Responsive image
博碩士論文 etd-0612123-151318 詳細資訊
Title page for etd-0612123-151318
論文名稱
Title
美是加值還是成本?探討員工外表吸引力影響同事主動助人行為與社會破壞行為之正、負向心理歷程:知覺溫暖與能力的干擾式中介效果
Beauty is Premium or Cost? Exploring the positive and negative psychological processes linking employee physical attractiveness influences coworkers' proactive helping behaviors and social undermining behaviors: The moderating role of perceived warmth and competence
系所名稱
Department
畢業學年期
Year, semester
語文別
Language
學位類別
Degree
頁數
Number of pages
49
研究生
Author
指導教授
Advisor
召集委員
Convenor
口試委員
Advisory Committee
口試日期
Date of Exam
2023-06-19
繳交日期
Date of Submission
2023-07-12
關鍵字
Keywords
外表吸引力、社會互動渴望、妒羨、主動助人行為、社會破壞行為、知覺他人溫暖、知覺他人能力
physical attractiveness, desire for social interaction, envy, proactive helping, social undermining, perceived warmth, perceived competent
統計
Statistics
本論文已被瀏覽 104 次,被下載 0
The thesis/dissertation has been browsed 104 times, has been downloaded 0 times.
中文摘要
本研究以內隱人格理論、社會比較理論為基礎,探討員工外表吸引力是否會透過社會互動渴望影響同事主動助人之行為、或透過妒羨情緒影響同事產生社會破壞行為。除此之外,本文進一步檢視同事知覺員工的「溫暖」、「能力」在不同的高低組合下,是否會干擾前述社會互動渴望對員工外表吸引力與同事主動助人行為、以及妒羨對員工外表吸引力與同事社會破壞行為的中介效果。

本研究以輪轉式設計 (round-robin design) 發放問卷,以團隊成員為研究對象,完整收集團隊內部所有成員之互評對偶資料,總計211位成員參與研究,共配對452筆有效對偶資料。研究結果顯示:(1)員工外表吸引力會透過增加社會互動渴望進而影響同事主動助人行為;(2)員工外表吸引力會透過妒羨情緒進而提升遭受同事的社會破壞行為;(3)同事知覺員工為「高溫暖高能力」及「低溫暖低能力」的組合時,會加強員工外表吸引力透過社會互動渴望、提升同事主動助人行為的間接效果;(4)同事知覺員工為「低溫暖高能力」的組合時,會顯著增強外表吸引力透過妒羨、提升同事社會破壞行為的間接效果。
Abstract
Based on the implicit personality and social comparison theories, the aim of the study is to explore the positive and negative interpersonal processes linking employee’s physical attractiveness and colleagues’ proactive helping behavior through social interaction desires, and colleagues’ social undermining behavior through envy. Additionally, this study further examines whether coworkers’ perceived warmth and competence towards employees jointly moderate the indirect effects of employee physical attractiveness on coworkers’ proactive helping via social interaction desire, as well as on coworkers’ social undermining behavior via envy.

The present study utilized the round-robin design to collect dyadic data among employees and all other members within the same teams. A total of 211 members took part in the study, generating 452 valid dyadic responses. The results showed that: (1) Employees' physical attractiveness positively influences colleagues' proactive helping behavior through an increased desire for social interaction. (2) Employees' physical attractiveness enhances the likelihood of experiencing social undermining behavior from colleagues through envy. (3) Coworkers’ perceived warmth and competence jointly moderated the indirect effect of employees’ physical attractiveness on coworkers’ proactive helping via enhanced social interaction desire. This positive indirect effect is strengthened when coworkers’ perceived warmth and competence are both high, or both low; (4) Coworkers’ perceived warmth and competence jointly moderated the indirect effect of employees’ physical attractiveness on coworkers’ social undermining behavior via enhanced envy. This positive indirect effect is strengthened when coworkers’ perceived warmth is low whereas perceived competence is high.
目次 Table of Contents
論文審定書 ...................................................................................................... i
摘要……………………………………………………………………………… ii
Abstract............................................................................................................iii
目錄 …………………………………………………………………………...... iv
圖次 ................................................................................................................. v
表次 ................................................................................................................ vi
第一章 緒論 .................................................................................................... 1
第二章 文獻探討與研究假設 ........................................................................ 6
第一節 外表吸引力與人際關係社會互動..................................................... 6
第二節 外表吸引力、社會互動渴望及主動助人行為:社會交換理論觀點...................................................................................................................... 6
第三節 外表吸引力、妒羨情緒、社會破壞行為:社會比較理論觀點...................................................................................................................... 8
第四節 外表吸引力會增加同事社會互動渴望或妒羨?知覺「溫暖」與「能力」的干擾效果...................................................................................... ................9
第三章 研究方法 .......................................................................................... 14
第一節 研究設計與問卷發放程序............................................................... 14
第二節 研究量表........................................................................................... 15
第三節 資料分析工具................................................................................... 18
第四章 研究結果 .......................................................................................... 19
第一節 敘述性統計和相關係數分析........................................................... 19
第二節 驗證性因素分析............................................................................... 21
第三節 假設檢定........................................................................................... 22
第五章 討論與建議 ...................................................................................... 27
第一節 研究發現與理論意涵....................................................................... 27
第二節 管理意涵........................................................................................... 30
第三節 研究限制與未來建議....................................................................... 31
文獻參考 ....................................................................................................... 34
附錄 ............................................................................................................... 39
參考文獻 References
尤慧慧 (2005)。應徵者外表吸引力與行為對甄面談決策之影響:以職務性別取向符合程度、顧客接觸需求程度為干擾變項。
紀乃文, & 古思婕. (2019). 見賢思齊或嫉賢妒能? 探討良性與惡性妒羨與任務績效, 人際反生產力行為的關係: 個人與情境面因素的干擾效果. 管理學報, 36(3), 245-277.
彭台光, 高月慈, & 林鉦棽. (2006). 管理研究中的共同方法變異: 問題本質, 影響, 測試和補救. 管理學報, 23(1), 77-98.
Adam, G. R. (1977). Physical attractiveness research: toward a developmental social psychology of beauty. Human Development, 20, 217-239.
Agthe, M., Spörrle, M., & Maner, J. K. (2010). Don't hate me because I'm beautiful: Anti-attractiveness bias in organizational evaluation and decision making. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 46(6), 1151-1154.
Andreoni, J., & Petrie, R. (2008). Beauty, gender and stereotypes: Evidence from laboratory experiments. Journal of Economic Psychology, 29(1), 73-93.
Barocas, R., & Karoly, P. (1972). Effects of physical appearance on social
responsiveness. Psychological Reports, 31(2), 495-500.
Bauer, D. J., Preacher, K. J., & Gil, K. M. (2006). Conceptualizing and testing
random indirect effects and moderated mediation in multilevel models: new procedures and recommendations. Psychological methods, 11(2), 142.
Blau, P. (2017). Exchange and power in social life. Routledge.
Borland, J., & Leigh, A. (2014). Unpacking the beauty premium: What channels does it operate through, and has it changed over time?. Economic Record, 90(288), 17-32.
Chi, N. W., & Tu, M. H. (2023). Why and when proactive helping does not lead to future help: The roles of psychological need satisfaction and interpersonal competence. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 140, 103824.
Clifford, M. M. (1975). Physical attractiveness and academic performance. Child Study Journal.
Clifford, M. M., & Walster, E. (1973). The effect of physical attractiveness on teacher expectations. Sociology of education, 248-258.
Cohen-Charash, Y., & Mueller, J. S. (2007). Does perceived unfairness exacerbate or mitigate interpersonal counterproductive work behaviors related to envy?. Journal of applied psychology, 92(3), 666.
Crusius, J., Gonzalez, M. F., Lange, J., & Cohen-Charash, Y. (2020). Envy: An
adversarial review and comparison of two competing views. Emotion
Review, 12(1), 3-21.
Cuddy, A. J., Fiske, S. T., & Glick, P. (2008). Warmth and competence as universal dimensions of social perception: The stereotype content model and the BIAS map. Advances in experimental social psychology, 40, 61-149.
Dion, K., Berscheid, E., & Walster, E. (1972). What is beautiful is good. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 24(3), 285–290.
Duffy, M. K., Ganster, D. C., & Pagon, M. (2002). Social undermining in the
workplace. Academy of management Journal, 45(2), 331-351.
Duffy, M. K., Scott, K. L., Shaw, J. D., Tepper, B. J., & Aquino, K. (2012). A social context model of envy and social undermining. Academy of management Journal, 55(3), 643-666.
Dunn, J. R., & Schweitzer, M. E. (2006). Green and mean: Envy and social
undermining in organizations. In Ethics in groups (Vol. 8, pp. 177-197).
Emerald Group Publishing Limited.
Efran, M. G. (1974). The effect of physical appearance on the judgment of guilt, interpersonal attraction, and severity of recommended punishment in a simulated jury task. Journal of Research in Personality, 8(1), 45-54.
Feingold, A. (1992). Good-looking people are not what we think. Psychological bulletin, 111(2), 304.
Fiske, S. T., & Neuberg, S. L. (1990). A continuum of impression formation, from category-based to individuating processes: Influences of information and motivation on attention and interpretation. Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 23, pp. 1-74).
Fiske, S. T., Cuddy, A. J., Glick, P., & Xu, J. (2002). A model of (often mixed)
stereotype content: competence and warmth respectively follow from
perceived status and competition. Journal of personality and social
psychology, 82(6), 878.
Frieze, I. H., Olson, J. E., & Russell, J. (1991). Attractiveness and income for men and women in management 1. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 21(13), 1039-1057.
Ganegoda, D. B., & Bordia, P. (2019). I can be happy for you, but not all the time: A contingency model of envy and positive empathy in the workplace. Journal of Applied Psychology, 104(6), 776.
Hatfield, E., & Sprecher, S. (1986). Mirror, mirror: The importance of looks in
everyday life. Suny Press.
Heilman, M. E., & Saruwatari, L. R. (1979). When beauty is beastly: The effects of appearance and sex on evaluations of job applicants for managerial and nonmanagerial jobs. Organizational behavior and human performance, 23(3), 360-372.
Heilman, M. E., & Stopeck, M. H. (1985). Attractiveness and corporate success: Different causal attributions for males and females. Journal of Applied Psychology, 70(2), 379.
Hosoda, M., Stone‐Romero, E. F., & Coats, G. (2003). The effects of physical
attractiveness on job‐related outcomes: A meta‐analysis of experimental
studies. Personnel psychology, 56(2), 431-462.
Judge, T. A., Hurst, C., & Simon, L. S. (2009). Does it pay to be smart, attractive, or confident (or all three)? Relationships among general mental ability, physical attractiveness, core self-evaluations, and income. Journal of Applied Psychology, 94(3), 742.
Kelley H. H. (1967) Attribution theory in social psychology. In Levine D. (Ed.), Nebraska symposium on motivation. Vol. 15. Lincoln, NE: Univer. of
Nebraska Press. Pp. 192–238.
Kenrick, D. T., & Gutierres, S. E. (1980). Contrast effects and judgments of physical attractiveness: When beauty becomes a social problem. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 38(1), 131.
Kleck, R. E., & Rubenstein, C. (1975). Physical attractiveness, perceived attitude similarity, and interpersonal attraction in an opposite-sex encounter. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 31(1), 107.
Kniffin, K. M., & Wilson, D. S. (2004). The effect of nonphysical traits on the
perception of physical attractiveness: Three naturalistic studies. Evolution and Human Behavior, 25(2), 88-101.
Lange, J., & Crusius, J. (2015). Dispositional envy revisited: Unraveling the
motivational dynamics of benign and malicious envy. Personality and social psychology bulletin, 41(2), 284-294.
Lee, H. W., Chi, N. W., Kim, Y. J., Lee, H., Lin, S. H., & Johnson, R. E. (2022).
Leaders’ responses to receipt of proactive helping: Integrating theories of
approach–avoidance and challenge–hindrance. Human Relations, 2022.
Lemay Jr, E. P., Clark, M. S., & Greenberg, A. (2010). What is beautiful is good
because what is beautiful is desired: Physical attractiveness stereotyping as projection of interpersonal goals. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 36(3), 339-353.
Li, Y., Zhang, C., & Laroche, M. (2019). Is beauty a premium? A study of the
physical attractiveness effect in service encounters. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 50, 215-225.
Mieczkowski, H., Liu, S. X., Hancock, J., & Reeves, B. (2019, March). Helping not hurting: Applying the stereotype content model and bias map to social robotics. In 2019 14th ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot
Interaction, 222-229.
Min, S. W., Humphrey, S. E., Aime, F., Petrenko, O. V., Quade, M. J., & Fu, S. Q. (2022). Dealing with new members: Team members’ reactions to newcomer’s attractiveness and sex. Journal of Applied Psychology, 107(7), 1115.
Morgan, R., Locke, A., & Arnocky, S. (2022). Envy mediates the relationship
between physical appearance comparison and women’s intrasexual
gossip. Evolutionary Psychological Science, 8(2), 148-157.
Morrow, P. C. (1990). Physical attractiveness and selection decision making. Journal of Management, 16(1), 45-60.
Morrow, P. C., McElroy, J. C., Stamper, B. G., & Wilson, M. A. (1990). The effects of physical attractiveness and other demographic characteristics on promotion decisions. Journal of Management, 16(4), 723-736.
Mulford, M., Orbell, J., Shatto, C., & Stockard, J. (1998). Physical attractiveness, opportunity, and success in everyday exchange. American journal of sociology, 103(6), 1565-1592.
Parrot, W. G., & Smith, R. H. (1993). Distinguishing the experiences of envy and jealousy. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 64, 906-920
Pendry, L. F., & Macrae, C. N. (1994). Stereotypes and mental life: The case of the motivated but thwarted tactician. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 30(4), 303-325.
Pinhas, L., Toner, B. B., Ali, A., Garfinkel, P. E., & Stuckless, N. (1999). The effects of the ideal of female beauty on mood and body satisfaction. International journal of eating disorders, 25(2), 223-226.
Podsakoff, P. M., & Organ, D. W. (1986). Self-reports in organizational research: Problems and prospects. Journal of management, 12(4), 531-544.
Segal-Caspi, L., Roccas, S., & Sagiv, L. (2012). Don’t judge a book by its cover, revisited: Perceived and reported traits and values of attractive women.Psychological science, 23(10), 1112-1116.
Shahani-Denning, C., Dudhat, P., Tevet, R., & Andreoli, N. (2010). Effect of physical attractiveness on selection decisions in India and the united states.International Journal of Management, 27(1), 37.
Sigall, H., & Ostrove, N. (1975). Beautiful but dangerous: effects of offender
attractiveness and nature of the crime on juridic judgment. Journal of
Personality and Social Psychology, 31(3), 410.
Spitzmuller, M., & Van Dyne, L. (2013). Proactive and reactive helping: Contrasting the positive consequences of different forms of helping. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 34(4), 560-580.
Taylor, S. E., & Lobel, M. (1989). Social comparison activity under threat: downward evaluation and upward contacts. Psychological review, 96(4), 569.
Tesser, A., & Collins, J. E. (1988). Emotion in social reflection and comparison situations: intuitive, systematic, and exploratory approaches. Journal of personality and social psychology, 55(5), 695.
Thompson, J. K., Heinberg, L., & Tantleff-Dunn, S. (1991). The physical appearance comparison scale. The Behavior Therapist, 14, 174.
Thornton, B., & Moore, S. (1993). Physical attractiveness contrast effect: Implications for self-esteem and evaluations of the social self. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 19(4), 474-480.
Tsai, W. C., Huang, T. C., & Yu, H. H. (2012). Investigating the unique predictability and boundary conditions of applicant physical attractiveness and non‐verbal behaviours on interviewer evaluations in job interviews. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 85(1), 60-79.
Tsai, W. C., & Huang, Y. M. (2002). Mechanisms linking employee affective delivery and customer behavioral intentions. Journal of applied psychology, 87(5), 1001.
Tu, M. H., Gilbert, E. K., & Bono, J. E. (2022). Is beauty more than skin deep?
Attractiveness, power, and nonverbal presence in evaluations of hirability. Personnel Psychology, 75(1), 119-146.
Wan, L. C., & Wyer Jr, R. S. (2015). Consumer reactions to attractive service
providers: approach or avoid?. Journal of Consumer Research, 42(4), 578-
595. Watkins, L. M., & Johnston, L. (2000). Screening job applicants: The impact of physical attractiveness and application quality. International Journal of selection and assessment, 8(2), 76-84.
Weiner, B. (2005). Social Motivation, Justice, and the Moral Emotions: An
Attributional Approach. Lawrence Earlbaum, Mahwah, NJ.
Westman, M., & Vinokur, A. D. (1998). Unraveling the relationship of distress levels within couples: Common stressors, empathic reactions, or crossover via social interaction?. Human relations, 51(2), 137-156.
Wood, J. V. (1996). What is social comparison and how should we study
it?. Personality and social psychology bulletin, 22(5), 520-537.
Yu, L., Duffy, M. K., & Tepper, B. J. (2018). Consequences of downward envy: A model of self-esteem threat, abusive supervision, and supervisory leader selfimprovement. Academy of Management Journal, 61(6), 2296-2318
電子全文 Fulltext
本電子全文僅授權使用者為學術研究之目的,進行個人非營利性質之檢索、閱讀、列印。請遵守中華民國著作權法之相關規定,切勿任意重製、散佈、改作、轉貼、播送,以免觸法。
論文使用權限 Thesis access permission:自定論文開放時間 user define
開放時間 Available:
校內 Campus:開放下載的時間 available 2033-07-12
校外 Off-campus:開放下載的時間 available 2033-07-12

您的 IP(校外) 位址是 18.191.5.239
現在時間是 2024-05-04
論文校外開放下載的時間是 2033-07-12

Your IP address is 18.191.5.239
The current date is 2024-05-04
This thesis will be available to you on 2033-07-12.

紙本論文 Printed copies
紙本論文的公開資訊在102學年度以後相對較為完整。如果需要查詢101學年度以前的紙本論文公開資訊,請聯繫圖資處紙本論文服務櫃台。如有不便之處敬請見諒。
開放時間 available 2028-07-12

QR Code