Responsive image
博碩士論文 etd-0608123-115707 詳細資訊
Title page for etd-0608123-115707
論文名稱
Title
綠色品牌行銷策略:以華生水資源生技為例
Green Brand Marketing Strategy:A Case Study of Hwa Seng Bottled Water Corporation
系所名稱
Department
畢業學年期
Year, semester
語文別
Language
學位類別
Degree
頁數
Number of pages
92
研究生
Author
指導教授
Advisor
召集委員
Convenor
口試委員
Advisory Committee
口試日期
Date of Exam
2023-05-24
繳交日期
Date of Submission
2023-07-08
關鍵字
Keywords
資源基礎觀點、品牌建構流程、品牌轉型、綠色品牌、經營策略、競爭優勢
Resource-based View, Brand Building Process, Brand Transformation, Green Brand, Business Strategy, Competitive Advantage
統計
Statistics
本論文已被瀏覽 47 次,被下載 3
The thesis/dissertation has been browsed 47 times, has been downloaded 3 times.
中文摘要
近年來,兩大議題受到全球廣大消費者的重視:健康與環保,台灣也不例外,顯然環保與健康兩個議題已然無法區別開來討論,使得企業無不將環保與永續經營的思維納入長期策略的規劃之中。但儘管擁有新的策略想像,如何實際打造綠色品牌仍是企業最艱難的議題,因為重新規劃策略使命往往也意味著公司整體層面的轉型。但本研究個案企業 (華生水資源生技股份有限公司) 找到成功方法,將品牌建構納入策略轉型的一環,以新品牌面貌與行銷手段創造新的競爭優勢。
本研究主要以Barney資源基礎觀點與Urde品牌建構理論為兩大理論支柱,輔以其延伸觀點與其它相關管理理論,從盤點競爭資源為研究出發點,逐步釐清個案企業建構綠色品牌以及品牌行銷的策略全貌,藉以理解個案企業如何成功重新定義策略,並化核心價值為具體商業行動、如何成功重新定義策略,並化核心價值為具體商業行動,並找出個案公司綠色品牌行銷的成功模式與關鍵因素。最後,本研究成功歸納與改良綠色品牌觀點下之Urde雙軌品牌建構流程模型。
本研究最大的應用價值在於,為中小企業提供一盞品牌轉型的明燈。在有限的資源下,中小企業未必要大張旗鼓的重新打造新的綠色品牌,透過使命與策略的微調,利用有限的資源也能為既有的品牌創造新一波的競爭優勢。
Abstract
In recent years, two major issues have attracted the attention of consumers all over the world: health and environmental protection, and Taiwan is no exception. Obviously, environmental protection and health can no longer be discussed separately, which makes all enterprises incorporate the thinking of environmental protection and sustainable management into long-term strategy planning. But despite having a new strategic vision, how to actually build a green brand is still the most difficult issue for enterprises, because re-planning the strategic mission often also means the transformation of the company as a whole. However, the case company in this study (Hwa Seng Bottled Water Corporation) found a successful way to incorporate brand building into a part of strategic transformation, creating new competitive advantages with a new brand image and marketing methods.
This study mainly uses Barney's resource-based viewpoint and Urde's brand construction theory as two theoretical pillars, supplemented by its extended viewpoint and other related management theories, starting from the inventory of competitive resources, and gradually clarifying the case company's green brand building and brand marketing strategies The whole picture, in order to understand how the case company successfully redefines the strategy and turns the core value into specific business actions, and finds out the successful model and key factors of the case company's green brand marketing . Finally, this research successfully summarizes and improves Urde's dual-track brand building process model under the perspective of green branding.
The greatest application value of this study lies in providing a bright light for brand transformation for small and medium-sized enterprises. With limited resources, it is not necessary for small and medium-sized enterprises to create new green brands with great fanfare. Through fine-tuning missions and strategies, limited resources can also create a new wave of competitive advantages for existing brands.
目次 Table of Contents
論文審定書 i
誌 謝 ii
摘 要 iii
Abstract iv
目 錄 v
圖 次 vii
表 次 ix
第壹章 緒論 1
第一節 研究背景與動機 1
第二節 研究目的 2
第三節 研究流程 3
第四節 研究對象與範圍 5
第貳章 文獻回顧 6
第一節 環境分析理論 6
第二節 策略管理與執行 8
第三節 資源觀點與理論 13
第四節 品牌建構與價值衡量 16
第參章 研究設計與方法 20
第一節 研究架構與設定 20
第二節 研究流程與方法 23
第三節 個案研究方法 26
第肆章 包裝飲用水產業與個案介紹 27
第一節 包裝飲用水產業 27
第二節 個案簡介—華生水資源生技股份有限公司 32
第三節 華生品牌介紹 36
第伍章 華生綠色品牌策略分析 43
第一節 華生水資源生技競爭資源與優劣勢分析 43
第二節 華生經營策略分析 47
第三節 華生水資源生技VMOST分析 53
第四節 華生品牌之綠色品牌建構策略 57
第五節 進階應用 65
第陸章 研究結論與建議 71
第一節 結論 71
第二節 管理意涵 73
參考文獻 74
一、中文 74
二、外文 74
三、網路文章 77
附錄:訪談紀錄 79
參考文獻 References
參考文獻
一、中文
方至民. (2015). 策略管理:建立企業永續競爭力 (第四版). 前程文化.
方至民. (2019). 策略管理概論:應用導向 (第三版). 前程文化.
許育嘉 (2013) 。綠色品牌建構-以LED照明產業為例。﹝碩士論文。東海大學﹞臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統。
郭律磊 (2022) 。雙導向顧客社群外包策略與競爭優勢建構—以一等一科技為例。﹝碩士論文。國立中山大學﹞臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統。
二、外文
Aaker, D. A. (1992). The value of brand equity. Journal of business strategy, 13(4), 27-32.
Aaker, D. A. (1996). Measuring brand equity across products and markets. California management review, 38(3).
Barney, J. (1991). Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage. Journal of management, 17(1), 99-120.
Barney, J. B. (1995). Looking inside for competitive advantage. Academy of Management Perspectives, 9(4), 49-61.
Barney, J. B. (2002). Strategic management: From informed conversation to academic discipline. Academy of Management Perspectives, 16(2), 53-57.
Bekk, M., Spörrle, M., Hedjasie, R., & Kerschreiter, R. (2016). Greening the competitive advantage: antecedents and consequences of green brand equity. Quality & Quantity, 50, 1727-1746.
Bower, J. L., & Doz, Y. L. (1979). Strategic management: A new view of business policy and planning.
Cadle, J., Paul, D., & Turner, P. (2010). Business analysis techniques: 72 essential tools for success. BCS, The Chartered Institute.
Birger, W. E. R. N. E. R. F. E. L. T. (1984). A resource-based view of the firm. Strategic Management Journal, 5(2), 171-180.
Chandler, A.D. (1962) Strategy and Structure: Chapters in the History of American Enterprise. MIT Press, Boston.
Chapman, Robert. (2011). Simple tools and techniques for enterprise risk management, 2nd edition.
Chen, Y. and Chang, C. (2013), "Towards green trust: The influences of green perceived quality, green perceived risk, and green satisfaction", Management Decision, Vol. 51 No. 1, pp. 63-82.
Dichter, E. (1984). How values influence attitudes. Personal values and consumer psychology, 139-144.
Duran, R. P., Eisenhart, M. A., Erickson, F. D., Grant, C. A., Green, J. L., Hedges, L. V., & Schneider, B. L. (2006). Standards for reporting on empirical social science research in AERA publications: American Educational Research Association. Educational Researcher, 35(6), 33-40.
Eisenhardt, K. M., & Martin, J. A. (2000). Dynamic capabilities: what are they?. Strategic management journal, 21(10‐11), 1105-1121.
Fraenkel, J. R., Wallen, N. E., & Hyun, H. H. (2006). How to design and evaluate research in education . New York: Mac Graw Hill.
Gangestad, S. W., & Simpson, J. A. (2000). The evolution of human mating: Trade-offs and strategic pluralism. Behavioral and brain sciences, 23(4), 573-587.
Gaya, H., & Struwig, M. (2016). Is Activity-Resource-based View (ARBV) the New Theory of the Firm for Creating Sources of Sustainable Competitive Advantage in Services Firms?. Global Journal of Management and Business Research, 16(A5), 33-45.
Ghodeswar, B. M. (2008). Building brand identity in competitive markets: a conceptual model. Journal of product & brand management, 17(1), 4-12.
Grant, R. M. (1991). The resource-based theory of competitive advantage: implications for strategy formulation. California management review, 33(3), 114-135.
Grant, R. M. (1996). Toward a knowledge‐based theory of the firm. Strategic management journal, 17(S2), 109-122.
Hamel, G. and Prahalad, C., 1993. Strategy as Stretch and Leverage. Harvard Business Review, pp.75 - 84.
Humphrey, Albert S. (December 2005). "SWOT Analysis for Management Consulting" (PDF). SRI Alumni Newsletter. SRI International. pp. 7–8.
Hussey, D. (1998). Sources of information for competitor analysis. Strategic Change, 7(6), 343-356.
Idenburg, P. J. (1993). Four styles of strategy development. Long range planning, 26(6), 132-137.
Ikujiro, N. (1991). enterprises of Knowledge Innovation. Harvard Business Review.
Johnson, G., & Scholes, K. (1993). Exploring Corporate Strategy. 3rd editionNew York.
Kaplan, R. S., & Norton, D. P. (1992). Measures that drive performance. Harvard Business Review.
Kogut, B., & Zander, U. (1992). Knowledge of the firm, combinative capabilities, and the replication of technology. Organization science, 3(3), 383-397.
Kogut, B., & Zander, U. (1996). What firms do? Coordination, identity, and learning. Organization science, 7(5), 502-518.
Levy, M. R. (1978). Opinion leadership and television news uses. The Public Opinion Quarterly, 42(3), 402-406.
Mintzberg, H. (1978). Patterns in strategy formation. Management science, 24(9), 934-948.
Knott, P. J. (2015). Does VRIO help managers evaluate a firm’s resources?. Management Decision, 53(8), 1806-1822.
Mintzberg, H. (1979). The structuring of organizations. Englewood Cliffs NJ: Prentice Hall.
Nandan, S. An exploration of the brand identity–brand image linkage: A communications perspective.J Brand Manag 12, 264–278 (2005).
Neilson, G. L., Martin, K. L., & Powers, E. (2008). The secrets to successful strategy execution. Harvard business review, 86(6).
Nonaka, I. (1994). A dynamic theory of organizational knowledge creation. Organization science, 5(1), 14-37.
Patanakul, P., Iewwongcharoen, B., & Milosevic, D. (2010). An empirical study on the use of project management tools and techniques across project life-cycle and their impact on project success. Journal of General Management, 36(1), 41-65.
Porter, M. E. (1985). Technology and competitive advantage. Journal of business strategy, 5(3), 60-78.
Porter, M. E. (1990). "The Competitive Advantage of Nations". Harvard Business Review. No. March–April 1990. ISSN 0017-8012.
Porter, M. E. (1996). What is strategy?.
Porter, M. E. (2004). Building the microeconomic foundations of prosperity: findings from the microeconomic competitiveness index (pp. 1-23). London: Palgrave Macmillan.
Rosengren, A., Standoft, A., & Sundbrandt, A. (2010). Brand identity & brand image: a case study of Apotek Hjärtat.
Rothaermel F. T. (2013). Strategic management : concepts and cases ([International ed.]). McGraw-Hill/Irwin.
Roy, Dilip & Banerjee, Saikat. (2008). CARE-ing strategy for integration of brand identity with brand image. International Journal of Commerce and Management. 17. 140-148.
Sondhi, R. (1999). Total strategy. Airworthy.
Tuominen, P. (1999). Managing Brand Equity. 73
Urde, M. (2003). Core value‐based corporate brand building. European Journal of marketing.
Yin, R. K. (2009). Case study research: Design and methods(Vol. 5). sage.
Zack, M. H. (1999). Developing a Knowledge Strategy. California Management Review, 41(3), 125–145.

三、網路文章
李蘇竣. (2022, August 3). 全台年耗10億瓶裝水 「奉茶App」找到裝水點 估減用45萬個塑膠瓶. 環境資訊中心. https://e-info.org.tw/node/234722
陳文嫺. (2017, September 6). 藍金市場 水勢當道!台灣瓶裝水產值達95.3億!. 食力. https://www.foodnext.net/issue/paper/4975387630
陳文嫺. (2017, September 6). 瓶裝水的環境警訊:2050年 海洋中的塑料瓶將比魚多!. 食力. https://www.foodnext.net/issue/paper/4111187511?fbclid=IwAR3CLuFlhgH-GURj76VeJo96Si5_tFw44atC-R-XqSCXNyi4Hipz7KjrS4Y
蘇崇愷, & 楊晴安. (2022, July 30). 3千億人民幣大餅!盤點陸瓶裝水品牌興衰. 食力. https://www.foodnext.net/issue/paper/4111187511?fbclid=IwAR3CLuFlhgH-GURj76VeJo96Si5_tFw44atC-R-XqSCXNyi4Hipz7KjrS4Y
曾仁凱. (2022, September 28). 旗下四品牌並進 統一穩坐包裝水市占王. Yahoo!新聞. https://tw.news.yahoo.com/news%2F旗下四品牌並進-統-穩坐包裝水市占王-201000589.html
生物可分解塑膠比較環保?真正的塑膠污染問題解法其實是... (2020, November 25). 綠色和平. https://www.greenpeace.org/taiwan/update/22362/生物可分解塑膠比較環保?真正的塑膠污染問題解/
Lin, A. (Ed.). (2022, January 6). 影響2022年永續發展的15項關鍵趨勢 (A. Lin, Trans.). CSRone. https://csrone.com/topics/7221
(2011). 華生. https://www.hwaseng.com.tw/?gclid=Cj0KCQjw9deiBhC1ARIsAHLjR2CPLbbNIiPwcG-fhR8vxW1wHHtYbHgRjcBylGvLzkkzKh6GTZR904kaArwREALw_wcB
GROWING SUCCESS IN THE BOTTLED WATER INDUSTRY. (2018, January). WaterHQ. http://waterhq.world/issue-sections/bottled-water/bottled-water-for-home-office/growing-success-in-the-bottled-water-industry/
電子全文 Fulltext
本電子全文僅授權使用者為學術研究之目的,進行個人非營利性質之檢索、閱讀、列印。請遵守中華民國著作權法之相關規定,切勿任意重製、散佈、改作、轉貼、播送,以免觸法。
論文使用權限 Thesis access permission:校內校外完全公開 unrestricted
開放時間 Available:
校內 Campus: 已公開 available
校外 Off-campus: 已公開 available


紙本論文 Printed copies
紙本論文的公開資訊在102學年度以後相對較為完整。如果需要查詢101學年度以前的紙本論文公開資訊,請聯繫圖資處紙本論文服務櫃台。如有不便之處敬請見諒。
開放時間 available 已公開 available

QR Code