論文使用權限 Thesis access permission:校內校外完全公開 unrestricted
開放時間 Available:
校內 Campus: 已公開 available
校外 Off-campus: 已公開 available
論文名稱 Title |
利用文字探勘技術分析體驗服務所產生的顧客價值-以自助式烘焙DIY體驗空間為例 Using Text Mining Techniques to Reveal Customers’ Value of DIY Baking Space Service |
||
系所名稱 Department |
|||
畢業學年期 Year, semester |
語文別 Language |
||
學位類別 Degree |
頁數 Number of pages |
66 |
|
研究生 Author |
|||
指導教授 Advisor |
|||
召集委員 Convenor |
|||
口試委員 Advisory Committee |
|||
口試日期 Date of Exam |
2023-07-07 |
繳交日期 Date of Submission |
2023-07-26 |
關鍵字 Keywords |
文字探勘、服務設計、主題分析、顧客價值、DIY體驗、烘焙體驗 Text Mining, Service Design, Topic Analysis, Customer Value, DIY Experience, Baking Experience |
||
統計 Statistics |
本論文已被瀏覽 215 次,被下載 8 次 The thesis/dissertation has been browsed 215 times, has been downloaded 8 times. |
中文摘要 |
本研究應用文字探勘技術,深入研究烘焙DIY體驗空間的顧客價值和服務流程,以釐清關鍵管理議題,提供未來發展趨勢的建議與指導。 本研究結合文字探勘主題分析法與服務設計理論,對線上評論進行系統性的分類和分析。經由對過去相關文獻的探討,研究者對主題進行定義並建立專屬的主題詞庫,進而使評論在顧客價值和服務流程兩方面進行精確的主題分析。另本研究進一步依照評論內文所涵蓋的資源、活動以及情境對主題分析結果進行更深度的解析。 本研究發現,在烘焙DIY體驗空間的顧客評論中,情感價值的闡述特別明顯,具體表現在「親切」、「態度」以及「樂趣」等關鍵詞的高頻出現。同時,大部分的評論都強調了顧客與員工的互動教學過程。本研究進一步針對低分評論進行分析,發現較缺乏經驗的顧客,在評價互動教學過程時,經常提及工作人員態度不佳、催促、時間壓力以及感受到壓力等情況。 綜合上述,本研究以實證的方式揭露顧客的痛點並提出改善方案。未來研究可以針對更大的樣本群體、更廣的研究範疇進行研究,並將研究成果應用於其他手作體驗產業,以提供更具體和可行的管理策略建議以及未來發展方向的指引。 |
Abstract |
This study applies text mining techniques to investigate the customer value and service process of DIY baking spaces with the goal to clarify key management issues and provide guidance and suggestions for future development. This research combines text mining topic analysis methods and service design theory to systematically classify and analyze online reviews. Based on past research, we define topics and establish a dedicated topic lexicon, enabling precise topic analysis of reviews pertaining to customer value and service process. In addition, this study further interprets the results of the topic analysis in a more in-depth way, according to the ARC (resources, activities, and contexts) covered in the review content. This research shows that, in customer reviews of DIY baking spaces, the elucidation of customer value “emotion” is particularly prominent, specifically manifested in the high frequency of keywords such as 'kindness', 'attitude', and 'fun'. At the same time, most of the reviews emphasized the interactive baking process with staff. This study further analyzes low-scoring reviews and finds that less baking experienced customers often mentioned poor staff attitude, pushing, time pressure, and feelings of stress when evaluating the interactive teaching process. In summary, this study identifies customer problems from reviews and provides suggestions for improvements in DIY baking service. Future research can target larger sample groups and broader research areas, and apply research results to other handmade experience industries, to provide more specific and feasible management strategy recommendations and guidance for future development directions. |
目次 Table of Contents |
論文審定書 i 誌謝 ii 摘要 iii ABSTRACT iv 圖次 vii 表次 viii 第一章 緒論 1 第一節 研究背景 1 第二節 研究動機 2 第三節 研究問題與目的 3 第四節 小結 3 第二章 文獻探討 4 第一節 DIY(DO IT YOURSELF) 4 第二節 烘焙DIY體驗空間 6 第三節 顧客價值 7 第四節 服務設計 9 第三章 研究方法 11 第一節 資料蒐集及處理 12 第二節 定義服務流程 19 第三節 主題分析 22 第四節 ARC框架定義 29 第五節 探索性資料分析與交叉分析 32 第六節 小結 36 第四章 研究結果 37 第一節 較多針對製作過程與教學互動的線上評論 37 第二節 討論度較高的顧客價值 38 第三節 服務流程所產生的顧客價值 38 第四節 『互動』服務流程中低評論星等的因素 39 第五章 結論與建議 47 第一節 研究發現 47 第二節 管理意涵 48 第三節 未來展望 48 參考文獻 50 附錄 54 附錄A 自定義服務流程主題詞庫 54 附錄B 自定義顧客價值主題詞庫 55 附錄C 自定義ARC框架主題詞庫 56 |
參考文獻 References |
1. 林亮怡. (2019). DIY體驗空間之服務設計-以烘焙體驗空間為例. https://hdl.handle.net/11296/g2qbus 2. 林筱庭. (2018). 以體驗行銷與感質空間探討自助式烘焙DIY教室之研究. https://hdl.handle.net/11296/c6p339 3. 宋同正. (2014). 序– 服務設計的本質內涵和流程工具. 設計學報(Journal of Design), 19(2), Article 2. https://www.jodesign.org.tw/index.php/JODesign/article/view/1130 4. 楊振甫, & 黃則佳. (2011). 打開服務設計的秘密 Service Design Tools and Methods. 財團法人台灣設計研究院. https://www.eslite.com/product/1001173362095560 5. Atkinson, P. (2006). Do It Yourself: Democracy and Design. Journal of Design History, 19(1), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1093/jdh/epk001 6. Babin, B. J., Darden, W. R., & Griffin, M. (1994). Work and/or fun: Measuring hedonic and utilitarian shopping value. Journal of Consumer Research, 20, 644–656. https://doi.org/10.1086/209376 7. Bi, J.-W., Liu, Y., Fan, Z.-P., & Zhang, J. (2019). Wisdom of crowds: Conducting importance-performance analysis (IPA) through online reviews. Tourism Management, 70, 460–478. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tourman.2018.09.010 8. Bitner, M. J. (2008). Service Blueprinting: A Practical Technique for Service Innovation. https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.2307/41166446 9. Design Council UK. (2007). Eleven lessons: Managing design in eleven global companies. https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/Eleven-lessons-%3A-managing-design-in-eleven-global/af2d521725e1e5b1bb33594212ba3df2ed2fe2a1 10. Grönroos, C., & Voima, P. (2013). Critical service logic: Making sense of value creation and co-creation. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 41(2), 133–150. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11747-012-0308-3 11. Halvorsrud, R., Kvale, K., & Følstad, A. (2016). Improving service quality through customer journey analysis. Journal of Service Theory and Practice, 26(6), 840–867. https://doi.org/10.1108/JSTP-05-2015-0111 12. Holdford, D. A. (2019). Using Service Blueprints to Visualize Pharmacy Innovations. Pharmacy, 7(2), Article 2. https://doi.org/10.3390/pharmacy7020043 13. Khademi-Vidra, A., & Bujdosó, Z. (2020). Motivations and Attitudes: An Empirical Study on DIY (Do-It-Yourself) Consumers in Hungary. Sustainability, 12(2), 517. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12020517 14. Kuznetsov, S., & Paulos, E. (2010). Rise of the expert amateur: DIY projects, communities, and cultures. Proceedings of the 6th Nordic Conference on Human-Computer Interaction: Extending Boundaries, 295–304. https://doi.org/10.1145/1868914.1868950 15. Lusch, R., & Vargo, S. (2006). 服務主導邏輯 Service-Dominant Logic: Reactions, Reflections and Refinements (池熙璿, 翻譯員). Marketing Theory, 6, 281. https://doi.org/10.1177/1470593106066781 16. Moritz, S. (2009). Service design: Practical access to an evolving field. Lulu. com. 17. Pavan, L. (2022). Detecting Main Topics using Dictionary-based Topic Analysis. International Journal of Linguistics, Literature and Translation, 5(12), 48–52. https://doi.org/10.32996/ijllt.2022.5.12.6 18. Pöllänen, S. (2015). Elements of Crafts that Enhance Well-Being. Journal of Leisure Research, 47(1), 58–78. https://doi.org/10.1080/00222216.2015.11950351 19. Pretlow, C., & Sobel, K. (2015). Rethinking Library Service: Improving the User Experience with Service Blueprinting. Public Services Quarterly, 11(1), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1080/15228959.2014.967826 20. Richardson, A. (2015). Using Customer Journey Maps to Improve Customer Experience. https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/Using-Customer-Journey-Maps-to-Improve-Customer-Richardson/a89832c3aaebe8de46794487d34505cf5ebddda9 21. Sheth, J. N., Newman, B. I., & Gross, B. L. (1991). Why we buy what we buy: A theory of consumption values. Journal of Business Research, 22, 159–170. https://doi.org/10.1016/0148-2963(91)90050-8 22. Singh, J. P., Irani, S., Rana, N. P., Dwivedi, Y. K., Saumya, S., & Kumar Roy, P. (2017). Predicting the “helpfulness” of online consumer reviews. Journal of Business Research, 70, 346–355. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2016.08.008 23. Stickdorn, M., & Schneider, J. (2012). This is Service Design Thinking: Basics, Tools, Cases. https://www.wiley.com/en-us/This+is+Service+Design+Thinking%3A+Basics%2C+Tools%2C+Cases-p-9781118156308 24. Tsai, Y.-H., Chang, C.-M. & Hwang, S.-Y. (2023). TARFlow: A Workflow System for Text Analytics and Retrieval. 2023 International Conference on Consumer Electronics, Taiwan. 25. Tukey, J. W. (1977). Exploratory Data Analysis. Addison-Wesley Publishing Company. 26. Villarroel Ordenes, F., Theodoulidis, B., Burton, J., Gruber, T., & Zaki, M. (2014). Analyzing Customer Experience Feedback Using Text Mining: A Linguistics-Based Approach. Journal of Service Research, 17, 278–295. https://doi.org/10.1177/1094670514524625 27. Watson, M., & Shove, E. (2008). Product, Competence, Project and Practice: DIY and the dynamics of craft consumption. Journal of Consumer Culture, 8(1), 69–89. https://doi.org/10.1177/1469540507085726 28. Williams, C. C. (2008). Re-thinking the motives of do-it-yourself (DIY) consumers. The International Review of Retail, Distribution and Consumer Research, 18(3), 311–323. https://doi.org/10.1080/09593960802113885 29. Wolf, M., & McQuitty, S. (2011). Understanding the do-it-yourself consumer: DIY motivations and outcomes. AMS Review, 1(3–4), 154–170. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13162-011-0021-2 30. Wolf, M., & McQuitty, S. (2013). Circumventing Traditional Markets: An Empirical Study of the Marketplace Motivations and Outcomes of Consumers’ Do-It-Yourself Behaviors. Journal of Marketing Theory and Practice, 21(2), 195–210. https://doi.org/10.2753/MTP1069-6679210205 31. Woodruff, R. B. (1997). Customer value: The next source for competitive advantage. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 25(2), 139–153. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02894350 32. Zeithaml, V. A. (1988). Consumer Perceptions of Price, Quality, and Value: A Means-End Model and Synthesis of Evidence. Journal of Marketing, 52(3), 2–22. https://doi.org/10.1177/002224298805200302 33. Zomerdijk, L., & Voss, C. (2010). Service Design for Experience-Centric Services. Journal of Service Research - J SERV RES, 13, 67–82. https://doi.org/10.1177/1094670509351960 |
電子全文 Fulltext |
本電子全文僅授權使用者為學術研究之目的,進行個人非營利性質之檢索、閱讀、列印。請遵守中華民國著作權法之相關規定,切勿任意重製、散佈、改作、轉貼、播送,以免觸法。 論文使用權限 Thesis access permission:校內校外完全公開 unrestricted 開放時間 Available: 校內 Campus: 已公開 available 校外 Off-campus: 已公開 available |
紙本論文 Printed copies |
紙本論文的公開資訊在102學年度以後相對較為完整。如果需要查詢101學年度以前的紙本論文公開資訊,請聯繫圖資處紙本論文服務櫃台。如有不便之處敬請見諒。 開放時間 available 已公開 available |
QR Code |