論文使用權限 Thesis access permission:自定論文開放時間 user define
開放時間 Available:
校內 Campus:開放下載的時間 available 2033-08-21
校外 Off-campus:開放下載的時間 available 2033-08-21
論文名稱 Title |
運動與炫耀性消費:當分享運動相關貼文分享變成引起羨慕與 嫉妒的暗示 Conspicuous Consumption of Exercise: When Sports-related Posts Sharing Becomes a Cue Evoking Envy and Jealous |
||
系所名稱 Department |
|||
畢業學年期 Year, semester |
語文別 Language |
||
學位類別 Degree |
頁數 Number of pages |
66 |
|
研究生 Author |
|||
指導教授 Advisor |
|||
召集委員 Convenor |
|||
口試委員 Advisory Committee |
|||
口試日期 Date of Exam |
2023-05-31 |
繳交日期 Date of Submission |
2023-08-21 |
關鍵字 Keywords |
地位、社交軟體平台、羨慕、運動相關貼文、炫耀性消費 Envy, Sports-related Posts, Conspicuous Consumption, Social Media Platform, Status |
||
統計 Statistics |
本論文已被瀏覽 210 次,被下載 0 次 The thesis/dissertation has been browsed 210 times, has been downloaded 0 times. |
中文摘要 |
比起傳統的炫耀性消費通常圍繞著展示奢侈購買或奢華體驗,本研究探討了一種新穎的炫耀性消費形式。具體而言,本研究為在社交媒體平台上分享與體育相關的貼文的現象,而這在傳統上並未被歸類為炫耀性消費。通過進行定性研究和實驗研究,這篇論文揭示了分享這些貼文如何演變成一種新的炫耀性消費。 我們提出,分享與體育相關的貼文與感知的嫉妒之間的是受到推測個體毅力和地位來調節的;此外,在貼文中展示運動成效表現的追蹤時,這種效果很可能會增強。在貼文中包含運動成效表現追踪數據可以增強觀眾對毅力的推斷,從而影響他們對被感知地位的推斷。 這些研究的發現表明,分享與體育相關的帖子確實可以作為提升社會地位和增強毅力的暗示,並藉此引發起貼文受眾的嫉妒。本研究對於體育品牌具有重要意義,暗示了潛在的增長和發展領域,如創造績效追蹤應用程序。此外,這些發現提供了有價值的見解,可以指導未來體育相關行業的發展方向。通過揭示這種微妙但有影響力的炫耀性消費形式,這項研究為更深入地理解社交媒體和地位展示領域中的動態做出了貢獻。 |
Abstract |
Moving beyond the realm of conventional conspicuous consumption, which often revolves around showcasing luxury purchases or extravagant experiences, this study delves into a novel form of conspicuous consumption. Specifically, it explores the phenomenon of sharing sports-related posts on social media platforms, which was not traditionally classified as a luxury experience. Through conducting a qualitative study and experimental research, the thesis sheds light on how sharing such posts has evolved into a new avenue of conspicuous consumption. We propose that the connection between sharing sports-related posts and perceived envy is mediated by the inference of one's persistence and status; furthermore, this effect is likely to be heightened when performance tracking is showcased within the post. The inclusion of performance tracking numbers in the posts amplifies the viewer's perception of persistence, subsequently impacting the inference of their perceived status. The findings from these studies reveal that sharing sports-related posts can indeed serve as markers of elevated social status and enhanced persistence, and consequently triggers the emergence of envy feelings from the audience of these posts. Those insights have significant implications for sports brands, suggesting potential areas of growth and development, such as the creation of performance tracking applications. Moreover, these findings provide valuable insights that can guide the future trajectory of the sports-related industries. By uncovering this subtle yet impactful form of conspicuous consumption, the research contributes to a deeper understanding of the dynamics at play in the realm of social media and status projection. |
目次 Table of Contents |
Thesis Validation Letter i Abstract (Chinese) ii Abstract (English) iii Table of Content v List of Figures vi List of Tables vii Chapter 1 Introduction 1 Chapter 2 Conceptual Background 4 2.1 Posts Sharing on Social Media Platform 4 2.2 Conspicuous Consumption 6 2.3 Envy 13 Chapter 3 Theoretical Framework 14 Chapter 4 Study 1: Fundamentally Understanding of the Sports-related Posts Sharing on Social Media and Perception of Envy from Qualitative Research Interviews 17 4.1 Interviewees 17 4.2 Section 1: the Perception of Seeing Posts They Thought As Conspicuous Consumption 19 4.3 Section 2: the Perception of Seeing Posts That Evokes Their Envy 24 4.4 Section 3: the Inference Status and Competence of Sports-related Posts and Traditional Conspicuous Consumption Posts 27 4.5 Section 4: Their Own Conspicuous Consumption Behavior 32 4.6 Discussion and Further Studies 36 Chapter 5 Study 2: How Sports-related Posts Could Cause Status and Competence Inference and Thus Occur an Envy Perception 37 5.1 Method 37 5.2 Results 39 Chapter 6 General Discussion 40 6.1 General Discussion 40 6.2 Implications and Future Research 42 References 44 Appendix 54 |
參考文獻 References |
Abele, A. E., & Wojciszke, B. (2007). Agency and communion from the perspective of self versus others. Journal of personality and social psychology, 93(5), 751. Apaolaza, V., Policarpo, M. C., Hartmann, P., Paredes, M. R., & D'Souza, C. (2022). Sustainable clothing: Why conspicuous consumption and greenwashing matter. Business Strategy and the Environment. Bagwell, L. S., & Bernheim, B. D. (1996). Veblen effects in a theory of conspicuous consumption. The American economic review, 349-373. Barauskaite, D., Gineikiene, J., Fennis, B. M., Auruskeviciene, V., Yamaguchi, M., & Kondo, N. (2018). Eating healthy to impress: How conspicuous consumption, perceived self-control motivation, and descriptive normative influence determine functional food choices. Appetite, 131, 59-67. Belk, R. W. (1988). Possessions and the extended self. Journal of consumer research, 15(2), 139-168. Belk, R. W., Bahn, K. D., & Mayer, R. N. (1982). Developmental recognition of consumption symbolism. Journal of consumer research, 9(1), 4-17. Bellezza, S., Gino, F., & Keinan, A. (2012). The Red Sneakers Effect: Inferring Status From Signals of Nonconformity. ACR North American Advances. Bellezza, S., Paharia, N., & Keinan, A. (2017). Conspicuous consumption of time: When busyness and lack of leisure time become a status symbol. Journal of Consumer Research, 44(1), 118-138. Burrow, A. L., & Rainone, N. (2017). How many likes did I get?: Purpose moderates links between positive social media feedback and self-esteem. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 69, 232-236. Campbell, C. (1995). Conspicuous confusion? A critique of Veblen's theory of conspicuous consumption. Sociological theory, 37-47. Cantril, H. (1965). The Pattern of Human Concerns. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University. Carter, T. J., & Gilovich, T. (2012). I am what I do, not what I have: the differential centrality of experiential and material purchases to the self. Journal of personality and social psychology, 102(6), 1304. Chaudhuri, H. R., & Majumdar, S. (2006). Of diamonds and desires: understanding conspicuous consumption from a contemporary marketing perspective. Academy of marketing science review, 2006, 1. Chaudhuri, H. R., & Majumdar, S. (2006). Of diamonds and desires: understanding conspicuous consumption from a contemporary marketing perspective. Academy of marketing science review, 2006, 1. De Botton, A. (2008). Status anxiety. Vintage. De Fruyt, F., Van de Wiele, L., & Van Heeringen, C. (2000). Cloninger's psychobiological model of temperament and character and the five-factor model of personality. Personality and individual differences, 29(3), 441-452. Didžiokaitė, G., Saukko, P., & Greiffenhagen, C. (2018). The mundane experience of everyday calorie trackers: Beyond the metaphor of Quantified Self. New Media & Society, 20(4), 1470-1487. Dubois, D., Rucker, D. D., & Galinsky, A. D. (2012). Super size me: Product size as a signal of status. Journal of Consumer Research, 38(6), 1047-1062. Eastman, J. K., Goldsmith, R. E., & Flynn, L. R. (1999). Status consumption in consumer behavior: Scale development and validation. Journal of marketing theory and practice, 7(3), 41-52. Etkin, J. (2016). The hidden cost of personal quantification. Journal of consumer research, 42(6), 967-984. Feng, W., Yang, M. X., & Irina, Y. Y. (2023). From devil to angel: How being envied for luxury brand social media word of mouth discourages counterfeit purchases. Journal of Business Research, 165, 113919. Frank, R. H. (2001). Luxury fever: Why money fails to satisfy in an era of excess. Simon and Schuster. Green, S. M. (1991). " Human Ethology", by Irenäus Eibl-Eibesfeldt (Book Review). Human Biology, 63(4), 558. Haggerty, M. E. (1921). Recent developments in measuring human capacities. The Journal of Educational Research, 3(4), 241-253. Han, Y. J., Nunes, J. C., & Drèze, X. (2010). Signaling status with luxury goods: The role of brand prominence. Journal of marketing, 74(4), 15-30. Han, Y. J., Nunes, J. C., & Drèze, X. (2010). Signaling status with luxury goods: The role of brand prominence. Journal of marketing, 74(4), 15-30. Hogan, J., & Ones, D. S. (1997). Conscientiousness and integrity at work. In Handbook of personality psychology (pp. 849-870). Academic Press. Hogan, R., & Hogan, J. (1991). Personality and status. In Personality, social skills, and psychopathology: An individual differences approach (pp. 137-154). Boston, MA: Springer US. Hogan, R., Johnson, J. A., & Briggs, S. R. (Eds.). (1997). Handbook of personality psychology. Elsevier. Jong, S. T., & Drummond, M. J. (2020). Exploring online fitness culture and young females. In Re-thinking Leisure in a Digital Age (pp. 50-62). Routledge. Karakayali, N. (2009, September). Social distance and affective orientations 1. In Sociological Forum (Vol. 24, No. 3, pp. 538-562). Oxford, UK: Blackwell Publishing Ltd. Kramer, A. D. (2010, April). An unobtrusive behavioral model of" gross national happiness". In Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on human factors in computing systems (pp. 287-290). Kreling, R., Meier, A., & Reinecke, L. (2022). Feeling authentic on social media: Subjective authenticity across Instagram stories and posts. Social Media+ Society, 8(1), 20563051221086235. Lufi, D., & Cohen, A. (1987). A scale for measuring persistence in children. Journal of personality assessment, 51(2), 178-185. Luo, M., & Hancock, J. T. (2020). Self-disclosure and social media: motivations, mechanisms, and psychological well-being. Current opinion in psychology, 31, 110-115. Lupton, D. (2013). Quantifying the body: monitoring and measuring health in the age of mHealth technologies. Critical public health, 23(4), 393-403. Lynn, M. (1991). Scarcity effects on value: A quantitative review of the commodity theory literature. Psychology & Marketing, 8(1), 43-57. Lynn, M. (1991). Scarcity effects on value: A quantitative review of the commodity theory literature. Psychology & Marketing, 8(1), 43-57. Magee, J. C., & Galinsky, A. D. (2008). 8 social hierarchy: The self‐reinforcing nature of power and status. The academy of management annals, 2(1), 351-398. Maltseva, K., & Lutz, C. (2018). A quantum of self: A study of self-quantification and self-disclosure. Computers in Human Behavior, 81, 102-114. Manago, A. M., Graham, M. B., Greenfield, P. M., & Salimkhan, G. (2008). Self-presentation and gender on MySpace. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 29(6), 446-458. Manago, A. M., Graham, M. B., Greenfield, P. M., & Salimkhan, G. (2008). Self-presentation and gender on MySpace. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 29(6), 446-458. Mason, R. (1984). Conspicuous consumption: A literature review. European journal of Marketing, 18(3), 26-39. Ng, J. C., Lin, E. S., & Lee, V. K. (2023). Does Instagram make you speak ill of others or improve yourself? A daily diary study on the moderating role of malicious and benign envy. Computers in Human Behavior, 148, 107873. Nikolaidis, P. T., Ćuk, I., & Knechtle, B. (2019). Pacing of women and men in half-marathon and marathon races. Medicina, 55(1), 14. Nikolaidis, P. T., Ćuk, I., & Knechtle, B. (2019). Pacing of women and men in half-marathon and marathon races. Medicina, 55(1), 14. O'cass, A., & McEwen, H. (2004). Exploring consumer status and conspicuous consumption. Journal of consumer behaviour: an international research review, 4(1), 25-39. O'cass, A., & McEwen, H. (2004). Exploring consumer status and conspicuous consumption. Journal of consumer behaviour: an international research review, 4(1), 25-39. Piron, F. (2000). Consumers’ perceptions of the country‐of‐origin effect on purchasing intentions of (in) conspicuous products. Journal of consumer marketing, 17(4), 308-321. Richins, M. L. (1994). Special possessions and the expression of material values. Journal of consumer research, 21(3), 522-533. Richins, M. L., & Dawson, S. (1992). A consumer values orientation for materialism and its measurement: Scale development and validation. Journal of consumer research, 19(3), 303-316. Roberts, B. W., Kuncel, N. R., Shiner, R., Caspi, A., & Goldberg, L. R. (2007). The power of personality: The comparative validity of personality traits, socioeconomic status, and cognitive ability for predicting important life outcomes. Perspectives on Psychological science, 2(4), 313-345. Salerno, A., Laran, J., & Janiszewski, C. (2019). The bad can be good: When benign and malicious envy motivate goal pursuit. Journal of Consumer Research, 46(2), 388-405. Saurabh S. & Sapna S. (2019). Factors Affecting Conspicuous Buying in Gurugram and Impact of Social Media Intensity and eWom in Luxury Buying. International Journal of Research and Analytical Reviews, 6(1), 480-489. Schlenker, B. R., & Wowra, S. A. (2003). Carryover effects of feeling socially transparent or impenetrable on strategic self-presentation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 85(5), 871. Schlenker, B. R., Lifka, A., & Wowra, S. A. (2004). Helping new acquaintances make the right impression: Balancing image concerns of others and self. Self and Identity, 3(3), 191-206. Schlosser, A. E. (2009). The effect of computer-mediated communication on conformity vs. nonconformity: An impression management perspective. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 19(3), 374-388. Schlosser, A. E. (2020). Self-disclosure versus self-presentation on social media. Current opinion in psychology, 31, 1-6. Scott, M. L., Mende, M., & Bolton, L. E. (2013). Judging the book by its cover? How consumers decode conspicuous consumption cues in buyer–seller relationships. Journal of Marketing Research, 50(3), 334-347. Seibert, S. E., & Kraimer, M. L. (2001). The five-factor model of personality and career success. Journal of vocational behavior, 58(1), 1-21. Smith, R. H., & Kim, S. H. (2007). Comprehending envy. Psychological bulletin, 133(1), 46. Sutin, A. R., Costa, P. T., Miech, R., & Eaton, W. W. (2009). Personality and career success: Concurrent and longitudinal relations. European journal of personality, 23(2), 71-84. Toma, C. L., & Hancock, J. T. (2013). Self-affirmation underlies Facebook use. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 39(3), 321-331. Trigg, A. B. (2001). Veblen, Bourdieu, and conspicuous consumption. Journal of economic issues, 35(1), 99-115. Van de Ven, N., Zeelenberg, M., & Pieters, R. (2011). The envy premium in product evaluation. Journal of Consumer Research, 37(6), 984-998. Van de Ven, N., Zeelenberg, M., & Pieters, R. (2011). The envy premium in product evaluation. Journal of Consumer Research, 37(6), 984-998. Veblen, T. (1899). 1994. The theory of the leisure class. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Publishers. Vuorinen, J., & Bergroth, H. (2020). Self-tracking, Power, and the Transition from Discipline to Control. In Human-Centric Computing in a Data-Driven Society: 14th IFIP TC 9 International Conference on Human Choice and Computers, HCC14 2020, Tokyo, Japan, September 9–11, 2020, Proceedings 14 (pp. 351-360). Springer International Publishing. Wang, N., Kosinski, M., Stillwell, D. J., & Rust, J. (2014). Can well-being be measured using Facebook status updates? Validation of Facebook’s Gross National Happiness Index. Social Indicators Research, 115, 483-491. Wang, Y., & Griskevicius, V. (2014). Conspicuous consumption, relationships, and rivals: Women's luxury products as signals to other women. Journal of consumer research, 40(5), 834-854. Wee, C. H., Ta, S. J., & Cheok, K. H. (1995). Non‐price determinants of intention to purchase counterfeit goods: an exploratory study. International Marketing Review, 12(6), 19-46. |
電子全文 Fulltext |
本電子全文僅授權使用者為學術研究之目的,進行個人非營利性質之檢索、閱讀、列印。請遵守中華民國著作權法之相關規定,切勿任意重製、散佈、改作、轉貼、播送,以免觸法。 論文使用權限 Thesis access permission:自定論文開放時間 user define 開放時間 Available: 校內 Campus:開放下載的時間 available 2033-08-21 校外 Off-campus:開放下載的時間 available 2033-08-21 您的 IP(校外) 位址是 3.143.23.38 現在時間是 2024-11-21 論文校外開放下載的時間是 2033-08-21 Your IP address is 3.143.23.38 The current date is 2024-11-21 This thesis will be available to you on 2033-08-21. |
紙本論文 Printed copies |
紙本論文的公開資訊在102學年度以後相對較為完整。如果需要查詢101學年度以前的紙本論文公開資訊,請聯繫圖資處紙本論文服務櫃台。如有不便之處敬請見諒。 開放時間 available 2028-08-21 |
QR Code |