Responsive image
博碩士論文 etd-0722123-150517 詳細資訊
Title page for etd-0722123-150517
論文名稱
Title
社群媒體中同溫層效應對政治行為之影響
The Influence of the Echo chamber on Political Behavior
系所名稱
Department
畢業學年期
Year, semester
語文別
Language
學位類別
Degree
頁數
Number of pages
90
研究生
Author
指導教授
Advisor
召集委員
Convenor
口試委員
Advisory Committee
口試日期
Date of Exam
2023-06-26
繳交日期
Date of Submission
2023-08-22
關鍵字
Keywords
同溫層效應、社群媒體、線上政治表達意願、投票意願、民主滿意度
Echo Chamber, Social Media, Online Political Expression, Voting Intention, Democratic Satisfaction
統計
Statistics
本論文已被瀏覽 344 次,被下載 35
The thesis/dissertation has been browsed 344 times, has been downloaded 35 times.
中文摘要
  隨著web 2.0技術的廣泛應用,社群媒體的崛起已成為一股趨勢,為了更貼近選民的日常生活,各政黨紛紛投入大量資金到社群媒體上,這些挹注的資源影響著選民的政治生活與各式重大社會議題,著名的案例有2016年的英國脫歐公投、2016年美國總統選舉,都可觀察到社群媒體顯著的影響力。這些社群媒體所造成的現象吸引學界進行相關研究,然國內相關研究仍多半以單一社會議題作為研究場域,尚未加入政黨政治為背景,來探索社群媒體中同溫層效應如何對於公眾造成的影響。
  有鑑於此,本研究將以同溫層效應為理論基礎,並以探討社群感知好友立場一致性及感知社群新聞立場一致性作為衡量指標,來觀察其對線上政治表達及線下投票所造成的影響,並使用民主滿意度作為中介變數,政黨忠誠做為干擾變數,進行相關的研究探討。
  研究結果有以下發現:第一,發現同溫層效應,不僅會提升個人的民主滿意度,也會加強個人於線上政治表達與投票的意願。第二,民主滿意度僅會對線下投票行為產生中介效果,在線上政治表達不具中介角色。第三,政黨忠誠具有負向調節作用。具體而言,有政黨偏好的個人,相比起中間選民,反倒會有較低的民主滿意度、線上政治表達與投票意願。
Abstract
  With the wide application of web 2.0 technology, the rise of social media has become a trend. In order to be closer to the daily life of the voters, political parties have invested a lot of money in social media, and these resources have influenced the political life of the voters and various major social issues. The influence of social media can be seen in famous cases such as the 2016 UK Brexit referendum and the 2016 US presidential election. These phenomena caused by social media have attracted research in the academic field, but most of the related studies in Taiwan still focus on a single social issue, and have not yet included party politics as a background to explore the impact of the stratospheric effect of social media on the public.
  In view of this, this study takes the echo chamber as the theoretical basis and uses the community's perception of the consistency of friends' positions and the consistency of the community's perceived journalistic positions as the indicators to observe its impact on online political expression and offline voting, and uses democratic satisfaction as the mediating variable and party loyalty as the interfering variable in this study.
The results of the study include the following findings: First, the echo chamber effect is found to increase not only individuals' democratic satisfaction, but also their willingness to express themselves and vote online. Second, democratic satisfaction only mediates offline voting behavior, but does not mediate online political expression. Third, party loyalty has a negative moderating effect. Specifically, individuals with party preference are less likely to be satisfied with democracy and less likely to be willing to express themselves and vote online compared to the middle class of voters.
目次 Table of Contents
論文審定書 i
摘要 ii
Abstract iii
目錄 iv
表次 v
圖次 vii
第一章 緒論 1
第一節 研究背景與動機 1
第二節 研究問題與目的 4
第二章 文獻回顧 6
第一節 社群媒體與同溫層效應 6
第二節 同溫層效應與政治行為 11
第三節 社群媒體與民主滿意度 16
第四節 政黨忠誠的調節作用 19
第三章 研究方法 23
第一節 研究架構 23
第二節 資料收集 24
第三節 問卷變項定義及測量題項說明 25
第四章 資料分析與結果 31
第一節 受試者描述統計分析 31
第二節 假說驗證 37
第五章 結論與建議 58
第一節 研究結論 58
第二節 理論貢獻 61
第三節 研究限制與未來展望 62
參考文獻 64
附錄一 研究問卷 73
附錄二 各變項次數分配表 76

參考文獻 References
一、 中文文獻
王光旭、蔡子弘、陳薇丞(2019)。政治人物經營臉書策略之研究:以第九屆不分區立法委員為例。民主與治理,6(2),1-45。
王劭文(2017)。網路「同溫層」現象初探:以婚姻平權臉書社群為例。政治大學傳播學院碩士論文。
王嵩音 (2017)。社交媒體政治性使用行為與公民參與之研究。資訊社會研究,32, 83-111。
王嵩音 (2022)。臉書使用動機與行為對於社會資本的影響。資訊社會研究,42,123-150。
林奕孜(2021)。臺灣所得分配與民主制度的評價-是異例嗎?。臺灣民主季刊,18(4),43-74。
林儀(2019)。年金改革假新聞之研究。學校行政雙月刊,121,204 -219。
張政文(2018)。探討臉書意見氣候與害怕孤立對政治表達意願的影響及其調節因素。國立中山大學行銷傳播碩士論文。
張卿卿、陶振超(2016)。臺灣傳播調查資料庫第一期第四次(2015年):政治傳播與公民傳播【執行報告】。政治大學臺灣傳播調查資料庫。
莊伯仲 (2022)。候選人與臉書粉絲之互動分:以2016年總統大選為例。資訊社會研究,42,87-122。
陳陸輝(2019)。台灣的民主治理與政治支持。東亞研究,50(1),119-152。
劉建志(2020)。臉書使用者之同溫層研究:以年金改革為例。政治作戰學院碩士論文。
蔡佳泓(2019)。政府治理表現、公民文化與民主滿意度。社會科學論叢,13(2),43-75。
鄭夙芬、俞振華(2021)。總統滿意度之研究(E10803)【原始數據】取自中央研究院人文社會科學研究中心調查研究專題中心學術調查研究資料庫。
鍾佩庭(2018)。認知失諧理論如何影響臉書的同溫層以婚姻平權議題為例。淡江大學大眾傳播碩士論文。

二、 西洋文獻
Alhindi, W. A., Talha, M., & Sulong, G. B. (2012). The role of modern technology in arab spring. Archives des sciences, 65(8), 101–112.
Anderson, C. J., & LoTEMPIO, A. J. (2002). Winning, Losing and Political Trust in America. British Journal of Political Science, 32(2), 335–351. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0007123402000133
Anderson, C. J., Blais, A., Bowler, S., Donovan, T., & Listhaug, O. (2005). Losers’ Consent: Elections and Democratic Legitimacy. OUP Oxford.
Bakshy, E., Messing, S., & Adamic, L. A. (2015). Exposure to ideologically diverse news and opinion on Facebook. Science, 348(6239), 1130–1132. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aaa1160
Banducci, S. A., & Karp, J. A. (2003). How Elections Change the Way Citizens View the Political System: Campaigns, Media Effects and Electoral Outcomes in Comparative Perspective. British Journal of Political Science, 33(3), 443–467. https://doi.org/10.1017/S000712340300019X
Barberá, P., Jost, J. T., Nagler, J., Tucker, J. A., & Bonneau, R. (2015). Tweeting From Left to Right: Is Online Political Communication More Than an Echo Chamber? Psychological Science, 26(10), 1531–1542. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797615594620
Bennett, W. L., & Livingston, S. (2018). The disinformation order: Disruptive communication and the decline of democratic institutions. European journal of communication, 33(2), 122–139.
Boulianne, S. (2015). Social media use and participation: A meta-analysis of current research. Information, Communication & Society, 18(5), 524–538. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2015.1008542
Boutyline, A., & Willer, R. (2017). The Social Structure of Political Echo Chambers: Variation in Ideological Homophily in Online Networks. Political Psychology, 38(3), 551–569. https://doi.org/10.1111/pops.12337
Boyd, D. M., & Ellison, N. B. (2007). Social Network Sites: Definition, History, and Scholarship. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 13(1), 210–230. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1083-6101.2007.00393.x
Breen, M. J., Shoemaker, P. J., & Stamper, M. (2000). Fear of Social Isolation: Testing an Assumption from the Spiral of Silence. https://dspace.mic.ul.ie/handle/10395/727
Bright J. (2017). Explaining the Emergence of Echo Chambers on Social Media: The Role of Ideology and Extremism (SSRN Scholarly Paper 2839728). https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2839728
Ceron, A., & Memoli, V. (2016). Flames and debates: Do social media affect satisfaction with democracy? Social indicators research, 126, 225–240.
Chae, Y., Lee, S., & Kim, Y. (2019). Meta-analysis of the relationship between Internet use and political participation: Examining main and moderating effects. Asian Journal of Communication, 29(1), 35–54. https://doi.org/10.1080/01292986.2018.1499121
Converse, P. E. (2006). Democratic theory and electoral reality. Critical Review, 18(1–3), 297–329. https://doi.org/10.1080/08913810608443662
Cooke, N. A. (2017). Posttruth, truthiness, and alternative facts: Information behavior and critical information consumption for a new age. The library quarterly, 87(3), 211–221.
Curini, L., Jou, W., & Memoli, V. (2012). Satisfaction with Democracy and the Winner/Loser Debate: The Role of Policy Preferences and Past Experience. British Journal of Political Science, 42(2), 241–261. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0007123411000275
Diamond, L. (2015). Facing up to the democratic recession. Journal of Democracy, 26(1), 141–155.
Dubois, E., & Blank, G. (2018). The echo chamber is overstated: The moderating effect of political interest and diverse media. Information, Communication & Society, 21(5), 729–745. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2018.1428656
Flaxman, S., Goel, S., & Rao, J. M. (2016). Filter Bubbles, Echo Chambers, and Online News Consumption. Public Opinion Quarterly, 80(S1), 298–320. https://doi.org/10.1093/poq/nfw006
Garrett, R. K. (2009). Echo chambers online?: Politically motivated selective exposure among Internet news users. Journal of computer-mediated communication, 14(2), 265–285.
Garton, L., Haythornthwaite, C., & Wellman, B. (1997). Studying Online Social Networks. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 3(1), JCMC313. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1083-6101.1997.tb00062.x
Gil de Zúñiga, H., & Diehl, T. (2019). News finds me perception and democracy: Effects on political knowledge, political interest, and voting. New media & society, 21(6), 1253–1271.
Gil de Zúñiga, H., Jung, N., & Valenzuela, S. (2012). Social Media Use for News and Individuals’ Social Capital, Civic Engagement and Political Participation. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 17(3), 319–336. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1083-6101.2012.01574.x
Gil de Zúñiga, H., Molyneux, L., & Zheng, P. (2014). Social media, political expression, and political participation: Panel analysis of lagged and concurrent relationships. Journal of communication, 64(4), 612–634.
Gil de Zúñiga, H., Weeks, B., & Ardèvol-Abreu, A. (2017). Effects of the news-finds-me perception in communication: Social media use implications for news seeking and learning about politics. Journal of computer-mediated communication, 22(3), 105–123.
Haenschen, K. (2016). Social pressure on social media: Using Facebook status updates to increase voter turnout. Journal of Communication, 66(4), 542–563.
Haim, M., Graefe, A., & Brosius, H.-B. (2018). Burst of the Filter Bubble? Digital Journalism, 6(3), 330–343. https://doi.org/10.1080/21670811.2017.1338145
Halberstam, Y., & Knight, B. (2014). Are Social Media more Social than Media? Measuring Ideological Homophily and Segregation on Twitter∗. https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/Are-Social-Media-more-Social-than-Media-Measuring-Halberstam-Knight/10bb88d6cdf826d246fce4f60d947cae8037bf7b
Hampton, K. N., Shin, I., & Lu, W. (2017). Social media and political discussion: When online presence silences offline conversation. Information, Communication & Society, 20(7), 1090–1107. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2016.1218526
Harlow, S. (2012). Social media and social movements: Facebook and an online Guatemalan justice movement that moved offline. New media & society, 14(2), 225–243.
Iyengar, S., & Hahn, K. S. (2009). Red Media, Blue Media: Evidence of Ideological Selectivity in Media Use. Journal of Communication, 59(1), 19–39. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.2008.01402.x
Janis, I. L. (2008). Groupthink. IEEE Engineering Management Review, 36(1), 36.
Justwan, F., Baumgaertner, B., Carlisle, J. E., Clark, A. K., & Clark, M. (2018). Social media echo chambers and satisfaction with democracy among Democrats and Republicans in the aftermath of the 2016 US elections. Journal of Elections, Public Opinion and Parties, 28(4), 424–442. https://doi.org/10.1080/17457289.2018.1434784
Kahne, J., & Bowyer, B. (2018). The Political Significance of Social Media Activity and Social Networks. Political Communication, 35(3), 470–493. https://doi.org/10.1080/10584609.2018.1426662
Kaplan, A. M., & Haenlein, M. (2010). Users of the world, unite! The challenges and opportunities of Social Media. Business Horizons, 53(1), 59–68. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bushor.2009.09.003
Kreiss, D. (2016). Seizing the moment: The presidential campaigns’ use of Twitter during the 2012 electoral cycle. New media & society, 18(8), 1473–1490.
Kreiss, D., & MCGREGOR, S. C. (2018). Technology Firms Shape Political Communication: The Work of Microsoft, Facebook, Twitter, and Google With Campaigns During the 2016 U.S. Presidential Cycle. Political Communication, 35(2), 155–177. https://doi.org/10.1080/10584609.2017.1364814
Lee, S., & Xenos, M. (2019). Social distraction? Social media use and political knowledge in two U.S. Presidential elections. Computers in Human Behavior, 90, 18–25. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2018.08.006
Lelkes, Y., Sood, G., & Iyengar, S. (2017). The Hostile Audience: The Effect of Access to Broadband Internet on Partisan Affect. American Journal of Political Science, 61(1), 5–20. https://doi.org/10.1111/ajps.12237
Markus, G. B. (1986). Stability and change in political attitudes: Observed, recalled, and “explained”. Political behavior, 8, 21–44.
Marzouki, Y., Skandrani-Marzouki, I., Béjaoui, M., Hammoudi, H., & Bellaj, T. (2012). The Contribution of Facebook to the 2011 Tunisian Revolution: A Cyberpsychological Insight. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking, 15(5), 237–244. https://doi.org/10.1089/cyber.2011.0177
Mustapha, L. K., & Omar, B. (2020). Do social media matter? Examining social media use and youths’ political participation during the 2019 Nigerian general elections. The Round Table, 109(4), 441–457. https://doi.org/10.1080/00358533.2020.1788766
Neo, R. L. (2021). Linking perceived political network homogeneity with political social media use via perceived social media news credibility. Journal of Information Technology & Politics, 18(3), 355–369. https://doi.org/10.1080/19331681.2021.1881016
Newman, N., Fletcher, R., Kalogeropoulos, A., Levy, D., & Nielsen, R. K. (2017). Reuters digital news report. Reuters Institute for the Study of Journalism, University of Oxford.
Oser, J., & Boulianne, S. (2020). Reinforcement Effects between Digital Media Use and Political Participation: A Meta-Analysis of Repeated-Wave Panel Data. Public Opinion Quarterly, 84(S1), 355–365. https://doi.org/10.1093/poq/nfaa017
Passini, S. (2012). The facebook and Twitter revolutions: Active participation in the 21st century. Human Affairs, 22(3), 301–312. https://doi.org/10.2478/s13374-012-0025-0
Rhodes, S. C. (2022). Filter Bubbles, Echo Chambers, and Fake News: How Social Media Conditions Individuals to Be Less Critical of Political Misinformation. Political Communication, 39(1), 1–22. https://doi.org/10.1080/10584609.2021.1910887
Ridings, C. M., Gefen, D., & Arinze, B. (2002). Some antecedents and effects of trust in virtual communities. The Journal of Strategic Information Systems, 11(3), 271–295. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0963-8687(02)00021-5
Schaub, M., & Morisi, D. (2020). Voter mobilisation in the echo chamber: Broadband internet and the rise of populism in Europe. European Journal of Political Research, 59(4), 752–773. https://doi.org/10.1111/1475-6765.12373
Soffer, O., & Gordoni, G. (2018). Opinion expression via user comments on news websites: Analysis through the perspective of the spiral of silence. Information, Communication & Society, 21(3), 388–403. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2017.1281991
Strauß, N., Alonso-Muñoz, L., & Gil de Zúñiga, H. (2020). Bursting the filter bubble: The mediating effect of discussion frequency on network heterogeneity. Online Information Review, 44(6), 1161–1181. https://doi.org/10.1108/OIR-11-2019-0345
Sude, D. J., Knobloch-Westerwick, S., Robinson, M. J., & Westerwick, A. (2019). “Pick and choose” opinion climate: How browsing of political messages shapes public opinion perceptions and attitudes. Communication Monographs, 86(4), 457–478. https://doi.org/10.1080/03637751.2019.1612528
Sunstein, C. R. (2018). # Republic: Divided democracy in the age of social media. Princeton University Press.
Talwar, S., Dhir, A., Kaur, P., Zafar, N., & Alrasheedy, M. (2019). Why do people share fake news? Associations between the dark side of social media use and fake news sharing behavior. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 51, 72–82. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jretconser.2019.05.026
Turcotte, J., York, C., Irving, J., Scholl, R. M., & Pingree, R. J. (2015). News Recommendations from Social Media Opinion Leaders: Effects on Media Trust and Information Seeking. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 20(5), 520–535. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcc4.12127
Walter, S., Brüggemann, M., & Engesser, S. (2018). Echo Chambers of Denial: Explaining User Comments on Climate Change. Environmental Communication, 12(2), 204–217. https://doi.org/10.1080/17524032.2017.1394893
Wang, M. Y., Hmielowski, J. D., Hutchens, M. J., & Beam, M. A. (2017). Extending the Spiral of Silence: Partisan Media, Perceived Support, and Sharing Opinions Online. Journal of Information Technology & Politics, 14(3), 248–262. https://doi.org/10.1080/19331681.2017.1338980
Wattenberg, M. P. (1982). From parties to candidates: Examining the role of the media. Public Opinion Quarterly, 46(2), 216–227.
Weatherford, M. S. (1987). How does government performance influence political support? Political Behavior, 9(1), 5–28. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00987276
Wellman, B. (2001). Computer networks as social networks. Science, 293(5537), 2031–2034.
Williams, H. T. P., McMurray, J. R., Kurz, T., & Hugo Lambert, F. (2015). Network analysis reveals open forums and echo chambers in social media discussions of climate change. Global Environmental Change, 32, 126–138. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2015.03.006
Wilson, G. V., & Kerr, J. H. (1999). Affective responses to success and failure: A study of winning and losing in competitive rugby. Personality and Individual Differences, 27(1), 85–99. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0191-8869(98)00226-8
Wolfsfeld, G., Segev, E., & Sheafer, T. (2013). Social media and the Arab Spring: Politics comes first. The International Journal of Press/Politics, 18(2), 115–137.
Woolley, J. K., Limperos, A. M., & Oliver, M. B. (2010). The 2008 presidential election, 2.0: A content analysis of user-generated political Facebook groups. Mass Communication and Society, 13(5), 631–652.
Zhu, C. (2021). A Study of Key Factors Influencing Youth Voter Turnout.
電子全文 Fulltext
本電子全文僅授權使用者為學術研究之目的,進行個人非營利性質之檢索、閱讀、列印。請遵守中華民國著作權法之相關規定,切勿任意重製、散佈、改作、轉貼、播送,以免觸法。
論文使用權限 Thesis access permission:校內校外完全公開 unrestricted
開放時間 Available:
校內 Campus: 已公開 available
校外 Off-campus: 已公開 available


紙本論文 Printed copies
紙本論文的公開資訊在102學年度以後相對較為完整。如果需要查詢101學年度以前的紙本論文公開資訊,請聯繫圖資處紙本論文服務櫃台。如有不便之處敬請見諒。
開放時間 available 已公開 available

QR Code