Responsive image
博碩士論文 etd-0613123-231933 詳細資訊
Title page for etd-0613123-231933
論文名稱
Title
新冠疫情對董事會與公司績效關係之影響
The Impact of the COVID-19 Pandemic on the Relationship between the Board of Directors and Firm Performance
系所名稱
Department
畢業學年期
Year, semester
語文別
Language
學位類別
Degree
頁數
Number of pages
58
研究生
Author
指導教授
Advisor
召集委員
Convenor
口試委員
Advisory Committee
口試日期
Date of Exam
2023-06-26
繳交日期
Date of Submission
2023-07-13
關鍵字
Keywords
上市櫃公司、董事會結構、公司績效、新冠肺炎、危機
Listed Companies, Board Structure, Firm Performance, COVID-19, Crisis
統計
Statistics
本論文已被瀏覽 65 次,被下載 4
The thesis/dissertation has been browsed 65 times, has been downloaded 4 times.
中文摘要
本研究旨在探討董事會結構對公司財務績效的影響,並進一步研究COVID-19期間董事會結構與財務績效之間的調節效果。研究樣本涵蓋了台灣2015年至2021年的上市櫃公司,總計6593筆有效樣本。本文將董事會結構分為董事會規模、獨立董事比例、董事長不兼任總經理、董事會開會次數、董事會平均出席率和獨立董事平均兼任家數等解釋變數,並分析其與股東權益報酬率、資產報酬率和Tobin's Q之間的關聯性。
研究結果顯示,獨立董事比例對三個公司財務指標均呈現正向關聯且達到顯著水準。董事長不兼任總經理對三個公司財務指標皆呈現正向關聯且達到顯著水準。董事會開會次數和董事會平均出席率對股東權益報酬率、資產報酬率和Tobin's Q均呈現正向關聯且達到顯著水準。
最後進一步探討了COVID-19期間對董事會結構和財務績效的調節效果。結果顯示董事會開會次數和董事會平均出席率在這一期間對公司財務績效有顯著的正向調節效果,而其他董事會結構變數則未受調節影響。這意味著在COVID-19疫情期間,增加董事會的開會次數和董事會成員的出席率對維持穩定公司財務績效是至關重要,透過此方式降低危機造成的衝擊並且能適應危機時的各種挑戰。
Abstract
This thesis aims to investigate the impact of board structure on firm financial performance and further examine the moderating effect of board structure during the COVID-19 period. The sample consists of 6,593 valid observations from listed companies in Taiwan spanning from 2015 to 2021. I consider board structure variables such as board size, proportion of independent directors, board duality, board meeting frequency, average attendance rate, and the number of independent directors holding multiple directorships, and analyze their relationships with shareholder equity return, asset return, and Tobin's Q.

The results indicate a positive and significant relationship between the proportion of independent directors and all three financial indicators. Board duality shows a positive and significant association with all three indicators. Board meeting frequency and attendance rate exhibit positive and significant associations with shareholder equity return, asset return, and Tobin's Q.

Furthermore, I examine the moderating effect of board structure on Financial performance during the COVID-19 period. The results reveal that board meeting frequency and attendance rate have a significant positive moderating effect on certain Financial performance indicators during this period, while other board structure variables are not influenced by this moderation. This implies that increasing board meeting frequency and the attendance of board members are crucial in maintaining stable firm Financial performance during the COVID-19 pandemic.
目次 Table of Contents
論文審定書 i
致謝 ii
中文摘要 iii
Abstract iv
目 錄 v
圖 次 vi
表 次 vii
第壹章 緒論 1
第一節 研究背景與動機 1
第二節 研究目的 3
第三節 研究架構 4
第貳章 文獻探討 6
第一節 董事會結構與公司績效 6
第二節 重大危機發生之董事會結構與公司財務績效 11
第參章 研究方法 14
第一節 樣本選取與資料來源 14
第二節 變數定義與衡量 14
第三節 實證模型 17
第肆章 實證結果及分析 19
第一節 敘述性統計分析 19
第二節 相關性分析 21
第三節 迴歸結果分析 23
第五章 結論與建議 43
第一節 研究發現 43
第二節 研究限制與建議 45
參考文獻 46
參考文獻 References
一、 中文參考文獻
丁秀儀, 陳于欣. (2010). 公司獨立董事為何忙碌?. 管理學報, 27(3), 291-318.
王媛慧, 許順旺, 蔡玉琴, 黃美珠, 徐達光. (2015). 董事會特徵對食品業經營績效之影響. 輔仁民生學誌, 21(1), 15-33.
朱博湧, 林裕淩, 王筠傑. (2015). 獨立董事多樣性對於公司價值之研究. 管理資訊計算, 4(2), 65-82.
李馨蘋, 莊宗憲. (2007). 公司治理機制與公司績效之實證研究. 東吳經濟商學學報 (57), 1-27.
張元, 萬欣芝. (2016). 董事兼職會影響新上市上櫃公司的後續績效表現嗎?. 兩岸金融季刊, 4(2), 83-128.
謝佩綺. (2016). 企業資訊揭露, 公司治理與財務危機預警之實證研究-以台灣上市上櫃電子業為例

二、 英文參考文獻
Adams, R. B., Hermalin, B. E., & Weisbach, M. S. (2010). The role of boards of directors in corporate Governance: A conceptual framework and survey. Journal of Economic Literature, 48(1), 58-107.
Aebi, V., Sabato, G., & Schmid, M. (2012). Risk Management, corporate Governance, and bank performance in the Financial crisis. Journal of Banking & Finance, 36(12), 3213-3226.
Ajeigbe, K. B., & Ganda, F. (2023). The implications of the pandemic for the corporate Governance, remuneration and sustainability performance of South African listed companies. International Journal of Innovative Research and Scientific Studies, 6(1), 174-184.
Albulescu, C. T. (2021). COVID-19 and the United States financial markets’ volatility. Finance Research Letters, 38, 101699.
Ashraf, B. N. (2020). Stock markets’ reaction to COVID-19: Cases or fatalities?. Research in International Business and Finance, 54, 101249.
Boyd, B. K. (1994). Board control and CEO compensation. Strategic Management Journal, 15(5), 335-344.
Brickley, J. A., Coles, J. L., & Jarrell, G. A. (1994). Corporate leadership structure: On the separation of the positions of CEO and Chairman of the Board. Bradley Policy Research Center.
Cervantes, P., Díaz, A., Esparcia, C., & Huélamo, D. (2022). The impact of COVID-19 induced panic on stock market returns: A two-year experience. Economic Analysis and Policy, 76, 1075-1097.
Choi, S. Y. (2020). Industry volatility and economic uncertainty due to the COVID-19 pandemic: Evidence from wavelet coherence analysis. Finance Research Letters, 37, 101783.
Chou, H. I., Chung, H., & Yin, X. (2013). Attendance of board meetings and company performance: Evidence from Taiwan. Journal of Banking & Finance, 37(11), 4157-4171.
Daily, C. M., & Dalton, D. R. (1994). Bankruptcy and corporate Governance: The impact of board composition and structure. Academy of Management Journal, 37(6), 1603-1617.
Dalton, D. R., Daily, C. M., Johnson, J. L., & Ellstrand, A. E. (1999). Number of directors and Financial performance: A meta-analysis. Academy of Management Journal, 42(6), 674-686.
Fama, E. F., & Jensen, M. C. (1983). Agency problems and residual claims. The Journal of Law and Economics, 26(2), 327-349.
Fama, E. F., & Jensen, M. C. (1983). Separation of ownership and control. The Journal of Law and Economics, 26(2), 301-325.
Faleye, O. (2007). Does one hat fit all? The case of corporate leadership structure. Journal of Management & Governance, 11, 239-259.
Farwis, M., Siyam, M. M., Nazar, M. C. A., & Aroosiya, M. A. C. F. (2021). The nexus between corporate Governance and firm performance during COVID-19 pandemic in Sri Lanka. Journal of Economics, Finance and Accounting Studies, 3(1), 81-88.
Ferris, S. P., Jagannathan, M., & Pritchard, A. C. (2003). Too busy to mind the business? Monitoring by directors with multiple board appointments. The Journal of Finance, 58(3), 1087-1111.
Goodstein, J., Gautam, K., & Boeker, W. (1994). The effects of board size and diversity on strategic change. Strategic Management Journal, 15(3), 241-250.
Gordon, J. N. (2007). The rise of independent directors in the United States, 1950-2005: Of shareholder value and stock market prices. Stanford Law Review, 1465-1568.
Harris, I. C., & Shimizu, K. (2004). Too busy to serve? An examination of the influence of overboarded directors. Journal of Management Studies, 41(5), 775-798.
Hermalin, B., & Weisbach, M. S. (2001). Boards of directors as an endogenously determined institution: A survey of the economic literature.
Jackling, B., & Johl, S. (2009). Board structure and firm performance: Evidence from India's top companies. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 17(4), 492-509.
Kalemli-Ozcan, S., Gourinchas, P. O., Penciakova, V., & Sander, N. (2020). COVID-19 and SME failures. IMF Working Papers, 2020(207).
Kaur, M., Malik, K., & Sharma, S. (2021). A note on boardroom challenge, board effectiveness and corporate stewardship during COVID-19. 131-135.
Khatib, S. F., & Nour, A. (2021). The impact of corporate Governance on firm performance during the COVID-19 pandemic: Evidence from Malaysia. Journal of Asian Finance, Economics and Business, 8(2), 0943-0952.
Kumar, S., & Rao, P. (2021). Challenges are thrown in Corporate Governance during COVID 19. Academia Letters.
Lin, Y. F., Yeh, Y. M. C., & Yang, F. M. (2014). Supervisory quality of board and firm performance: a perspective of board meeting attendance. Total Quality Management & Business Excellence, 25(3-4), 264-279.
Lipton, M., & Lorsch, J. W. (1992). A modest proposal for improved corporate Governance. The business Lawyer, 59-77.
Mehrotra, S. (2016). The Nature of Corporate Board Structure and Its Impact on the Performance of USA Listed Firms. IUP Journal of Corporate Governance, 15.
Ntim, C. G., & Osei, K. A. (2011). The impact of corporate board meetings on corporate performance in South Africa. African Review of Economics and Finance, 2(2), 83-103.
Pearce, J. A., & Zahra, S. A. (1992). Board composition from a strategic contingency perspective. Journal of Management studies, 29(4), 411-438.
Peni, E., & Vähämaa, S. (2012). Did good corporate Governance improve bank performance during the Financial crisis?. Journal of Financial Services Research, 41, 19-35.
Phiri, A., Anyikwa, I., & Moyo, C. (2023). Co-movement between Covid-19 and G20 stock market returns: A Time and Frequency Analysis. Heliyon, 9(3).
Sharma, V. D. (2004). Board of director characteristics, institutional ownership, and fraud: Evidence from Australia. Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory, 23(2), 105-117.
Shehzad, K., Xiaoxing, L., & Kazouz, H. (2020). COVID-19’s disasters are perilous than Global Financial Crisis: A rumor or fact?. Finance Research Letters, 36, 101669.
Shen, H., Fu, M., Pan, H., Yu, Z., & Chen, Y. (2020). The impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on firm performance. Emerging Markets Finance and Trade, 56(10), 2213-2230.
Vafeas, N. (1999). Board meeting frequency and firm performance. Journal of Financial Economics, 53(1), 113-142.
Yermack, D. (1996). Higher market valuation of companies with a small board of directors. Journal of Financial Economics, 40(2), 185-211.
Zhang, W., Hou, W., & Qu, C. (2022). A sectoral-level analysis of the short-and long-term impacts of the COVID-19 pandemic on China’s stock market volatility. Heliyon, 8(10).
電子全文 Fulltext
本電子全文僅授權使用者為學術研究之目的,進行個人非營利性質之檢索、閱讀、列印。請遵守中華民國著作權法之相關規定,切勿任意重製、散佈、改作、轉貼、播送,以免觸法。
論文使用權限 Thesis access permission:校內校外完全公開 unrestricted
開放時間 Available:
校內 Campus: 已公開 available
校外 Off-campus: 已公開 available


紙本論文 Printed copies
紙本論文的公開資訊在102學年度以後相對較為完整。如果需要查詢101學年度以前的紙本論文公開資訊,請聯繫圖資處紙本論文服務櫃台。如有不便之處敬請見諒。
開放時間 available 已公開 available

QR Code