Responsive image
博碩士論文 etd-0729123-224752 詳細資訊
Title page for etd-0729123-224752
論文名稱
Title
社會資本觀點探究跨部門互動的社會創業歷程
Using Social Capital Perspective to Explore Interactive Process of Cross-Sector Societal Entrepreneurship
系所名稱
Department
畢業學年期
Year, semester
語文別
Language
學位類別
Degree
頁數
Number of pages
115
研究生
Author
指導教授
Advisor
召集委員
Convenor
口試委員
Advisory Committee
口試日期
Date of Exam
2023-07-24
繳交日期
Date of Submission
2023-08-29
關鍵字
Keywords
社會創業、跨部門合作、社會資本、友善農業、永續發展
Cross-sector Collaboration, Societal Entrepreneurship, Social Capital, Eco-friendly Agriculture, Sustainable Development
統計
Statistics
本論文已被瀏覽 258 次,被下載 9
The thesis/dissertation has been browsed 258 times, has been downloaded 9 times.
中文摘要
本研究旨在透過社會創業與社會資本的文獻探討,深入探究跨部門面對永續發展不同面向的複雜問題合作的社會創業歷程。並以Brunie所提出多層次社會資本觀點,進行實證研究,深度分析關鍵組織與行動者如何透過與其他部門鏈結創造社會資本,進行跨部門互動的社會創業關鍵行動,在台灣建立平衡生態與友善農業永續發展模式。
過去的社會創業研究傾向於探討單一組織如何應對單一性社會議題,鮮少涉及到複雜社會問題如生態農業的多部門參與。此外,複雜社會問題下,跨部門合作互動的社會創業往往需要考慮社會資本的應用,而本研究運用Brunie提出的多層次社會資本觀點,補充該研究領域的不足。本研究方法採取質性個案研究,透過深度訪談不同部門關鍵行動者,並與所蒐集的次級資料進行分析驗證。
研究發現社會資本於動態社會創業脈絡中的整合移轉,聚焦社會資本於部門互動過程中轉化、融合與演進的整合移轉。社會資本的整合移轉影響互動行動者或組織微觀、中觀、宏觀層次的產出,更擴散並回饋而強化或深化集體、關係、及普遍社會資本效力,創新契機。通過社會資本整合移轉的方式影響著社會創業各階段的發展。社會資本整合移轉包括解決複雜社會問題時不同行動計畫之間的資本整合移轉、關鍵組織在跨部門互動中融合的社會資本轉變,以及普遍社會資本的持續擴散效應。研究發現不僅強化社會資本與社會創業理論上的應用,同時也豐富跨部門合作社會創業的理解和分析,從而為理論和實踐領域帶來新的研究觀點和貢獻。
Abstract
This study aims to explore the societal entrepreneurial process of cross-sector cooperation on complex issues of sustainable development through literature review of social and societal entrepreneurship and social capital. Based on the multi-level social capital perspective proposed by Brunie, an empirical research was conducted to deeply analyze how key organizations and actors create social capital through links with other sectors, and carry out key actions of societal entrepreneurship that interact across-sectors to establish a sustainable development model of societal entrepreneurship balanced with ecology and friendly agriculture in Taiwan.
Previous researches about social entrepreneurship have tended to explore how a single organization responds to one social issue, and rarely involves multi-sector participation in complex social issues regarding both ecology and agriculture. In the context of emerging complex social problems, societal entrepreneurship with cross-sector cooperation and interaction often needs to consider the application of social capital. This study can supplement the research gap of societal entrepreneurship from the perspective of social capital generated by cross-sector interaction. This research method adopts a qualitative case study, through in-depth interviews with key actors from distinctive sectors, and conducts analysis and verification with the collected secondary data.
The study found the integration and shift of social capital in the context of dynamic societal entrepreneurship, focusing on its translating, fusing and evolving of social capital in the process of sectoral interaction. The integration and shift of social capital affects the output of actors or units at the micro, meso, and macro levels, and it spreads and reflects to strengthen or deepen the effectiveness of collective, relational, and generalized social capital. The integration and shift of social capital affects the process of societal entrepreneurship throughout different stages.
The integration and shift of social capital of translating, fusing and evolving takes place distinctively as entrepreneurial plan actions, sectoral interaction and continuous effectuation of generalized social capital go on. The research findings not only strengthen the theoretical application of social capital and societal entrepreneurship, but also enrich the understanding and analysis of cross-sector cooperative societal entrepreneurship, thereby bringing new insights and contributions to the theoretical and practical fields.
目次 Table of Contents
目 錄
論文審定書……………………………………………i
誌謝……………………………………………………ii
摘要……………………………………………………iii
Abstract …………………………………………..……iv
第一章 緒論……………………………………..……1
第一節 研究背景與研究動機………………….……1
第二節 研究目的與研究問題………………….……8
第二章 文獻探討……………………………………12
第一節 社會創業……………………………………12
第二節 社會資本…………………….…….……….23
第三章 研究方法………………………….…..……34
第一節 個案研究方法……………………..………34
第二節 研究資料來源與蒐集……………..………35
第三節 研究資料整理和分析……………..………40
第四章 研究分析、討論與發現…………..………42
第一節 倡議行動計畫分析………………...…...…42
第二節 品牌創業行動計畫分析…………….....…51
第三節 社會創業跨部門合作挑戰………….....…57
第四節 社會資本分析………………………...……67
第五節 研究討論與發現……………………...……81
第五章 結論…………………………………...……90
參考文獻……………………………………....……93
附錄……………………………………..…….....…102

參考文獻 References
參考文獻
中文文獻

1蔡雅芳, 胡哲生, 吳世望, & 劉嘉馨. (2018). 應用社會企業概念創造社區老人預防照護價值. 輔仁管理評論, 25(1), 109-129.
2王哲璟. (2021). 創意產業商業模式建構老鷹紅豆品牌形象對品牌認同、購買意願影響之研究,實踐大學企業管理學系碩士論文。
3台灣猛禽研究會,http://raptor.org.tw/,檢索日期:2023年6月15日。
4林子傑. (2019). 品牌形象、品牌認知及服務品質對老鷹紅豆購買意願影響之研究-以屏東市全聯實業消費者為例,國立屏東科技大學農企業管理系所碩士論文。
5林子傑. (2020). 品牌形象, 品牌認知及服務品質對老鷹紅豆購買意願影響之研究-以屏東市全聯實業消費者為例.
6林慧音. (2016).創業精神與社區發展—開創觀點下的返鄉青年創業歷程探究, 國立中山大學企業管理學系博士論文。
7屏科大野保所鳥類生態研究室,http://iwcraptor.pixnet.net/blog,檢索日期:2023年6月15日。
8高明瑞, & 蔡依倫. (2009). 鑲嵌的社會創業歷程: 制度革新觀點. 創業管理研究, 4(4), 107-134.
9陳彥伶. (2020). 從黑鳶中毒事件到環境友善農業品牌:老鷹紅豆個案之政策倡議過程,國立中山大學公共事務管理研究所碩士論文。
10陳昭文. (2018). 全聯-老鷹紅豆之策略行銷分析,國立政治大學/經營管理碩士學程碩士論文。
11陳尊賢(2001) (R8) 農業生產與生態環境行政院農業委員會全球資訊網「農政與農情」月刊 https://www.coa.gov.tw/ws.php?id=3861&print=Y
12陶在樸,1998,《地球文明的永續發展》。台北:中華徵信所,初版。
13楊銘賢, 吳濟聰, 蘇哲仁, & 高慈薏. (2011). 企業家社會資本對社會企業創業與創新之影響. 創業管理研究, 6(1), 81-106.
14廖俊松,2004,〈地方廿一世紀永續發展之策略〉。《中國行政評論》第13卷2期,頁183-212。
15劉阿榮, & 謝登旺. (2009). 台灣永續發展之環境與社會經濟的辯證. 國家與社會, (6), 1-49.
16劉美玲. (2007). 老鷹守護者沈振中的自我實踐之路,佛光大學生命學研究所碩士論文。
17蔡如潔, (2018). 企業推動公益產品之影響因素探討―以全聯實業的老鷹紅豆為例,國防大學運籌管理學系碩士論文。
18蔡依倫, & 高明瑞. (2013). 制度變遷與組織型態創設: 身心障礙者社會企業的浮現歷程研究. 中山管理評論, 21(2), 339-368.
19梁易慈, & 王仕圖.(2023). 從社會資本談社區型社會企業的發展與創新: 以東片寶石村社會企業為例. 台灣社區工作與社區研究學刊, 13(1), 51-100.

英文文獻
1Alvord, S. H., Brown, L. D., & Letts, C. W. (2004). Social entrepreneurship and societal transformation: An exploratory study. The journal of applied behavioral science, 40(3), 260-282.
2Austin, J. E. (2000). Strategic collaboration between nonprofits and businesses. Nonprofit and voluntary sector quarterly, 29(1_suppl), 69-97.
3Austin, J., Stevenson, H., & Wei–Skillern, J. (2006). Social and commercial entrepreneurship: same, different, or both?. Entrepreneurship theory and practice, 30(1), 1-22.
4Bacq, S., & Janssen, F. (2011). The multiple faces of social entrepreneurship: A review of definitional issues based on geographical and thematic criteria. Entrepreneurship & Regional Development, 23(5-6), 373-403.
5Bauer, C. M., Guzmán, C., & Santos, F. J. (2012). Social capital as a distinctive feature of Social Economy firms. International entrepreneurship and management journal, 8, 437-448.
6Berends, H., & Deken, F. (2021). Composing qualitative process research. Strategic Organization, 19(1), 134-146.
7Berglund, K., & Johannisson, B. (2012). Introduction: In the beginning was societal entrepreneurship. In Societal Entrepreneurship (pp. 1-27). Edward Elgar Publishing.
8Berglund, K., & Wigren, C. (2012). Soci (et) al entrepreneurship: The shaping of a different story of entrepreneurship. Tamara: Journal for Critical Organization Inquiry, 10(1-2).
9Berglund, K., Johannisson, B., & Schwartz, B. (Eds.). (2012). Societal entrepreneurship: Positioning, penetrating, promoting. Edward Elgar Publishing.
10Bonfanti, A., Battisti, E., & Pasqualino, L. (2016). Social entrepreneurship and corporate architecture: evidence from Italy. Management Decision, 54(2), 390-417.
11Bourdieu, P. (1980). Le capital social. Actes de la recherche en sciences sociales, 31(1), 2-3.
12Bourdieu, P. (1985). The forms of capital in Richardson JG ed Handbook of theory and research for the sociology of education Greenwood. New York.
13Brehm, J., & Rahn, W. (1997). Individual-level evidence for the causes and consequences of social capital. American journal of political science, 999-1023.
14Briggs, X. D. (2004). Social capital: Easy beauty or meaningful resource?. Journal of the American planning Association, 70(2), 151-158.
15Brunie, A. (2009). Meaningful distinctions within a concept: Relational, collective, and generalized social capital. Social science research, 38(2), 251-265.
16Burt, R. S. (1992). The social structure of competition. In Structural holes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. Networks in the Knowledge Economy, Oxford University Press, London, 13-56.
17Choi, N., & Majumdar, S. (2014). Social entrepreneurship as an essentially contested concept: Opening a new avenue for systematic future research. Journal of business venturing, 29(3), 363-376.
18Coleman, J. S. (1990). Foundations of social theory. Harvard university press.
19Conteh, C. (2013). Strategic inter-organizational cooperation in complex environments. Public Management Review, 15(4), 501-521.
20Czarniawska, B. (2009). Emerging institutions: pyramids or anthills?. Organization Studies, 30(4), 423-441.
21Dees, J. G. (1998). The meaning of social entrepreneurship.
22Defourny, J., & Nyssens, M. (2013). Social innovation, social economy and social enterprise: what can the European debate tell us?. 978-1-84980-999-3.
23Defourny, J., Borzaga, C., & Defourny, J. (2001). From third sector to social enterprise. The Emergence of Social Enterprise; Borzaga, C., Defourny, J., Eds, 17-31.
24Deng, W., Hendrikse, G., & Liang, Q. (2021). Internal social capital and the life cycle of agricultural cooperatives. Journal of Evolutionary Economics, 31, 301-323.
25Egri, C. P. (1999). The environmental round table role-play exercise: The dynamics of multistakeholder decision-making processes. Journal of Management Education, 23(1), 95-112.
26Eisenhardt, K. M., & Graebner, M. E. (1989). Theory building from case study research. Academy of Management Review, 14(4), 532-550.
27Elkington, J. (1997). The triple bottom line. Environmental management: Readings and cases, 2, 49-66.
28Esser, H. (2008). The two meaning of social capital. Dalam D. Castiglione, J. van Deth, & G. Wolleb (Eds.), The handbook of social capital (hal. 22–49).
29Esteves, A. M., Genus, A., Henfrey, T., Penha‐Lopes, G., & East, M. (2021). Sustainable entrepreneurship and the Sustainable Development Goals: Community‐led initiatives, the social solidarity economy and commons ecologies. Business Strategy and the Environment, 30(3), 1423-1435.
30Etzkowitz, H. (2003). Innovation in innovation: The triple helix of university-industry-government relations. Social science information, 42(3), 293-337.
31Evans, P. (1997). Government action, social capital, and development: Reviewing the evidence of synergy. RESEARCH SERIES-INSTITUTE OF INTERNATIONAL STUDIES UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA BERKELEY, 178-209.
32Evers, A., & Laville, J. L. (Eds.). (2004). The third sector in Europe. Edward Elgar Publishing.
33Fletcher, D. E. (2006). Entrepreneurial processes and the social construction of opportunity. Entrepreneurship & Regional Development, 18(5), 421-440.
34Foley, M. W., & Edwards, B. (1999). Is it time to disinvest in social capital?. Journal of public policy, 19(2), 141-173.
35Fukuyama, F. (1996). Trust: The social virtues and the creation of prosperity. Simon and Schuster.
36Gautam, Y., & Andersen, P. (2016). Diversificación de los medios de vida rurales y bienestar de los hogares: percepciones de Humla, Nepal. Journal of Rural Studies, 44, 239-249.
37Gawell, M., Johannisson, B., & Lundqvist, M. (2009). Entrepreneurship in the Name of Society: Reader’s Digest of a Swedish Research Anthology. The KK Foundation.
38Gray, B. (1989). 1989 Collaborating: Finding common ground for multiparty problems. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
39Gray, B. (2000). Assessing inter-organizational collaboration: Multiple conceptions and multiple methods. Cooperative strategy: Economic, business, and organizational issues, 243-260.
40Gray, B., & Hay, T. M. (1986). Political limits to interorganizational consensus and change. The Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 22(2), 95-112.
41Gregory, D. J., & Anderson, B. B. (2006). Framing a theory of social entrepreneurship: Building on two schools of practice and thought. Research on social entrepreneurship, 39-66.
42Grootaert, C., & Van Bastelaer, T. (Eds.). (2002). Understanding and measuring social capital: A multidisciplinary tool for practitioners (Vol. 1). World Bank Publications.
43Harding, R. (2004). Social enterprise: the new economic engine?. Business strategy review, 15(4), 39-44Hardy, C., Lawrence, T. B., & Phillips, N. (2006). Swimming with sharks: Creating strategic change through multi-sector collaboration. International Journal of Strategic Change Management, 1(1-2), 96-112.
45Haugh, H. (2005). A research agenda for social entrepreneurship. Social enterprise journal, 1(1), 1-12.
46Hero, R. (2003). Multiple theoretical traditions in American politics and racial policy inequality. Political Research Quarterly, 56(4), 401-408.
47Hjorth, D., & Steyaert, C. (2004). Narrative and discursive approaches in entrepreneurship: A second movements in entrepreneurship book. University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign's academy for entrepreneurial leadership historical research reference in entrepreneurship.
48Hong, S. Y., Lin, H. S., Walther, B. A., Shie, J. E., & Sun, Y. H. (2018). Recent avian poisonings suggest a secondary poisoning crisis of black kites during the 1980s in Taiwan. The Journal of Raptor Research, 52(3), 326-337.
49Hooghe, M. (2003). Voluntary associations and democratic attitudes: Value congruence as a causal mechanism. In Generating social capital: Civil society and institutions in comparative perspective (pp. 89-111). New York: Palgrave Macmillan US.
50Hurlbert, J. S., Haines, V. A., & Beggs, J. J. (2000). Core networks and tie activation: What kinds of routine networks allocate resources in nonroutine situations?. American Sociological Review, 598-618.
51Jabareen, Y. R. (2006). Sustainable urban forms: Their typologies, models, and concepts. Journal of planning education and research, 26(1), 38-52.
52Kanter, R. M. (1989). Becoming PALs: Pooling, allying, and linking across companies. Academy of Management Perspectives, 3(3), 183-193.
53Krishna, A. (2002). Active social capital: Tracing the roots of development and democracy. Columbia University Press.
54Krishna, A. (2003). One thing or many: Is social capital fungible across diverse arenas. In annual meeting of the American Political Science Association, Philadelphia.
55Krishna, A. (2008). Social capital and economic development. The handbook of social capital, 438-466.
56Lang, R., & Fink, M. (2019). Rural social entrepreneurship: The role of social capital within and across institutional levels. Journal of Rural Studies, 70, 155-168.
57Langley, A. (2009). Studying processes in and around organizations. The Sage handbook of organizational research methods, 409, 429.
58Langley, A., Smallman, C., & Tsoukas, H. van de & Ven, AH (2013). Process studies of change in organization and management: Unveiling temporality, activity, and flow. Academy of Management Journal, 56(1), 1-13.
59Lazega, E., & Pattison, P. E. (2001). Social capital as social mechanisms and collective assets: The example of status auctions among colleagues. Social capital: Theory and research, 185, 208.
60Li, Q., & Wu, M. (2020). Tourists’ pro-environmental behaviour in travel destinations: Benchmarking the power of social interaction and individual attitude. Journal of Sustainable Tourism, 28(9), 1371-1389.
61Lin, C. Y. Y., & Chen, J. (2016). Impact of Societal and Social Innovation. Berlin: Springer.
62Lin, N. (1999a). Building a network theory of social capital. Connections, 22(1), 28-51.
63Lin, N. (1999b). Social networks and status attainment. Annual review of sociology, 25(1), 467-487.
64Lin, N. (2001). Social capital: A theory of social structureand action. Cambridge University Pres.
65Lin, N. (2008). A network theory of social capital. The handbook of social capital, 50(1), 69.
66Loukis, E., Kyriakou, N., Pazalos, K., & Popa, S. (2017). Inter-organizational innovation and cloud computing. Electronic Commerce Research, 17, 379-401.
67Lyon, F. (2000). Trust, networks and norms: The creation of social capital in agricultural economies in Ghana. World Development, 28(4), 663-681.
68Maguire, S., Hardy, C., & Lawrence, T. B. (2004). Institutional entrepreneurship in emerging fields: HIV/AIDS treatment advocacy in Canada. Academy of management journal, 47(5), 657-679.
69Mair, J., & Marti, I. (2006). Social entrepreneurship research: A source of explanation, prediction, and delight. Journal of world business, 41(1), 36-44.
70Mair, J., & Marti, I. (2009). Entrepreneurship in and around institutional voids: A case study from Bangladesh. Journal of business venturing, 24(5), 419-435.
71Majava, J., Isoherranen, V., & Kess, P. (2013). Business collaboration concepts and implications for companies. International Journal of Synergy and Research, 2(1-2).
72Martin, R. L., & Osberg, S. (2007). Social entrepreneurship: The case for definition.
73Matlay, H., & Mitra, J. (2002). Entrepreneurship and learning: the double act in the triple helix. The International Journal of Entrepreneurship and Innovation, 3(1), 7-16.
74McCann, J. E. (1983). Design guidelines for social problem-solving interventions. The Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 19(2), 177-189.
75Meyskens, M., Carsrud, A. L., & Cardozo, R. N. (2010). The symbiosis of entities in the social engagement network: The role of social ventures. Entrepreneurship & Regional Development, 22(5), 425-455.
76Montgomery, A. W., Dacin, P. A., & Dacin, M. T. (2012). Collective social entrepreneurship: Collaboratively shaping social good. Journal of business ethics, 111, 375-388.
77Nahapiet, J., & Ghoshal, S. (1998). Social capital, intellectual capital, and the organizational advantage. Academy of management review, 23(2), 242-266.
78Ostrom, E., & Ahn, T. K. (2009). The meaning of social capital and its link to collective action. Handbook of social capital: The troika of sociology, political science and economics, 17.
79Peredo, A. M., & McLean, M. (2006). Social entrepreneurship: A critical review of the concept. Journal of world business, 41(1), 56-65.
80Peterson, T., & Schenker, K. (2018). Social entrepreneurship in a sport policy context. Sport in Society, 21(3), 452-467.
81Portes, A. (1998). Social capital: Its origins and applications in modern sociology. Annual review of sociology, 24(1), 1-24.
82Putnam, R. D. (2000). Bowling alone: The collapse and revival of American community. Simon and schuster.
83Putnam, R. D., Leonardi, R., & Nanetti, R. Y. (1994). Making democracy work: Civic traditions in modern Italy. Princeton university press.
84Rado, I., Lu, M. F., Lin, I. C., & Aoo, K. (2021). Societal entrepreneurship for sustainable Asian rural societies: A multi-sectoral social capital approach in Thailand, Taiwan, and Japan. Sustainability, 13(5), 2747.
85Rod, M., & Rod, G. Reviewing Effectuation and Bricolage in the Context of Social Entrepreneurship Multisector Collaborations.
86Saebi, T., Foss, N. J., & Linder, S. (2019). Social entrepreneurship research: Past achievements and future promises. Journal of management, 45(1), 70-95.
87Sagawa, S., & Segal, E. (2000). Common interest, common good: Creating value through business and social sector partnerships. California management review, 42(2), 105-122.
88Savitz, A. (2013). The triple bottom line: how today's best-run companies are achieving economic, social and environmental success-and how you can too. John Wiley & Sons.
89Saz-Gil, I., Bretos, I., & Díaz-Foncea, M. (2021). Cooperatives and social capital: A narrative literature review and directions for future research. Sustainability, 13(2), 534.
90Scott, W. R. (2013). Institutions and organizations: Ideas, interests, and identities. Sage publications.
91Shah, D. V. (1998). Civic engagement, interpersonal trust, and television use: An individual‐level assessment of social capital. Political Psychology, 19(3), 469-496.
92Shane, S., & Venkataraman, S. (2000). The promise of entrepreneurship as a field of research. Academy of management review, 25(1), 217-226.
93Shrestha, M. K. (2013). Internal versus external social capital and the success of community initiatives: A case of self‐organizing collaborative governance in Nepal. Public Administration Review, 73(1), 154-164.
94Sjöstrand, S. E. (1992). On the rationale behind “irrational” institutions. Journal of Economic Issues, 26(4), 1007-1040.
95Springett, D., & Redclift, M. (2015). Sustainable development: History and evolution of the concept. In Routledge international handbook of sustainable development (pp. 3-38). Routledge.
96Sullivan, H., & Skelcher, C. (2017). Working across boundaries: Collaboration in public services. Bloomsbury Publishing.
97Tillmar, M. (2012). Sectoral intertwining at the grass root level. Societal Entrepreneurship: Positioning, Penetrating, Promoting, 33.
98Trist, E. (1983). Referent organizations and the development of inter-organizational domains. Human relations, 36(3), 269-284.
99Uphoff, N. (2000). Understanding social capital: learning from the analysis and experience of participation. Social capital: A multifaceted perspective, 6(2), 215-249.
100Uslaner, E. M. (2004). Trust and social bonds: Faith in others and policy outcomes reconsidered. Political Research Quarterly, 57(3), 501-507.
101Valentinov, V. L. (2004). Toward a social capital theory of cooperative organisation. Journal of Cooperative Studies, 37(3), 5-20.
102Van der Gaag, M., Snijders, T. A., & Flap, H. D. (2008). Position generator measures and their relationship to other social capital measures. Social capital: An international research program, 27-49.
103Wade, R. (1988). Village republics: economic conditions for collective action in South India. (No Title).
104Wang, W., Wang, J., Liu, K., & Wu, Y. J. (2020). Overcoming barriers to agriculture green technology diffusion through stakeholders in China: A social network analysis. International journal of environmental research and public health, 17(19), 6976.
105Warren, M. R., Thompson, J. P., & Saegert, S. (2001). The role of social capital in combating poverty. Social capital and poor communities, 3, 1-28.
106Weerawardena, J., & Mort, G. S. (2006). Investigating social entrepreneurship: A multidimensional model. Journal of world business, 41(1), 21-35.
107Westley, F., & Vredenburg, H. (1991). Strategic bridging: The collaboration between environmentalists and business in the marketing of green products. The Journal of applied behavioral science, 27(1), 65-90.
108Westley, F., & Vredenburg, H. (1997). Interorganizational collaboration and the preservation of global biodiversity. Organization Science, 8(4), 381-403.
109Woolcock, M., & Narayan, D. (2000). Social capital: Implications for development theory, research, and policy. The world bank research observer, 15(2), 225-249.
110World Commission on Environment and Development. (1987). Our Common Future Oxford. UK: Oxford University Press.
111Wu, Y. J., Wu, T., & Arno Sharpe, J. (2020). Consensus on the definition of social entrepreneurship: a content analysis approach. Management Decision, 58(12), 2593-2619.
112Yin, R. K. (2009). Case study research: Design and methods (Vol. 5). sage.
113Yin, R. K. (2018). Case study research and applications. Sage.
114Zahra, S. A. (2010). Harvesting family firms' organizational social capital: A relational perspective. Journal of Management Studies, 47(2), 345-366.
電子全文 Fulltext
本電子全文僅授權使用者為學術研究之目的,進行個人非營利性質之檢索、閱讀、列印。請遵守中華民國著作權法之相關規定,切勿任意重製、散佈、改作、轉貼、播送,以免觸法。
論文使用權限 Thesis access permission:校內校外完全公開 unrestricted
開放時間 Available:
校內 Campus: 已公開 available
校外 Off-campus: 已公開 available


紙本論文 Printed copies
紙本論文的公開資訊在102學年度以後相對較為完整。如果需要查詢101學年度以前的紙本論文公開資訊,請聯繫圖資處紙本論文服務櫃台。如有不便之處敬請見諒。
開放時間 available 已公開 available

QR Code