Responsive image
博碩士論文 etd-0619123-141828 詳細資訊
Title page for etd-0619123-141828
論文名稱
Title
管理教練與員工創新行為之關係:內在動機與關係能量的中介效果
Managerial Coaching and Employee Innovative Behavior: The Mediating Effects of Intrinsic Motivation and Relational Energy
系所名稱
Department
畢業學年期
Year, semester
語文別
Language
學位類別
Degree
頁數
Number of pages
47
研究生
Author
指導教授
Advisor
召集委員
Convenor
口試委員
Advisory Committee
口試日期
Date of Exam
2023-05-23
繳交日期
Date of Submission
2023-07-19
關鍵字
Keywords
管理教練、關係能量、內在動機、創新行為、中介效果
Managerial Coaching, Relational Energy, Intrinsic Motivation, Innovative Behavior, Mediating Effect
統計
Statistics
本論文已被瀏覽 57 次,被下載 0
The thesis/dissertation has been browsed 57 times, has been downloaded 0 times.
中文摘要
在現今社會日益競爭激烈的商業環境下,有效的領導力對於企業在商業環境中獲得成功至關重要。 在各種領導風格中,管理教練已被證明對員工的績效和行為均具有影響 (Bakker & Demerouti, 2017)。 與此同時,創新行為對組織成功的重要性也已得到確認,人們更願意了解管理教練等的領導風格將會如何影響員工的創新行為。 本研究旨在於探討教練式管理和員工創新行為兩者之間的關係,以及內在動機和關係能量在該關係中的中介作用。本研究借鑒了資源保護理論 (Hobfoll, 1989) 和認知評價理論(O'Brien & Toms, 2008),對管理教練、創新行為、內在動機和關係能量進行文獻回顧。該研究建立了由理論假設開始、到研究設計、再到數據收集程序和數據分析以檢驗假設。對於問卷所收集到對於台灣、香港高科技產業、傳統製造業、金融業從業人員的問卷調查數據,我們會使用IBM SPSS Statistics 28.0進行數據分析檢驗。研究結果證明,管理教練可以在有內在動機中介的情況下對員工創新行為產生出正向影響。 最後,本研究除了為組織行為相關的領域的獻作出貢獻外, 將會根據研究結果提出本研究的結論、研究限制和未來研究方向的建議。還對組織和管理者俱有重要的管理意義,闡明了管理教練與員工的創新行為之間的關係,中介變量在管理教練實施過程具有何種重要性,並展示瞭如何通過管理教練在組織內培養創新文化和開發員工的創新潛能。
Abstract
With the increasingly competitive business environment in today's society, effective leadership is essential for a business to succeed in the business environment. Among various leadership styles, managerial coaching has been shown to exerted an influence on employee performance and behavior (Bakker & Demerouti, 2017). At the same time, the importance of innovative behavior in organizational success has been recognized, and people are more interest to know about how leadership styles, such as managerial coaching can influence employees’ innovative behavior. This study is purpose to explore the relationship between managerial coaching and employees’ innovative behavior, and the mediating role of intrinsic motivation and relational energy in this relationship. By the Conservation of Resources Theory (Hobfoll, 1989) and Cognitive Evaluation Theory (O'Brien & Toms, 2008), this study conducts a literature review on managerial coaching, relational energy, intrinsic motivation and innovative behavior. The study established theoretical hypotheses, research design, data collection, and data analysis to test all hypotheses. For the data collected by the questionnaire from employees in high-tech industry, traditional manufacturing industry, and financial industry of Taiwan and Hong Kong, this study uses IBM SPSS Statistics 28.0 for data analysis. The study's results prove that managerial coaching can positively affect employees' innovative behavior under the condition of intrinsic motivation mediation. Finally, not just can contributing to the literature of organizational behavior area, the conclusion, limitations and suggestions for future research directions can propose base on the findings. It also has important management implications for different organizations and managers, by clarifying the relationship between managerial coaching and employee’s innovative behavior, the importance of mediating variables in the implementation of managerial coaching, as more as showing how to cultivate a culture of innovation and develop the innovative potential of employees through managerial coaching in the organization.
目次 Table of Contents
Table of Content
Verification Letter from the Oral Examination Committee i
Chinese Abstract ii
English Abstract iii
Table of Content v
Table of Figures vi
Table of Tables vi
Introduction 1
Literature Review 3
Conservation of Resources Theory 3
Cognitive Evaluation Theory 4
Managerial Coaching and Innovative Behavior 5
Mediating role of Intrinsic Motivation 7
Mediating role of Relational Energy 8
Method 10
Research design 11
Research sample and data collection 11
Question and measurement scales 14
Managerial coaching 15
Relational energy 16
Intrinsic motivation 17
Innovative behavior 18
Data analysis 19
Descriptive statistics 19
Reliability analysis 20
Regression analysis 20
Correlation analysis 21
Result 21
Construct Validity 21
Descriptive Statistics 25
Hypotheses Testing 26
Discussion 29
Research conclusion 29
Theoretical implications 30
Managerial implication 32
Limitation 34
References 37
Table of Figures
Figures 1 Research framework 7
Figures 2 The Results of the Hypothesized Model 29
Table of Tables
Table 1 Respondent’s profile 14
Table 2 Measurement of Managerial coaching 16
Table 3 Measurement of Relational energy 17
Table 4 Measurement of Intrinsic motivation 18
Table 5 Measurement of Innovative behavior 19
Table 6 Results of Confirmatory Factor Analyses of the Four-Factor Model 25
Table 7 Means, Standard Deviations, Reliability, and Correlations among Study 26
Table 8 Results of Hierarchical Regression Analyses 28
Table 9 Results of the Bootstrapping Test 29
參考文獻 References
Amabile, T. M. (1988). A model of creativity and innovation in organizations. Research in organizational behavior, 10(1), 123-167. Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
Brislin, R. W. (1970). Back-translation for cross-cultural research. Journal of cross-cultural psychology, 1(3), 185-216. https://doi.org/10.1177/135910457000100301
Bentler, P. M., & Bonnet, D. C. (1980). Significance tests and goodness of fit in the analysis of covariance structures. Psychological Bulletin, 88, 588-606. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.88.3.588
Basu, R. (1991). An empirical examination of leader-member exchange and trans leadership as predictors of innovative behavior. Unpublished doctoral disserta due University, West Lafayette, IN.
Bakker, A. B., & Demerouti, E. (2017). Job demands–resources theory: Taking stock and looking forward. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 22(3), 273–285. https://doi.org/10.1037/ocp0000056
Cascio, W., & Boudreau, J. (2008). Investing in people: Financial impact of human resource initiatives. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Education Inc.
Deci, E.L. (1975). Conceptualizations of Intrinsic Motivation. Intrinsic motivation, 23-63. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4613-4446-9_2
Daniels, A. C., & Daniels, J. E. (2004). Performance management: Changing behavior that drives organizational effectiveness (4th ed.). New York: Performance Management.
Evered, R. D., & Selman, J. C. (1989). Coaching and the art of management. Organizational dynamics, 18(2), 16-32. https://doi.org/10.1016/0090-2616(89)90040-5
Ellinger, A. D., & Bostrom, R. P. (1999). Managerial coaching behaviors in learning organizations. Journal of Management Development, 18(9), 752-771. https://doi.org/10.1108/02621719910300810
Ellinger, A. D., Ellinger, A. E., Bachrach, D. G., Wang, Y. L., & Elmadag Bas, A. B. (2011). Organizational investments in social capital, managerial coaching, and employee work-related performance. Management Learning, 42(1), 67-85. https://doi.org/10.1177/1350507610384329
Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981). Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research, 18(1), 39-50. https://doi.org/10.1177/002224378101800104
Graen, G. B., & Scandura, T. A. (1987). Toward a psychology of dyadic organizing. In L. L. Cummings & B. M. Staw (Eds.), Research in organizational behavior, 9, 175-208.
Graen, G. B., & Uhl-Bien, M. (1995). Relationship-based approach to leadership: Development of leader-member exchange (LMX) theory of leadership over 25 years: Applying a multi-level multi-domain perspective. The leadership quarterly, 6(2), 219-247. https://doi.org/10.1016/1048-9843(95)90036-5
Gosserand, R. H., & Diefendorff, J. M. (2005). Emotional Display Rules and Emotional Labor: The Moderating Role of Commitment. Journal of Applied Psychology, 90(6), 1256-1264. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.90.6.1256
Gagné, M., Forest, J., Vansteenkiste, M., Crevier-Braud, L., Van Den Broeck, A., Aspeli, A. et al. (2015). The multidimensional work motivation scale: Validation evidence in seven languages and nine countries. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 24(2), 178-196. https://doi.org/10.1080/1359432X.2013.877892
Hobfoll, S. E. (1989). Conservation of resources: A new attempt at conceptualizing stress. American Psychologist, 44(3), 513–524. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.44.3.513
Hu, L. T., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural equation modeling: a multidisciplinary journal, 6(1), 1-55. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705519909540118
Hobfoll, S. E. (2011). Conservation of Resource Caravans and Engaged Settings. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 84(1).116-122. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-8325.2010.02016.x
Janssen, O. (2001). Fairness perceptions as a moderator in the curvilinear relationships between job demands, and job performance and job satisfaction. Academy of management journal, 44(5), 1039-1050. https://doi.org/10.5465/3069447
James, L. R., & Sells, S. B. (2013). Psychological climate: Theoretical perspectives and empirical research. In Toward a psychology of situations (pp. 285-306). Psychology Press.
Kanter, R. M. (2009). When a thousand flowers bloom: Structural, collective, and social conditions for innovation in organizations. In Knowledge management and organizational design (pp. 93-131). Routledge.
Kahn, K. B. (2018). Understanding innovation. Business Horizons, 61(3), 453-460. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bushor.2018.01.011
Lussier, R.N. and Achua, C.F. (2007). Leadership: Theory, application, skill development, (3rd.), Thomson/Soumwestern. Mason, OH, 473.
McDonald, R. P., & Ho, M. R. (2002). Principles and practice in reporting structural equation analysis. Psychological methods, 7(1), 64-82. https://doi.org/10.1037/1082-989X.7.1.64
Mao, J. Y., Li, Y., Guo, L., Shi, Y., & Wang, J. (2022). Diminished relational energy: How and when co-worker incompetence accusations hinder employee creativity. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 31(3), 383-394. https://doi.org/10.1080/1359432X.2021.1979963
Owens, B. P., Baker, W. E., Sumpter, D. M., & Cameron, K. S. (2016). Relational energy at work: Implications for job engagement and job performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 101(1), 35. https://doi.org/10.1037/apl0000032
O'Brien, H. L., & Toms, E. G. (2008). What is user engagement? A conceptual framework for defining user engagement with technology. Journal of the American society for Information Science and Technology, 59(6), 938-955. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.20801
Redshaw, B. (2000). Do we really understand coaching? How can we make it work better?. Industrial and Commercial training, 32(3), 106-109. https://doi.org/10.1108/00197850010371693
Scott, S. G., & Bruce, R. A. (1994). Determinants of innovative behavior: A path model of individual innovation in the workplace. Academy of management journal, 37(3), 580-607. https://doi.org/10.5465/256701
Sonnentag, S. (2003). Recovery, work engagement, and proactive behavior: A new look at the interface between nonwork and work. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88(3), 518–528. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.88.3.518
White, R. W. (1959). Motivation reconsidered: The concept of competence. Psychological Review, 66(5), 297–333. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0040934
Zhao, H., & Liu, W. (2020). Managerial coaching and subordinates' workplace well‐being: A moderated mediation study. Human Resource Management Journal, 30(2), 293-311. https://doi.org/10.1111/1748-8583.12280
電子全文 Fulltext
本電子全文僅授權使用者為學術研究之目的,進行個人非營利性質之檢索、閱讀、列印。請遵守中華民國著作權法之相關規定,切勿任意重製、散佈、改作、轉貼、播送,以免觸法。
論文使用權限 Thesis access permission:自定論文開放時間 user define
開放時間 Available:
校內 Campus:開放下載的時間 available 2028-07-19
校外 Off-campus:開放下載的時間 available 2028-07-19

您的 IP(校外) 位址是 3.145.178.157
現在時間是 2024-05-02
論文校外開放下載的時間是 2028-07-19

Your IP address is 3.145.178.157
The current date is 2024-05-02
This thesis will be available to you on 2028-07-19.

紙本論文 Printed copies
紙本論文的公開資訊在102學年度以後相對較為完整。如果需要查詢101學年度以前的紙本論文公開資訊,請聯繫圖資處紙本論文服務櫃台。如有不便之處敬請見諒。
開放時間 available 2028-07-19

QR Code