Responsive image
博碩士論文 etd-0631123-130206 詳細資訊
Title page for etd-0631123-130206
論文名稱
Title
負面工作事件對員工創造力之影響:以挑戰型/阻礙型壓力為中介變項及認知改變為調節變項
The Effect of Negative Work Events on Employee Creativity: The Mediating Role of Challenge/Hindrance Stressors and Moderating Role of Cognitive Change
系所名稱
Department
畢業學年期
Year, semester
語文別
Language
學位類別
Degree
頁數
Number of pages
40
研究生
Author
指導教授
Advisor
召集委員
Convenor
口試委員
Advisory Committee
口試日期
Date of Exam
2023-05-25
繳交日期
Date of Submission
2023-07-31
關鍵字
Keywords
負面工作事件、員工創造力、工作壓力、挑戰型壓力、阻礙型壓力、認知改變
negative work events, employee creativity, work stress, challenge stressors, hindrance stressors, cognitive change
統計
Statistics
本論文已被瀏覽 48 次,被下載 0
The thesis/dissertation has been browsed 48 times, has been downloaded 0 times.
中文摘要
員工創造力是組織創新及永續發展的關鍵,然而員工在日常工作中難以避免的負面事件對創造力存在潛在影響。本研究根據負面相關的重要工作事件(如:上級不當督導、組織內部衝突及工作不安全感等)與員工創造力相關之文獻,結合非單一概念之工作壓力——挑戰型/阻礙型壓力框架,藉以探討負面工作事件透過不同類別之工作壓力對員工創造力之影響。此外,本研究以認知改變作為調節變項,以了解工作壓力與認知改變之交互作用與員工創造力的關係,亦進一步地探究不同程度的認知改變對前述中介機制的調節效果。
本研究採不同時間點(連續兩個工作天,共兩階段)的問卷調查方式,蒐集234份臺灣全職工作者的樣本。分析結果顯示挑戰型壓力會中介負面工作事件與員工創造力之間的關係。此外,認知改變與挑戰型/阻礙型壓力的交互作用,對員工創造力具有影響,且在高度使用認知改變的情境下,負面工作事件透過挑戰型壓力對員工創造力的正向間接效果較強;然而,高度使用認知改變時會削弱負面工作事件透過阻礙型壓力對員工創造力的負向間接效果。本研究有助於拓展工作中面臨的各式負面情境對創新行為的影響之相關理論及實務意涵。
Abstract
Employee creativity is crucial for organizational innovation and sustainable development. However, negative events that employees encounter in their daily work can potentially impact creativity. Based on the literature linking negative work events(i.e., abusive supervision, conflicts, and job insecurity) and creativity, this study investigates how the relationships between negative work events and employee creativity are mediated by perceived work stress of employees (i.e., challenge and hindrance stressors). In addition, this study also explored the moderating role of cognitive change on the indirect effect of negative work events on employee creativity via challenge/hindrance stressors.
This study used a survey method at different time points to collect a sample of 234 full-time employees in Taiwan. The results show that challenge stressors mediate the relationship between negative work events and employee creativity. Moreover, the interaction between cognitive change and challenge/hindrance stressors influences employee creativity, and under highly-used cognitive change conditions, the positive indirect effect of negative work events on employee creativity through challenge stressors is stronger. However, highly-used cognitive change weakens the negative indirect effect of negative work events on employee creativity through hindrance stressors. These findings contribute to negative work events, work stress, cognitive change and employee creativity, and theoretical and practical implications are also discussed.
目次 Table of Contents
論文審定書 i
中文摘要 ii
Abstract iii
目錄 iv
圖次 v
表次 v
第壹章 緒論 1
第貳章 文獻探討與假設發展 4
第一節 員工創造力 4
第二節 挑戰型/阻礙型壓力 4
第三節 認知改變 6
第四節 研究假設發展 6
第參章 研究方法 10
第一節 研究架構 10
第二節 研究樣本與施測程序 10
第三節 研究工具 11
第四節 資料分析方法 12
第肆章 研究結果 13
第一節 描述性統計與相關性 13
第二節 驗證性因素分析結果 13
第三節 假設檢定 14
第伍章 討論 18
第一節 理論意涵 18
第二節 實務意涵 20
第三節 研究限制與未來研究建議 21
參考文獻 23
附錄 30

參考文獻 References
何瑞枝 & 蔡啟通. (2018). 不當督導與員工建言行為:建言效能的中介與政治技能的調節效果. 管理學報, 35(3). https://doi.org/10.6504/JMBR.201809_35(3).0004
黃品全, & 韓明娟. (2015). 顧客導向、工作投入與顧客焦點建言:挑戰、妨礙型壓力源之調節效果. 人力資源管理學報, 15(2), 1–24. https://doi.org/10.6147/JHRM.2015.1502.01
林鉦棽林鉦棽, Cheng-Chen (Timothy) Lin 陳曉鈴, 賴鳳儀賴鳳儀, & Fong-Yi Lai 湯蕙娟. (2022). 病患不文明行為對情緒調節的影響:壓力心態與顧客導向的調節式中介模式. 組織與管理, 15(1), 091–137. https://doi.org/10.53106/199687602022021501003
謝碧玲, 郭彥廷, 葉盈均, 張肇松, & 吳英璋. (2010). 情緒調節與罹病意義對急性血癌病患因應疾病的影響:兩名女性個案之初探結果. 高雄行為科學學刊, 2, 147–162. https://doi.org/10.29854/TJKBS.201012.0008
莊璦嘉, 李均揚, 陳宇軒, & 嚴國晉. (2019). 員工創造力研究之回顧與展望:臺灣與東亞的研究發現. 臺大管理論叢, 29(3), 39–82. https://doi.org/10.6226/NTUMR.201912_29(3).0002
Akgunduz, Y., Alkan, C., & Gok, O. A. (2018). Perceived organizational support, employee creativity and proactive personality: The mediating effect of meaning of work. Journal of Hospitality and Tourism Management, 34, 105–114. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhtm.2018.01.004
Amabile, T. M., Barsade, S. G., Mueller, J. S., & Staw, B. M. (2005a). Affect and Creativity at Work. Administrative Science Quarterly, 50, 367–403. https://doi.org/10.2189/asqu.2005.50.3.367
Amabile, T. M., Barsade, S. G., Mueller, J. S., & Staw, B. M. (2005b). Affect and Creativity at Work. Administrative Science Quarterly, 50, 367–403. https://doi.org/10.2189/asqu.2005.50.3.367
Amabile, T. M., Conti, R., Coon, H., Lazenby, J., & Herron, M. (1996). Assessing the work environment for creativity. Academy of Management Journal, 39(5), 1154–1184. https://doi.org/10.2307/256995
Amabile, T. M., Schatzel, E. A., Moneta, G. B., & Kramer, S. J. (2004). Leader behaviors and the work environment for creativity: Perceived leader support. Leadership Quarterly, 15(1), 5–32. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2003.12.003
Amundsen, S., & Martinsen, O. L. (2015). Linking Empowering Leadership to Job Satisfaction, Work Effort, and Creativity: The Role of Self-Leadership and Psychological Empowerment. Journal of Leadership & Organizational Studies, 22(3), 304–323. https://doi.org/10.1177/1548051814565819
Baer, M., & Oldham, G. R. (2006). The Curvilinear Relation Between Experienced Creative Time Pressure and Creativity: Moderating Effects of Openness to Experience and Support for Creativity. Journal of Applied Psychology, 91(4), 963–970. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.91.4.963
Beal, D. J., Weiss, H. M., Barros, E., & MacDermid, S. M. (2005). An episodic process model of affective influences on performance. The Journal of Applied Psychology, 90(6), 1054–1068. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.90.6.1054
Byron, K., Khazanchi, S., & Nazarian, D. (2010). The relationship between stressors and creativity: A meta-analysis examining competing theoretical models. Journal of Applied Psychology, 95(1), 201–212. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0017868
Cash, M. L., & Gardner, D. (2011). Cognitive hardiness, appraisal and coping: Comparing two transactional models. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 26(8), 646–664. https://doi.org/10.1108/02683941111181752
Cavanaugh, M. A., Boswell, W. R., Roehling, M. V., & Boudreau, J. W. (2000). An empirical examination of self-reported work stress among U.S. managers. Journal of Applied Psychology, 85, 65–74. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.85.1.65
Chen, G., Sharma, P. N., Edinger, S. K., Shapiro, D. L., & Farh, J.-L. (2011). Motivating and demotivating forces in teams: Cross-level influences of empowering leadership and relationship conflict. The Journal of Applied Psychology, 96(3), 541–557. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0021886
Chen, L., Ye, Z., Shafait, Z., & Zhu, H. (2022). The Effect of Abusive Supervision on Employee Creativity: The Mediating Role of Negative Affect and Moderating Role of Interpersonal Harmony. Frontiers in Psychology, 13, 796355. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.796355
De Dreu, C. K. W. (2006). When Too Little or Too Much Hurts: Evidence for a Curvilinear Relationship Between Task Conflict and Innovation in Teams. Journal of Management, 32, 83–107. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206305277795
De Stobbeleir, K. E. M., Ashford, S. J., & Buyens, D. (2011). Self-Regulation of Creativity at Work: The Role of Feedback-Seeking Behavior in Creative Performance. Academy of Management Journal, 54(4), 811–831. https://doi.org/10.5465/AMJ.2011.64870144
Diefendorff, J. M., Richard, E. M., & Yang, J. (2008). Linking emotion regulation strategies to affective events and negative emotions at work. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 73(3), 498–508. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvb.2008.09.006
Ding, G., Liu, H., Huang, Q., & Gu, J. (2019). Enterprise social networking usage as a moderator of the relationship between work stressors and employee creativity: A multilevel study. Information & Management, 56(8), 103165. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.im.2019.04.008
Edwards, J. R., & Lambert, L. S. (2007). Methods for integrating moderation and mediation: A general analytical framework using moderated path analysis. Psychological Methods, 12(1), 1–22. https://doi.org/10.1037/1082-989X.12.1.1
Gross, J. J. (1998). The Emerging Field of Emotion Regulation: An Integrative Review. Review of General Psychology, 2(3), 271–299. https://doi.org/10.1037/1089-2680.2.3.271
Gross, J. J., & John, O. P. (2003). Individual differences in two emotion regulation processes: Implications for affect, relationships, and well-being. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 85, 348–362. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.85.2.348
Han, G. H., Harms, P. D., & Bai, Y. (2017). Nightmare Bosses: The Impact of Abusive Supervision on Employees’ Sleep, Emotions, and Creativity. Journal of Business Ethics, 145(1), 21–31. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-015-2859-y
He, Y., Walker, J. M., Payne, S. C., & Miner, K. N. (2021). Explaining the negative impact of workplace incivility on work and non-work outcomes: The roles of negative rumination and organizational support. Stress and Health, 37(2), 297–309. https://doi.org/10.1002/smi.2988
Hon, A. H. Y. (2012). Shaping Environments Conductive to Creativity: The Role of Intrinsic Motivation. Cornell Hospitality Quarterly - CORNELL HOSP Q, 53, 53–64. https://doi.org/10.1177/1938965511424725
Hu, L., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling, 6, 1–55. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705519909540118
Ibrahim, H. I., Isa, A., & Shahbudin, A. S. Md. (2016). Organizational Support and Creativity: The Role of Developmental Experiences as a Moderator. Procedia Economics and Finance, 35, 509–514. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2212-5671(16)00063-0
Landis, R. S., Beal, D. J., & Tesluk, P. E. (2000). A comparison of approaches to forming composite measures in structural equation models. Organizational Research Methods, 3, 186–207. https://doi.org/10.1177/109442810032003
Lazarus, R. S. (2006). Stress and Emotion: A New Synthesis. Springer Publishing Company.
Lazarus, R. S., & Alfert, E. (1964). SHORT-CIRCUITING OF THREAT BY EXPERIMENTALLY ALTERING COGNITIVE APPRAISAL. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 69, 195–205. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0044635
Lazarus, R. S., & Folkman, S. (1984). Stress, Appraisal, and Coping. Springer Publishing Company.
Lepine, J. A., Podsakoff, N. P., & Lepine, M. A. (2005). A meta-analytic test of the challenge stressor-hindrance stressor framework: An explanation for inconsistent relationships among stressors and performance. Academy of Management Journal, 48(5), 764–775. https://doi.org/10.5465/AMJ.2005.18803921
Li, C., Zhao, H., & Begley, T. M. (2015). Transformational leadership dimensions and employee creativity in China: A cross-level analysis. Journal of Business Research, 68(6), 1149–1156. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2014.11.009
Little, T. D., Cunningham, W. A., Shahar, G., & Widaman, K. F. (2002). To parcel or not to parcel: Exploring the question, weighing the merits. Structural Equation Modeling, 9, 151–173. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15328007SEM0902_1
Matsuo, M. (2006). Customer orientation, conflict, and innovativeness in Japanese sales departments. Journal of Business Research, 59, 242–250. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2005.06.002
Matta, F. K., Erol-Korkmaz, H. T., Johnson, R. E., & Bicaksiz, P. (2014). Significant work events and counterproductive work behavior: The role of fairness, emotions, and emotion regulation. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 35(7), 920–944. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.1934
Moin, M. F., Spagnoli, P., Khan, A. N., & Hameed, Z. (2022). Challenge-hindrance stressors and service employees job outcomes. Current Psychology. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-022-03531-y
Mumford, M. D. (2003). Where Have We Been, Where Are We Going? Taking Stock in Creativity Research. Creativity Research Journal, 15(2–3), 107–120. https://doi.org/10.1080/10400419.2003.9651403
Oldham, G. R., & Cummings, A. (1996). Employee Creativity: Personal and Contextual Factors at Work. The Academy of Management Journal, 39(3), 607–634. https://doi.org/10.2307/256657
Richards, J. M., & Gross, J. J. (2000). Emotion regulation and memory: The cognitive costs of keeping one’s cool. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 79(3), 410–424. https://doi.org/10.1037//0022-3514.79.3.410
Sawhney, G., & Michel, J. S. (2022). Challenge and Hindrance Stressors and Work Outcomes: The Moderating Role of Day-Level Affect. Journal of Business & Psychology, 37(2), 389–405. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10869-021-09752-5
Scheibe, S. (2021). Employee age moderates within-person associations of daily negative work events with emotion regulation, attention, and well-being. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 30(6), 872–886. https://doi.org/10.1080/1359432X.2021.1873772
Volmer, J., & Fritsche, A. (2016). Daily Negative Work Events and Employees’ Physiological and Psychological Reactions. Frontiers in Psychology, 7, 1711. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2016.01711
W, B. R. (1980). Translation and content analysis of oral and written materials. Methodology, 389–444.
Wallace, C., Edwards, B., Arnold, T., Frazier, M., & Finch, D. (2009). Work Stressors, Role-Based Performance, and the Moderating Influence of Organizational Support. The Journal of applied psychology, 94, 254–262. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0013090
Williams, L., & O’Boyle, E. (2008). Measurement models for linking latent variables and indicators: A review of human resource management research using parcels. Human Resource Management Review, 18, 233–242. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hrmr.2008.07.002
Yousaf, O., & Taylor, J. (2022). Dispositional Mindfulness Mediates the Relationship between Emotion Regulation and Creativity. Journal of Creativity in Mental Health, 0(0), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1080/15401383.2022.2074182
Zhang, H., Kwan, H. K., Zhang, X., & Wu, L.-Z. (2012). High Core Self-Evaluators Maintain Creativity: A Motivational Model of Abusive Supervision. Journal of Management, 40, 1151–1174. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206312460681
Zhang, Y., LePine, J., Buckman, B., & Wei, F. (2013). It’s Not Fair ... Or Is It? The Role of Justice and Leadership in Explaining Work Stressor-Job Performance Relationships. Academy of Management Journal, 57, 675–697. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2011.1110
Zhou, H., & Long, L.-R. (2011). Effects of job insecurity and creative self-efficacy on employees’ creativity. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 43, 929–940.
Zhou, J., & George, J. M. (2001). When Job Dissatisfaction Leads to Creativity: Encouraging the Expression of Voice. Academy of Management Journal, 44(4), 682–696. https://doi.org/10.5465/3069410
Zhu, L. Y., Bauman, C. W., & Young, M. J. (2023). Unlocking creative potential: Reappraising emotional events facilitates creativity for conventional thinkers. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 174, 104209.

電子全文 Fulltext
本電子全文僅授權使用者為學術研究之目的,進行個人非營利性質之檢索、閱讀、列印。請遵守中華民國著作權法之相關規定,切勿任意重製、散佈、改作、轉貼、播送,以免觸法。
論文使用權限 Thesis access permission:自定論文開放時間 user define
開放時間 Available:
校內 Campus:開放下載的時間 available 2025-07-31
校外 Off-campus:開放下載的時間 available 2025-07-31

您的 IP(校外) 位址是 3.146.221.204
現在時間是 2024-05-01
論文校外開放下載的時間是 2025-07-31

Your IP address is 3.146.221.204
The current date is 2024-05-01
This thesis will be available to you on 2025-07-31.

紙本論文 Printed copies
紙本論文的公開資訊在102學年度以後相對較為完整。如果需要查詢101學年度以前的紙本論文公開資訊,請聯繫圖資處紙本論文服務櫃台。如有不便之處敬請見諒。
開放時間 available 2025-07-31

QR Code