2019年7月3日，台灣發生「自強號刺警事件」，其犯案過程與判決結果引發社會譁然，也因該事件與電視劇《我們與惡的距離》劇情高度相似，使人們將兩件事進行討論，更發現該劇傳達的資訊默默影響著閱聽人的認知。究竟是甚麼因素，影響閱聽人對戲劇的解讀型態（優勢型解讀、對立型解讀），以及後續對社會議題關注程度呢？
本研究建立在基模理論，探討寫實程度如何影響閱聽人觀賞台灣電視劇《我們與惡的距離》後的解讀型態（優勢型解讀、對立型解讀），了解閱聽人是否因共鳴感知與評價，調節解讀型態對社會議題關注程度的影響，並以問卷調查法進行本研究。
研究結果發現，寫實程度越高，閱聽人越會採用優勢型解讀，若寫實程度越低，閱聽人則越可能採用對立型解讀。而對立型解讀的閱聽人，社會議題關注程度比優勢型解讀高。此外，高度共鳴感知以及評價皆能強化解讀型態以及社會議題關注程度之間的關係，若共鳴感知、評價越低，結果則反之。

On July 3, 2019, the TRA Tze-Chiang Limited Express police assassination incident occurred in Taiwan, it’s criminal process and the verdict caused a social uproar. Also, because the incident was highly similar to the plot of "The World Between Us", people discussed the similarities and differences between the two events, and surprisingly, the information of the drama also influences the views of the audience. What are the factors that make the audience of "The World Between Us" change their interpretation type (Dominant reading, and Oppositional reading) and the degree of attention to social issues?
This research is based on the schema theory, and discuss how the degree of realism affects audience interpretation type after watching the Taiwanese TV series "The World Between Us", and explore whether the perception of resonance and evaluation affects audience degree of attention to social issues. This research adopt the questionnaire survey methods to measure variables.
Results show that the higher the degree of realism, the more likely readers would adopt dominant reading, and the lower the degree of realism, the more likely readers would adopt oppositional reading. For readers of oppositional reading, the degree of attention to social issues is higher than readers of dominant reading. Moreover, the higher the degree of resonance and evaluation can strengthen the relationship between interpretation type and the degree of attention to social issues. If the resonance and evaluation are lower, not the other way around.

論文審定書………………………………………………………………………….…i
中文摘要………………………………………………………………………….…ii
英文摘要…………………………………………………………………………...iii
第壹章 緒論………………………………………………………………………..…1
第一節 研究背景……………………………………………………………...1
第二節 研究動機………..…………………………………………………….3
第三節 研究問題…………………………………………………………..……7
第四節 研究目的……………………………………………………………...8
第貳章 文獻探討……………………………………………………………………9
第一節 認知基模與解讀型態……………………………………………...9
第二節 寫實….……………………………………………………………..13
第三節 共鳴………………………………………………………………...17
第四節 評價………………………………………………………………...20
第五節 社會議題關注程度……………………………………………...…22
第參章 研究架構及研究假設………………………………………………………24
第一節 研究架構………………………………………………………………24
第二節 研究假設…………………………………………………………..25
第肆章 研究方法……………………………………………………………………32
第一節 問卷調查法………………………………………………………..32
第二節 研究對象………………….…………………………………………...33
第三節 問卷設計………………….………………………………………..34
第四節 前測問卷………………….………………………………………..42
第伍章 研究結果……………………………………………………………………43
第一節 樣本之描述性分析…………………………………………………..43
第二節 信度分析…………..…………………………………………………..45
第三節 假設驗證…………..…………………………………………………..45
第陸章 研究結果……………………………………………………………………55
第一節 研究發現…………..…………………………………………………..55
第二節 理論意涵…………..…………………………………………………..59
第三節 實務意涵…………..…………………………………………………..61
第四節 研究限制與未來研究方向…………………………………………..63
參考文獻…………………………………………………………………………......66
附錄………………………………………………………………………………......78

ELLE（2019/04/13）。《我們與惡的距離》這些點破社會現實的血淋淋台詞金
句：「沒有一個爸媽，要花20年去養一個殺人犯⋯」。
https://www.elle.com/tw/entertainment/drama/g27084297/the-world-between-us-
9-quotes/
Google台灣官方部落格（2019/12/11）。《台灣2019年搜尋排行榜出爐》。
https://taiwan.googleblog.com/2019/12/products-search-year-in-search.html
VIDA ORANGE生活報橘（2019/03/27）。【在戲背後，演員看到什麼？】《我們
與惡的距離》吳慷仁：原來支持的東西，拍完戲後就不確定了。取自：
https://buzzorange.com/vidaorange/2019/03/27/the-world-between-us/
丁榮國（1999）。〈電視收視率量與質的探討〉。《復興崗學報》，67，191-222。
天下雜誌（2019）。〈奧美觀點：《與惡》成功背後，呂蒔媛與大數據的距離〉。
　　取自：https://www.cw.com.tw/article/5095338
太報（2020/05/01）。刺警案無罪的反思：學會思辨問題，才能學會解決問題。
取自：https://www.taisounds.com/w/TaiSounds/society_20050120020124930
中時新聞網（2019/10/07）。《與惡》再下一城 釜山成為台灣之光。取自：
https://www.chinatimes.com/realtimenews/20191007004329-260404?chdtv
中時新聞網（2021/10/14）。恐怖現場畫面曝光 城中城大樓全面狂燒已成廢墟。
取自https://www.chinatimes.com/realtimenews/20211014000972-260402?chdtv
中央通訊社（2019/12/07）。亞洲影藝創意大獎 公視奪3獎項。取自：
https://www.cna.com.tw/news/amov/201912060347.aspx
王力威（2012）。《完美無瑕的童話結局？台灣偶像劇與女性觀眾愛情觀之關聯
性研究》。國立中山大學傳播管理研究所碩士論文。
王泰俐（2009）。〈八卦電視新聞的閱聽眾接收分析〉。《傳播與管理研究》8卷2
期。P3 - P 35。
公視新聞網（2020/04/30）。刺死鐵路警嫌犯 精神問題一審無罪。取自：
https://news.pts.org.tw/article/476761
今周刊（2019）。《我們與惡的距離》：給需要療傷的社會―一場大型心理諮商。
https://reurl.cc/V3lbYZ
台灣媒體觀察教育基金會（2020）。108年閱聽人電視使用行為及滿意度調查報
告。https://www.mediawatch.org.tw/news/9912
自由時報（2019/07/04）。慟！台鐵車廂刺警案 李姓勇警大量出血搶救不治。取
自：https://news.ltn.com.tw/news/society/breakingnews/2842206
朱全斌（1999）。〈有線電視新聞頻道觀眾接收分析〉。《廣播與電視期刊》第13
期，p.41-p.61。
朱宜文（2017）。《解讀偶像劇性別意識型態：以臺中市某國中教學行動研究為
例》。國立臺灣師範大學公民教育與活動領導學系碩士論文。
李玉琪（2021）。《流行音樂運用社群媒體營銷模式分析—以〈本色頑童〉為
例》。世新大學傳播管理學研究所碩士論文。
李金銓（1983）。《大眾傳播倫理―社會、媒介、人》。台北：三民。
李孟穎（2014）。《觀看浪漫偶像劇的情緒反應及其對愛情關係滿意度的影
響》。國立臺北教育大學心理與諮商學系碩士班碩士論文。
李政忠（2003）。〈從抽樣與統計方法探討網路問卷調查的可行性：比較電話訪
談與網路問卷樣本的實質差異性〉。《廣播與電視》，第二十一期，頁55-
95。
吳怡國、姜易慧（2010）。《台灣偶像劇產業發展變遷之歷時性研究》，《中華傳
播學會年會論文集》。
呂姿雯（2003）。《女性雜誌讀者的閱讀行為、愛情態度及其解讀型態之研究—
以女性雜誌中兩性互動論述為例》。中國文化大學新聞研究所碩士論文。
宏將觀點（2019）。《我們與惡的距離》觀察台劇收視趨勢。
http://www.mediadrive.com.cn/manage/files/17620190515091819.pdf
林妤芳（2005）。《國小中年級兒童對卡通內容及暴力行為的解讀方式之研究》。
國立屏東師範學院教育行政研究所碩士論文。
林清山譯（1995）。Richard E. Mayer著。《教育心理學―認知取向》。台北：遠
流出版社。
洪泉湖（1998）。〈從政治學論公民教育的理論與實施〉。於張秀雄主編的《公民
教育的理論與實施》中紀載。台北：師大書苑。
風傳媒（2019/10/06）。《我們與惡的距離》狂摘6獎項 賈靜雯：宋喬安告訴大
家，唯有愛跟放下才能往前走。取自：
https://www.storm.mg/article/1794965?page=1
徐磊瑄（2019）。《電視劇《後宮甄嬛傳》人物形象》。國立臺北教育大學語文與
創作學系碩士班碩士論文。
陳芸芸譯（2000）。Abercrombie, N. 著。《電視與社會》。台北：韋伯出版社。
符瓊尹（2019）。陸媒筆下的台劇30年興衰―《我們與惡的距離》台劇的「文
藝復興」。取自：https://chinaqna.com/a/79461
張羽彤（2013）。《中國大陸電視劇《蝸居》的再現與接收分析》。國立中正大學
電訊傳播所碩士論文。
張瑞芩（2019）。《鬆動偶像劇中浪漫愛的建構：一個國中教育現場的行動研
究》。國立高雄師範大學性別教育研究所碩士論文。
教育部國語辭典（2000）。取自：http://dict.concised.moe.edu.tw/cgi-
bin/jbdic/gsweb.cgi?o=djbdic&searchid=Z00000017877
郭幼龍（1999）。《民眾對台灣電影的評價與電影消費行為之關係研究》。世新大
學傳播研究所碩士論文。
曾承涵（2014）。《從台灣偶像劇之性別意識型態探討台南市國中生性別平等意
識之研究》。國立臺南大學教育學系課程與教學碩士班碩士論文。
曾盈儒（2020）。《以敘事說服理論分析《我們與惡的距離》之閱聽眾涉入度與
說服阻力》。世新大學口語傳播學研究所碩士論文。
黃郅雯（2019）。《戲劇內醫療議題與閱聽眾媒介體驗的關係–以電視劇《麻醉
風暴》為例》。輔仁大學大眾傳播學研究所碩士論文。
游柔晴（2020）。《電視劇《我們與惡的距離》中思覺失調症者的形象再現》。銘
傳大學新媒體暨傳播管理學系碩士班碩士論文。
葉銘浩（2020）。《OTT電視節目的新合作模式：以電視劇《我們與惡的距離》
為例》。國立臺北藝術大學文創產業國際藝術碩士學位學程碩士論文。
楊維倫（2003）。《情境脈絡與台灣日劇迷的收視經驗》。世新大學傳播研究所碩
士論文。
遠見雜誌（2019）。〈《我們與惡》如此成功，這個科技團隊功不可沒！〉。取自
https://www.gvm.com.tw/article/67028
鳴人堂（2019/07/08）。誰讓鐵警成殉職「英雄」？談那些沒拿刀的共犯們。取
自：https://opinion.udn.com/opinion/story/12322/3916692
鳴人堂（2020/01/20）。2019台劇回顧：打進國際市場的「類型劇」，能否成今
年跳板？取自：https://opinion.udn.com/opinion/story/120596/4298405
歐敬洛（2017）。《太陽的後裔》泰國版 大熱新劇《愛的任務》被批美化軍政
府。《香港01》。https://reurl.cc/dGRv0y
蔡琰（1994）。〈電視單元戲劇與社會之關聯〉。《新聞學研究》。49期，P107 –
P 122．
蔡琰（2000）。《台灣劇：戲劇傳播的敘事理論》。台北：三民。
鄭慧蘭（2001）。《高中生公民參與態度與行為之研究―以台北市公立高中為
例》。國立台灣師範大學公民訓育研究所碩士論文。
謝尹亭（2014）。《高職輕度智能障礙學生之愛情態度：偶像劇與色情影片之影
響》。輔仁大學兒童與家庭學系碩士班碩士論文。
謝炫達（2001）。《全球化廣告的接收分析―影響閱聽人解讀型態之因素研究》。
國立政治大學廣告學系碩士班碩士論文。
謝涵如（2012）。《台灣偶像劇的療癒系功能之探討—以《我可能不會愛你》為
例》。中國文化大學新聞暨傳播學院新聞學系碩士論文。
鐘若方（2019）。《台灣電視劇國際策略之研究》。世新大學傳播管理學研究所碩
士論文。
鍾起惠（2003）。《節目品質與優質電視─兼論當前台灣電視節目產製的困境及
出路》。臺北：廣電基金會。
蘇鑰機（1999）。〈用欣賞指數量度節目品質—香港的經驗〉。《廣視與電視》。
14期，P139-P166。
蘇鑰機、鍾庭耀（2001）。《電視節目欣賞指數：香港經驗》。香港：電視節目欣
賞指數調查顧問團。
Aaker, D. A. (1996). Measuring brand equity across products and markets. California
Management Review, 38(3), 102-120.
Abercrombie, N., & Longhurst, B. (1998). Audiences: A sociological theory of
performance and imagination. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Ainslie, A., Dreze, X., & Zufryden, F. (2005). Modeling Movie Life Cycles and
Market Share. Marketing Science, 24, 508-517.
Albrecht, J. E., & Myers, J. L. (1998). Accessing distant text information during
reading:Effects of contextual cues. Discourse Processes, 26, 87-107.
Aminudin, A. (2018). Audience in Reception Analysis Perspective. The
Asian Conference on Media, Communication & Film. At: Tokyo, Japan. 1-13.
Anderson, R. C., Reynolds, R. E., Schallert, D. L., & Goetz, E. T. (1977).
Frameworks for comprehending discourse. American Educational Research
Journal, 14(4), 367-381.
Ang, I. (1985). Watching Dallas: Soap Opera and Melodramatic Imagination.
London: Methuen.
Austin, B. A. (1989). Immediate seating: a look at movie audiences. CA: Wads-worth
Publishing Company.
Barwise, P. & Ehrenberg, A. (1988). Television and Its Audience. Publisher: SAGE
Bennett, W. L. (2008). Changing Citizenship in the Digital Age. New York:
Massachusetts Institute of Technology.
Beville, H. M. (1988). Audience Ratings: Radio, Television and Cable. Lawrence
Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ.
Boniface, L., & MacIlroy, G. (1994). Soap opera: Fiction or fantasy? Critical Arts:
South-North Cultural and Media Studies,. 8, 66-76.
Bouson, J. B. (1989). The Empathic Reader: A Study of the Narcissistic Character
and the Drama of the Self. MA: University of Massachusetts Press.
Briandana, R. & Azwan, A. (2020). New media audience and gender perspective: A
reception analysis of millenials interpretation. International Journal of
Humanities and Social Science Research, 6(1), 58-63.
Bruhn, M., Schoenmüller, V., Schäfer, D., & Heinrich, D. (2012). Brand
authenticity:Towards a deeper understanding of its conceptualization and
measurement. Advances in Consumer Research, 40, 567-576.
Cabrera, D. (1997). Resonating sound art and the aesthetics of room resonance. Convergence:The Journal of Research into New Media Technologies, 3, 108-137.
Cardozo, R.N. (1965). An Experimental Study of Customer Effort, Expectation and
Satisfaction. Journal of Marketing Research, 2(3), 244-249.
Chapko, M. K. & Lewis, M. H. (1975). Authoritarianism and All in the Family. The
Journal of Psychology, 90. 245-248.
Chaudhuri, A.,& Holbrook, M.B.(2001). The chain of effects from brand trust and
brand affect to brand performance: The role of loyalty. Journal of Marketing,
65(2), 81-93.
Cook, A. E., Halleran, J. G., & O’Brien, E. J. (1998). What is readily available during
reading? A memory-based view of text processing. Discourse Processes, 26,
109-129.
Czsentmihalyi M (1990). Flow: The Psychology of Optimal Experience. Harper
Perennial.
Dens, N., De Pelsmacker, P., Wouters, M., & Purnawirawan, N.(2012). Do you like
what you recognize? The effects of brand placement prominence and movie plot
connection on brand attitude as mediated by recognition. Journal of Advertising,
41(3), 35-53.
Denzin, N. and Lincoln, Y. (2000). The Discipline and Practice of Qualitative
Research. Handbook of Qualitative Research. Sage: Thousand Oaks, 1-32.
Dewey, J. (1988). Experience and education. In J. A. Boydston (Ed.), John
Dewey: The later works, 1925-1953 (Vol. 13, pp.4-63). Carbondale, IL: Southern
Illinois University Press. (Original work published 1938)
Douglas, M. (1984). Purity and danger: An analysis of the concepts of pollution and
taboo. London: Routledge.
Eggermont, S. (2005). Television viewing and young adolescents’ beliefs and
assumptions about sexual relations: the ‘effect’ of different program clusters at
different experience levels. Conference Papers: International Communication
Association: New York. 1-32.
Eisenberg, E., & Strayer, J. (1987). Cambridge studies in social and emotional
development. Empathy and its development. Cambridge University Press.
Ellmore, R. T. (1990). National textbook company’s mass media dictionary.
Lincolnwood, IL: National textbook company.
Fiske, J. (1986). Television culture. London and New York: Methuen.
Fiske, J. (1989). Understanding Popular Culture. London: Routledge.
Folks, S. (1984). Consumer Reactions to Product Failure: An Attributional Approach.
Journal of Consumer Research, 10, 398-409.
Fornell, C. (1992). A National Customer Satisfaction Barometer: The Swedish
Experience. Journal of Marketing, 55(4), 1-22.
Gerbner, G., Gross, L., Morgan, M., & Signorielli, N. (1980). The mainstreaming of
America: Violence profile no.11. Journal of Communication, 30, 10–29.
Giles, D. C. (2002). Parasocial interaction: A review of the literature and a model for
future research. Media Psychology, 4, 279–305.
Gitomer, J. (2000). Tell a story with BLT and you’ll weave a yarn of sales. Business
Journal, 14(13), 14-21.
Glastonbury, B., & MacKean, J. (1991). Survey methods. Handbook for research
studies in the social sciences. 225-247. London: Falmer.
Goodhardt G., Ehrenberg A., Collins M. (1987). The television audience. 2nd ed.
Gower, Aldershot, U.K
Graber, D. A. (1988). Processing the news. New York: Longman.
Green, M. C., & Brock, T. C. (2000). The role of transportation in the persuasiveness
of public narratives. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 79, 701–721.
Green, M. C., Brock, T. C., & Kaufman, G. F. (2004). Understanding media
enjoyment: The role of transportation into narrative worlds. Communication
Theory, 14(4), 311–327.
Guba, E. G., & Lincoln, Y. S. (1994). Competing paradigms in qualitative research. In
N.K. Denzin & Y.S. Lincoln (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research. 105-117.
Thousand Oaks, LA: Sage.
Gunter, B., & Wober, M. (1992). The Reactive Viewer. London: John Libbey and
Company.
Hall, S. (1973). Encoding and decoding in the television discourse. Centre for
contemporary culture studies, Stencilled Occasional Paper No. 7. Birmingham
University of Birmingham.
Holmes, F. L. D. (1935). Resonance. Quarterly Journal of Speech, 21, 216-224.
Hudson, S., & Hudson, H. (2013). Engaging with consumers using social media: a
case study of music festivals. International Journal of Event and Festival
Management, 4(3), 206-223.
Ishii, K . Sum H. & Watanabe, S. (1999). Japanese and U.S. Programs in Taiwan:
New Patterns in Taiwanese Television. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic
Media, 43(3), 416-431.
Kamleitner, B., & Jyote, A.K.(2013). How using versus showing interaction between
characters and products boosts product placement effectiveness. International
Journal of Advertising, 32(4), 633-653
Keller, K. (2001). Building customer-based brand equity. Marketing Management,
10(2), 14-19.
Klarer, M. (2014). Putting television “aside”: novel narration in House of Cards. New
Review of Film and Television Studies, 12(2), 203–220.
Kotler, P., & Keller, K. L. (2009). Marketing management (13th ed.). Upper Saddle
River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
Krathwohl, D. R. (1993). Methods of educational and social science research: An
integrated approach. White Plains, New York: Longman.
Leggatt, T. (1993). Quality in television: The views of professionals. In studies of
broadcasting: An international annual of broadcasting science, 29, 37-69.
Levine, T. R., Serota, K. B., & Shulman, H. C. (2010). The impact of lie to me on
viewers’ actual ability to detect deception. Communication Research, 37(6),
847–856.
Levy, M. R., & Windahl, S. (1984). Audience activity and gratifications: A conceptual
clarification and exploration. Communication Research, 11(1), 51-78.
Liebes, T. (1996). Notes on the struggle to define involvement in television viewing.
In J. Hay, L. Grossberg, & E. Wartella (Eds.), The Audience and Its Landscape
(p. 177-186). Boulder, CO: Westview.
Livingstone, S. M. (1990). Interpreting a Television Narrative: How Different Viewers
See a Story. Journal of Communication, 40(1), 72–85.
Markus, H. & Zajonc, R. B. (1985). The cognitive perspective in social psychology, 1,
137-230, New York: Random House.
Martyn, H. (1992). Deconstructing the qualitative-quantitative divide. What’s wrong
with ethnography? London: Routledge.
McKoon, G., Gerrig, R., & Greene, S. B. (1996). Pronoun resolution without
pronouns: Some consequences of memory-based text processing. Journal of
Experimental Psychology:Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 22, 919-932.
McLeod, J. M., Bybee, C. R. & Durall, J. A. (1982). Evaluating media performance
by gratification sought and received. Journalism Quarterly, 59, 3-12.
McQuail, D. (1997). Audience analysis. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Middleton, D., & Crook, C. (1996). Bartlett and socially ordered consciousness: A
dis-cursive perspective: Comments on Rosa. Culture & Psychology, 2, 379-396.
Myers, J. L., & O’Brien, E. J. (1998). Accessing the discourse representation during
reading. Discourse Process. 26, 131–157.
Nightingale, V. (2003). The cultural revolution in audience research. A Companion
to Media Studies. 360-381.
Norman D. A. & Bobrow, D. G. (1975). On data-limited and resource-limited
processing. Cognitive Psychology, 7, 44-64.
Nunnally, J.C, & Bernstein, I.H. (1994) The Assessment of Reliability. Psychometric
Theory, 3, 248-292.
Oatley, K. (1999). Meeting of minds: Dialogue, sympathy, and identification in
reading fiction. Poetics, 26, 439–454.
O’Brien, E. J., Albrecht, J. E., Hakala, C. M., & Rizzella, M. L. (1995). Activation
and suppression of antecedents during reinstatement. Journal of Experimental
Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 21, 626–634.
O’Brien, E. J., Raney, G. E., Albrecht, J. E., & Rayner, K. (1997). Processes involved
in the resolution of explicit anaphors. Discourse Processes, 23, 1–24.
Oubaha, D. & Amzaourou, O. (2017). Audience reception analysis of public service
television news in Morocco. International Journal of Advanced Research, 5(11),
457-469.
Oza, A. (2021). Stereotyping of Blacks and Colored in Films and TV Series.
School of Liberal Studies. Pandit Dindayal Energy University.
Palmgreen, P. (1984). Uses and gratifications: A theoretical perspective. In R.
N.Bostrom(Ed.), Communication Yearbook(pp. 20-55). Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
Palmgreen, P., & Rayburn, J. D. (1979). Uses and gratification and exposure to public
television: A discrepancy approach. Communication research, 6(2), 155-180.
Palmgreen, P., Wenner, L. A. and Rosengren, K. E. (1985). Uses and Gratifications
Research: The past ten years. In K. E. Rosengren et al.(Ed.), Media gratification
research: Current perspectives. 11-37. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
Patton, M. Q. (1990). Qualitative evaluation and research methods. Newbury Park.
CA: Sage.
Perdana D. D. (2020). Reception Analysis of Related Audience by Watching “Sexy
Killers” the Documentary Film. 2nd International Media Conference 2019 (IMC
2019). Advances in Social Science, Education and Humanities Research,
423, 86-98.
Perse, E. M., Pavitt, C., & Burggraf, C. S. (1990). Implicit theories of marriage and
evaluations of marriage on television. Human Communication Research, 16.
387-408.
Pine II, B. J., & Gilmore, J. H. (1999). The Experience Economy: past, present and
future. Boston: Harvard Business School Press. 21-44.
Pingree, S. (1983). Children’s cognitive processing in constructing social reality.
Journalism Quarterly. 60. 415-422.
Potkay, C. R. & Potkay, C. E. (1984). Perceptions of female and male comic strip
characters II: Favorability and identification are different dimensions. Sex Roles, 10, 119-128.
Press, A. (1989). Class and Gender in the Hegemonic Process Class Differences in
Women's Perceptions of Television Realism and Identification with Television
Characters. Media Culture & Society, 11, 229-251.
Pritchard, R. (1990). The effects of cultural schemata on reading processing strategies.
Reading Research Quarterly, 25(4), 273-295.
Rice, R. E. (1986). Issues and Concepts in Research on Computer-Mediated
Communication Systems. Communication Yearbook, 12, 436-476.
Roberts, E. J. (1984). Program appeal and program impact: A new approach to
qualitative ratings. Research Working Paper. Graduate school of business,
Columbia University.
Robin, A. C., Lawrence, F. F., & Linda, L. P. (2002). Changing faces: cosmetics
opinion leadership among women in the new Hungary. European Journal of
marketing, 36, 1287-1308.
Roscoe, J.T. (1975). Fundamental Research Statistics for the Behavioral Sciences.
2nd edition. New York: Holt Rinehart & Winston.
Ruggiero, T. E. (2000). Uses and gratifications theory in the 21st century. Mass
communication & Society, 3(1), 3-37.
Rumelhart, D. E. (1984). Schemata and the cognitive system. Handbook of social
cognition, 1, 161-188.
Sandhu, N. (2018). Preferred Image of Women on Indian Television: A Move from
Classic Stereotypes. ANTYAJAA: Indian Journal of Women and Social Change,
3. 119-136.
Segrin, C., & Nabi, R. L. (2002). Does television cultivate unrealistic expectation
about marriage? Journal of Communication, 52, 247-263.
Sigelman, L., & Sigelman, C. K. (1974). The politics of popular culture: campaign
cynicism and “The Candidate”. Sociology and Social Research, 58(3), 272–277.
Silverstone, R. (1994). Television and Everyday Life. London：Routledge.
Simons, N. (2015). Article TV drama as a social experience: An empirical
investigation of the social dimensions of watching TV drama in the age of non-
linear television. Communications, 40(2), 219-236.
Sproull, L. (1986). Using electronic mail for data collection in organizational
research. Academy of Management Science, 29(11), 159-169.
Talkwalker & HubSpot. (2021). 2021 Social Media Trends Global Report.
https://www.talkwalker.com/resource/report/social-trends-talkwalker-final.pdf
Taylor, V. A. & Bearden, W. O. (2002). The effects of price on brand extension
evaluations: The moderating role of extension similarity. Journal of the Academy
of Marketing Science, 30 (2), 131-140.
Thompson, J. B. (1995). The Media and Modernity: A Social Theory of the Media.
Cambridge, UK: Polity Press.
Wan, H. H. (2008). Resonance as a Mediating Factor Accounting for the Message
Effect in Tailored Communication—Examining Crisis Communication in a
Tourism Context. Journal of Communication, 58, 472-489.
Wick, R. H. (1992). Schema theory and measurement in mass commination research:
Theoretical and methodological issue in news information processing.
Communication Yearbook, 15, 114-145.
Widmayer, S. A. (2005). Schema Theory: An Introduction. Computer Science.
http://saber2.net/Archivos/Schema-Theory-Intro.pdf
Wilterson, A. I., Kemper, C. M., Kim, N., Webb, T. W. Reblando, A. M. W., &
Graziano, M. S. A. (2019). Attention control and the attention schema theory of
consciousness. Progress in Neurobiology,195, 1-66.
Williams, R. (2011). “This is the night TV died”: Television post-object fandom and
the demise of The West Wing. Popular Communication. The International
Journal of Media and Culture, 9(4), 266–279.