近年來我國施行了一系列防止疫情蔓延的政策，包括隔離檢疫、強制配戴口罩和其他具有限制性的規定。這些政策不僅為公眾的生活帶來不便，甚至侵害了公民自由和基本權利。為什麼大部分的國人都會傾向順服於這些政策？除了對疫情的恐懼之外，本研究提出了更深層次的人格特質：權威人格傾向。具有這種人格特質的人傾向服從權威和重視集體利益。
綜合權威人格的相關研究，本研究透過網路問卷對順服於防疫政策的國人進行實證研究。本研究認為愈具有權威人格傾向的人，愈是傾向於順服政府的防疫政策。而在1400名受訪者中，本研究發現權威人格傾向在解釋防疫政策順服方面起到積極的關鍵作用，在權威人格傾向的影響下，本研究為疫情和政策順服的文獻增加了新的發現，具體而言在探究個人防疫政策順服時，除了原有文獻所提及的因素之外，亦須將權威人格傾向的心理因素納入考量。

In the past few years, the Taiwan government has initiated a series of policies countering COVID, including quarantine, mandatory masks, and other restricted regulations. These policies inconvenience the public and even violate their liberty and freedom. However, why do major Taiwanese comply with these policies? In addition to the fear of COVID, the article proposes the deeper personality as an alternative but missing literature: a perspective from authoritarian personality. People with such personality would tend to obey and respect their authority and collective interests.
Following the literature on authoritarian personality, the paper conducts an empirical assessment of the Taiwanese complying with the COVID policy with an online survey. We argue that a person with a more authoritarian personality tends to cooperate with the government’s COVID policy actively. With 1400 respondents, we find that authoritarianism plays a positive role in explaining public policy compliance. While including the influence of authoritarian personality, the paper adds new findings to the literature on COIVD and policy compliance. In particular, when examining individual compliance with epidemic prevention policies, it is necessary to consider the psychological factors related to authoritarian personality traits.

論文審定書 i
摘要 ii
Abstract iii
目錄 iv
表目錄 v
第一章 緒論 1
第一節 研究背景與動機 1
第二節 研究問題與目的 3
第二章 文獻回顧與研究假設 5
第ㄧ節 權威人格對政策順服的直接影響 5
第二節 權威人格對政策順服的異質影響-麻煩程度、權利侵害與政府信任 17
第三節 研究假設 20
第三章 研究方法 22
第一節 資料來源 22
第二節 變數測量 24
第三節 分析方法 32
第四章 實證分析結果 34
第一節 權威人格對政策順服的直接影響 34
第二節 權威人格對政策順服的異質影響-麻煩程度 38
第三節 權威人格對政策順服的異質影響-權利侵害 42
第四節 權威人格對政策順服的異質影響-政府信任 46
第五章 結論 50
第一節 研究結論 50
第二節 研究限制與後續研究展望 53
參考文獻 56
附錄 64

一、中文部分
丁與祥、李美枝、陳皎眉，1991，《社會心理學》，台北：國立空大。
文崇一，1993，《中國人的價值觀》，台北：東大。
丘昌泰，2013，《公共政策：基礎篇》，高雄：巨流。
石之瑜，1998，〈「權威人格」研究的今昔〉，《問題與研究》， 第37期，頁67 - 86。
石之瑜，1999，《政治心理學》，台北：五南。
朱志宏，2004，《公共行政》，台北：三民。
林嘉誠，1989，《政治心理形成與政治參與行為》，台北：商務。
林水波、張世賢，2006，《公共政策》，台北：五南。
林秀雲（譯），Earl Babbie（著），2021，《社會科學研究方法》，台北：雙葉。
林三欽，2020，〈我國防疫措施法制之合憲性爭議—以限制高中以下師生出國禁令為例〉，《月旦法學教室》，212，44-51。
林雨佑、嚴文廷，2020，〈以防疫之名限制醫療人員出國，國家有權力嗎？怎麼做才合宜？〉，https://www.twreporter.org/a/covid-19-taiwan-restrict-doctor-go-abroad，最後瀏覽日期：2022/7/21。
林靜蘭、高端勇、丘梅萱、凃兆璘，2021，〈疫情下民眾的心理健康〉，《精神衛生護理雜誌》，16(2)，14-21。
林政楠、黃韋豪，2022，《台拉（LV）立（LT）三邊協議型擴充加值型（add-on）國際合作研究計畫—自我防衛的決心：拉脫維亞、立陶宛、與台灣的掛國比較研究（1/3）》，計畫編號：MOST 111-2923-H-003-MY3，台北：科技部補助專題研究計畫。
吳定，1999，《公共政策辭典》，台北：五南書局。
吳定，2003，《公共政策》，台北：國立空大。
吳秋全，2021，〈民眾亂丟垃圾行為的研究：政策順服之觀點〉，國立臺灣大學社會科學院政治學系碩士論文。
呂亞力，2016，《政治學》，台北：三民。
邱文聰，2021，〈在例外與常態間失落的法治原則─論臺灣模式防疫的法制問題 〉，《法官協會雜誌 》，22，128-145。
洪鎌德，1999，《當代政治經濟學》，台北：揚智。
凌渝郎，1994，《政治學》，台北：三民。
馬起華，1963，《政治適應動力學》，台北：帕米爾。
馬起華，1978，《政治行為》，台北：正中。
馬起華，1981，《政治社會學》，台北：正中。
馬起華，1984，《政治心理分析》，台北：正中。
陳文雄，1974，〈傅洛依德與社會學習論人格理論之比較〉，《師友月刊》，87，27-30。
陳華興，2009，〈政策利害關係人對廉政政策順服與政治信任感關聯性之研究-以環保署業務往來之廠商為例〉，國立政治大學行政管理碩士學程碩士論文。
陳光輝，2010，〈民主經驗與民主價值-兩個世代台灣大學生之比較〉，《台灣民主季刊》，7(4)，1-45。
陳琇惠、黃俞禎，2015，〈國保女性被保險人政策認知與政策順服之研究〉，《當代社會工作期刊》，七，1-27。
陳巧如，2004，〈環境主義與政策順服：以台北市限用塑膠袋政策為例〉，國立台北大學公共行政暨政策學系碩士論文。
曹萃栩，2022， 〈論 COVID-19 防疫法制及其措施-從風險社會、預防原則到台灣傳染病防治法之修正〉，國立臺北大學法律學系碩士論文。
彭懷恩，1992，《中國政治文化的轉型-台灣政治心理取向》，台北：風雲。
賈文宇，2020，〈防疫還要談憲政主義嗎？〉，《法律與生命科學》，9(1)，39-65。
詹祐維，2020，〈傳染病防治法強制隔離措施之檢討－以釋字 690 號解釋為中心〉，《萬國法律》，231，13-23。
楊中芳，2001，《如何理解中國人-文化與個人論文集》，台北：遠流。
廖崇翰、陳陸輝，2021，〈人格、興趣、黨性：解析台灣大學生參與太陽花示威運動的因素〉，《台灣政治學刊》，25(2)，69-113。
蔡維廷、王靖興，2021，〈人格特質對台灣大學生政治容忍感之影響〉，《台灣政治學刊》，25(1)，97-149。
蔡甫昌，2021，〈從SARS到武漢肺炎，那些經歷與警惕〉，記疫COVID19，https://covid19.nctu.edu.tw/article/6449，最後瀏覽日：2022/7/17。
魏鏞、朱志宏、詹中原、黃德福，1992，《公共政策》，台北：國立空大。
顏厥安，2022，〈以為自己絕對無誤，就是個天大的錯誤〉，https://new7.storm.mg/article/4326158，最後瀏覽日期：2022/7/27。

二、英文部分
Allport, Gordon W. (1937). Personality: A Psychological Interpretation. New York, NY: H. Holt.
Adorno, T., Frenkel-Brunswik, E., Levinson, D., & Sanford, R. (1950). The authoritarian personality. New York, NY: Harper.
Altemeyer, B. (1981). Right-wing authoritarianism. Winnipeg: University of Manitoba Press.
Altemeyer, B. (1998). The other “authoritarian personality”. In Advances in experimental social psychology, 30, 47-92.
Atalay, A. S., & Meloy, M. G. (2020). Improving evacuation compliance through control: Implications for emergency management policy and disaster communications. Journal of Nonprofit & Public Sector Marketing, 32(4), 364-378.
Arora, A., Jha, A. K., Alat, P., & Das, S. S. (2020). Understanding coronaphobia. Asian journal of psychiatry, 54, 102384.
Ahorsu, D. K., Lin, C. Y., Imani, V., Saffari, M., Griffiths, M. D., & Pakpour, A. H. (2020). The fear of COVID-19 scale: development and initial validation. International journal of mental health and addiction, 1-9.
Armendáriz Miranda, P. (2022). Explaining autocratic support: The varying effects of threat on personality. Political Psychology, 43(6), 993-1007.
Arikan, G. (2023). Sociotropic and personal threats and authoritarian reactions during COVID-19. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 49(3), 447-459.
Bouchard Jr, T. J. (2004). Genetic influence on human psychological traits: A survey. Current directions in psychological science, 13(4), 148-151.
Bargain, O., & Aminjonov, U. (2020). Trust and compliance to public health measures in times of COVID-19. Journal of Public Economics, 192.
Comfort, L. K. (2007). Crisis management in hindsight: Cognition, communication, coordination, and control. Public administration review, 67, 189-197.
Carriere, K. R. (2019). Threats to human rights: A general review. Journal of Social and Political Psychology, 7(1), 8–32.
Clark, C., Davila, A., Regis, M., & Kraus, S. (2020). Predictors of COVID-19 voluntary compliance behaviors: An international investigation. Global transitions, 2, 76-82.
Choi, J., & Wehde, W. (2020). Trust in emergency management authorities and individual emergency preparedness for tornadoes. Risk, Hazards & Crisis in Public Policy, 11(1), 12-34.
Duckitt, J. (2013). Authoritarianism in societal context: The role of threat [Special Section]. International Journal of Psychology, 48(1), 1-59.
Damian, R. I., Spengler, M., Sutu, A., & Roberts, B. W. (2019). Sixteen going on sixty-six: A longitudinal study of personality stability and change across 50 years. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 117(3), 674.
Degerman, D., Flinders, M., & Johnson, M. T. (2020). In defence of fear: COVID-19, crises and democracy. Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy, 1-22.
Fromm, E. (1994). Escape from freedom. Macmillan.
Feldman, S.(2003). Enforcing social conformity: A theory of authoritarianism. Political psychology, 24(1), 41-74.
Fricker, S., Galesic, M., Tourangeau, R., & Yan, T. (2005). An experimental comparison of web and telephone surveys. Public Opinion Quarterly, 69(3), 370-392.
Fetzer, T., Hensel, L., Hermle, J., & Roth, C. (2021). Coronavirus perceptions and economic anxiety. The review of economics and statistics, 103(5), 968-978.
Filsinger, M., & Freitag, M. (2022). Pandemic threat and authoritarian attitudes in Europe: An empirical analysis of the exposure to COVID-19. European Union Politics, 23(3), 417-436.
Fu,RT.M.,Huang,W.H.,Huang,M.H.,&Chu,Y.H.（2022）.We See the World as a Dangerous Place:Authoritarianism and Chinese Assessment of American Influence .（Working paper）
Goldberg, L. R. (1990). An alternative" description of personality": the big-five factor structure. Journal of personality and social psychology, 59(6), 1216-1229.
Guasti, P. (2020). The impact of the Covid-19 pandemic in Central and Eastern Europe: The rise of autocracy and democratic resilience. Democratic theory, 7(2), 47-60.
Guasti, P., & Bustikova, L. (2022). Pandemic power grab. East European Politics, 38(4), 529-550.
Hyman, H. (1959). Political socialization.New York: Free Press.
Hetherington, M., & Suhay, E. (2011). Authoritarianism, threat, and Americans’ support for the war on terror. American Journal of Political Science, 55(3), 546-560.
Howlett, M. (2018). Matching policy tools and their targets: Beyond nudges and utility maximisation in policy design. Policy & Politics, 46(1), 101-124.
Huang Cheng-Yi ，2020，〈Soft Regulation and Hard Compliance in Taiwan〉，https://www.theregreview.org/2020/06/11/huang-soft-regulation-hard-compliance-taiwan/，最後瀏覽日期：2022/7/25。
Kossowska, M., Trejtowicz, M., de Lemus, S., Bukowski, M., Van Hiel, A., & Goodwin, R. (2011). Relationships between right‐wing authoritarianism, terrorism threat, and attitudes towards restrictions of civil rights: A comparison among four European countries. British Journal of Psychology, 102(2), 245-259.
Kornyeyeva, L., & Boehnke, K. (2013). The role of self-acceptance in authoritarian personality formation: Reintroducing a psychodynamic perspective into authoritarianism research. Psychoanalytic Psychology, 30(2), 232.
Liu, L. Y., Wu, W. N., & McEntire, D. A. (2021). Six Cs of pandemic emergency management: A case study of Taiwan's initial response to the COVID-19 pandemic. International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction, 64, 102516.
Manzi, C., Roccato, M., & Russo, S. (2015). Meaning buffers right-wing authoritarian responses to societal threat via the mediation of loss of perceived control. Personality and Indi- vidual Differences, 83, 117 – 121.
Murphy, H., Greer, A., & Wu, H. C. (2018). Trusting government to mitigate a new hazard: The case of Oklahoma earthquakes. Risk, Hazards & Crisis in Public Policy, 9(3), 357-380.
Manson, J. H. (2020). Right-wing authoritarianism, left-wing authoritarianism, and pandemic-mitigation authoritarianism. Personality and individual differences, 167, 110251.
Ollerenshaw, T. (2022). The Conditional Effects of Authoritarianism on COVID-19 Pandemic Health Behaviors and Policy Preferences. Political Behavior, 1-24.
Perry, R. W., & Lindell, M. K. (1991). The effects of ethnicity on evacuation decision-making. International Journal of Mass Emergencies & Disasters, 9(1), 47-59.
Pak, A., Adegboye, O. A., Adekunle, A. I., Rahman, K. M., McBryde, E. S., & Eisen, D. P. (2020). Economic consequences of the COVID-19 outbreak: the need for epidemic preparedness. Frontiers in public health, 8, 241.
Roberts, Brent W., and DelVecchio, Wendy F.. (2000). “The Rank-Order Consistency of Personality Traits from Childhood to Old Age: A Quantitative Review of Longitudinal Studies.” Psychological Bulletin 126 (1): 3–25.
Roccato, M., Cavazza, N., Colloca, P., & Russo, S. (2020). A democratic emergency after a health emergency? Exposure to COVID‐19, perceived economic threat and support for anti‐democratic political systems. Social Science Quarterly, 101(6), 2193-2202.
Roy, D., Tripathy, S., Kar, S. K., Sharma, N., Verma, S. K., & Kaushal, V. (2020). Study of knowledge, attitude, anxiety & perceived mental healthcare need in Indian population during COVID-19 pandemic. Asian journal of psychiatry, 51, 102083.
Rahman, S. Y. (2020). ‘Social distancing’during COVID-19: the metaphors and politics of pandemic response in India. Health sociology review, 29(2), 131-139.
Reicher, S., & Drury, J. (2021). Pandemic fatigue? How adherence to covid-19 regulations has been misrepresented and why it matters. British Medical Journal, 372, n173.
Stenner, K. (2005). The authoritarian dynamic (Vol. 10). Cambridge: Cambridge university press.
Siegrist, M., & Bearth, A. (2021). Worldviews, trust, and risk perceptions shape public acceptance of COVID-19 public health measures. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 118(24), e2100411118.
Saechang, O., Yu, J., & Li, Y. (2021, February). Public trust and policy compliance during the COVID-19 pandemic: The role of professional trust. In Healthcare , 9(2), 151.
Shanka, M. S., & Menebo, M. M. (2022). When and how trust in government leads to compliance with COVID-19 precautionary measures. Journal of Business Research, 139, 1275-1283.
Terpstra, T. (2011). Emotions, trust, and perceived risk: Affective and cognitive routes to flood preparedness behavior. Risk Analysis: An International Journal, 31(10), 1658-1675.
Tsai, C. H., Wang, C. H., & Weng, D. L. C. (2019). Personality traits and individual attitude toward the independence–unification issue in Taiwan. Journal of Asian and African Studies, 54(3), 430-451.
Talevi, D.; Socci, V.; Carai, M.; Carnaghi, G.; Faleri, S.; Trebbi, E.; Di Bernardo, A.; Capelli, F.; Pacitti, F. (2020).Mental health outcomes of the CoViD-19 pandemic. Riv. Psichiatr. 55, 137–144.
Tandon, R. (2020). COVID-19 and mental health: preserving humanity, maintaining sanity, and promoting health. Asian journal of psychiatry, 51, 102256.
Whitley Jr, B. E. (1999). Right-wing authoritarianism, social dominance orientation, and prejudice. Journal of personality and social psychology, 77(1), 126.
Waugh Jr, W. L., & Streib, G. (2006). Collaboration and leadership for effective emergency management. Public administration review, 66, 131-140.
Weaver, R. K. (2014). Compliance regimes and barriers to behavioral change. Governance, 27(2), 243-265.
Wang, C. H., Lin, T. J., Weng, D. L. C., & Chang, Y. B. (2020). Personality traits and individual attitudes toward same-sex marriage: evidence from Taiwan. Sexuality Research and Social Policy, 17, 524-540.
Yen, W. T. (2020). Taiwan’s COVID‐19 management: Developmental state, digital governance, and state‐society synergy. Asian Politics & Policy, 12(3), 455-468.
Yen, W. T., & Liu, L. Y. (2021). Crafting Compliance Regime under COVID‐19: Using Taiwan's Quarantine Policy as a Case Study. Global policy, 12(4), 562-567.
Yue, R. P. H., Lau, B. H., Chan, C. L., & Ng, S. M. (2022). Risk perception as a double-edged sword in policy compliance in COVID-19 pandemic? A two-phase evaluation from Hong Kong. Journal of Risk Research, 25(9), 1131-1145.
Yuan, M., & Swedlow, B. (2022). Chinese cultural biases, value congruence, and support for and compliance with protective policies during the COVID‐19 pandemic. Review of Policy Research, 00, 1– 33..