. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.obhdp.2019.03.008
Smith, W. K., & Lewis, M. W. (2011). Toward a theory of paradox: A dynamic equilibrium model of organizing. Academy of Management Review, 36(2), 381-403. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2011.59330958
Snehvrat, S., Chaudhary, S., & Majhi, S. G. (2022). Ambidexterity and absorptive capacity in boundary-spanning managers: role of paradox mindset and learning goal orientation. Management Decision, 60(12), 3209-3231. https://doi.org/10.1108/md-03-2021-0328
Spector, P. E. (1978). Organizational Frustration: A Model and Review of the Literature. Personnel Psychology, 31(4), 815-829. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-6570.1978.tb02125.x
Stavrou, E., & Ierodiakonou, C. (2016). Entitlement to work-life balance support: Employee/Manager perceptual discrepancies and their effect on outcomes. Human Resource Management, 55(5), 845-869. https://doi.org/10.1002/hrm.21745
Storms, P. L., & Spector, P. E. (1987). Relationships of organizational frustration with reported behavioral reactions of employees. Journal of Occupational Psychology, 60(3), 227-234. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-8325.1987.tb00255.x
Sulea, C., Virga, D., Maricutoiu, L. P., Schaufeli, W., Zaborila Dumitru, C., & Sava, F. A. (2012). Work engagement as mediator between job characteristics and positive and negative extra‐role behaviors. Career Development International, 17(3), 188-207. https://doi.org/10.1108/13620431211241054
Tomlinson, E. C. (2012). An integrative model of entitlement beliefs. Employee Responsibilities and Rights Journal, 25(2), 67-87. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10672-012-9208-4
Ugwu, F. O., & Onyishi, I. E. (2017). Linking perceived organizational frustration to work engagement. Journal of Career Assessment, 26(2), 220-239. https://doi.org/10.1177/1069072717692735
Valentine, S. R., Giacalone, R. A., & Fleischman, G. (2020). Workplace bullying, socially aversive attitudes, reduced work group effectiveness, and organizational frustration. Human Resource Development Quarterly, 32(2), 131-153. https://doi.org/10.1002/hrdq.21418
Valle, M., Kacmar, M., & Andrews, M. (2018). Ethical leadership, frustration, and humor: a moderated-mediation model. Leadership & Organization Development Journal, 39(5), 665-678. https://doi.org/10.1108/lodj-02-2018-0083
van Assen, M. F., & Caniëls, M. C. J. (2022). Economic and social LMX and innovative work behaviour: the moderating effect of paradox mindset. European Journal of Innovation Management, 25(6), 1057-1075. https://doi.org/10.1108/ejim-05-2022-0234
Whelpley, C. E., & McDaniel, M. A. (2016). Self-esteem and counterproductive work behaviors: a systematic review. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 31(4), 850-863. https://doi.org/10.1108/jmp-01-2014-0008
Yin, J. (2021). Effects of the paradox mindset on work engagement: The mediating role of seeking challenges and individual unlearning. Current Psychology: A Journal for Diverse Perspectives on Diverse Psychological Issues. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-021-01597-8
Yin, J. (2022). Living with tensions in the workplace: a grounded theory of paradoxical leadership in cultivating subordinates' paradox mindset. Leadership & Organization Development Journal, 43(6), 862-873. https://doi.org/10.1108/lodj-04-2021-0151
Zhang, Y., Waldman, D. A., Han, Y.-L., & Li, X.-B. (2015). Paradoxical Leader Behaviors in People Management: Antecedents and Consequences. Academy of Management Journal, 58(2), 538-566. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2012.0995
Zheng, W., Kark, R., & Meister, A. L. (2018). Paradox versus dilemma mindset: A theory of how women leaders navigate the tensions between agency and communion. The Leadership Quarterly, 29(5), 584-596. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2018.04.001
電子全文 Fulltext
本電子全文僅授權使用者為學術研究之目的,進行個人非營利性質之檢索、閱讀、列印。請遵守中華民國著作權法之相關規定,切勿任意重製、散佈、改作、轉貼、播送,以免觸法。
論文使用權限 Thesis access permission:校內校外完全公開 unrestricted
開放時間 Available:
校內 Campus: 已公開 available
校外 Off-campus: 已公開 available


紙本論文 Printed copies
紙本論文的公開資訊在102學年度以後相對較為完整。如果需要查詢101學年度以前的紙本論文公開資訊,請聯繫圖資處紙本論文服務櫃台。如有不便之處敬請見諒。
開放時間 available 已公開 available

QR Code