論文使用權限 Thesis access permission:自定論文開放時間 user define
開放時間 Available:
校內 Campus:開放下載的時間 available 2025-08-15
校外 Off-campus:開放下載的時間 available 2025-08-15
論文名稱 Title |
探勘CSR報告書對企業績效的影響 Mining CSR Reports for the Impact of Corporate Firm Performance |
||
系所名稱 Department |
|||
畢業學年期 Year, semester |
語文別 Language |
||
學位類別 Degree |
頁數 Number of pages |
57 |
|
研究生 Author |
|||
指導教授 Advisor |
|||
召集委員 Convenor |
|||
口試委員 Advisory Committee |
|||
口試日期 Date of Exam |
2023-07-07 |
繳交日期 Date of Submission |
2023-08-15 |
關鍵字 Keywords |
文字探勘、企業社會責任報告書、公司財務績效、主題模型、命名實體模型 Text Mining, Topic Modeling, Named-Entity Recognition, Corporate Social Responsibility, Corporate financial performance |
||
統計 Statistics |
本論文已被瀏覽 220 次,被下載 0 次 The thesis/dissertation has been browsed 220 times, has been downloaded 0 times. |
中文摘要 |
企業社會責任(CSR)近年來引起了廣泛關注,其對企業財務績效(CFP)的影響一直存在著持續的討論。然而,過去在這一領域的研究主要集中在由評鑑機構所評估的CSR表現上,而不是CSR報告書內容的揭露。本研究採用文字探勘的方式來衡量永續報告書中環境和社會揭露,並客觀的研究環境面揭露的深度、廣度和社會面利害關係人的揭露對公司財務績效的影響。此外,我們提出了一種使用無標籤資料進行自動主體種子詞挑選的方式,並應用在GuidedLDA主題模型上,該方法可以引導主題模型判斷出在CSR報告書中與全球報告倡議組織(GRI)標準一致的主題。我們蒐集臺灣上市公司的CSR報告以及臺灣金融資料庫TEJ中2016年至2020年間的資料進行分析。結果顯示,CSR在環境上的深度及廣度的揭露對公司的CFP有顯著影響,而不同的利害關係人的揭露也會對不同的財務指標有所影響。我們期望我們的研究結果能夠幫助企業更妥善的規劃CSR揭露的策略,以增加其在CSR未來活動的價值,此外,也能幫助投資者更加客觀的衡量企業的CSR揭露,而不只是依賴評鑑機構給予的分數。 |
Abstract |
Corporate social responsibility (CSR) has gained much attention in recent years, and its impact on corporate financial performance (CFP) is in constant debate. However, previous studies in this line of research have primarily focused on CSR performance evaluated by rating agencies rather than the disclosure of CSR reports. This thesis adopts a text-mining approach to measure environmental and social disclosure and examine the effects of depth, breadth, and stakeholders of disclosure on firm performance objectively. Additionally, we propose a novel approach for automatic seed word selection without label data in GuidedLDA, which can guide the topic to align the topics in CSR reports with the Global Reporting Initiative (GRI) Standards. We retrieve the CSR reports of listed companies in Taiwan and their financial data from TEJ, the prevalent financial database in Taiwan, between 2016 to 2020. Our findings show that the level of detail and coverage in CSR disclosure significantly affect a company’s CFP. We expect our findings to help companies in strategically planning their CSR disclosure, thereby adding value to their future activities. Moreover, our research aims to enable investors to objectively measure firms' CSR disclosure without solely relying on rating agencies. |
目次 Table of Contents |
論文審定書i 致謝ii 摘要iii ABSTRACTiv TABLE OF CONTENTv TABLE OF FIGUREvii TABLE OF TABLEviii 1 INTRODUCTION1 2 RELATED WORKS6 2.1 CSR AND FIRM PERFORMANCE6 2.1.1 CSR Performance and Firm Performance7 2.1.2 CSR performance and CSR disclosure8 2.1.3 CSR disclosure and Firm performance9 2.2 CSR AND TEXT MINING10 3 CSR DISCLOSURE CONSTRUCTION12 3.1 ENVIRONMENTAL DISCLOSURE MEASUREMENT12 3.1.1 Breadth Score13 3.1.2 Depth Score15 3.2 SOCIAL DISCLOSURE MEASUREMENT16 4 METHODOLOGY17 4.1 TOPIC MODEL18 4.2 AUTOMATIC SEED WORDS SELECTION METHOD FOR GUIDEDLDA19 4.2 NAME ENTITY RECOGNITION MODEL21 4.3 REGRESSIONS MODEL22 5 EXPERIMENTS23 5.1 DATA PREPARATION23 5.2 AUTOMATIC SEED WORDS SELECTION METHOD FOR GUIDEDLDA27 5.2.1 Evaluation Setting27 5.2.2 Experiment Results on Automatic Seed Words Selection28 5.2.3 Result on Automatic Seed Words Selection Method for GuidedLDA31 5.2.3 Topic Model Settings34 5.4 RESULT ON REGRESSION MODEL35 6 CONCLUSION39 REFERENCES41 |
參考文獻 References |
Akben Selcuk, E., & Kiymaz, H. (2017). Corporate Social Responsibility and Firm Performance: Evidence from an Emerging Market. Accounting and Finance Research, 6, 42. https://doi.org/10.5430/afr.v6n4p42 Alareeni, B. A., & Hamdan, A. (2020). ESG impact on performance of US S&P 500-listed firms. Corporate Governance: The International Journal of Business in Society. Al-Tuwaijri, S. A., Christensen, T. E., & Hughes, K. E. (2004). The relations among environmental disclosure, environmental performance, and economic performance: A simultaneous equations approach. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 29(5), 447–471. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0361-3682(03)00032-1 Amankwah-Amoah, J., & Syllias, J. (2020). Can adopting ambitious environmental sustainability initiatives lead to business failures? An analytical framework. Business Strategy and the Environment, 29(1), 240–249. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.2361 Barnett, M. L., & Salomon, R. M. (2006). Beyond dichotomy: The curvilinear relationship between social responsibility and financial performance. Strategic Management Journal, 27(11), 1101–1122. Blei, D. M., Ng, A. Y., & Jordan, M. I. (2003). Latent dirichlet allocation. Journal of Machine Learning Research, 3(Jan), 993–1022. Breiman, L., Friedman, J. H., Olshen, R. A., & Stone, C. J. (2017). Classification And Regression Trees (1st ed.). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.1201/9781315139470 Chang, C.-C., & Lin, C.-J. (2011). LIBSVM: A library for support vector machines. ACM Transactions on Intelligent Systems and Technology, 2(3), 1–27. https://doi.org/10.1145/1961189.1961199 Chen, T., & Guestrin, C. (2016). XGBoost: A Scalable Tree Boosting System. Proceedings of the 22nd ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining, 785–794. https://doi.org/10.1145/2939672.2939785 Cormier, D., & Magnan, M. (1999). Corporate Environmental Disclosure Strategies: Determinants, Costs and Benefits. Journal of Accounting, Auditing & Finance, 14(4), 429–451. https://doi.org/10.1177/0148558X9901400403 Darnall, N., Ji, H., Iwata, K., & Arimura, T. H. (2022). Do ESG reporting guidelines and verifications enhance firms’ information disclosure? Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 29(5), 1214–1230. Du, S., & Yu, K. (2021). Do corporate social responsibility reports convey value relevant information? Evidence from report readability and tone. Journal of Business Ethics, 172, 253–274. Fama, E. F., & MacBeth, J. D. (1973). Risk, return, and equilibrium: Empirical tests. Journal of Political Economy, 81(3), 607–636. Fatemi, A., Fooladi, I., & Tehranian, H. (2015). Valuation effects of corporate social responsibility. Journal of Banking & Finance, 59, 182–192. Fatemi, A., Glaum, M., & Kaiser, S. (2018). ESG performance and firm value: The moderating role of disclosure. Global Finance Journal, 38, 45–64. Feng, M., Yu, W., Wang, X., Wong, C. Y., Xu, M., & Xiao, Z. (2018). Green supply chain management and financial performance: The mediating roles of operational and environmental performance. Business Strategy and the Environment, 27(7), 811–824. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.2033 Fitzgerald, T., Balsmeier, B., Fleming, L., & Manso, G. (2021). Innovation search strategy and predictable returns. Management Science, 67(2), 1109–1137. Florescu, C., & Caragea, C. (2017). PositionRank: An Unsupervised Approach to Keyphrase Extraction from Scholarly Documents. Proceedings of the 55th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 1: Long Papers), 1105–1115. https://doi.org/10.18653/v1/P17-1102 Freeman, I. (n.d.). RE 1984 Strategic Management: A Stakeholder Approach. Boston. Pitman. Friede, G., Busch, T., & Bassen, A. (2015). ESG and financial performance: Aggregated evidence from more than 2000 empirical studies. Journal of Sustainable Finance & Investment, 5(4), 210–233. Gerged, A. M., Beddewela, E., & Cowton, C. J. (2021). Is corporate environmental disclosure associated with firm value? A multicountry study of Gulf Cooperation Council firms. Business Strategy and the Environment, 30(1), 185–203. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.2616 Giuli, A. D., & Kostovetsky, L. (2014). Are red or blue companies more likely to go green? Politics and corporate social responsibility. Journal of Financial Economics, 111(1), 158–180. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfineco.2013.10.002 Greiner, M., & Sun, J. (2021). How corporate social responsibility can incentivize top managers: A commitment to sustainability as an agency intervention. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 28(4), 1360–1375. Gul, F. A., Krishnamurti, C., Shams, S., & Chowdhury, H. (2020). Corporate social responsibility, overconfident CEOs and empire building: Agency and stakeholder theoretic perspectives. Journal of Business Research, 111, 52–68. Harrison, J. S., & Wicks, A. C. (2013). Stakeholder theory, value, and firm performance. Business Ethics Quarterly, 23(1), 97–124. Hasan, I., Kobeissi, N., Liu, L., & Wang, H. (2018). Corporate social responsibility and firm financial performance: The mediating role of productivity. Journal of Business Ethics, 149, 671–688. Hou, T. C.-T. (2019). The relationship between corporate social responsibility and sustainable financial performance: Firm-level evidence from Taiwan. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 26(1), 19–28. https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.1647 Inoue, Y., & Lee, S. (2011). Effects of different dimensions of corporate social responsibility on corporate financial performance in tourism-related industries. Tourism Management, 32(4), 790–804. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tourman.2010.06.019 Jagarlamudi, J., Daumé III, H., & Udupa, R. (2012). Incorporating lexical priors into topic models. Proceedings of the 13th Conference of the European Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics, 204–213. Kiriu, T., & Nozaki, M. (2020). A text mining model to evaluate firms’ ESG activities: An application for japanese firms. Asia-Pacific Financial Markets, 27(4), 621–632. Kitzmueller, M., & Shimshack, J. (2012). Economic perspectives on corporate social responsibility. Journal of Economic Literature, 50(1), 51–84. Konadu, R., Owusu-Agyei, S., Lartey, T. A., Danso, A., Adomako, S., & Amankwah-Amoah, J. (2020). CEOs’ reputation, quality management and environmental innovation: The roles of stakeholder pressure and resource commitment. Business Strategy and the Environment, 29(6), 2310–2323. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.2504 Liew, W. T., Adhitya, A., & Srinivasan, R. (2014). Sustainability trends in the process industries: A text mining-based analysis. Computers in Industry, 65(3), 393–400. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compind.2014.01.004 Lu, W., Ye, M., Chau, K. W., & Flanagan, R. (2018). The paradoxical nexus between corporate social responsibility and sustainable financial performance: Evidence from the international construction business. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 25(5), 844–852. https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.1501 Mihalcea, R., & Tarau, P. (2004). TextRank: Bringing Order into Text. Proceedings of the 2004 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing, 404–411. https://aclanthology.org/W04-3252 Nor, N. M., Bahari, N. A. S., Adnan, N. A., Kamal, S. M. Q. A. S., & Ali, I. M. (2016). The Effects of Environmental Disclosure on Financial Performance in Malaysia. Procedia Economics and Finance, 35, 117–126. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2212-5671(16)00016-2 Pérez, A. (2015). Corporate reputation and CSR reporting to stakeholders: Gaps in the literature and future lines of research. Corporate Communications: An International Journal. Petersen, M. A. (2009). Estimating Standard Errors in Finance Panel Data Sets: Comparing Approaches. Review of Financial Studies, 22(1), 435–480. https://doi.org/10.1093/rfs/hhn053 Schütze, H., Manning, C. D., & Raghavan, P. (2008). Introduction to information retrieval (Vol. 39). Cambridge University Press Cambridge. Sethi, S. P., Martell, T. F., & Demir, M. (2017). Enhancing the role and effectiveness of corporate social responsibility (CSR) reports: The missing element of content verification and integrity assurance. Journal of Business Ethics, 144, 59–82. Shin, D., He, S., Lee, G. M., Whinston, A. B., Cetintas, S., & Lee, K.-C. (2020). Enhancing social media analysis with visual data analytics: A deep learning approach. SSRN. Tamimi, N., & Sebastianelli, R. (2017). Transparency among S&P 500 companies: An analysis of ESG disclosure scores. Management Decision, 55(8), 1660–1680. Tarnavsky, M. H. (2021). Too Many Cooks in the Kitchen: Why Do ESG Scores Differ So Much? Cyan Reef B.V. https://www.cyanreef.com/too-many-cooks-in-the-kitchen-why-the-esg-scores-differ-so-much/ Threlfall, R., King, A., Shulman, J., & Bartels, W. (2020). The time has come: The KPMG survey of sustainability reporting 2020. Amstelveen, The Netherlands. Ting, P.-H. (2021). Do large firms just talk corporate social responsibility? - The evidence from CSR report disclosure. Finance Research Letters, 38, 101476. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.frl.2020.101476 Vishwanathan, P., van Oosterhout, H., Heugens, P. P., Duran, P., & Van Essen, M. (2020). Strategic CSR: A concept building meta-analysis. Journal of Management Studies, 57(2), 314–350. Wang, Z., Hsieh, T.-S., & Sarkis, J. (2018). CSR performance and the readability of CSR reports: Too good to be true? Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 25(1), 66–79. Xie, J., Nozawa, W., Yagi, M., Fujii, H., & Managi, S. (2019). Do environmental, social, and governance activities improve corporate financial performance? Business Strategy and the Environment, 28(2), 286–300. Zhang, X., Zhao, X., & He, Y. (2022). Does it pay to be responsible? The performance of ESG investing in China. Emerging Markets Finance and Trade, 58(11), 3048–3075. |
電子全文 Fulltext |
本電子全文僅授權使用者為學術研究之目的,進行個人非營利性質之檢索、閱讀、列印。請遵守中華民國著作權法之相關規定,切勿任意重製、散佈、改作、轉貼、播送,以免觸法。 論文使用權限 Thesis access permission:自定論文開放時間 user define 開放時間 Available: 校內 Campus:開放下載的時間 available 2025-08-15 校外 Off-campus:開放下載的時間 available 2025-08-15 您的 IP(校外) 位址是 18.225.95.229 現在時間是 2024-11-21 論文校外開放下載的時間是 2025-08-15 Your IP address is 18.225.95.229 The current date is 2024-11-21 This thesis will be available to you on 2025-08-15. |
紙本論文 Printed copies |
紙本論文的公開資訊在102學年度以後相對較為完整。如果需要查詢101學年度以前的紙本論文公開資訊,請聯繫圖資處紙本論文服務櫃台。如有不便之處敬請見諒。 開放時間 available 2025-08-15 |
QR Code |