Responsive image
博碩士論文 etd-0612123-195700 詳細資訊
Title page for etd-0612123-195700
論文名稱
Title
ESG對財務績效及信用評等之影響
The effect of ESG on financial performance and credit ratings
系所名稱
Department
畢業學年期
Year, semester
語文別
Language
學位類別
Degree
頁數
Number of pages
52
研究生
Author
指導教授
Advisor
召集委員
Convenor
口試委員
Advisory Committee
口試日期
Date of Exam
2023-07-01
繳交日期
Date of Submission
2023-07-12
關鍵字
Keywords
ESG、財務績效、信用評等、資金成本、CSR
ESG, financial performance, credit rating, cost of capital, CSR
統計
Statistics
本論文已被瀏覽 467 次,被下載 0
The thesis/dissertation has been browsed 467 times, has been downloaded 0 times.
中文摘要
此次研究以2015到2021年台灣上市及上櫃公司為樣本,檢視企業社會責任績效(ESG)和財務績效及信用評等(ROA、ROE、Tobin’sQ及信用評等)間的關係,並進一步探討高科技電子產業是否因為較佳之ESG績效而有更好之財務績效及信用評等。
實證結果顯示ESG績效愈好則財務績效及信用評等愈佳均達顯著水準,其中電子產業在ROA、Tobin's Q及信用評顯著優於非電子業,ROE則未達顯著水準,推測其可能原因為,平均而言電子業負債比率低於非電子業,故較少使用權益乘數來提升ROE,惟電子產業確實能因為較佳的ESG績效,而有更佳的財務績效與信用評等均達顯著水準,顯示有較佳ESG績效的電子產業確實有更佳之財務績效及信用評等。
Abstract
This study explores the relationship between corporate ESG performance and financial performance and credit ratings (ROA, ROE, Tobin'sQ and credit ratings, etc.) from 2015 to 2021, and further explores whether the high-tech electronics industry has better financial performance and credit ratings due to better ESG performance.
The empirical results show that the better the ESG performance, the better the financial performance and credit rating have reached a significant level, among which the electronics industry is significantly better than the non-electronics industry in ROA, Tobin's Q and credit rating, and the ROE is not at a significant level, it is speculated that the possible reason is that, the debt ratio of the electronics industry is lower than that of the non-electronics industry on average, so the equity multiplier is less used to improve ROE, but the electronics industry can indeed achieve a significant level of better financial performance and credit rating due to better ESG performance. It means that electronics industries show better ESG performance does have better financial performance and credit ratings.
目次 Table of Contents
目錄
學位論文審定書.......................................................i
中文摘要 ............................................................ii
英文摘要 ...........................................................iii
第一章 緒論 ..........................................................1
第一節 研究背景 ..................................................1
第二節 研究動機...................................................2
第三節 研究問題 ..................................................3
第二章 文獻回顧與假說建立 ............................................5
第一節 上市櫃永續報告書作業辦法與揭露演進歷程 ....................5
第二節 GRI、SASB、TCFD、TESG準則說明 ............................11
第三節 公司治理、CSR與企業績效及資金成本或信用評等相關文獻 ......18
第四節 ESG和SASB與企業財務績效、資金成本或信用評等相關文獻 .....19
第五節 研究假說建立 .............................................20
第三章 研究方法 .....................................................21
第一節 資料來源與樣本選擇 .......................................21
第二節 變數定義 .................................................23
第三節 實證模型 .................................................26
第四章 實證結果與分析 ...............................................27
第一節 敘述統計 .................................................27
第二節 相關係數 .................................................29
第三節 實證結果分析 .............................................29
第五章 結論與建議 ...................................................34
第一節 研究結論..................................................34
第二節 研究限制與建議 ...........................................35
參考文獻 ............................................................37
附錄 ................................................................42
參考文獻 References
參考文獻
一、中文部分
池祥萱、繆文娟與莊瀅臻,2014,企業社會責任對於公司財務績效的影響是雙面刃嗎?來自全球 500 大公司的證據,管理學報,31(1),1-19。
池祥萱、林煜恩、張韶雯與池祥麟,2022,創新或過度投資?過度自信經理人從事企業社會責任活動對公司經營績效的影響,管理評論,41(1),43-63。
朱祥瑋(2020),ESG、環境績效與公司風險之探討,政治大學財務管理學系學位論文。
沈中華,張元,2008,企業的社會責任行為可以改善財務績效嗎?以英國FTSE社會責任指數為例,中央研究院經濟研究所,經濟論文。林慧(2022),國際產業分類下SASB評分機制對企業財務及風險表現的研究—以台灣企業為例,政治大學金融學系學位論文。
林慧(2022),國際產業分類下SASB評分機制對企業財務及風險表現的研究—以台灣企業為例,政治大學金融學系學位論文。
施凱珍(2021),採 SASB 準則下 ESG 重大性議題與財務績效之探討,國立政治大學風險管理與保險學系碩士論文。
柯弈(2022),ESG品質與揭露對企業財務表現的影響,國立臺灣大學管理學院財務金融研究所碩士論文。
陳振遠、王健聰與洪世偉,2017,公司治理對於企業社會責任、公司價值之影 響,中山管理評論,25(1),135-176。
張育維(2017),企業社會責任揭露程度 與財務績效之關聯性,淡江大學會計學系碩士班 碩士論文。
張竣期(2022),企業社會責任、財務績效與股價報酬: 基於臺灣上市公司與追蹤資料模型的研究,國立臺灣大學管理學院國際企業學系碩士論文。
張瑄圃(2022),SASB準則下ESG重大性議題對股權資金成本之影響,政治大學財務管理學系學位論文。
游孟軒(2022),SASB準則下台灣上市公司ESG揭露程度與財務績效之關聯性探討,政治大學會計學系學位論文。
趙子聰(2022),公司治理與企業績效之關聯性-兼論企業社會責任之影響,淡江大學會計學系碩士班學位論文。
劉慧賢(2018),研發費用支出和企業經營績效之動態關聯探討-以電子業為例,交通大學管理學院經營管理學程學位論文。
二、英文部分
Barnea, A., and Rubin, A. 2010. Corporate Social Responsibility as a Conflict between Shareholders. Journal of Business Ethics, 97(1), 71-86.
Calantone, R. J., Cavusgil, S. T. and Zhao, Y. 2002. “Learing orientation, firm innovation capability, and firm performance.” Industrial Marketing Management, 75 31(6), 515-524.
Cahan, S. F., Chen, C., Chen, L., & Nguyen, N. H.. (2015). Corporate social responsibility and media coverage. Journal of Banking & Finance, 59, 409-422.
Del Guerio, D. and J.Hawkins. 1998. The motivation and impact of pension fund activism, Journal of Financial Economics, 52, 293-340
Douglas A. Schuler, Margaret Cording(2006) A Corporate Social Performance–Corporate Financial Performance Behavioral Model for Consumers, The Academy of Management Review,31(3),540-558.
Dhaliwal, D. S., S. Radhakrishnan, A. Tsang, and Y. G. Yang(2012), ‘Nonfinancial Disclosure and Analyst Forecast Accuracy: International Evidence on Corporate Social Responsibility Disclosure’, The Accounting Review, 87(3), 723–759
Eccles, R., & G., Serafeim. (2013). The Performance Frontier: Innovating for a Sustainable Strategy. Harvard Business Review, 91, 5, 50–60.
Friedman, M.(1970), A Friedman doctrine: The social responsibility of business is to increase its profit. New York Times Magazine, 13(1), 32-3.
Fatemi, A. M., Fooladi, I. J., & Tehranian, H.(2015). Valuation effects of corporate social responsibility. Journal of Banking & Finance, 59, 182–192
Ghoul, S. E., Guedhami, O., Kwok, C. C. Y., & Mishra, D. R.(2011). Does corporate social responsibility affect the cost of capital? Journal of Banking & Finance, 35(9), 2388–2406.
Gao, F., Dong, Y., Ni, C., and Fu, R.(2016). Determinants and economic consequences of non-financial disclosure quality. European Accounting Review, 25 (2), 287–317.
Henriksson, R., Livnat, joshua , Pfeifer, P., & Stumpp, M. (2019)Integrating ESGin Portfolio Construction, The Journal of Portfolio Management, 45, 95-4918.
Hsiao, L. P., Chen, W., and Lin, J. R. 2020. The Effect of Corporate Social Responsibility Performance on Financial Risk. NTU Management Review, 30(2), 257-310.
Huang, C. J., Ke, W. C., and Lin, C. P. 2020. Does CSR Materiality Affect Financial Performance in Taiwan?. Journal of Financial Studies, 28(4), 59-109.
Jensen, M. C., and Meckling, W. H. 1976. Theory of the Firm: Managerial Behavior, Agency Costs, and Ownership Structure. Journal of Financial Economics, 3, 305- 360.
Jones, T. M.(1995). Instrumental stakeholder theory: A synthesis of ethics and economics. Academy of Management Review, 20, 404-437.
Khan, M., Serafeim, G., & Yoon, A.. (2016). Corporate Sustainability: First Evidence on Materiality. The Accounting Review, 91(6), 1697–1724.
Kim, B., & Lee, S.. (2020). The impact of material and immaterial sustainability on firm performance: The moderating role of franchising strategy. Tourism Management, 77, 103999
Lyon, T., Lu, Y., Shi, X., & Yin, Q.(2013). How do investors respond to green company awards in China? Ecological Economics, 94, 1–8
McWilliams, A. and D. Siegel. 2000. Corporate social responsibility: A theory of the firm perspective. Academy of Management Review, 26(1), 117-127.
Molloy, L., H. Erekson, & R. Gorman. 2002. Exploring the relationship between Environmental and Financial Performance. Working Paper, Mianmi University
McWilliams, A., Siegel, D. S., and Wright, P. M. 2006. Corporate Social Responsibility: Strategic Implications. Journal of Management Studies, 43(1), 1-18.
Malik, M.(2015). Value-enhancing capabilities of CSR: A brief review of contemporary literature. Journal of Business Ethics, 127, 419–438
Maha Faisal Alsayegh, Rashidah Abdul Rahman, Saeid Homayoun(2020) Corporate economic, environmental, and social sustainability performance transformation through ESG disclosure, Sustainability,12 (9), 3910
Ntiamoah, E. B., Egyiri, P. O., & Kwamega, M.. (2014). Corporate Social Responsibility Awareness, Firm Commitment and Organizational Performance.
OECD(2020), ESG Investing: Practices, Progress and Challenges, Retrieved December 26, 2020, fromhttps://www.oecd.org/finance/ESG-Investing-Practices-Progress-Challenges.pdf
Preston, L. E., & O’Bannon, D. P. (1997). The Corporate Social-Financial Performance Relationship: A Typology and Analysis. Business & Society, 36(4), 419–429.
Peloza, J. (2009). The Challenge of Measuring Financial Impacts From Investments in Corporate Social Performance. Journal of Management, 35, 6, 1518–1541.
Porter, M.E. and Kramer, M.R. (2011) The Big Idea: Creating Shared Value. Harvard Business Review, 89, 2-17.
Robertson, D.C., Nicholson, N. (1996) Expressions of corporate social responsibility in U.K. firms. J Bus Ethics 15, 1095–1106
Tobin, J. 1969. A General Equilibrium Approach to Monetary Theory. Journal of Money, Credit and Banking, 1(1), 15-29.
Tang, Z., Hull, C. E., and Rothenberg, S. 2012. How Corporate Social Responsibility Engagement Strategy Moderates the CSR–Financial Performance Relationship. Journal of Management Studies, 49(7), 1274-1303.
Yeganeh, Y. H., & Barzegar, G. (2014). The Effect of Disclosure Level of Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) on Corporate Financial Performance (CFP) in Tehran Stock Exchange. International Journal of Accounting Research, 1, 11, 43–51.
Yu, H.-C., Kuo, L., & Kao, M.-F.. (2017). The relationship between CSR disclosure and competitive advantage. Sustainability Accounting, Management and Policy Journal, 8, 5, 547–570.
電子全文 Fulltext
本電子全文僅授權使用者為學術研究之目的,進行個人非營利性質之檢索、閱讀、列印。請遵守中華民國著作權法之相關規定,切勿任意重製、散佈、改作、轉貼、播送,以免觸法。
論文使用權限 Thesis access permission:自定論文開放時間 user define
開放時間 Available:
校內 Campus:開放下載的時間 available 2026-07-12
校外 Off-campus:開放下載的時間 available 2026-07-12

您的 IP(校外) 位址是 3.144.100.252
現在時間是 2024-11-21
論文校外開放下載的時間是 2026-07-12

Your IP address is 3.144.100.252
The current date is 2024-11-21
This thesis will be available to you on 2026-07-12.

紙本論文 Printed copies
紙本論文的公開資訊在102學年度以後相對較為完整。如果需要查詢101學年度以前的紙本論文公開資訊,請聯繫圖資處紙本論文服務櫃台。如有不便之處敬請見諒。
開放時間 available 2026-07-12

QR Code