Responsive image
博碩士論文 etd-0616123-213822 詳細資訊
Title page for etd-0616123-213822
論文名稱
Title
混合工作的影響員工生產力和員工福利
The Impact of Hybrid Work on Employee Productivity and Employee Well-Being
系所名稱
Department
畢業學年期
Year, semester
語文別
Language
學位類別
Degree
頁數
Number of pages
65
研究生
Author
指導教授
Advisor
召集委員
Convenor
口試委員
Advisory Committee
口試日期
Date of Exam
2023-07-07
繳交日期
Date of Submission
2023-07-16
關鍵字
Keywords
混合工作、生產力、員工福利、工作需求和資源、後COVID-19時代
Hybrid Work, Productivity, Employee Well-being, Job demand and resource, Post Covid-19
統計
Statistics
本論文已被瀏覽 63 次,被下載 7
The thesis/dissertation has been browsed 63 times, has been downloaded 7 times.
中文摘要
在混合工作的背景下,本研究透過 JD-R 理論探討員工生產力與幸福感之間的關係。本研究在 JD-R 理論的背景下調查了員工生產力與幸福感之間的關係。尤其它研究了混合工作安排中的工作需求和資源如何影響員工的生產力和福祉。 這些數據以線上問卷收集於在混合環境中工作的 563 名員工。此研究結果表明,工作需求和資源(與工作相關的因素)與員工成果(包括生產力和幸福感)之間存在統計上顯著的關係。此外,工作量增加和難以過渡到新的工作條件等工作需求被發現會對員工的工作效率產生顯著的負面影響。另一方面,工作資源,如日程安排的靈活性、工作自主性、清晰的溝通和組織支持,被發現會顯著影響員工的生產力和幸福感。這些結果對 JD-R 理論具有重要意義,強調在理解員工福利和生產力時需要考慮工作需求和資源。調查結果對公司也有實際意義,著重於為員工提供工作資源和減少工作需求以促進他們的福祉和生產力的重要性。
Abstract
In the context of hybrid work, this study investigates the relationship between employee productivity and well-being through the JD-R theory. This study examined the relationship between employee productivity and well-being through the framework of the JD-R theory. In particular, it investigated how job demands and resources in hybrid work arrangements affect employee productivity and well-being. The data was collected from 563 employees who operate in a hybrid environment via an online survey. The results of the study indicate a statistically significant correlation between work-related factors from job demands and job resources, and employee outcomes, including productivity and well-being. In addition, job demands such as an increased workload and the difficulty of transitioning to new work conditions were found to have to negatively impact employee productivity significantly. On the other hand, job resources, such as schedule flexibility, job autonomy, clear communication, and organizational support, were discovered to impact employee productivity and well-being significantly. These findings have significant implications for the JD-R theory, highlighting the need to consider job demands and resources when comprehending employee well-being and productivity. The findings also have practical implications for organizations, highlighting the significance of providing job resources to employees and reducing job demands in order to promote their well-being and productivity.
目次 Table of Contents
Table of Contents
Letter of Validation i
Acknowledgement ii
Abstract (Chinese) iii
Abstract (English) iv
Table of Figures vii
Table of Tables viii
Chapter 1 Introduction 1
1.1 Introduction 1
1.2 Research Objectives 3
1.3 Research Outlines 4
Chapter 2 Literature Review 6
2.1 Definition of Hybrid Work 6
2.2 Benefits and Challenges of Hybrid Work 7
2.3. The Impact of Hybrid Work on Productivity and Employee Well-Being 12
2.4 Job Demand and Resource (JD-R) Theory Related to Hybrid Work 14
2.5 Conceptual Framework and Hypothesis 22
Chapter 3 Research Methodology 24
3.1 Research Design 24
3.2 Data Sampling and Collection 25
3.3 Data Analysis 26
Chapter 4 Results 28
4.1 Descriptive Statistic and Interpretation 28
4.2 Reliability Analysis 33
4.3 Correlation Analysis and Interpretation 34
Chapter 5 Discussion and Conclusion 42
5.1 Employee Productivity and Well-Being through JD-R Theory 42
5.2 Theoretical Implication 46
5.3 Managerial Implication 47
5.4 Limitations and Future Research Directions 47
References 49
Appendix 1 53
Appendix 2 56

參考文獻 References
Agarwal, M. (Ed.). (2021). How Amazon, Facebook, Apple, Google are shifting to hybrid work regimes. Business Today. Retrieved December 7, 2022, from https://www.businesstoday.in/industry/it/story/how-amazon-facebook-apple-google-are-shifting-to-hybrid-work-regimes-298436-2021-06-11
Alexopoulos, Angelos N. and Buckley, Finian. (2006). “What Trust Matters When: The Temporal Value of Professional and Personal Trust for Effective Knowledge
Transfer”. In: Group and Organization Management 38.3 (2013). ISSN:
10596011. doi:10.1177/1059601113488939
Alfanza, M. T. (2021). Telecommuting Intensity in the Context of COVID-19 Pandemic: Job Performance and Work-Life Balance. Economics and Business, 35(1), 107-116.
Allen, T., Johnson, R., Kiburz, K., & Shockley, K. (2013). Work-family conflict and flexible work arrangements: Deconstructing flexibility. Personnel Psychology, 66(2), 345–376. https://doi.org/10.1111/peps.12012
APA. (2022). 2022 TRENDS REPORT: Reworking Work. Retrieved March 27, 2023, from https://www.apa.org/monitor/2022/01/special-reworking-work
Bakker, A. B., & Demerouti, E. (2007). The Job Demands-Resources model: State of the art. Journal of managerial psychology, 22(3), 309-328.
Bakker, A. B., & Demerouti, E. (2017). Job demands–resources theory: Taking stock and looking forward. Journal of occupational health psychology, 22(3), 273.
Barrero, J. M., Bloom, N., & Davis, S. J. (2021). Why working from home will stick (No. w28731). National Bureau of Economic Research.
Bowling, N. A., Alarcon, G. M., Bragg, C. B., & Hartman, M. J. (2015). A meta-analytic examination of the potential correlates and consequences of workload. Work & stress, 29(2), 95-113.
Camacho, S., & Barrios, A. (2022). Teleworking and technostress: early consequences of a COVID-19 lockdown. Cognition, Technology & Work, 24(3), 441-457.
Connolly, P. (2007). Quantitative data analysis in education: A critical introduction using SPSS. Routledge.
Cortina, J. M. (1993). What is coefficient alpha? An examination of theory and applications. Journal of Applied Psychology, 78(1), 98–104. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.78.1.98
De Vaus, D. (2002). Analyzing Social Science Data. 50 Key Problems in Data Analysis. Sage, London, The United Kingdom.
Demerouti, E., Bakker, A. B., Nachreiner, F., & Schaufeli, W. B. (2001). The job demands-resources model of burnout. Journal of Applied psychology, 86(3), 499.
Etehadi, B., & Karatepe, O. M. (2019). The impact of job insecurity on critical hotel employee outcomes: The mediating role of self-efficacy. Journal of Hospitality Marketing & Management, 28(6), 665-689.
Fatima, T., Bilal, A. R., Waqas, M., & Imran, M. K. (2022). Keeping up with this workload is difficult: the ramifications of work overload on career resilience. Kybernetes, (ahead-of-print).
Gleb Tsipursky, C. E. O., & Experts, D. A. (2022). Returning to the office and leading hybrid and remote teams: A manual on benchmarking to best practices for competitive advantage.
Grant, C. A., Wallace, L. M., & Spurgeon, P. C. (2013). An exploration of the psychological factors affecting remote e‐worker's job effectiveness, well‐being and work‐life balance. Employee Relations.
Grzegorczyk, M., Mariniello, M., Nurski, L., & Schraepen, T. (2021). Blending the physical and virtual: a hybrid model for the future of work (No. 14/2021). Bruegel Policy Contribution.
Guy, J. (2021). Employees working from home are putting in longer hours than before the pandemic. CNN. Retrieved December 7, 2022, from https://edition.cnn.com/2021/02/05/business/working-from-home-hours-pandemic-scli-intl-gbr/index.html
Hardy, P., Soriano Marcolino, L., & Fontanari, J. F. (2021). The paradox of productivity during quarantine: An agent-based simulation. The European Physical Journal B, 94(1), 40. doi:10.1140/epjb10051-020-00016-4 PMID:33531876
Ingusci, E., Signore, F., Giancaspro, M. L., Manuti, A., Molino, M., Russo, V., Zito, M., & Cortese, C. G. (2021). Workload, Techno Overload, and Behavioral Stress During COVID-19 Emergency: The Role of Job Crafting in Remote Workers. Frontiers in Psychology. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.655148
Iqbal, K. M. J., Khalid, F., & Barykin, S. Y. (2021). Hybrid workplace: The future of work. In Handbook of Research on Future Opportunities for Technology Management Education (pp. 28-48). doi:10.4018/978-1-7998-8327-2.ch003
Johnson, T. P. (2014). Snowball sampling: introduction. Wiley StatsRef: Statistics Reference Online.
Kirchner, K., & Ipsen, C. (2022). Establishing trust in hybrid work–the role of people and technology.
Lenka, Reena Mahapatra. “Unique Hybrid Work model- The future of remote work”. In: Journal of Archaelogy of Egypt 18.7 (2021).
LRA. (2021). Practical Guide to Hybrid Working. Retrieved March 27, 2023, from https://www.lra.org.uk/sites/default/files/2021-10/A%20Practical%20Guide%20to%20Hybrid%20Working%20-%20LRA%20-%20October%202021.pdf
Montreuil, S. and Lippel, K. (2003), “Telework and occupational health: a Quebec empirical study and regulatory implications”, Safety Science, Vol. 41 No. 4, pp. 339-358.
Mutebi, N., & Hobbs, A. (2022). The impact of remote and hybrid working on workers and organisations. UK Parliament.
Naor, M., Pinto, G. D., Hakakian, A. I., & Jacobs, A. (2022). The impact of COVID-19 on office space utilization and real-estate: a case study about teleworking in Israel as new normal. Journal of Facilities Management, 20(1), 32–58. https://doi.org/10.1108/JFM-12-2020-0096
Netigate. (2021). Hur vill svenska anställda att arbetsgivare hanterar hemarbete efter pandemin? Stockholm: Netigate. [Accessed on 21 Jan. 2023].
Newport C. (2019) ‘Was E-mail a Mistake?’ The New Yorker, Retrieved March 27, 2023, from https://www. newyorker.com/tech/annals-of-technology/was-e-mail-a-mistake
Niebuhr, F., Borle, P., Börner-Zobel, F., & Voelter-Mahlknecht, S. (2022). Healthy and Happy Working from Home? Effects of Working from Home on Employee Health and Job Satisfaction. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 19(3), 1122–. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19031122
Nunnally, J. C. (1978). Psychometric theory (2nd ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill.
Owl Labs. (2019). 2019 state of Remote Work Report. 2019 State of Remote Work Report. Retrieved March 27, 2023, from https://resources.owllabs.com/state-of-remote-work/2019
Pimentel, J. L. (2010). A note on the usage of Likert Scaling for research data analysis. USM R&D Journal, 18(2), 109-112.
Pyöriä P. (2011) ‘Managing Telework: Risks, Fears and Rules’, Management Research Review 34(4): 386-399
Rahaman, M. S., Kudo, S., Rawling, T., Ren, Y., & Salim, F. D. (2020). Seating preference analysis for hybrid workplaces. Academic Press
Stich, M. (2022). Making Hybrid Work Work: A systematic literature review on hybrid working teams: Eine systematische Literaturanalyse über hybride Arbeitsteams/
Su, Y. (2020), “Working from home during a pandemic: It’s not for everyone”, Federal Reserve Bank of Dallas Retrieved March 30, 2023, from https://www.dallasfed.org/research/economics/2020/0407.
The Hubble Team. (2023). The official list of every company’s back-to-office strategy. Retrieved March 27, 2023, from https://hubblehq.com/blog/famous-organizations-workplace-strategies
Tran, L. (2022). The Impact of Hybrid Work on Productivity: Understanding the Future of Work: A case study in agile software development teams.
Vidhyaa, B., & Ravichandran, M. A (2022). LITERATURE REVIEW ON HYBRID WORK MODEL. Journal homepage: www. ijrpr. com ISSN, 2582, 7421.
Weideman, M., & Hofmeyr, K. B. (2020). The influence of flexible work arrangements on employee engagement: An exploratory study. SA Journal of Human Resource Management, 18(1), 1-18.
Wigert, B. (2021). The future of hybrid work: 5 key questions answered with data. Retrieved March 29, 2023, from https://www.gallup.com/workplace/390632/future-hybrid-work-key-questions-answered-data.aspx
Yang, E., Bisson, C., & Sanborn, B. E. (2019). Coworking space as a third-fourth place: changing models of a hybrid space in corporate real estate. In Journal of Corporate Real Estate (Vol. 21, Issue 4, pp.324–345). Emerald Group Holdings Ltd. doi:10.1108/JCRE-12-2018-0051
電子全文 Fulltext
本電子全文僅授權使用者為學術研究之目的,進行個人非營利性質之檢索、閱讀、列印。請遵守中華民國著作權法之相關規定,切勿任意重製、散佈、改作、轉貼、播送,以免觸法。
論文使用權限 Thesis access permission:校內校外完全公開 unrestricted
開放時間 Available:
校內 Campus: 已公開 available
校外 Off-campus: 已公開 available


紙本論文 Printed copies
紙本論文的公開資訊在102學年度以後相對較為完整。如果需要查詢101學年度以前的紙本論文公開資訊,請聯繫圖資處紙本論文服務櫃台。如有不便之處敬請見諒。
開放時間 available 已公開 available

QR Code